Anonymous wrote:I have older kids and my SIL held her kids back for a ridiculously long time. It’s weird with the cousins and it always kind of was. One 21 year old went straight to law school and is a 21 year old law student. Same age cousin is a sophomore. One got back from junior year abroad and same age cousin is applying to college. It is a little strange.
I graduated at 21, but I was a few weeks away from 22. I'd be really embarrassed if my mom was going around bragging that I graduated at "21" which is a bit of a stretch thinking it was a huge accomplishment when my cousin graduated at 22 or about to turn 23 when the difference was months not years.
Anonymous wrote:Public schools aren’t retaining anyone because that costs $$$. I’ve only heard of retention being offered when a kid missed a lot of a grade due to something like a serious medical issue, or at the end of the Covid school years - 2019-20 or 2020-21 - if a kid didn’t progress during the closures. My neighbor had a young for grade 1st grader in 20-21 and FCPS did offer to let her repeat 1st in person.
But let this thread be a heads up to everyone: redshirting is common, perhaps even expected, in private schools, especially for the younger for grade kids. So plan accordingly.
+1, and I would say it’s increasingly common in public school among parents who read the data on developmentally appropriate settings for 4-5. So, assume if you send a four year old they’ll be youngest by a year+, and an early five year old by a year. None of this is secret, or unavailable information to you.
Since most public schools do an age cut off around September 1st, the number of kids attending K at age 4 is very small (and even people who complain about excessive redshirting don't complain about redshirting a kid who would be 4 during the "normal" cut off). In NY (which is the only place with a midyear cut off that results in a lot of 4 year olds being eligible for K) it's common for people to redshirt those kids and no one complains about it.
The only redshirting people complain about is when people start redshirting kids who would be well over 5 when starting K but they hold them back anyway. Yes, in some privates that's common place, but the school generally encourages it and everyone has a chance to do it -- they like having an older class of K students and often they will strongly encourage redshirting summer or late spring birthdays. Some schools even offer a transitional year for young K students before taking the regular K class, so you still wind up with a fairly age-homogenous class.
But in public that's not the case, and when some parents start deciding their April or May birthday kid needs another year, it can leave other parents stuck with the consequences of those actions without warning. No one is going to get mad that a parent redshirted so their kid could start K at 5, but when you see kids starting K at 6 and a half, it becomes an issue.
Please yell at me now and tell me I'm a "crazy anti-redshirter" for agreeing this specific issue is a problem.
As someone with a young for grade kid, I think it is absolutely insane to consider this a problem whatsoever, and really makes you sound like someone who has no experience with any real problems in life.
My kid with an August birthday who I sent on time (she started K at 5 but was among the youngest in her grade) was viciously bullied by a redshirted child in 1st grade. My kid was 6 years old for the entirety of 1st grade. The bullying child turned 8 in September and was signficantly bigger and taller. Redshirting played a major role in the bullying because while this one child was the leader, there were many older kids in the classroom due to redshirting and when the bully would attack/provoke my kid, she'd cry, and then all the older kids would round on her and call her a baby and tease her for being small and young (she is average height for her age).
I had no idea how prevalent redshirting was when I enrolled my kid in K. She was academically and socially ready for a K classroom full of 5 and 6 year old children. In fact she continues to be at the top of her grade academically and she is well liked by teachers for being a good listener who follows directions and is helpful and kind in the classroom (something that apparently the extra years of preschool or staying home did not help instill in these redshirted kids who are merely bigger and older, not more mature).
I absolutely resent that my child's classroom environment has been dominated by older children who I think should have spent their 5/6 year in K learning out to function in elementary school, but instead spent it elsewhere and arrived at elementary school with their own ideas about how school should work. I resent how common bullying and relational aggression are at the school because of these older-but-less-mature kids.
Call me a crazy anti-redshirted if you want. I think redshirting sucks. Kids should start school at the same age so that they learn the same skills and are generally at the same developmental level. Kids with developmental delays can/should be held back to accommodate their delays, but it shouldn't be at the parents' discretion.
We will be moving school districts before these older kids hit puberty in 3rd grade and we have to deal with that.
As a parent who doesn't care about redshirting one way or another (and has both middle-of-age-for grade and young-for-grade kids, none old-for-grade): the bullying isn't because your kid is small. Bullies will find literally anything to gang up on kids about. One of my kids was bulled for not watching Spongebob Squarepants in a late elementary grade. Does that make sense as a thing to mock a kid over? No. But my kid was a prickly and kind of hard-to-get-to-know kid, so of course they were a target. The actual thing to make fun of was incidental to the act of piling on.
