What do you think will be the results of the Va house election?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My district will go for the Dem candidate for Virginia House. However, I predict the GOP nominee will double the votes of the last GOP candidate. Neither is the incumbent.

Agree. D's will win across the board. Too many votes for D's as they have money and infrastructure to do what is needed to win.

+1, I’m betting the Dems will pick up anywhere between 8-14 additional seats in the VGA, enough for a supermajority. They are going to absolutely steam roll the R’s. And then with redistricting, we can build on this year's win and increase the lead even further next time.

There is so much anger out there right now against trump that almost no R seat is safe now. Couple that with the solid popularity that Joe is enjoying and a roaring economy and R’s don’t stand a chance.

Literally the ONLY way they can win is through massive fraud. And if by some nightmare scenario where it’s a close race and Terry doesn’t get the votes, I hope he won’t concede, but rather fight fight fight! The fraud will be exposed, and the votes will be thrown out. But I think that’s a pretty unlikely scenario. There just aren’t enough R’s to get away with the amount of fraud they’d have to commit to get the numbers.

I truly hope D's win exactly has you described. You must be working for Team TM

I think your numbers are way off the mark. Your analysis doesn't hold water. The only people still angry about Trump are rabid Ds. The rest of us realize he's not on the ballot and will have no influence on running Virginia. I think you are highly underestimating the anger people have for Ds right now. If you are with the campaign, you are tipping your hand as to setting up some BS fraud scenario. TMac is not a likeable guy and has ticked off many with his words and tactics. Independents are breaking hard for Youngkin as are many moderate Ds over the school issue.

The final issues where you are completely off the mark are where you state Joe is enjoying solid popularity and the economy is roaring, lol. Uh idk where you get that idea, but he is not popular right now and people are feeling the effects of inflation in their every day lives. You sound very young and naive.

Thank you. Trump has nothing to do with this election as far as I’m concerned. I’m most concerned by democrats desire to incite racial hatred by making everything - especially education - about identity politics. We need to come together as a country. I think we need a return to simply running the government in a non-woke, non-wacky, competent fashion. For me that means Youngkin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My district will go for the Dem candidate for Virginia House. However, I predict the GOP nominee will double the votes of the last GOP candidate. Neither is the incumbent.

Agree. D's will win across the board. Too many votes for D's as they have money and infrastructure to do what is needed to win.

+1, I’m betting the Dems will pick up anywhere between 8-14 additional seats in the VGA, enough for a supermajority. They are going to absolutely steam roll the R’s. And then with redistricting, we can build on this year's win and increase the lead even further next time.

There is so much anger out there right now against trump that almost no R seat is safe now. Couple that with the solid popularity that Joe is enjoying and a roaring economy and R’s don’t stand a chance.

Literally the ONLY way they can win is through massive fraud. And if by some nightmare scenario where it’s a close race and Terry doesn’t get the votes, I hope he won’t concede, but rather fight fight fight! The fraud will be exposed, and the votes will be thrown out. But I think that’s a pretty unlikely scenario. There just aren’t enough R’s to get away with the amount of fraud they’d have to commit to get the numbers.

I truly hope D's win exactly has you described. You must be working for Team TM

let’s just say I’ve got some inside info. It’s not even going to be as close as people are saying. The margin will be well outside almost every credible poll’s margin for error.

And come Wednesday we’ll be laughing at yet another failed GQP’r.

Bookmarked this, thanks

If election results aren't anywhere near poll results, that would be concerning.

VERY

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Welp, I voted straight R for the first time in my life. I’m a new VA resident and am giddy about this election. I spent the whole pandemic in DC feeling very alone - mocked as a murderer for wanting school to open, hearing endless nonsense like “looting is a form of free speech”, blah blah blah. I heard so much stupidity - I was on the verge on an aneurysm (and my tongue was bloody from being bitten) when the moving truck FINALLY arrived. The lunacy of the past year has made me a die hard Republican. I don’t see myself going back. I wonder if there are more like me?

All I can say is Welcome. We are not near the monsters that the left loves to paint us out to be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My district will go for the Dem candidate for Virginia House. However, I predict the GOP nominee will double the votes of the last GOP candidate. Neither is the incumbent.

Agree. D's will win across the board. Too many votes for D's as they have money and infrastructure to do what is needed to win.

+1, I’m betting the Dems will pick up anywhere between 8-14 additional seats in the VGA, enough for a supermajority. They are going to absolutely steam roll the R’s. And then with redistricting, we can build on this year's win and increase the lead even further next time.

There is so much anger out there right now against trump that almost no R seat is safe now. Couple that with the solid popularity that Joe is enjoying and a roaring economy and R’s don’t stand a chance.

