Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

People don’t like them because they’re entitled, lying narcissists. Also, if you are going to turn on your family and accuse them of being racist on international TV, you need to provide receipts. In general, don’t launch racism allegations (which are very serious) if you can’t or won’t back up your claims.

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the royal family, with its history of colonialism, is racist. Only the gaslighting, disingenuous idiots, such as yourself and the other fools on this thread, have such a hard time believing it. You’re willfully ignorant at best and racist at worst.

Hmmmm...so 8 guess we know your opinion of a person who would choose to marry into this royal family that you've stated anyone with an ounce of commonsense would know is racist...

She’s not naive. She probably had an idea of what she was getting into and went ahead for her own reasons (fame, monetizing the royal title). I still like her though because the brf is a giant POS, and they deserve to be used and exploited by someone in the same manner they exploited millions of POC in the past.

It seems you think she uses and exploits people. Not exactly admirable qualities.

And yet the PP admires Meghan for these same traits.

DP. Where did PP say she admires Meghan? She clearly says that she thinks she is monetizing the royal title and seeking fame. This is what so irritating about a lot of you people. Pointing out that the BRF is racist and exploitive is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan.

+1. And being able to see how Meghan has been mistreated and abused by both the BRF and the tabloids/British media is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan or thinking she's a saint or whatever tf people keep saying. I don't give a flying F about Meghan or Harry, but if you're on the side that's constantly buying into the tabloid BS and hearsay about this woman and devoting time and energy to tearing her apart, you're a loser.

I couldn't care less about Saint Meghan but I'm just curious about why she complains the BRF is racist when she married one of them that wore a Nazi costume and called a fellow militaryman by ethnic slurs.

So, she gets castigated for speaking to Oprah, yet some of you want Meghan to go public with MORE details? Mkay.

Honestly, once H&M launched their accusations of racism on Oprah, they kinda had a moral duty to address their own racism. It’s always easy to point fingers at others; it’s much harder to look inward and recognize your own failings. Harry should have provided a full accounting of and adequate apology for his own racism (of which there is plenty of evidence).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the royal family, with its history of colonialism, is racist. Only the gaslighting, disingenuous idiots, such as yourself and the other fools on this thread, have such a hard time believing it. You’re willfully ignorant at best and racist at worst.

Hmmmm...so 8 guess we know your opinion of a person who would choose to marry into this royal family that you've stated anyone with an ounce of commonsense would know is racist...

She’s not naive. She probably had an idea of what she was getting into and went ahead for her own reasons (fame, monetizing the royal title). I still like her though because the brf is a giant POS, and they deserve to be used and exploited by someone in the same manner they exploited millions of POC in the past.

It seems you think she uses and exploits people. Not exactly admirable qualities.

And yet the PP admires Meghan for these same traits.

DP. Where did PP say she admires Meghan? She clearly says that she thinks she is monetizing the royal title and seeking fame. This is what so irritating about a lot of you people. Pointing out that the BRF is racist and exploitive is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan.

+1. And being able to see how Meghan has been mistreated and abused by both the BRF and the tabloids/British media is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan or thinking she's a saint or whatever tf people keep saying. I don't give a flying F about Meghan or Harry, but if you're on the side that's constantly buying into the tabloid BS and hearsay about this woman and devoting time and energy to tearing her apart, you're a loser.

I couldn't care less about Saint Meghan but I'm just curious about why she complains the BRF is racist when she married one of them that wore a Nazi costume and called a fellow militaryman by ethnic slurs.

So, she gets castigated for speaking to Oprah, yet some of you want Meghan to go public with MORE details? Mkay.

Lol, 100% this. It doesn't make sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

People don’t like them because they’re entitled, lying narcissists. Also, if you are going to turn on your family and accuse them of being racist on international TV, you need to provide receipts. In general, don’t launch racism allegations (which are very serious) if you can’t or won’t back up your claims.

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the royal family, with its history of colonialism, is racist. Only the gaslighting, disingenuous idiots, such as yourself and the other fools on this thread, have such a hard time believing it. You’re willfully ignorant at best and racist at worst.

Hmmmm...so 8 guess we know your opinion of a person who would choose to marry into this royal family that you've stated anyone with an ounce of commonsense would know is racist...