And it's possible (probable?) this older kid is lashing out because:
- they do have delays and you have no idea and the delays are social
- they feel embarassed about your kid doing as well when they are so much older.
PP here. Of course bullying can happen for a whole variety of reasons.
But at my kid's specific school, in specific classrooms where there are a large percent of redshirted kids including one that was significantly older, the bullying was closely related to having a cohort of older, bigger, unsocialized kids. My DD was not the only child targeted, but all the children who were bullied were "on time" kids who were on the younger end of normal for the grade. All the bullies were the oldest kids in class.
Also, it's not just about the age difference. It's also that these redshirted kids were not socialized into elementary school when they were young enough for it help. They arrived at K too old and less malleable. In my child's 1st grade class, those older kids RAN the classroom. This year my kid is in 2nd and due to the bullying issues last year, my kid and others who were targeted are in a classroom without any of the much older kids. The classroom is significantly better, with less conflict and fewer behavioral issues.
I don't have any issue with moderate redshirting for kids with summer birthdays. I don't think you should be allowed to redshirt a kid with a birthday during the school year unless there is a clear reason why delaying kindergarten will help. And I actually think a lot of developmental delays might be made worse by redshirting unless you can show the kids are going to get services to improve the situation. Perhaps some of these delays would be best addressed by having the kid in a classroom with other kids and receiving services through the school.
I honestly do not understand why you continue to keep your child in a school where your DC experiences significant bullying and you believe the classroom activities and level are so wildly inappropriate. It seems weird to me.
You seem very ignorant of the reality that most parents experience. Most parents can’t just switch schools out of the blue.
Right. Which leads parents to make careful decisions about when their kids start school. For example— not sending a kid who may struggle to kindergarten too early.
Or, send our kid and get them the help they need so they don’t struggle.
What "help" do you recommend?
IEP’s. Soooo many kids have them. Professional help often paid for by the school district. I’ve see kids get services for adhd, dyslexia, occupational therapy… I think many people like you overestimate your ability and underestimate the ability of professionals with undergrad and grad degrees in education and therapy.
IEPs are for children with disabilities. You have to qualify for them. You can't just "get an IEP."
- Professional with an undergrad and grad degree in education and psychology.
Then what is the issue you feel that you can’t send a 5 to Kinder? I’m telling you, you’re making it something it’s not. It’s not that hard. Trust me.
Some kids just need a bit more time. That’s the help. It’s so weird you can’t understand that. Professionals and parents agree. Busy bodies with faux concerns about other people’s children don’t get an opinion.
No, they don’t. They need to be in school with age appropriate peers
Could you please share the data you’re sourcing this from? That age-identical classrooms are critical to children’s success? Moreso than the developmental appropriateness of the environment? Because candidly I think you’re making this up as you go along.
My four year old and her seven year old cousin are best friends. It’s amazing to see how she brings out leadership and compassion in her older cousin and how her cousin brings out courage and creativity in her.
The discussion is about peers and a child held back isn't necessarily going to be a leader just because they are older. It harms everyone and when you get to HS, do you want your 14 year old in classes with 19-20 year olds as that is whats happening.
You’re right, a child who is redshirted isn’t necessarily going to be a leader and— parents who are redshirting aren’t always doing it for that reason anyway. So don’t worry about the redshirted kids.
You seem to be suggesting a freshman in high school could be taking classes with a senior— while the 20 y/o would be shockingly rare, it’s not more worrying to have a 19 than an 18 y/o senior. What is your panic about here?
It’s it rare at all. Electives, gym, health ed and math are always mixed. My 13-14 year old freshman had three classes with seniors freshman year. An elective that was auditioned in, pe and math.
Ok so please explain your anxiety around a 14 year old being in a class with a 19 year old that doesn’t exist for an 18 year old?
.
19 year olds in high school isn’t redshirting. Those are kids who failed a year, had transfer issues, are foreign students who need more time for the language, were homeschooled or have GED and need the credit etc etc. It happens rarely, but that won’t be solved by banning redshirting. Some areas have specific adult only high schools for ages 18 plus - maybe advocate for that if it’s an issue in your area.
These kids were held back. Except the fall kids who missed the deadline. Let’s call it what it is. It’s a huge issue when these adults are with young teens.
Nonsense. I’m around a ton of teens. This is 100% a non-issue.
The hyperbole from the anti-redshirt posters is so ridiculous. It’s like none of you have contact with any actual teens.
The redshirted kids at my child's middle school who all started puberty a grade earlier than they would have had they started on time absolutely changed the culture if the school and the experience for the non-redshirted kids, for the worse.
I cannot fathom why anyone who has seen a kid through puberty would be like "oh yeah, it would be great to have an age spread of 18 months in 6th and 7th grade. Super cool." It's already a hard time and it's already harder for the kids who start puberty early or late, but now you want to stretch it out even more? Whyyyyyyyyy? It makes no sense.