Literally the ONLY way they can win is through massive fraud. And if by some nightmare scenario where it’s a close race and Terry doesn’t get the votes, I hope he won’t concede, but rather fight fight fight! The fraud will be exposed, and the votes will be thrown out. But I think that’s a pretty unlikely scenario. There just aren’t enough R’s to get away with the amount of fraud they’d have to commit to get the numbers.

I truly hope D's win exactly has you described. You must be working for Team TM

let’s just say I’ve got some inside info. It’s not even going to be as close as people are saying. The margin will be well outside almost every credible poll’s margin for error.

And come Wednesday we’ll be laughing at yet another failed GQP’r.

Bookmarked this, thanks

If election results aren't anywhere near poll results, that would be concerning.

They won’t be. TM is going to win by a margin that comfortably surpasses the poling.

And yes - bookmark this post.

It sounds like you have some inside information on votes that no one has counted yet…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats will win easily. I've been voting dems all the time and will continue with that. That being said its mind-blowing how much money is spent by dems on on mailers, ads and get out to vote campaigns. If they are getting so much money, they will be working for the benefit with their donors than VA citizens

I don't know, sentiment towards Dems this time around is not good. In the polls, Repubs have a 23% voter enthusiasm lead.

Which polls?

"According to a Monmouth University poll released last week, Youngkin’s supporters are more excited to vote in the upcoming election by nearly 23 percentage points."

Enthusiasm does not equal votes. When more people vote, Democrats win, and VA made it very easy to vote.

Nice admission of fraud.

Exactly, but when the house races come out in favor of Rs, they will be shocked. I predict a sweep for the Rs.

[Anonymous]

Making the process of voting easier for any eligible citizen should be applauded, not considered fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Making the process of voting easier for any eligible citizen should be applauded, not considered fraud.

Voting is not difficult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Making the process of voting easier for any eligible citizen should be applauded, not considered fraud.

Voting is not difficult.

No, and now early voting isn't difficult either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My district will go for the Dem candidate for Virginia House. However, I predict the GOP nominee will double the votes of the last GOP candidate. Neither is the incumbent.

Agree. D's will win across the board. Too many votes for D's as they have money and infrastructure to do what is needed to win.

+1, I’m betting the Dems will pick up anywhere between 8-14 additional seats in the VGA, enough for a supermajority. They are going to absolutely steam roll the R’s. And then with redistricting, we can build on this year's win and increase the lead even further next time.

There is so much anger out there right now against trump that almost no R seat is safe now. Couple that with the solid popularity that Joe is enjoying and a roaring economy and R’s don’t stand a chance.

Literally the ONLY way they can win is through massive fraud. And if by some nightmare scenario where it’s a close race and Terry doesn’t get the votes, I hope he won’t concede, but rather fight fight fight! The fraud will be exposed, and the votes will be thrown out. But I think that’s a pretty unlikely scenario. There just aren’t enough R’s to get away with the amount of fraud they’d have to commit to get the numbers.

I truly hope D's win exactly has you described. You must be working for Team TM

let’s just say I’ve got some inside info. It’s not even going to be as close as people are saying. The margin will be well outside almost every credible poll’s margin for error.

And come Wednesday we’ll be laughing at yet another failed GQP’r.

Bookmarked this, thanks

If election results aren't anywhere near poll results, that would be concerning.

VERY

We’re you concerned when Northam and Gillespie’s polls were a dead heat and Northam won by nine points?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be realistic. McAullife can’t get a crowd to see him and Youngkin is drawing huge crowds. We are being told that these huge crowds won’t vote….

Remember how Biden couldn’t draw a crowd either yet seemed to win states Dems couldn’t? And all the deciding votes were in left counties?

This is why there are still ongoing election audits, etc. And what we found out in Wisconsin was disturbing - that the election rules were ‘relaxed’ so that employees at nursing homes could vote for their residents. And Covid kept family out so there was literally no oversight. In Georgia there’s video of mail bins of ballots being dumped into boxes in the middle of the night. Arizona has a host of voting ‘issues’.

Leftists think nothing is being done about all this. Trust me, it is. It’s slow and behind the scenes, but we are starting to win this war despite what mainstream puts out there. Shoulder to the wheel and all that

This post is baffling.

There's no voter fraud in Virginia. Yes, there are audits, the process includes checks and verification. We don't need to change the audits, they already are good.

Whoever is elected on November 3, that is who is elected. The results will be accurate and trusted by everyone. Except for those trying to undermine the democratic process.

Exactly how would you know if there will be no voter fraud? VA has opened a door on voting with no chance of audit. Example: 6 in a household. Send 1 to vote- they use photo id, re-enter 3 times using various utility bills. Fill out absentee ballots for 2 other people. FCDC undermines the Democratic process for each school board election. Charges $40 to join and then you can vote in the FCDC selection. You don't have to able to vote in real elections to join , pay, and vote in FCDC stuff.

