There's actually a third group who know how the conversation went. Those of us that read the first post. Which clearly you did not.
OP wasn't "proselytizing" and you clearly misrepresent the encounter. |
That is not a transcript of the conversation. We don’t know exactly what was said. But ok. |
So the OP lied? And somehow you know that? |
|
There was something OP specifically did that led them to believe she was a church-goer:
"...a member of the new family was talking with me about how much they are going to miss their old church and I was empathizing how hard it can be to leave a community and make a new one in your new home when they asked me about my faith, where I go to church etc. I breezily said, oh, I'm an atheist..." They thought OP was talking about finding a new faith community, because that's what they were talking about. They weren't expecting OP to say she was an atheist because they assumed, based on the context of what they said and OP's response, that she was a church-goer. That's why it was awkward. Not because they hate atheists or have never met atheists, but because they were genuinely surprised by OP's response. They were talking about church, OP was talking about her bowling league or whatever, but they thought she meant church. |
I am not saying the OP lied. I’m just saying we don’t know the exact words used. |
But the OP was there, the words were said to her, and she wrote them down for us to read. So you either accept those or not. Which is it? |
No I do not accept the first post in this thread to be an exact transcript of the conversation that took place. |
On what basis? Are you accusing the OP of making it up? Are you insinuating she mis-remembers it? Simply put: how the hell do you know? |
But do you accept them?? pp did NOT ask you to agree that it was an exact transcript. |
I suppose I don’t, but the OP presented the post as a summation of a conversation, only using direct quotes once. |
you are the one currently doing the trashing... |
I'd say currently, as it stands, no-one expects anyone to say they are an atheist in a casual conversation about anything, especially about finding a church. It would have been OK if OP had said something like "I'm Jewish" or "I don't go to church" or maybe even "I'm agnostic". But to casually mention that you are an atheist is currently not expected, not cool, not part of regular conversation. I think more atheists should do it. To make it more normal and acceptable, like casual mention of a same sex spouse. |
I think a lot of people just aren't used to it. we've learned to be accepting of other religions, but not to be accepting of people who do not believe in a religion. Certainly most people have not learned to have their supernatural beliefs compared to beliefs they do not hold, like Odin. It seems to come as a shock and an insult -- like "How dare you compare my real God that lots of people believe in to that old-fashioned God that no one believes in anymore!" |
OP I wouldn’t sweat it. I am religious but would not take offense at anyone saying they are atheist. Especially in DMV/ urban areas. It was weird your new neighbor assumed you go to church - unless you live in the South/ Bible Belt. It was also unkind of them to make their gracious hosts feel uncomfortable. It was really nice of you to invite over your new neighbors for dinner. You did nothing wrong. It is good to be honest way. Maybe your husband was right but you shouldn’t have to tread in egg shells about your beliefs if they don’t hurt anyone. Peace . |
Thank you. I'm not OP, but really appreciate a believer saying this. Would love it if you spread this attitude to your fellow believers. |