I am fine if K is for 6/7 year olds. Just make it official and start school later. But this unofficial system where K is for 4-7 yr olds, and people are supposed to case the joint in advance to guess where in that age spread to send their kid? That's dumb. Just pick an age and have everyone send their kid when they hit that age.
Typical onset of puberty for girls is between 8 and 13 years old. For boys, it’s between 9-14 years old. That’s already a 5-year spread within the realm of completely normal.
You need to calm down.
1) Onset is not not equally distributed along those ranges.
2) Redshirting of non-summer birthdays makes the range even wider, which is a substantial issue. It forces families of on time kids to deal with puberty issues a year earlier than even the earliest year they would otherwise deal with it.
3) I feel very calm, thank you -- my kids are through this. Parents choosing to redshirt have not. They are making a choice based on a perceived disadvantage in kindergarten, not understanding the negative impact 4-6 years later. Both for their kid and dir peers.
There is absolutely no evidence for the bolded statement. You don’t understand statistics.
You don't need evidence for basic math.
Redshirting expands the range if ages in one grade. You can argue whether that's a good thing or a bad thing or a neutral thing. But you can't argue it's not a thing.
Without redshirting, the typical 6th grade class would have 11 year olds turning 12, either during the school year or in the summer following. With redshirting, it will have a mix of 11 and 12 year olds at the beginning of the year, and a mix of 12 and 13 year olds at the end PLUS some non-redshirted summer birthdays who are still 11.
Again, you can argue that's not a big deal or that it only amounts to a few extra minutes months, but mathematically, redshirting expands the age range for the grade. Which means, yes, it expands the range of puberty onset.
These are just facts.
That applies equally to the Summer birthdays you’re good with redshirting.
I'm not advocating for any policy or another.
Yes, redshirting summer birthdays expands the age range of a grade. But by less. If redshirting is restricted to summer birthdays, you still get a cohort of kids who are 11/12 in 6th. But some kids will start the year at 12+, instead of starting at 11 and turning 12 during the year. So an expansion, yes, though a more minor one. And say only late summer birthdays are redshirted-- this might expand the range by only a week or two.
That is different than a situation where some parents are redshirting kids with spring birthdays, which will expand the range by 4-6 months.
Two weeks is a fraction of 6 months, so it is not unreasonable for a person to argue that redshirting of kids with birthdays close to the cut off should be allowed, but not kids with birthdays far from the cut off.
Except you know more children are born in August/July/September so the impact isn’t proportionally much smaller.
The thing that makes it unreasonable to argue that redshirting of a September birthday is fine and an October birthday isn’t is that the rules say both are equally permitted and no one on DCUM makes the rules. No schools are trying to limit the practice (private schools outright encourage it) and no lawmaker is going to support giving a right to a September parent that an October parent is denied. So all the anti-redshirt hysteria is just screaming into the internet void that other parents are exercising their prerogatives in a way that OP and her comrades didn’t.
You have to look at the cut off dates. This is a DC/MD/VA board that recently has people from all over but in DC the cut off is 9/30, MD 9/1, and VA 9/30. So, in MD, a September kid can test in from 9/1-10/15 but because the school are so overcrowded, many refuse or find bogus reasons to deny a child, which happened to so we had to go private. Only a few states allow an October kid so that's a mute point.
Privates encourage it due to lack of space and its EASIER for them. Its far easier teaching a 6 year old reading or prereading than a 5 year old who isn't. However, what is also missing is these play based preschools and parents don't work with their kids to get them ready and then blame the child for not being ready and except for documented delays, someone failed this child if they aren't ready or someone is lying. At 5, there should be no expectecations. K is for learning all that.
But preschool should be play based. 3 and 4 year olds should not be doing worksheets at preschool. Kindergarten *should* be that bridge year for introduction to learning - and it used to be- but it’s not anymore. That’s a huge part of the problem; kindergarten expectations are not aligned with the development of 4 turning 5 year olds/very recently turned 5 year olds so those parents of younger kids need to choose if they’re going to send their kids young or at 5 going on 6/early 6 instead.
Anonymous wrote:Public schools aren’t retaining anyone because that costs $$$. I’ve only heard of retention being offered when a kid missed a lot of a grade due to something like a serious medical issue, or at the end of the Covid school years - 2019-20 or 2020-21 - if a kid didn’t progress during the closures. My neighbor had a young for grade 1st grader in 20-21 and FCPS did offer to let her repeat 1st in person.
But let this thread be a heads up to everyone: redshirting is common, perhaps even expected, in private schools, especially for the younger for grade kids. So plan accordingly.
