Glenn Youngkin's brand of politics over?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glenn ran on a platform of HATE. Those of us who are smart knew he was an A**. Plus he was with Trump. Loser all around. We don't want him in Virginia.

This is exactly why the Dems lost the working class. They just can't wait to tell you how much smarter they are than the rest of us. All this MAGA BS should've destroyed the Republican party, but most people don't like being talked down to, so they're like, "eff these condescending, arrogant pricks" and vote for the Republican.

The working class were sold sold a bill of goods by a rich white man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glenn ran on a platform of HATE. Those of us who are smart knew he was an A**. Plus he was with Trump. Loser all around. We don't want him in Virginia.

This is exactly why the Dems lost the working class. They just can't wait to tell you how much smarter they are than the rest of us. All this MAGA BS should've destroyed the Republican party, but most people don't like being talked down to, so they're like, "eff these condescending, arrogant pricks" and vote for the Republican.

If Youngkin is such a success, why did most of the candidates he campaigned for lose?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's going to run for President, so he's applying for the job he wants and quiet quitting the job he has. He is not focused whatsoever on Virginia state agendas unless they also are national spotlight agendas.

He did run a spectacular gubernatorial campaign compared to McAullife. But once he won that race, his eyes got wider and he is now laser focused on becoming the Republican nominee in 2024. So now he will bend and pivot to whatever will get him that nom. Virginia got screwed by both sides: 1) by the left for shoving down our throat's Terry McAullife as the savior for the democratic nominee when there were other well qualified candidates, and 2) by the moderates who claimed Youngkin was his own brand, was a moderate and would focus on Virginia issues. McAullife handed Youngkin the election in the debate when he said that parents should not be involved in their children's public school education. Politico did a 15 min podcast re this campaign, that moment and how Youngkin won. It's worth listening to because I am sure he's got the same people working on this next campaign.

The sad thing is McAuliffe was 100% correct about parents’ role in public education. There already exist myriad ways to have input — but they absolutely do not get to dictate what happens in the actual classroom or schools.

Why can't parents have a larger role in what happens in public school classrooms? Who gets to decide?

How is it fair that the rich can spend tens of thousands of dollars per year on private school tuition and be treated as a partner with the school on their child's education, but parents who can't afford to be treated like high end consumers are denied substantive input into their child's education?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glenn ran on a platform of HATE. Those of us who are smart knew he was an A**. Plus he was with Trump. Loser all around. We don't want him in Virginia.

This is exactly why the Dems lost the working class. They just can't wait to tell you how much smarter they are than the rest of us. All this MAGA BS should've destroyed the Republican party, but most people don't like being talked down to, so they're like, "eff these condescending, arrogant pricks" and vote for the Republican.

If Youngkin is such a success, why did most of the candidates he campaigned for lose?

This is the truth. He is all flash and no substance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glenn ran on a platform of HATE. Those of us who are smart knew he was an A**. Plus he was with Trump. Loser all around. We don't want him in Virginia.

This is exactly why the Dems lost the working class. They just can't wait to tell you how much smarter they are than the rest of us. All this MAGA BS should've destroyed the Republican party, but most people don't like being talked down to, so they're like, "eff these condescending, arrogant pricks" and vote for the Republican.

If Youngkin is such a success, why did most of the candidates he campaigned for lose?

OMG you guys

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glenn ran on a platform of HATE. Those of us who are smart knew he was an A**. Plus he was with Trump. Loser all around. We don't want him in Virginia.

This is exactly why the Dems lost the working class. They just can't wait to tell you how much smarter they are than the rest of us. All this MAGA BS should've destroyed the Republican party, but most people don't like being talked down to, so they're like, "eff these condescending, arrogant pricks" and vote for the Republican.

If Youngkin is such a success, why did most of the candidates he campaigned for lose?

OMG you guys

Wow. Youngkin is such a loser. He actually spent all of that time endorsing a bunch of other losers? Get back to work “banning CRT” or whatever other fake crap he claims.

What was with the laser eye balls at the end? I couldn’t use sound because my partner is still sleeping.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's going to run for President, so he's applying for the job he wants and quiet quitting the job he has. He is not focused whatsoever on Virginia state agendas unless they also are national spotlight agendas.

He did run a spectacular gubernatorial campaign compared to McAullife. But once he won that race, his eyes got wider and he is now laser focused on becoming the Republican nominee in 2024. So now he will bend and pivot to whatever will get him that nom. Virginia got screwed by both sides: 1) by the left for shoving down our throat's Terry McAullife as the savior for the democratic nominee when there were other well qualified candidates, and 2) by the moderates who claimed Youngkin was his own brand, was a moderate and would focus on Virginia issues. McAullife handed Youngkin the election in the debate when he said that parents should not be involved in their children's public school education. Politico did a 15 min podcast re this campaign, that moment and how Youngkin won. It's worth listening to because I am sure he's got the same people working on this next campaign.