6 in a household - does that mean 6 registered voters? Why is one person voting for all six?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s be realistic. McAullife can’t get a crowd to see him and Youngkin is drawing huge crowds. We are being told that these huge crowds won’t vote….

Remember how Biden couldn’t draw a crowd either yet seemed to win states Dems couldn’t? And all the deciding votes were in left counties?

This is why there are still ongoing election audits, etc. And what we found out in Wisconsin was disturbing - that the election rules were ‘relaxed’ so that employees at nursing homes could vote for their residents. And Covid kept family out so there was literally no oversight. In Georgia there’s video of mail bins of ballots being dumped into boxes in the middle of the night. Arizona has a host of voting ‘issues’.

Leftists think nothing is being done about all this. Trust me, it is. It’s slow and behind the scenes, but we are starting to win this war despite what mainstream puts out there. Shoulder to the wheel and all that

This post is baffling.

There's no voter fraud in Virginia. Yes, there are audits, the process includes checks and verification. We don't need to change the audits, they already are good.

Whoever is elected on November 3, that is who is elected. The results will be accurate and trusted by everyone. Except for those trying to undermine the democratic process.

Exactly how would you know if there will be no voter fraud? VA has opened a door on voting with no chance of audit. Example: 6 in a household. Send 1 to vote- they use photo id, re-enter 3 times using various utility bills. Fill out absentee ballots for 2 other people. FCDC undermines the Democratic process for each school board election. Charges $40 to join and then you can vote in the FCDC selection. You don't have to able to vote in real elections to join , pay, and vote in FCDC stuff.

6 in a household - does that mean 6 registered voters? Why is one person voting for all six?

This scenario makes no sense, and the myth of someone voting multiple times has been thoroughly debunked. Voter fraud is incredibly rare, and when it does happen (a handful of times among hundreds of millions of votes) it isn't like that. I strongly encourage anyone worried about voter fraud to volunteer as an election official. After working at the polls you will see how difficult fraud would be.

[Anonymous]

Thank you. Trump has nothing to do with this election as far as I’m concerned. I’m most concerned by democrats desire to incite racial hatred by making everything - especially education - about identity politics. We need to come together as a country. I think we need a return to simply running the government in a non-woke, non-wacky, competent fashion. For me that means Youngkin

Younkin wants to bad teaching that slavery was bad and ban teaching that it had any long term consequences for the families of slaves. How is he not the one inciting racial hatred and making it about identity politics???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Thank you. Trump has nothing to do with this election as far as I’m concerned. I’m most concerned by democrats desire to incite racial hatred by making everything - especially education - about identity politics. We need to come together as a country. I think we need a return to simply running the government in a non-woke, non-wacky, competent fashion. For me that means Youngkin

Younkin wants to bad teaching that slavery was bad and ban teaching that it had any long term consequences for the families of slaves. How is he not the one inciting racial hatred and making it about identity politics???

Thankfully McAuliffe said tonight that he will diversify teachers from 80% white to 50% white and 50% people of color. He will offer full rides to college for POC who commit to teaching for five years in Virginia. They will be able to provide the lived experience of the long term consequences of a slave ancestry. I suppose for the Hispanic students it will be their ancestor’s experience of immigrating to the States. For the Asian students it will be their ancestor’s experience in getting into competitive US graduate schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Thank you. Trump has nothing to do with this election as far as I’m concerned. I’m most concerned by democrats desire to incite racial hatred by making everything - especially education - about identity politics. We need to come together as a country. I think we need a return to simply running the government in a non-woke, non-wacky, competent fashion. For me that means Youngkin

Younkin wants to bad teaching that slavery was bad and ban teaching that it had any long term consequences for the families of slaves. How is he not the one inciting racial hatred and making it about identity politics???

Thankfully McAuliffe said tonight that he will diversify teachers from 80% white to 50% white and 50% people of color. He will offer full rides to college for POC who commit to teaching for five years in Virginia. They will be able to provide the lived experience of the long term consequences of a slave ancestry. I suppose for the Hispanic students it will be their ancestor’s experience of immigrating to the States. For the Asian students it will be their ancestor’s experience in getting into competitive US graduate schools.

This is a dog whistle to POC to come and vote tomorrow. No self-respecting POC should again vote to T Mac.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Thank you. Trump has nothing to do with this election as far as I’m concerned. I’m most concerned by democrats desire to incite racial hatred by making everything - especially education - about identity politics. We need to come together as a country. I think we need a return to simply running the government in a non-woke, non-wacky, competent fashion. For me that means Youngkin

Younkin wants to bad teaching that slavery was bad and ban teaching that it had any long term consequences for the families of slaves. How is he not the one inciting racial hatred and making it about identity politics???

He wants to "ban" teaching that slavery was bad? Where did he say that? Also, how will he ban the discussion of slavery having long-term consequences for African Americans? How is that banned exactly? Please tell.