The kids who weren't accepted deserved it, too. But when you're drawing names out of a hat, "deserve" and "worthy" aren't the right descriptors. I don't have a dog in this race, I am merely an observer. People like you, though, are idiots if you think that the kids who were accepted deserved it more than the kids who weren't. It's a crap shoot right now. Acknowledge it and move on. |
No need for condescension OP. No one is blaming kids who got into these schools. The system for applying to schools is corrupted. Bottom line. Anyone who disputes that is not playing with a full deck. |
Nope — I have seen people make up excuses to justify a kid not getting in even when the post only expressed disappointment or sadness, not that it was unfair and not denigrating other applicants. |
Complete agreement from me to! When I told DC some of the comments/grievances from parents I got the reply "Aren't there always people like this?", then a shrug and the subject was done for DC. |
What? The OP was about threads on this forum that blame other people and people responded, commenting on what they've seen in other threads. Are you really claiming that you have never seen one parent blame others? Ok then. |
. Right. How is the system broken? |
This is what I want to know. "The system" has been in place for eons; nothing has really changed. You go to high school, you get X grades and test scores, you develop an interest in Y school and you submit an application. The school looks at all of the applications they receive for the year and makes offers. Some kids get in, some don't. What, exactly, is broken? |
Yeah, that poster must not have teenagers. |
While I agree the system is broken, I am not sure how to fix it. Maybe have different consortiums of schools and limit a kid to one application per consortium. So one to an Ivy, one to a NESCAC, one to a state flagship, etc. That would at least show a priority and limit the applications to the schools. |
Larla, that is nice that you like X university...there are many schools that share similar attributes, let's plan on taking visits so you can see all the wonderful alternatives. |
|
I think grade and SAT inflation is also really hurting parent and student expectations. Back in the 90s only 1-2 kids at my high school had a 4.0 GPA. There were no weighted classes so no GPAs above a 4.0 at all. I got into Carnegie Mellon with a 3.75 GPA, which was very near the top of the class for my high school; the top student ended up at Harvard.
Now students who would have been B students in the 90s have 4.3 GPA, leading both them and their parents not to realize that a top GPA is now a 4.9 or some other nonsense. It's the same with SAT scores. A 1400 used to be really good. Now it seems anything under a 1550 is mediocre. All of the good students are bunched at the top, leading to a lack of separation amongst top students and more of a lotto feeling as to who gets in. The grading scale is fundamentally broken. |
And Larla will still cry and be upset and this is hard for everyone. Why is this so hard to understand? Quit blaming parents. |
|
I used to work for the admissions office for my school and the reality is they have to reject a ton of people with good stats because there are simply more applicants with those qualifications than there are spots. There are a lot of X factors like desired majors, usual skills, a very compelling and tailored essay, and so on.
Most applicants are not obviously unqualified, usually parents and guidance counselors are realistic with students. So that 90% rejected includes a lot of great kids. And kids need to understand that. They are not bad or failures for not getting into these very competitive schools. It's a crapshoot and depends on factors you sometimes can't really predict like maybe there were just too many people who wanted to major in economics that year. |
|
Our college visits began in the DMV - trying to determine what DD liked.. small, mid, large sized campus..city, suburbs, rural… Bottom line, I tried assist her with discovering her preferences, then discussed what we could afford, major, etc. to determine fit. We created her list based on these factors, which included many schools outside of the top 30. Highly selective/rejective schools are not a good fit for lots of students and there are a finite number of seats.
To all the students who applied and got into their preferred school, regardless of ranking - congratulations and best wishes! |
And how is that even remotely fair? You can't dictate to other kids and families how many schools they can apply to! Why would the schools even want to do that when each application represents XX in application fee income? |