+1, and I would say it’s increasingly common in public school among parents who read the data on developmentally appropriate settings for 4-5. So, assume if you send a four year old they’ll be youngest by a year+, and an early five year old by a year. None of this is secret, or unavailable information to you.
Since most public schools do an age cut off around September 1st, the number of kids attending K at age 4 is very small (and even people who complain about excessive redshirting don't complain about redshirting a kid who would be 4 during the "normal" cut off). In NY (which is the only place with a midyear cut off that results in a lot of 4 year olds being eligible for K) it's common for people to redshirt those kids and no one complains about it.
The only redshirting people complain about is when people start redshirting kids who would be well over 5 when starting K but they hold them back anyway. Yes, in some privates that's common place, but the school generally encourages it and everyone has a chance to do it -- they like having an older class of K students and often they will strongly encourage redshirting summer or late spring birthdays. Some schools even offer a transitional year for young K students before taking the regular K class, so you still wind up with a fairly age-homogenous class.
But in public that's not the case, and when some parents start deciding their April or May birthday kid needs another year, it can leave other parents stuck with the consequences of those actions without warning. No one is going to get mad that a parent redshirted so their kid could start K at 5, but when you see kids starting K at 6 and a half, it becomes an issue.
Please yell at me now and tell me I'm a "crazy anti-redshirter" for agreeing this specific issue is a problem.
As someone with a young for grade kid, I think it is absolutely insane to consider this a problem whatsoever, and really makes you sound like someone who has no experience with any real problems in life.
My kid with an August birthday who I sent on time (she started K at 5 but was among the youngest in her grade) was viciously bullied by a redshirted child in 1st grade. My kid was 6 years old for the entirety of 1st grade. The bullying child turned 8 in September and was signficantly bigger and taller. Redshirting played a major role in the bullying because while this one child was the leader, there were many older kids in the classroom due to redshirting and when the bully would attack/provoke my kid, she'd cry, and then all the older kids would round on her and call her a baby and tease her for being small and young (she is average height for her age).
I had no idea how prevalent redshirting was when I enrolled my kid in K. She was academically and socially ready for a K classroom full of 5 and 6 year old children. In fact she continues to be at the top of her grade academically and she is well liked by teachers for being a good listener who follows directions and is helpful and kind in the classroom (something that apparently the extra years of preschool or staying home did not help instill in these redshirted kids who are merely bigger and older, not more mature).
I absolutely resent that my child's classroom environment has been dominated by older children who I think should have spent their 5/6 year in K learning out to function in elementary school, but instead spent it elsewhere and arrived at elementary school with their own ideas about how school should work. I resent how common bullying and relational aggression are at the school because of these older-but-less-mature kids.
Call me a crazy anti-redshirted if you want. I think redshirting sucks. Kids should start school at the same age so that they learn the same skills and are generally at the same developmental level. Kids with developmental delays can/should be held back to accommodate their delays, but it shouldn't be at the parents' discretion.
We will be moving school districts before these older kids hit puberty in 3rd grade and we have to deal with that.
As a parent who doesn't care about redshirting one way or another (and has both middle-of-age-for grade and young-for-grade kids, none old-for-grade): the bullying isn't because your kid is small. Bullies will find literally anything to gang up on kids about. One of my kids was bulled for not watching Spongebob Squarepants in a late elementary grade. Does that make sense as a thing to mock a kid over? No. But my kid was a prickly and kind of hard-to-get-to-know kid, so of course they were a target. The actual thing to make fun of was incidental to the act of piling on.
And it's possible (probable?) this older kid is lashing out because:
- they do have delays and you have no idea and the delays are social
- they feel embarassed about your kid doing as well when they are so much older.
PP here. Of course bullying can happen for a whole variety of reasons.
But at my kid's specific school, in specific classrooms where there are a large percent of redshirted kids including one that was significantly older, the bullying was closely related to having a cohort of older, bigger, unsocialized kids. My DD was not the only child targeted, but all the children who were bullied were "on time" kids who were on the younger end of normal for the grade. All the bullies were the oldest kids in class.
Also, it's not just about the age difference. It's also that these redshirted kids were not socialized into elementary school when they were young enough for it help. They arrived at K too old and less malleable. In my child's 1st grade class, those older kids RAN the classroom. This year my kid is in 2nd and due to the bullying issues last year, my kid and others who were targeted are in a classroom without any of the much older kids. The classroom is significantly better, with less conflict and fewer behavioral issues.
