new Reade/Biden thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

You know what they want. They want Ukraine to make motions about investigating Hunter Biden.

This is a political hit job.

So let’s move on and demand investigations into Donald’s many, many sexual assaults. He’s stalling on supplying his DNA for E. Jean Carroll’s suit. Why, do you think? Why would he stall if she isn’t right?

Really? You can't think of any good reasons why he may not want to bow to her every demand?

I can think of dozens. Beginning with.... she is a loon.

+1
Of all people with questionable tales and motives... E. Jean Carroll is at the top of the list.

The judge requiring Trump’s DNA disagreed.

What judge? You mean Carroll's lawyers?

The judge that allowed her case to go forward.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/e-jean-carroll-who-accused-trump-of-rape-reportedly-seeks-his-dna

There is nothing in this link that says a judge "required Trump's DNA."

[Anonymous]

Why are some of you dredging up a Miss Finland accusation from TWO years ago? Why now? Hmmm. So interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are some of you dredging up a Miss Finland accusation from TWO years ago? Why now? Hmmm. So interesting.

How many years ago is Tara Reade’s story from?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are some of you dredging up a Miss Finland accusation from TWO years ago? Why now? Hmmm. So interesting.

To show you that nobody actually cares who a Presidential candidate touches or where he touches them. I know it used to matter. I think it should matter. But that was before Trump. If you would like it to matter again, start with your candidate, because I am not starting with mine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are some of you dredging up a Miss Finland accusation from TWO years ago? Why now? Hmmm. So interesting.

To show you that nobody actually cares who a Presidential candidate touches or where he touches them. I know it used to matter. I think it should matter. But that was before Trump. If you would like it to matter again, start with your candidate, because I am not starting with mine.

Beautifully said!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Back to the topic.....

She has stated that she is getting death threats. I hope she has security.

If Tara Reade is getting death threats, she should refer them to the proper authorities. Has she done so?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are some of you dredging up a Miss Finland accusation from TWO years ago? Why now? Hmmm. So interesting.

To show you that nobody actually cares who a Presidential candidate touches or where he touches them. I know it used to matter. I think it should matter. But that was before Trump. If you would like it to matter again, start with your candidate, because I am not starting with mine.

Beautifully said!

+2!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are some of you dredging up a Miss Finland accusation from TWO years ago? Why now? Hmmm. So interesting.

To show you that nobody actually cares who a Presidential candidate touches or where he touches them. I know it used to matter. I think it should matter. But that was before Trump. If you would like it to matter again, start with your candidate, because I am not starting with mine.

Beautifully said!

+2!!!!!

+1 million.

I cared 4 years ago and it didn't make any difference. So I am not worried about it now.

If they cared about who raped who, they wouldn't have nominated or elected current president dumbass. It's laughable the conservatives are trying to make this a thing. It's a ploy to distract everyone from how many people are dying.

[Anonymous]

I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

It doesn't matter anymore.
One rapey old guy running against another.
They have to find something else to attack on either side, the rapes and attacks don't seem to phase republicans, so game over. We are not falling for it again. Especially when Trump voters all now have blood on their hands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are some of you dredging up a Miss Finland accusation from TWO years ago? Why now? Hmmm. So interesting.

To show you that nobody actually cares who a Presidential candidate touches or where he touches them. I know it used to matter. I think it should matter. But that was before Trump. If you would like it to matter again, start with your candidate, because I am not starting with mine.

Beautifully said!

+2!!!!!

+1 million.

I cared 4 years ago and it didn't make any difference. So I am not worried about it now.

If they cared about who raped who, they wouldn't have nominated or elected current president dumbass. It's laughable the conservatives are trying to make this a thing. It's a ploy to distract everyone from how many people are dying.

+1 million and one. I wish I could choose a candidate with no baggage. But I can’t. So I am going to go with the candidate, that when I line up their stance and record, issue for issue (including women’s rights) with mine, for the most part, they are aligned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are some of you dredging up a Miss Finland accusation from TWO years ago? Why now? Hmmm. So interesting.

To show you that nobody actually cares who a Presidential candidate touches or where he touches them. I know it used to matter. I think it should matter. But that was before Trump. If you would like it to matter again, start with your candidate, because I am not starting with mine.

Beautifully said!

Nobody loves a good rapist more than a dem. Just sayin’.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

It doesn't matter anymore.
One rapey old guy running against another.
They have to find something else to attack on either side, the rapes and attacks don't seem to phase republicans, so game over. We are not falling for it again. Especially when Trump voters all now have blood on their hands.

This allegation doesn’t seem to be phasing neoliberals, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are some of you dredging up a Miss Finland accusation from TWO years ago? Why now? Hmmm. So interesting.

To show you that nobody actually cares who a Presidential candidate touches or where he touches them. I know it used to matter. I think it should matter. But that was before Trump. If you would like it to matter again, start with your candidate, because I am not starting with mine.

Beautifully said!

+2!!!!!

+1 million.

I cared 4 years ago and it didn't make any difference. So I am not worried about it now.

If they cared about who raped who, they wouldn't have nominated or elected current president dumbass. It's laughable the conservatives are trying to make this a thing. It's a ploy to distract everyone from how many people are dying.

Once again, this isn't an issue of morality, the way some of you are trying to paint it. It's an issue of hypocrisy in the way accusations are received by the media and by Democrats, depending of the politics of the accuser and accused. HYPOCRISY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think there is a whiff of hypocrisy at play here.

It doesn't matter anymore.
One rapey old guy running against another.
They have to find something else to attack on either side, the rapes and attacks don't seem to phase republicans, so game over. We are not falling for it again. Especially when Trump voters all now have blood on their hands.

I mean, really - is this your go-to cliché? Can't you come up with a new one? Freshen up your hyperbole while you're at it. You guys are just so stale and tiresome, regurgitating the same silly talking points.