The sad thing is McAuliffe was 100% correct about parents’ role in public education. There already exist myriad ways to have input — but they absolutely do not get to dictate what happens in the actual classroom or schools.

This would be a better message if schools were not undreperforming academically. That is traditionally the key criteria where schools do get taken over and rightfully so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's going to run for President, so he's applying for the job he wants and quiet quitting the job he has. He is not focused whatsoever on Virginia state agendas unless they also are national spotlight agendas.

He did run a spectacular gubernatorial campaign compared to McAullife. But once he won that race, his eyes got wider and he is now laser focused on becoming the Republican nominee in 2024. So now he will bend and pivot to whatever will get him that nom. Virginia got screwed by both sides: 1) by the left for shoving down our throat's Terry McAullife as the savior for the democratic nominee when there were other well qualified candidates, and 2) by the moderates who claimed Youngkin was his own brand, was a moderate and would focus on Virginia issues. McAullife handed Youngkin the election in the debate when he said that parents should not be involved in their children's public school education. Politico did a 15 min podcast re this campaign, that moment and how Youngkin won. It's worth listening to because I am sure he's got the same people working on this next campaign.

The sad thing is McAuliffe was 100% correct about parents’ role in public education. There already exist myriad ways to have input — but they absolutely do not get to dictate what happens in the actual classroom or schools.

Why can't parents have a larger role in what happens in public school classrooms? Who gets to decide?

How is it fair that the rich can spend tens of thousands of dollars per year on private school tuition and be treated as a partner with the school on their child's education, but parents who can't afford to be treated like high end consumers are denied substantive input into their child's education?

Yeah anyone who is still parroting McAuliffe on this is part of the problem. Dems need to read the room.

[Anonymous]

Hahaha - have you seen the election results? Who needs to read the room?

And
, specifically about the made up education attack strategy for politicians: https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/11/10/education-candidates-election-crt-indoctrination/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's going to run for President, so he's applying for the job he wants and quiet quitting the job he has. He is not focused whatsoever on Virginia state agendas unless they also are national spotlight agendas.

He did run a spectacular gubernatorial campaign compared to McAullife. But once he won that race, his eyes got wider and he is now laser focused on becoming the Republican nominee in 2024. So now he will bend and pivot to whatever will get him that nom. Virginia got screwed by both sides: 1) by the left for shoving down our throat's Terry McAullife as the savior for the democratic nominee when there were other well qualified candidates, and 2) by the moderates who claimed Youngkin was his own brand, was a moderate and would focus on Virginia issues. McAullife handed Youngkin the election in the debate when he said that parents should not be involved in their children's public school education. Politico did a 15 min podcast re this campaign, that moment and how Youngkin won. It's worth listening to because I am sure he's got the same people working on this next campaign.

The sad thing is McAuliffe was 100% correct about parents’ role in public education. There already exist myriad ways to have input — but they absolutely do not get to dictate what happens in the actual classroom or schools.

This would be a better message if schools were not undreperforming academically. That is traditionally the key criteria where schools do get taken over and rightfully so.

Schools “get taken over”?

American Taliban wet dream.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's going to run for President, so he's applying for the job he wants and quiet quitting the job he has. He is not focused whatsoever on Virginia state agendas unless they also are national spotlight agendas.

He did run a spectacular gubernatorial campaign compared to McAullife. But once he won that race, his eyes got wider and he is now laser focused on becoming the Republican nominee in 2024. So now he will bend and pivot to whatever will get him that nom. Virginia got screwed by both sides: 1) by the left for shoving down our throat's Terry McAullife as the savior for the democratic nominee when there were other well qualified candidates, and 2) by the moderates who claimed Youngkin was his own brand, was a moderate and would focus on Virginia issues. McAullife handed Youngkin the election in the debate when he said that parents should not be involved in their children's public school education. Politico did a 15 min podcast re this campaign, that moment and how Youngkin won. It's worth listening to because I am sure he's got the same people working on this next campaign.

The sad thing is McAuliffe was 100% correct about parents’ role in public education. There already exist myriad ways to have input — but they absolutely do not get to dictate what happens in the actual classroom or schools.

This would be a better message if schools were not undreperforming academically. That is traditionally the key criteria where schools do get taken over and rightfully so.

Schools “get taken over”?

American Taliban wet dream.

The only school district in the DMV that is not run by an elected BOE is DCPS. I guess Mayor Bowser is part of the “American Taliban”?

The reality is that it is a lot harder to have this kind of swagger when schools are underperforming academically. Don’t want to give these people a toe-hold on school cultural issue? Improve educational performance.