I don't have any issue with moderate redshirting for kids with summer birthdays. I don't think you should be allowed to redshirt a kid with a birthday during the school year unless there is a clear reason why delaying kindergarten will help. And I actually think a lot of developmental delays might be made worse by redshirting unless you can show the kids are going to get services to improve the situation. Perhaps some of these delays would be best addressed by having the kid in a classroom with other kids and receiving services through the school.
I honestly do not understand why you continue to keep your child in a school where your DC experiences significant bullying and you believe the classroom activities and level are so wildly inappropriate. It seems weird to me.
You seem very ignorant of the reality that most parents experience. Most parents can’t just switch schools out of the blue.
Right. Which leads parents to make careful decisions about when their kids start school. For example— not sending a kid who may struggle to kindergarten too early.
Or, send our kid and get them the help they need so they don’t struggle.
What "help" do you recommend?
IEP’s. Soooo many kids have them. Professional help often paid for by the school district. I’ve see kids get services for adhd, dyslexia, occupational therapy… I think many people like you overestimate your ability and underestimate the ability of professionals with undergrad and grad degrees in education and therapy.
IEPs are for children with disabilities. You have to qualify for them. You can't just "get an IEP."
- Professional with an undergrad and grad degree in education and psychology.
Then what is the issue you feel that you can’t send a 5 to Kinder? I’m telling you, you’re making it something it’s not. It’s not that hard. Trust me.
Some kids just need a bit more time. That’s the help. It’s so weird you can’t understand that. Professionals and parents agree. Busy bodies with faux concerns about other people’s children don’t get an opinion.
No, they don’t. They need to be in school with age appropriate peers
Could you please share the data you’re sourcing this from? That age-identical classrooms are critical to children’s success? Moreso than the developmental appropriateness of the environment? Because candidly I think you’re making this up as you go along.
My four year old and her seven year old cousin are best friends. It’s amazing to see how she brings out leadership and compassion in her older cousin and how her cousin brings out courage and creativity in her.
The discussion is about peers and a child held back isn't necessarily going to be a leader just because they are older. It harms everyone and when you get to HS, do you want your 14 year old in classes with 19-20 year olds as that is whats happening.
You’re right, a child who is redshirted isn’t necessarily going to be a leader and— parents who are redshirting aren’t always doing it for that reason anyway. So don’t worry about the redshirted kids.
You seem to be suggesting a freshman in high school could be taking classes with a senior— while the 20 y/o would be shockingly rare, it’s not more worrying to have a 19 than an 18 y/o senior. What is your panic about here?
It’s it rare at all. Electives, gym, health ed and math are always mixed. My 13-14 year old freshman had three classes with seniors freshman year. An elective that was auditioned in, pe and math.
Ok so please explain your anxiety around a 14 year old being in a class with a 19 year old that doesn’t exist for an 18 year old?
.
19 year olds in high school isn’t redshirting. Those are kids who failed a year, had transfer issues, are foreign students who need more time for the language, were homeschooled or have GED and need the credit etc etc. It happens rarely, but that won’t be solved by banning redshirting. Some areas have specific adult only high schools for ages 18 plus - maybe advocate for that if it’s an issue in your area.
These kids were held back. Except the fall kids who missed the deadline. Let’s call it what it is. It’s a huge issue when these adults are with young teens.
Nonsense. I’m around a ton of teens. This is 100% a non-issue.
The hyperbole from the anti-redshirt posters is so ridiculous. It’s like none of you have contact with any actual teens.
The redshirted kids at my child's middle school who all started puberty a grade earlier than they would have had they started on time absolutely changed the culture if the school and the experience for the non-redshirted kids, for the worse.
I cannot fathom why anyone who has seen a kid through puberty would be like "oh yeah, it would be great to have an age spread of 18 months in 6th and 7th grade. Super cool." It's already a hard time and it's already harder for the kids who start puberty early or late, but now you want to stretch it out even more? Whyyyyyyyyy? It makes no sense.
I am fine if K is for 6/7 year olds. Just make it official and start school later. But this unofficial system where K is for 4-7 yr olds, and people are supposed to case the joint in advance to guess where in that age spread to send their kid? That's dumb. Just pick an age and have everyone send their kid when they hit that age.
Parent of a young-for-grade older teen here, now in high school. I absolutely, positively do not care whatsoever that there were, and are, kids who are 18 months older in DCs class. DC is doing great, and is friends with a lot of them (who are lovely kids). It had no impact at all on DCs experience.
This weird redshirting obsession is a DCUM nutcase thing. Don’t drag the rest of us with normal kids and normal families into your lunacy.
As a parent of a HS kid, you don't think its weird and bullying doesn't go on when young freshman and older for the grade Seniors are in the same classes and its uncomfortable for everyone? You really think they are peers? How does it work when the freshman outshines the Senior?