She’s not naive. She probably had an idea of what she was getting into and went ahead for her own reasons (fame, monetizing the royal title). I still like her though because the brf is a giant POS, and they deserve to be used and exploited by someone in the same manner they exploited millions of POC in the past.

It seems you think she uses and exploits people. Not exactly admirable qualities.

And yet the PP admires Meghan for these same traits.

DP. Where did PP say she admires Meghan? She clearly says that she thinks she is monetizing the royal title and seeking fame. This is what so irritating about a lot of you people. Pointing out that the BRF is racist and exploitive is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan.

+1. And being able to see how Meghan has been mistreated and abused by both the BRF and the tabloids/British media is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan or thinking she's a saint or whatever tf people keep saying. I don't give a flying F about Meghan or Harry, but if you're on the side that's constantly buying into the tabloid BS and hearsay about this woman and devoting time and energy to tearing her apart, you're a loser.

They really are; they crack me up. If they had power I'd worry more about the state of the world but...them, power? LMAO

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

People don’t like them because they’re entitled, lying narcissists. Also, if you are going to turn on your family and accuse them of being racist on international TV, you need to provide receipts. In general, don’t launch racism allegations (which are very serious) if you can’t or won’t back up your claims.

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the royal family, with its history of colonialism, is racist. Only the gaslighting, disingenuous idiots, such as yourself and the other fools on this thread, have such a hard time believing it. You’re willfully ignorant at best and racist at worst.

Hmmmm...so 8 guess we know your opinion of a person who would choose to marry into this royal family that you've stated anyone with an ounce of commonsense would know is racist...

She’s not naive. She probably had an idea of what she was getting into and went ahead for her own reasons (fame, monetizing the royal title). I still like her though because the brf is a giant POS, and they deserve to be used and exploited by someone in the same manner they exploited millions of POC in the past.

It seems you think she uses and exploits people. Not exactly admirable qualities.

And yet the PP admires Meghan for these same traits.

DP. Where did PP say she admires Meghan? She clearly says that she thinks she is monetizing the royal title and seeking fame. This is what so irritating about a lot of you people. Pointing out that the BRF is racist and exploitive is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan.

+1. And being able to see how Meghan has been mistreated and abused by both the BRF and the tabloids/British media is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan or thinking she's a saint or whatever tf people keep saying. I don't give a flying F about Meghan or Harry, but if you're on the side that's constantly buying into the tabloid BS and hearsay about this woman and devoting time and energy to tearing her apart, you're a loser.

They really are; they crack me up. If they had power I'd worry more about the state of the world but...them, power? LMAO

The Meghan haters really are like the white middle-age female equivalent of incels. I can't for the life of me imagine expending so much energy and time hating on a woman and digging up every single detail, true or not, to justify my own vitriol. Piers Morgan is an apt representation of these people. Pathetic, zero self-awareness. Obsessive hatred is never a good look.

Someone I know IRL said it best. "I don't care about Meghan Markle, but the moment someone brings up how they don't like her, that person just becomes bad vibes."

[Anonymous]

“Just becomes bad vibes” is an absurd comment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Just becomes bad vibes” is an absurd comment.

Your post is absurd. PP brought up a good point (and so did the last three PP’s) and all you got to defend your obsessive hatred for this woman is this? You Meghan haters really are losers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Just becomes bad vibes” is an absurd comment.

Your post is absurd. PP brought up a good point (and so did the last three PP’s) and all you got to defend your obsessive hatred for this woman is this? You Meghan haters really are losers.

I don’t hate her. I’m just tired of them. They are too thirsty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

People don’t like them because they’re entitled, lying narcissists. Also, if you are going to turn on your family and accuse them of being racist on international TV, you need to provide receipts. In general, don’t launch racism allegations (which are very serious) if you can’t or won’t back up your claims.

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the royal family, with its history of colonialism, is racist. Only the gaslighting, disingenuous idiots, such as yourself and the other fools on this thread, have such a hard time believing it. You’re willfully ignorant at best and racist at worst.

Hmmmm...so 8 guess we know your opinion of a person who would choose to marry into this royal family that you've stated anyone with an ounce of commonsense would know is racist...

