PS. Even Trump casts himself as a victim a lot. In that case and probably many others, it ignores actual facts to make a manipulative ploy for sympathy. |
You think the atheist haters are professional victims? |
Was referring to DCUM’s professional atheist victims. |
Why don’t the police show up? Does he live alone? |
Yes, but that's just a part of their victimization. They also are very worried (and rightly so) that the world is becoming less religious. They fear they will be shunned in such a society, just as they shun atheists now. Nothing to worry about really. If the society changes to that degree, there will still be religious communities. The US will still be a free country. |
^^ just to be clear, this poster isn’t me, the +2 poster. The last two posters have twisted my point to turn it on its head. |
Maybe some of them, but probably many are just going along with what's considered acceptable in society. Remember when gay people were treated the same way? and interracial marriage, too? It wasn't that long ago. It takes time for things to change. The more people who are engaging in the formerly taboo activity (e.g., coming out as gay, dating people of another race), the more it is perceived as normal and is accepted by people in the society who don't engage in those activities themselves. |
I'm so confused. The thread seemed to start off as a pretty straightforward request for examples of how atheists handle being asked about their religion. It appears that it is a common enough question that lots of people chimed in with their different experiences of being asked, and how they respond. There were some disagreements among atheists about whether to hem and haw about their atheism or state it proudly, mostly seeming to boil down to an argument on one hand of not rocking the boat (i.e. just say you're not religious) and an argument on the other hand for normalizing it (i.e. tell people you're atheist so that it becomes a more accepted thing in society). Then a person of faith jumped in to suggest that atheists wouldn't be so disliked if they didn't belittle religious people, and now here we are 37 pages later talking about victimization. You guys, DCUM always offers such a wild ride! |
Good summary! Both sides (theists/atheists) feel victimized. That will likely change when people's atheism is more known. Theists will see them as the regular people they have always been. And atheists won't feel they have to hide their lack of belief for fear of being perceived negatively. |
| Announcing you’re an atheist, is only crass if they don’t bring up religion. If they are talking about church, it’s not tacky. They’re tacky for discussing religion in the first place. |
Ugh ignore the random comma. |
Maybe -- It depends on the context of the conversation. Religion or lack of religion aren't out-of-hand tacky subjects. |
I was at daycare dropoff last week and a mom was telling us other parents about her son's baptism over the weekend. "He's not a little heathen anymore," she joked. Maybe that joke is funny in church, where (probably) everyone is Christian and baptized, but in a setting like daycare dropoff where you don't know, yikes! |
Agree. This is a good example of it being tacky to mention religion in such a way, even jokingly, that implies that any kids who aren't baptized are "little heathens." I wonder what could be done to stop this Mom from talking this way. To me, her words seem more insensitive and thoughtless than intentionally cruel. |
I think it would take someone she knows better bringing the problematic nature of the joke to her attention in a non-judgmental way. I don't think it would be appropriate for me to do it, because I think coming from a stranger, it would just shame her or embarrass her and, to your point, I don't think it was meant to be intentionally cruel. |