No. I don’t think it’s weird. And anyone who does think it’s weird has not stepped foot in a high school in thirty years, nor talked to any actual teens.
As for bullying, my God you are naive and sheltered (which is why I suspect you are so worked up about something as irrelevant as redshirting). Come back and talk to me when you actually know anything about what is actually going on in high schools these days.
Of course its weird and not healthy. You are lazy and didn't want to put in the effort with yoru kids so you held them back. Its not about 30 years ago as it rarely happened then, its about what's happening today and how its unhealthy. You are really out of touch. You want 14 year old girls dating 18-20 year old men?
You can’t read. I have a young-for-grade teen, as I said.
You are also a disgusting creep.
What is wrong with you to call someone names? This is why kids behave this way as they have people like you as role models. You are clearly checked out and cannot have a teen or just an average teen if you are this clueless to what goes on.
Someone who is fantasizing about 14-year-old girls and adult men the way you are is creepy. That’s not name-calling. That’s facts.
For non-weirdos, kids take mixed-age classes all the time. I took classes at my local junior college when I was 15 since I had finished the high school level courses. So did a lot of the other advanced kids. And that still goes on in a lot of places today. It was not weird, because my classmates were not weird creepers like you.
Honestly, having read your increasingly unhinged and gross posts on this thread, I am actually very glad you haven’t been anywhere near the inside of a high school for a long time. Those kids are safer with you staying far, far away.
Anonymous wrote:What 20 year old well adjusted kid wants to just stay at home with mom and dad attending HS? Most are ready to explore and go to college!
This thread is giving everything, a true classic DCUM anti-redshirting thread. We are now onto the mythical 20-year-old high school seniors. Love it.
This thread is about 2 ten year olds in a 3rd grade class. Do the math. 20 year old senior. This isn't about everything else. It is about people who are holding back kids to start at 7.
That’s holding back twice. A redshirted kid is not starting at 7, he starts at 6. Something else besides redshirting is going on in OP’s class. Maybe kids that failed? International kids who had transfer issues?
READ THE THREAD YOU FORKING IDIOT. THIS IS DUE TO COVID. THIS THIRD GRADE CLASS IS THE ONE WHO STARTED K AFTER THE VIRTUAL YEAR. LOTS OF PARENTS DIDN'T PUT THEIR KID IN K ON TIME THAT YEAR.
LEARN HOW TO READ YOU DUMB DUMB STUPID PEOPLE.
What is wrong with you? Covid is no excuse. Bright parents work with their kids and send them on time. Why didn’t you?
Um, excuse me? My child has a summer birthday. She's 8 in 3rd grade. Is there something wrong with you that cannot read and understand that this grade was an anomaly. I don't know why you and OP are surprised that there are older kids in this class and why this entire thread is ignoring that Covid was the reason that there are kids turning 10 in 3rd grade.
This has nothing to do woth covid. It happened long before covid and still happeneing. You need a better excuse. You need to look beyond a your old in 3rd grade. When that 8 year old is a freshman in HS, they will be with 19-20 year old seniors in school and if they are smart or talented, in the smae classes. You want your 14 year old girl with 19-20 year old men hanging out?
I don’t allow my current freshman to hang out with seniors regardless. It’s one thing to see them in school and another to socialize after school; that’s a parenting issue.
Banning redshirting is not going to change the fact that there are 19 year olds in high school unless you also ban seniors who failed, transferred, or the myriad other reasons we have those isolated cases.
So, your kid isn’t in advanced classes, sports, extracurricular activities, music, arts, theater? That’s unfortunate. They all intermix even if you say no.
Anonymous wrote:Public schools aren’t retaining anyone because that costs $$$. I’ve only heard of retention being offered when a kid missed a lot of a grade due to something like a serious medical issue, or at the end of the Covid school years - 2019-20 or 2020-21 - if a kid didn’t progress during the closures. My neighbor had a young for grade 1st grader in 20-21 and FCPS did offer to let her repeat 1st in person.
But let this thread be a heads up to everyone: redshirting is common, perhaps even expected, in private schools, especially for the younger for grade kids. So plan accordingly.
+1, and I would say it’s increasingly common in public school among parents who read the data on developmentally appropriate settings for 4-5. So, assume if you send a four year old they’ll be youngest by a year+, and an early five year old by a year. None of this is secret, or unavailable information to you.
Since most public schools do an age cut off around September 1st, the number of kids attending K at age 4 is very small (and even people who complain about excessive redshirting don't complain about redshirting a kid who would be 4 during the "normal" cut off). In NY (which is the only place with a midyear cut off that results in a lot of 4 year olds being eligible for K) it's common for people to redshirt those kids and no one complains about it.
