No, you're wrong. It only exists to challenge equality. You think that group is going to change anyone's mind? Then I am not sure about yours. |
Really? I've heard plenty of times Christians who have mentioned that anyone who is not Christian or was not baptized or did not accept Jesus as their Savior was not saved, was not guaranteed to be accepted into Heaven or was damned (and various other alternatives). If you don't consider that a form of tearing down other religions (essentially saying that others did not belong to a true and saved religion), then we have a difference of opinion here. The Christian church as a general rule is not only unaccepting of other religions, but they are antagonistically so. And I say this as a practicing Christian. Additionally, there are many Christian denominations that specifically instruct their congregants to proseltyze and try to save those who are not followers of Christ. There are some that say that believers are not doing their duty to God if they don't. Trying to convince others that they are no following a True Faith, is tearing down other religions. |
We agree. Keep all religious groups out. |
It could be the Enlightenment Club, or the Humanist Club, I'll grant you that. But the Satanist Temple stepped up and offered this - and maybe they want to go mainstream -- and if my kid was middle or High School I'd have no problem with it. Elementary does seem a bit too young though. I can see the objections. |
Crickets on any answer. |
+1 |
Because it's a stupid question since there are no Satanists in the club. |
Oh BS that was answered. You need the answer explained to you? They don't. It's not about that. What there has been crickets on is the "why would families want Christians to gain access to their children?" Because that would expose the hypocrisy. |
Great question. Crickets. |
what's wrong with it? Also, I did answer at 17:02 |
You didn’t answer the question of why anyone would want Christians proselytizing to our children. You only asked why it’s called the satanist club if it’s truly humanist. I do not want anyone teaching Christianity to my child in public school, that is for sure. It’s hypocritical to claim one kind of club should be allowed and not the other. |
ok. I must have misread your question
|
That “little scripture” is at one point going to be Romans 10:9-10. Honestly have you ever seen a bunch of evangelical kids get together and talk religion without talking about people aren’t going to be saved unless they proclaim Jesus’ name? I am a former Mormon raised in Georgia (so I often participated in evangelical activities) and I cannot tell you how many times kids told me I was going to hell. And I can’t tell you how many times I heard that Mormons were the only true church. “I’m right, you’re wrong” is fundamental to the majority of American religions. I don’t really care who does what but the idea that the Satanists are being mean or something because they are emphasizing rationality is not true. If anybody is being mean it’s the churches. |
|
Two important points - one, the school district cannot legally refuse to rent to any group during non-school hours. There aren't even any kids present, so it would be plain discrimination.
Another thing; the club is being super transparent about who they are, so that no one registers their kid and then finds out later. So I don't see the problem. It's not even a religious club. |
What? That's the only basis for allowing it - nondiscrimination under the first amendment since the school allows other religious clubs after school. Read the article, and the rationale of the school district and the law professor |