Club? Not curriculum. Not for “other” kids. |
Correct. I’m not sure if other kids outside the club go or not, but the club is pretty big and has mixed demographics and is pretty far from Bethesda. |
Sure, what value do you place on STEM education? Compute it that way. |
Part of the value is accessibility. They should offer free programs to mcps. |
Someone is paying. |
The only thing my kids love more than the kids museum is bocce. We're so fortunate to have these wonderful resources. |
My kids also learned how to play bocce in PE. They loved it. I hope the school starts a bocce team! |
Of course. We understand. You value STEM enrichment for the wealthy kids at schools who can afford the prices at the Kid Museum and have parents who are willing to organize these trips. You are not concerned about the rest of our kids at all. If you truly valued education, you would advocate that MCPS uses the $2.5 million to go towards smaller class sizes or directly towards improving elementary science education in our school district. |
I prefer they spend on things like the KIDS museum instead of forcing it down the throats of so many who could care less. This way people who are genuinely interested can get the most out of it and those who prefer to spend their time on things like travel soccer or whatever can pursue that. |
Why do you assume that students at the lower income school ‘could care less’ and would prefer to spend their time on ‘soccer’? |
| MCPS teacher here. I used to be an electives teacher at a middle school. My recollection is that the money is coming from a grant, not MCPS directly. There is not enough money for all middle schools to come, so the grant requires underrepresented groups. They have a close collaboration with Parkland Middle and Shady grove middle. Other schools also invited, but as other have noted the costs are pretty high to bring a bus full of kids. Like a few thousand dollars that would have to come out of an individual school or PTA budget. Not sure if the the grant requirements have changed in the last few years. |
I think we should all be very proud that MCPS spend $780,000.00 dollars of Federal covid funding on bocce ball. It really shows that they wisely invest in teaching children how to roll a ball on a lawn, versus educating children or adding special needs slots for kids currently not in the program! It's so wonderful! Please re-elect Wolff so she can encourage McKnight to fund more activities like this! Maybe we can remove magnet programs and AP testing to fund pool tables and bowling? I'm so happy over the wonderful use of these resources! |
Sure, if I was a corrupt, I'd prefer funding to be spent on Kids Museum as well. On the other hand, if I was an honest board member, I might use the same amount of funding (11K for every school in MCPS) to fund an in-house STEM or after-school program? How many actual MCPS kids (a number count) benefited from Kids Museum this year under this program? Bet you can't name the exact number, can you? (Hint - I think MCPS is hiding it because it's so embarrassingly low?) |
You don't think special needs children should have a chance at being a member of a team? |
The question is not whether special needs can play bocce ball. The questions are why it must be bocce ball, why it cost $780,000.00 when a bocce ball set costs $40, why was it funded using Federal ESSER covid funding, why was it labeled for special needs only, and why did MCPS scatter the bocce ball costs in multiple places in their grant application to make the numbers look lower? I recall Al Capone ran a soup kitchen? |