The only redshirting people complain about is when people start redshirting kids who would be well over 5 when starting K but they hold them back anyway. Yes, in some privates that's common place, but the school generally encourages it and everyone has a chance to do it -- they like having an older class of K students and often they will strongly encourage redshirting summer or late spring birthdays. Some schools even offer a transitional year for young K students before taking the regular K class, so you still wind up with a fairly age-homogenous class.
But in public that's not the case, and when some parents start deciding their April or May birthday kid needs another year, it can leave other parents stuck with the consequences of those actions without warning. No one is going to get mad that a parent redshirted so their kid could start K at 5, but when you see kids starting K at 6 and a half, it becomes an issue.
Please yell at me now and tell me I'm a "crazy anti-redshirter" for agreeing this specific issue is a problem.
As someone with a young for grade kid, I think it is absolutely insane to consider this a problem whatsoever, and really makes you sound like someone who has no experience with any real problems in life.
My kid with an August birthday who I sent on time (she started K at 5 but was among the youngest in her grade) was viciously bullied by a redshirted child in 1st grade. My kid was 6 years old for the entirety of 1st grade. The bullying child turned 8 in September and was signficantly bigger and taller. Redshirting played a major role in the bullying because while this one child was the leader, there were many older kids in the classroom due to redshirting and when the bully would attack/provoke my kid, she'd cry, and then all the older kids would round on her and call her a baby and tease her for being small and young (she is average height for her age).
I had no idea how prevalent redshirting was when I enrolled my kid in K. She was academically and socially ready for a K classroom full of 5 and 6 year old children. In fact she continues to be at the top of her grade academically and she is well liked by teachers for being a good listener who follows directions and is helpful and kind in the classroom (something that apparently the extra years of preschool or staying home did not help instill in these redshirted kids who are merely bigger and older, not more mature).
I absolutely resent that my child's classroom environment has been dominated by older children who I think should have spent their 5/6 year in K learning out to function in elementary school, but instead spent it elsewhere and arrived at elementary school with their own ideas about how school should work. I resent how common bullying and relational aggression are at the school because of these older-but-less-mature kids.
Call me a crazy anti-redshirted if you want. I think redshirting sucks. Kids should start school at the same age so that they learn the same skills and are generally at the same developmental level. Kids with developmental delays can/should be held back to accommodate their delays, but it shouldn't be at the parents' discretion.
We will be moving school districts before these older kids hit puberty in 3rd grade and we have to deal with that.
As a parent who doesn't care about redshirting one way or another (and has both middle-of-age-for grade and young-for-grade kids, none old-for-grade): the bullying isn't because your kid is small. Bullies will find literally anything to gang up on kids about. One of my kids was bulled for not watching Spongebob Squarepants in a late elementary grade. Does that make sense as a thing to mock a kid over? No. But my kid was a prickly and kind of hard-to-get-to-know kid, so of course they were a target. The actual thing to make fun of was incidental to the act of piling on.
And it's possible (probable?) this older kid is lashing out because:
- they do have delays and you have no idea and the delays are social
- they feel embarassed about your kid doing as well when they are so much older.
PP here. Of course bullying can happen for a whole variety of reasons.
But at my kid's specific school, in specific classrooms where there are a large percent of redshirted kids including one that was significantly older, the bullying was closely related to having a cohort of older, bigger, unsocialized kids. My DD was not the only child targeted, but all the children who were bullied were "on time" kids who were on the younger end of normal for the grade. All the bullies were the oldest kids in class.
Also, it's not just about the age difference. It's also that these redshirted kids were not socialized into elementary school when they were young enough for it help. They arrived at K too old and less malleable. In my child's 1st grade class, those older kids RAN the classroom. This year my kid is in 2nd and due to the bullying issues last year, my kid and others who were targeted are in a classroom without any of the much older kids. The classroom is significantly better, with less conflict and fewer behavioral issues.
I don't have any issue with moderate redshirting for kids with summer birthdays. I don't think you should be allowed to redshirt a kid with a birthday during the school year unless there is a clear reason why delaying kindergarten will help. And I actually think a lot of developmental delays might be made worse by redshirting unless you can show the kids are going to get services to improve the situation. Perhaps some of these delays would be best addressed by having the kid in a classroom with other kids and receiving services through the school.
I honestly do not understand why you continue to keep your child in a school where your DC experiences significant bullying and you believe the classroom activities and level are so wildly inappropriate. It seems weird to me.
You seem very ignorant of the reality that most parents experience. Most parents can’t just switch schools out of the blue.
Right. Which leads parents to make careful decisions about when their kids start school. For example— not sending a kid who may struggle to kindergarten too early.
