new Reade/Biden thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

It doesn't matter anymore.
One rapey old guy running against another.
They have to find something else to attack on either side, the rapes and attacks don't seem to phase republicans, so game over. We are not falling for it again. Especially when Trump voters all now have blood on their hands.

Except it is one rapey old guy against just an old guy. Even Ms. Reade doesn't allege rape.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

It doesn't matter anymore.
One rapey old guy running against another.
They have to find something else to attack on either side, the rapes and attacks don't seem to phase republicans, so game over. We are not falling for it again. Especially when Trump voters all now have blood on their hands.

I mean, really - is this your go-to cliché? Can't you come up with a new one? Freshen up your hyperbole while you're at it. You guys are just so stale and tiresome, regurgitating the same silly talking points.

DP. Does the CDC have blood on its hands?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

It doesn't matter anymore.
One rapey old guy running against another.
They have to find something else to attack on either side, the rapes and attacks don't seem to phase republicans, so game over. We are not falling for it again. Especially when Trump voters all now have blood on their hands.

Except it is one rapey old guy against just an old guy. Even Ms. Reade doesn't allege rape.

jfc, you’re not helping your candidate’s cause.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

It doesn't matter anymore.
One rapey old guy running against another.
They have to find something else to attack on either side, the rapes and attacks don't seem to phase republicans, so game over. We are not falling for it again. Especially when Trump voters all now have blood on their hands.

Except it is one rapey old guy against just an old guy. Even Ms. Reade doesn't allege rape.

Of course she does. Nice try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

It doesn't matter anymore.
One rapey old guy running against another.
They have to find something else to attack on either side, the rapes and attacks don't seem to phase republicans, so game over. We are not falling for it again. Especially when Trump voters all now have blood on their hands.

I mean, really - is this your go-to cliché? Can't you come up with a new one? Freshen up your hyperbole while you're at it. You guys are just so stale and tiresome, regurgitating the same silly talking points.

DP. Does the CDC have blood on its hands?

No one has "blood on their hands," you tiresome fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

It doesn't matter anymore.
One rapey old guy running against another.
They have to find something else to attack on either side, the rapes and attacks don't seem to phase republicans, so game over. We are not falling for it again. Especially when Trump voters all now have blood on their hands.

I mean, really - is this your go-to cliché? Can't you come up with a new one? Freshen up your hyperbole while you're at it. You guys are just so stale and tiresome, regurgitating the same silly talking points.

That’s true. We should probably refer to frothy pink lung secretions instead of blood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

It doesn't matter anymore.
One rapey old guy running against another.
They have to find something else to attack on either side, the rapes and attacks don't seem to phase republicans, so game over. We are not falling for it again. Especially when Trump voters all now have blood on their hands.

I mean, really - is this your go-to cliché? Can't you come up with a new one? Freshen up your hyperbole while you're at it. You guys are just so stale and tiresome, regurgitating the same silly talking points.

DP. Does the CDC have blood on its hands?

No one has "blood on their hands," you tiresome fool.

I was a different poster, weirdo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are some of you dredging up a Miss Finland accusation from TWO years ago? Why now? Hmmm. So interesting.

To show you that nobody actually cares who a Presidential candidate touches or where he touches them. I know it used to matter. I think it should matter. But that was before Trump. If you would like it to matter again, start with your candidate, because I am not starting with mine.

Beautifully said!

+2!!!!!

+1 million.

I cared 4 years ago and it didn't make any difference. So I am not worried about it now.

If they cared about who raped who, they wouldn't have nominated or elected current president dumbass. It's laughable the conservatives are trying to make this a thing. It's a ploy to distract everyone from how many people are dying.

Once again, this isn't an issue of morality, the way some of you are trying to paint it. It's an issue of hypocrisy in the way accusations are received by the media and by Democrats, depending of the politics of the accuser and accused. HYPOCRISY.

Yes, much like the Republicans and the "liberal" media overlooked so many of Trump's immoral, illegal actions. Even when they did report it. they were always ready to chase some shiny new toy, some EMAILS even, so that Trump, the ultimate hypocrite, could just go on as if nothing happened. All to your thunderous applause.

You voted for a man who admitted to rape. You voted for a man who admitted to bribery. You voted for a man who said you would support him even if he committed murder. He announced proudly that he had done these things and you liked it because he was "honest."

He was right. You WILL support him no matter what he does. He has you wrapped around his finger, chasing whatever BS he tells you to. If you really think hypocrisy in politics is such a problem, then stop supporting the biggest hypocrite in the world.

[Anonymous]

You voted for a man who admitted to rape. You voted for a man who admitted to bribery. You voted for a man who said you would support him even if he committed murder. He announced proudly that he had done these things and you liked it because he was "honest."