She’s not naive. She probably had an idea of what she was getting into and went ahead for her own reasons (fame, monetizing the royal title). I still like her though because the brf is a giant POS, and they deserve to be used and exploited by someone in the same manner they exploited millions of POC in the past.

It seems you think she uses and exploits people. Not exactly admirable qualities.

And yet the PP admires Meghan for these same traits.

DP. Where did PP say she admires Meghan? She clearly says that she thinks she is monetizing the royal title and seeking fame. This is what so irritating about a lot of you people. Pointing out that the BRF is racist and exploitive is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan.

+1. And being able to see how Meghan has been mistreated and abused by both the BRF and the tabloids/British media is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan or thinking she's a saint or whatever tf people keep saying. I don't give a flying F about Meghan or Harry, but if you're on the side that's constantly buying into the tabloid BS and hearsay about this woman and devoting time and energy to tearing her apart, you're a loser.

They really are; they crack me up. If they had power I'd worry more about the state of the world but...them, power? LMAO

The Meghan haters really are like the white middle-age female equivalent of incels. I can't for the life of me imagine expending so much energy and time hating on a woman and digging up every single detail, true or not, to justify my own vitriol. Piers Morgan is an apt representation of these people. Pathetic, zero self-awareness. Obsessive hatred is never a good look.

Someone I know IRL said it best. "I don't care about Meghan Markle, but the moment someone brings up how they don't like her, that person just becomes bad vibes."

To me, “bad vibes” is wearing a Nazi uniform and then complaining that daddy won’t pay for your living expenses anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Just becomes bad vibes” is an absurd comment.

Your post is absurd. PP brought up a good point (and so did the last three PP’s) and all you got to defend your obsessive hatred for this woman is this? You Meghan haters really are losers.

I don’t hate her. I’m just tired of them. They are too thirsty.

This.

Too thirsty.

Over-exposed.

Why are they relevant? Royals are in the news “just because.” But they aren’t working royals anymore.

[Anonymous]

You can't try to live a normal life like a regular average person if you were in royalty or is of celebrity status.
If you try, you will need alot of security.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

People don’t like them because they’re entitled, lying narcissists. Also, if you are going to turn on your family and accuse them of being racist on international TV, you need to provide receipts. In general, don’t launch racism allegations (which are very serious) if you can’t or won’t back up your claims.

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the royal family, with its history of colonialism, is racist. Only the gaslighting, disingenuous idiots, such as yourself and the other fools on this thread, have such a hard time believing it. You’re willfully ignorant at best and racist at worst.

Hmmmm...so 8 guess we know your opinion of a person who would choose to marry into this royal family that you've stated anyone with an ounce of commonsense would know is racist...

She’s not naive. She probably had an idea of what she was getting into and went ahead for her own reasons (fame, monetizing the royal title). I still like her though because the brf is a giant POS, and they deserve to be used and exploited by someone in the same manner they exploited millions of POC in the past.

It seems you think she uses and exploits people. Not exactly admirable qualities.

And yet the PP admires Meghan for these same traits.

DP. Where did PP say she admires Meghan? She clearly says that she thinks she is monetizing the royal title and seeking fame. This is what so irritating about a lot of you people. Pointing out that the BRF is racist and exploitive is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan.

+1. And being able to see how Meghan has been mistreated and abused by both the BRF and the tabloids/British media is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan or thinking she's a saint or whatever tf people keep saying. I don't give a flying F about Meghan or Harry, but if you're on the side that's constantly buying into the tabloid BS and hearsay about this woman and devoting time and energy to tearing her apart, you're a loser.

They really are; they crack me up. If they had power I'd worry more about the state of the world but...them, power? LMAO

The Meghan haters really are like the white middle-age female equivalent of incels. I can't for the life of me imagine expending so much energy and time hating on a woman and digging up every single detail, true or not, to justify my own vitriol. Piers Morgan is an apt representation of these people. Pathetic, zero self-awareness. Obsessive hatred is never a good look.

Someone I know IRL said it best. "I don't care about Meghan Markle, but the moment someone brings up how they don't like her, that person just becomes bad vibes."

To me, “bad vibes” is wearing a Nazi uniform and then complaining that daddy won’t pay for your living expenses anymore.

