Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

About as absurd as the idea that William would become King before Charles, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Their first Netflix series will be on Invictus games. No surprise there as covering wounded vets as a subject will essentially prohibit criticism. Unless and until a REAL journalist digs into Invictus Foundation and finds our how it's nothing but a promotional vehicle for the prince.

Official Defense Department Warrior Games were already in existence...the U.S. didn't need Harry to come along and duplicate it.

Of course, since Warrior Games are sponsored by DoD they can't solicit and don't need to go out and shill money.

Harry can, and will, capitalize on U.S. wounded to draw attention to and fill up his Foundation's coffers, with no oversight by IRS because it's foreign.

I hope Americans, especially our military, step forward and call BS on this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

About as absurd as the idea that William would become King before Charles, no?

Not really. Charles is an old man. A sad fact of life is that old men sometimes die.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Where do we go from here?

I think the interview succeeded at painting them as sympathetic victims to some. More importantly, it shifted focus to Charles and William as the bad guys.

There are a few big BRF events in June and July that would ostensibly include Harry: trooping of the guard, Philip’s birthday, and the unveiling of Diana’s statue.

Meghan is having a baby, so she’s off the hook.

Will Harry attend?

Will he repair his relationship with his father and brother?

Will they respond to the interview?

I think you've confused which people are viewed with sympathy and which ones as bad guys...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

About as absurd as the idea that William would become King before Charles, no?

Not really. Charles is an old man. A sad fact of life is that old men sometimes die.

That is not the same thing as skipping over him. If he dies, he dies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

People don’t like them because they’re entitled, lying narcissists. Also, if you are going to turn on your family and accuse them of being racist on international TV, you need to provide receipts. In general, don’t launch racism allegations (which are very serious) if you can’t or won’t back up your claims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

People don’t like them because they’re entitled, lying narcissists. Also, if you are going to turn on your family and accuse them of being racist on international TV, you need to provide receipts. In general, don’t launch racism allegations (which are very serious) if you can’t or won’t back up your claims.

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the royal family, with its history of colonialism, is racist. Only the gaslighting, disingenuous idiots, such as yourself and the other fools on this thread, have such a hard time believing it. You’re willfully ignorant at best and racist at worst.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

People don’t like them because they’re entitled, lying narcissists. Also, if you are going to turn on your family and accuse them of being racist on international TV, you need to provide receipts. In general, don’t launch racism allegations (which are very serious) if you can’t or won’t back up your claims.

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the royal family, with its history of colonialism, is racist. Only the gaslighting, disingenuous idiots, such as yourself and the other fools on this thread, have such a hard time believing it. You’re willfully ignorant at best and racist at worst.

Why did Meghan choose to marry into a racist family??

Of the living royals, the existing evidence suggests the most racist family member is Harry (e.g., use of racial slurs, wearing Nazi uniform).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

People don’t like them because they’re entitled, lying narcissists. Also, if you are going to turn on your family and accuse them of being racist on international TV, you need to provide receipts. In general, don’t launch racism allegations (which are very serious) if you can’t or won’t back up your claims.

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the royal family, with its history of colonialism, is racist. Only the gaslighting, disingenuous idiots, such as yourself and the other fools on this thread, have such a hard time believing it. You’re willfully ignorant at best and racist at worst.

Why did Meghan choose to marry into a racist family??

Of the living royals, the existing evidence suggests the most racist family member is Harry (e.g., use of racial slurs, wearing Nazi uniform).

This. Yes, this. They are only racist now because Meghan baby needs it for her pity party narrative. She should look at who is sleeping next to her if she's worried about racism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

People don’t like them because they’re entitled, lying narcissists. Also, if you are going to turn on your family and accuse them of being racist on international TV, you need to provide receipts. In general, don’t launch racism allegations (which are very serious) if you can’t or won’t back up your claims.

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the royal family, with its history of colonialism, is racist. Only the gaslighting, disingenuous idiots, such as yourself and the other fools on this thread, have such a hard time believing it. You’re willfully ignorant at best and racist at worst.

Hmmmm...so 8 guess we know your opinion of a person who would choose to marry into this royal family that you've stated anyone with an ounce of commonsense would know is racist...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

People don’t like them because they’re entitled, lying narcissists. Also, if you are going to turn on your family and accuse them of being racist on international TV, you need to provide receipts. In general, don’t launch racism allegations (which are very serious) if you can’t or won’t back up your claims.

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the royal family, with its history of colonialism, is racist. Only the gaslighting, disingenuous idiots, such as yourself and the other fools on this thread, have such a hard time believing it. You’re willfully ignorant at best and racist at worst.

The Sussexes need to put up or shut up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

The statements

"Harry is popular with the under 50 demographic and some of them wanted to be King" and

"Meghan and Harry thought Harry would be King one day" are not the same statements. They do not even kind of mean the same thing.

100%. The vast majority of the animus towards this couple is due to people taking tabloids as gospel truth and somehow twisting these stories to fit their pre-conceived notions about who this couple is and what they stand for.

People don’t like them because they’re entitled, lying narcissists. Also, if you are going to turn on your family and accuse them of being racist on international TV, you need to provide receipts. In general, don’t launch racism allegations (which are very serious) if you can’t or won’t back up your claims.

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that the royal family, with its history of colonialism, is racist. Only the gaslighting, disingenuous idiots, such as yourself and the other fools on this thread, have such a hard time believing it. You’re willfully ignorant at best and racist at worst.

I’m glad you agree that Harry, who wore a Swastika to a party called “Colonials and Natives” is also a racist. Can you explain why Meghan knowingly married into that and now whines?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Annnnd I mentioned this years ago - Cambridge fans and supporters are literally a dying breed. Who has the majority of the under 50 demographic?

Hello, problem for the BRF.

The idea that Harry could become king is absurd. Meghan stans sometimes seem just as delusional as she is.

About as absurd as the idea that William would become King before Charles, no?

Not really. Charles is an old man. A sad fact of life is that old men sometimes die.

Not when his grandmother lived to 105, his father is 99 and his mother 94. The longevity genes are in favor of the Duke of Cornwall.