No. If you think that tape was an admission of guilt, you have not ever heard bar stories. He was getting a rise and laughs from the other guys on the bus. They replayed the tape the other day and there were people laughing. The more they laughed the more he talked. Crass? Yes. Admission of rape? Hardly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

It doesn't matter anymore.
One rapey old guy running against another.
They have to find something else to attack on either side, the rapes and attacks don't seem to phase republicans, so game over. We are not falling for it again. Especially when Trump voters all now have blood on their hands.

Except it is one rapey old guy against just an old guy. Even Ms. Reade doesn't allege rape.

Of course she does. Nice try.

She does? Please provide a link.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

You voted for a man who admitted to rape. You voted for a man who admitted to bribery. You voted for a man who said you would support him even if he committed murder. He announced proudly that he had done these things and you liked it because he was "honest."

No. If you think that tape was an admission of guilt, you have not ever heard bar stories. He was getting a rise and laughs from the other guys on the bus. They replayed the tape the other day and there were people laughing. The more they laughed the more he talked. Crass? Yes. Admission of rape? Hardly.

Except for all the women and girls (ie beauty contestants) who followed up with yes, he does these things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

It doesn't matter anymore.
One rapey old guy running against another.
They have to find something else to attack on either side, the rapes and attacks don't seem to phase republicans, so game over. We are not falling for it again. Especially when Trump voters all now have blood on their hands.

I mean, really - is this your go-to cliché? Can't you come up with a new one? Freshen up your hyperbole while you're at it. You guys are just so stale and tiresome, regurgitating the same silly talking points.

DP. Does the CDC have blood on its hands?

No one has "blood on their hands," you tiresome fool.

I was a different poster, weirdo.

Who cares? You both used the trite, idiotic expression. Thus you're both tiresome fools, as is anyone else who continues to use it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are some of you dredging up a Miss Finland accusation from TWO years ago? Why now? Hmmm. So interesting.

To show you that nobody actually cares who a Presidential candidate touches or where he touches them. I know it used to matter. I think it should matter. But that was before Trump. If you would like it to matter again, start with your candidate, because I am not starting with mine.

Beautifully said!

+2!!!!!

+1 million.

I cared 4 years ago and it didn't make any difference. So I am not worried about it now.

If they cared about who raped who, they wouldn't have nominated or elected current president dumbass. It's laughable the conservatives are trying to make this a thing. It's a ploy to distract everyone from how many people are dying.

Once again, this isn't an issue of morality, the way some of you are trying to paint it. It's an issue of hypocrisy in the way accusations are received by the media and by Democrats, depending of the politics of the accuser and accused. HYPOCRISY.

Yes, much like the Republicans and the "liberal" media overlooked so many of Trump's immoral, illegal actions. Even when they did report it. they were always ready to chase some shiny new toy, some EMAILS even, so that Trump, the ultimate hypocrite, could just go on as if nothing happened. All to your thunderous applause.

You voted for a man who admitted to rape. You voted for a man who admitted to bribery. You voted for a man who said you would support him even if he committed murder. He announced proudly that he had done these things and you liked it because he was "honest."

He was right. You WILL support him no matter what he does. He has you wrapped around his finger, chasing whatever BS he tells you to. If you really think hypocrisy in politics is such a problem, then stop supporting the biggest hypocrite in the world.

I'm sorry - what? When did Trump ever admit to rape or bribery? As for the "committing murder," no one in their right minds took him seriously. It was a figure of speech, perhaps poorly chosen, but certainly not meant to be taken seriously. You really need to learn the difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

You voted for a man who admitted to rape. You voted for a man who admitted to bribery. You voted for a man who said you would support him even if he committed murder. He announced proudly that he had done these things and you liked it because he was "honest."

No. If you think that tape was an admission of guilt, you have not ever heard bar stories. He was getting a rise and laughs from the other guys on the bus. They replayed the tape the other day and there were people laughing. The more they laughed the more he talked. Crass? Yes. Admission of rape? Hardly.

Exactly this. Not his finest moment, but not even close to an "admission of guilt." If it was, we'd have to arrest people all across the country who brag (and overexaggerate) their sexual experiences. And I include women as well as men, when I say "people".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

It doesn't matter anymore.
One rapey old guy running against another.
They have to find something else to attack on either side, the rapes and attacks don't seem to phase republicans, so game over. We are not falling for it again. Especially when Trump voters all now have blood on their hands.

Except it is one rapey old guy against just an old guy. Even Ms. Reade doesn't allege rape.

Of course she does. Nice try.

She does? Please provide a link.

Stop playing dumb and wasting space.

"The former aide, Tara Reade, who briefly worked as a staff assistant in Mr. Biden’s Senate office, told The New York Times that in 1993, Mr. Biden pinned her to a wall in a Senate building, reached under her clothing and penetrated her with his fingers. A friend said that Ms. Reade told her the details of the allegation at the time. Another friend and a brother of Ms. Reade’s said she told them over the years about a traumatic sexual incident involving Mr. Biden."
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/12/us/politics/joe-biden-tara-reade-sexual-assault-complaint.html/