Bravo! |
This conversation is about America. |
The PP said Christians in general. Seems that's not what they meant. |
+100. Right up there with LatinX, which a niche of academia is trying to foist on Latinos who don’t want it. Another progressive |
Nope. Dad was a senior exec at a large national corporation. |
PS. Another YMCA member was the Episcopalian CFO of the same corporation you’ve heard of. This was a very conscious decision to shun discrimination. |
Sorry, not sorry. It is blatant transphobia to refuse to use the correct term, LatinX. |
My husband and I were married by an ordained minister. My Jewish grandmother had a fit and kept saying, “This is so wrong, you should be getting married by a rabbi!”. She had no issue with my husband being Catholic and from South America, only that I was not going to do the traditional Jewish wedding or planning on raising our kids Jewish. |
This makes zero sense. Trans people apparently think being male versus women or vice versa is SOOOO important that they’ll get surgery, so you should go ahead and call them either Latina or Latino as the case may require. Latinx has nothing to do with it! |
| ^ Guys, that person is trolling. |
I’m sorry, I don’t get it, but perhaps you can explain to me. If a male transitions to a female, why would they feel the object of phobia if they were called Latina? |
The first/only person I heard explaining and advocating for the use of LatinX was a woman of Mexican descent. I agree it's a nonsolution, but there isn't a nonproblematic term for people from Mexico on south. |
And to clarify, she was not an academic. |
No, it is blatant cultural colonialism to take an intrinsically gendered language and force it into gender neutral pronouns just bc a tiny subset of the population has gender identity issues. Every single noun in every romance language has a gender. Deal with it. |
Agree! |