Weren’t those events 20 years apart? Maybe he’s matured and become less ignorant since his teens. If anything, it says a lot about his sh**ty family and upbringing that he thought it was fine to wear a Nazi uniform. And wasn’t his brother at the party? He’s older, why didn’t he say anything?

[Anonymous]

Charles, then William, then George. If people want to get rid of the monarchy, fine, but you can't just skip people because they're old or unlikeable. Americans just elected an old man to be President and that's an actual job. A King is a figurehead.

Harry is a buffoon. If he wasn't a prince, he'd be the 30 year old living in his mom's basement. As it is, this prince couldn't find a woman willing to marry him. (I don't think Meghan married him in good faith, but that's another issue).

There's also the issue of his paternity. Obviously the royal family would never say anything if he isn't Charles's son. It's irrelevant because he'll never be King. But that has always been a possibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Just becomes bad vibes” is an absurd comment.

A lot of people have "bad vibes" about Meghan. It's vague, yes, but some people know she's a bad apple but can't express why. Others think she is and can identify why. If you've ever been a victim of a narcissist, everyone will say you're crazy until they're exposed. Why have people not figured out this pattern by now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Just becomes bad vibes” is an absurd comment.

A lot of people have "bad vibes" about Meghan. It's vague, yes, but some people know she's a bad apple but can't express why. Others think she is and can identify why. If you've ever been a victim of a narcissist, everyone will say you're crazy until they're exposed. Why have people not figured out this pattern by now?

It’s also a very opaque answer to explain inherent racism and/or sexism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

People don’t like them because they’re entitled, lying narcissists. Also, if you are going to turn on your family and accuse them of being racist on international TV, you need to provide receipts. In general, don’t launch racism allegations (which are very serious) if you can’t or won’t back up your claims.

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the royal family, with its history of colonialism, is racist. Only the gaslighting, disingenuous idiots, such as yourself and the other fools on this thread, have such a hard time believing it. You’re willfully ignorant at best and racist at worst.

Hmmmm...so 8 guess we know your opinion of a person who would choose to marry into this royal family that you've stated anyone with an ounce of commonsense would know is racist...

She’s not naive. She probably had an idea of what she was getting into and went ahead for her own reasons (fame, monetizing the royal title). I still like her though because the brf is a giant POS, and they deserve to be used and exploited by someone in the same manner they exploited millions of POC in the past.

It seems you think she uses and exploits people. Not exactly admirable qualities.

And yet the PP admires Meghan for these same traits.

DP. Where did PP say she admires Meghan? She clearly says that she thinks she is monetizing the royal title and seeking fame. This is what so irritating about a lot of you people. Pointing out that the BRF is racist and exploitive is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan.

+1. And being able to see how Meghan has been mistreated and abused by both the BRF and the tabloids/British media is NOT the same thing as being a Meghan Stan or thinking she's a saint or whatever tf people keep saying. I don't give a flying F about Meghan or Harry, but if you're on the side that's constantly buying into the tabloid BS and hearsay about this woman and devoting time and energy to tearing her apart, you're a loser.

They really are; they crack me up. If they had power I'd worry more about the state of the world but...them, power? LMAO

The Meghan haters really are like the white middle-age female equivalent of incels. I can't for the life of me imagine expending so much energy and time hating on a woman and digging up every single detail, true or not, to justify my own vitriol. Piers Morgan is an apt representation of these people. Pathetic, zero self-awareness. Obsessive hatred is never a good look.

Someone I know IRL said it best. "I don't care about Meghan Markle, but the moment someone brings up how they don't like her, that person just becomes bad vibes."

To me, “bad vibes” is wearing a Nazi uniform and then complaining that daddy won’t pay for your living expenses anymore.

Weren’t those events 20 years apart? Maybe he’s matured and become less ignorant since his teens. If anything, it says a lot about his sh**ty family and upbringing that he thought it was fine to wear a Nazi uniform. And wasn’t his brother at the party? He’s older, why didn’t he say anything?

Harry was a grown man when he decided to wear a Nazi uniform. Why did he need his brother to help him understand he shouldn’t do that? H&M stans regard Harry like a lil baby whose caretakers cruelly refuse to change his poopy diaper.