Behavior indicates a need. A three year old misbehaving is indicating a need, a need the parent can meet. I'm not saying there shouldn't be misbehavior, quite the opposite. Misbehavior is an opportunity to learn and I'm the one responsible for teaching them. |
+1 Plus, if you are ruling out SN, it makes a difference. |
|
1) always remember, there is a reason that patience is a virtue.
2) do not allow ro much screen time, including TV, and never had dinner 3) Establish a routine - play outside, eat dinner, bath, read a book and then to bed 4) give choices, but very limited choices 5) be careful what you say regarding punishment, because you really have to follow through routinely 6) make sure they can play quietly by themselves though expect it for for short timeframes (I think one of the added benefits to taking young kids to church if they learn to sit still and see many other young kids doing the same) 7) start manners young |
I'm sure a 3 yr old thinks I can meet the need. But that doesn't mean I will. She may think she needs to wear flip flops and a bathing suit to school when it's 10 below. And while maybe I could allow her to do that, to meet the "need", I'm not crazy and neglectful and won't allow it. She can have a choice of more suitable attire and a tantrum won't be changing my mind. |
Are you being purposely obtuse? Her need here isn't to wear flip flops. It's to be told no she has to wear appropriate clothing for the weather. You are meeting her need by saying no. That's the point. |
And many three year olds will pitch a fit about it. That doesn't mean the parent is not doing the right thing. Of course they are right by setting and enforcing reasonable limits. A parent can do everything right and still have a kid having a tantrum. We're objecting to the PPs take that any misbehavior is ultimately the parent's fault. That's flat out ridiculous. |
In many ways that’s quite impressive. What I mean, and what I think others caught but could have been more explicit, is if you want children who are polite, you have to be polite. You can’t yell at a kid all day and expect a kid who doesn’t yell. If you want a kid who can express their feelings you have to express your feelings. |
+1000 As someone with two very different DCs I have learned their needs and tolerances are different. Nature and nurture work in concert with each other! (All “bad” kids are not always the parents fault, and all “good” Kids aren’t necessarily from some amazing parenting). |
That's not what you said before though. You said "If your three year old has a meltdown or misbehaves it is your fault." I agree a 3 yr old who is melting down has an unmet need, but a major reason 3 yr olds are prone to melt downs is that they are at an age of development where they don't always understand what their needs are, or how to communicate them. That's why the age is challenging and requires a lot of empathy and patience. You will not always be able to figure out what they need, and sometimes you just have to help them through it. But they might "misbehave" in the meantime. It's normal, and not evidence of your failure as a parent. |
|
Sometimes you need to know when your child needs compassion more than punishment. It can be hard to discern, but eventually you can tell when your kid is intentionally pushing boundaries vs just having a tough time. If it’s the latter, then no amount of consequences will change anything.
We’ve all had tough days where sometimes we just need someone to give us a break. I will give my kids a hug when I think they need it. That usually helps them calm down and we can talk things through. I started this young with them. |
You're a piss poor communicator. Do you understand what a need even is? |
This is an example of a parent giving bad advice. |
This is something I struggle with. My parents were very strict and old school and I work with kids and I very much want children who are well behaved so my instinct is often to correct and consequence instead of empathize and chill |
Agree with this. Also, minimize warnings and be willing to pull out the big consequences. With my first, I was willing to, say, leave the park if he went out of bounds. With our third, there was a lot more warning and alot more caving to tears (partly because of COVID stress) and we paid for it for years. |
| Minimize usage of the the cycle of warnings and consequences. It’s mostly worthless. Use it only for things that are safety issues or involve violence. You don’t have to threaten a kids screen time or desert because they won’t leave the park quickly or won’t put on a jacket. You just create a cycle of bargaining and negotiation where your kids only listen if you make numerous threats. Also, if you’re mad at a kid it’s your fault, not theirs. |