[Anonymous]

Today's OMG:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's going to run for President, so he's applying for the job he wants and quiet quitting the job he has. He is not focused whatsoever on Virginia state agendas unless they also are national spotlight agendas.

He did run a spectacular gubernatorial campaign compared to McAullife. But once he won that race, his eyes got wider and he is now laser focused on becoming the Republican nominee in 2024. So now he will bend and pivot to whatever will get him that nom. Virginia got screwed by both sides: 1) by the left for shoving down our throat's Terry McAullife as the savior for the democratic nominee when there were other well qualified candidates, and 2) by the moderates who claimed Youngkin was his own brand, was a moderate and would focus on Virginia issues. McAullife handed Youngkin the election in the debate when he said that parents should not be involved in their children's public school education. Politico did a 15 min podcast re this campaign, that moment and how Youngkin won. It's worth listening to because I am sure he's got the same people working on this next campaign.

The sad thing is McAuliffe was 100% correct about parents’ role in public education. There already exist myriad ways to have input — but they absolutely do not get to dictate what happens in the actual classroom or schools.

Why can't parents have a larger role in what happens in public school classrooms? Who gets to decide?

How is it fair that the rich can spend tens of thousands of dollars per year on private school tuition and be treated as a partner with the school on their child's education, but parents who can't afford to be treated like high end consumers are denied substantive input into their child's education?

Because parents are stupid.

Seriously I don't want religious nut jobs deciding what my kids read or learn.

How many parents can teach bio, chem, calculus etc ....

This is so dumb honestly people wake the hell up. You want to give them a religious and moral education go to private school but stay the hell out of public schools idiots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's going to run for President, so he's applying for the job he wants and quiet quitting the job he has. He is not focused whatsoever on Virginia state agendas unless they also are national spotlight agendas.

He did run a spectacular gubernatorial campaign compared to McAullife. But once he won that race, his eyes got wider and he is now laser focused on becoming the Republican nominee in 2024. So now he will bend and pivot to whatever will get him that nom. Virginia got screwed by both sides: 1) by the left for shoving down our throat's Terry McAullife as the savior for the democratic nominee when there were other well qualified candidates, and 2) by the moderates who claimed Youngkin was his own brand, was a moderate and would focus on Virginia issues. McAullife handed Youngkin the election in the debate when he said that parents should not be involved in their children's public school education. Politico did a 15 min podcast re this campaign, that moment and how Youngkin won. It's worth listening to because I am sure he's got the same people working on this next campaign.

The sad thing is McAuliffe was 100% correct about parents’ role in public education. There already exist myriad ways to have input — but they absolutely do not get to dictate what happens in the actual classroom or schools.

Why can't parents have a larger role in what happens in public school classrooms? Who gets to decide?

How is it fair that the rich can spend tens of thousands of dollars per year on private school tuition and be treated as a partner with the school on their child's education, but parents who can't afford to be treated like high end consumers are denied substantive input into their child's education?

Because parents are stupid.

Seriously I don't want religious nut jobs deciding what my kids read or learn.

How many parents can teach bio, chem, calculus etc ....

This is so dumb honestly people wake the hell up. You want to give them a religious and moral education go to private school but stay the hell out of public schools idiots.

The problem with what you are saying here is that the average student is not learning biology, chemistry or calculus. They are barely learning anything at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's going to run for President, so he's applying for the job he wants and quiet quitting the job he has. He is not focused whatsoever on Virginia state agendas unless they also are national spotlight agendas.

He did run a spectacular gubernatorial campaign compared to McAullife. But once he won that race, his eyes got wider and he is now laser focused on becoming the Republican nominee in 2024. So now he will bend and pivot to whatever will get him that nom. Virginia got screwed by both sides: 1) by the left for shoving down our throat's Terry McAullife as the savior for the democratic nominee when there were other well qualified candidates, and 2) by the moderates who claimed Youngkin was his own brand, was a moderate and would focus on Virginia issues. McAullife handed Youngkin the election in the debate when he said that parents should not be involved in their children's public school education. Politico did a 15 min podcast re this campaign, that moment and how Youngkin won. It's worth listening to because I am sure he's got the same people working on this next campaign.

The sad thing is McAuliffe was 100% correct about parents’ role in public education. There already exist myriad ways to have input — but they absolutely do not get to dictate what happens in the actual classroom or schools.

This would be a better message if schools were not undreperforming academically. That is traditionally the key criteria where schools do get taken over and rightfully so.

Sure so VA schools are as bad as Alabama, MO, MI, Kentucky, OHIO, Oklahama, South Dakota etc..

Absolutely schools can do better however the fake messaging from the right is absurd.

Youngkin's goal privatizes schools so he and Devos can pocket the monies DeSantis on track to do the same.

Republcians are stupid and will lose everything. Youngkin is a liar, never stays in VA he used you and you idiots let him.