Or, send our kid and get them the help they need so they don’t struggle.
What "help" do you recommend?
IEP’s. Soooo many kids have them. Professional help often paid for by the school district. I’ve see kids get services for adhd, dyslexia, occupational therapy… I think many people like you overestimate your ability and underestimate the ability of professionals with undergrad and grad degrees in education and therapy.
IEPs are for children with disabilities. You have to qualify for them. You can't just "get an IEP."
- Professional with an undergrad and grad degree in education and psychology.
Then what is the issue you feel that you can’t send a 5 to Kinder? I’m telling you, you’re making it something it’s not. It’s not that hard. Trust me.
Some kids just need a bit more time. That’s the help. It’s so weird you can’t understand that. Professionals and parents agree. Busy bodies with faux concerns about other people’s children don’t get an opinion.
No, they don’t. They need to be in school with age appropriate peers
Could you please share the data you’re sourcing this from? That age-identical classrooms are critical to children’s success? Moreso than the developmental appropriateness of the environment? Because candidly I think you’re making this up as you go along.
My four year old and her seven year old cousin are best friends. It’s amazing to see how she brings out leadership and compassion in her older cousin and how her cousin brings out courage and creativity in her.
The discussion is about peers and a child held back isn't necessarily going to be a leader just because they are older. It harms everyone and when you get to HS, do you want your 14 year old in classes with 19-20 year olds as that is whats happening.
You’re right, a child who is redshirted isn’t necessarily going to be a leader and— parents who are redshirting aren’t always doing it for that reason anyway. So don’t worry about the redshirted kids.
You seem to be suggesting a freshman in high school could be taking classes with a senior— while the 20 y/o would be shockingly rare, it’s not more worrying to have a 19 than an 18 y/o senior. What is your panic about here?
It’s it rare at all. Electives, gym, health ed and math are always mixed. My 13-14 year old freshman had three classes with seniors freshman year. An elective that was auditioned in, pe and math.
Ok so please explain your anxiety around a 14 year old being in a class with a 19 year old that doesn’t exist for an 18 year old?
.
19 year olds in high school isn’t redshirting. Those are kids who failed a year, had transfer issues, are foreign students who need more time for the language, were homeschooled or have GED and need the credit etc etc. It happens rarely, but that won’t be solved by banning redshirting. Some areas have specific adult only high schools for ages 18 plus - maybe advocate for that if it’s an issue in your area.
These kids were held back. Except the fall kids who missed the deadline. Let’s call it what it is. It’s a huge issue when these adults are with young teens.
Nonsense. I’m around a ton of teens. This is 100% a non-issue.
The hyperbole from the anti-redshirt posters is so ridiculous. It’s like none of you have contact with any actual teens.
The redshirted kids at my child's middle school who all started puberty a grade earlier than they would have had they started on time absolutely changed the culture if the school and the experience for the non-redshirted kids, for the worse.
I cannot fathom why anyone who has seen a kid through puberty would be like "oh yeah, it would be great to have an age spread of 18 months in 6th and 7th grade. Super cool." It's already a hard time and it's already harder for the kids who start puberty early or late, but now you want to stretch it out even more? Whyyyyyyyyy? It makes no sense.
I am fine if K is for 6/7 year olds. Just make it official and start school later. But this unofficial system where K is for 4-7 yr olds, and people are supposed to case the joint in advance to guess where in that age spread to send their kid? That's dumb. Just pick an age and have everyone send their kid when they hit that age.
Parent of a young-for-grade older teen here, now in high school. I absolutely, positively do not care whatsoever that there were, and are, kids who are 18 months older in DCs class. DC is doing great, and is friends with a lot of them (who are lovely kids). It had no impact at all on DCs experience.
This weird redshirting obsession is a DCUM nutcase thing. Don’t drag the rest of us with normal kids and normal families into your lunacy.
As a parent of a HS kid, you don't think its weird and bullying doesn't go on when young freshman and older for the grade Seniors are in the same classes and its uncomfortable for everyone? You really think they are peers? How does it work when the freshman outshines the Senior?
No. I don’t think it’s weird. And anyone who does think it’s weird has not stepped foot in a high school in thirty years, nor talked to any actual teens.
As for bullying, my God you are naive and sheltered (which is why I suspect you are so worked up about something as irrelevant as redshirting). Come back and talk to me when you actually know anything about what is actually going on in high schools these days.
Of course its weird and not healthy. You are lazy and didn't want to put in the effort with yoru kids so you held them back. Its not about 30 years ago as it rarely happened then, its about what's happening today and how its unhealthy. You are really out of touch. You want 14 year old girls dating 18-20 year old men?
You can’t read. I have a young-for-grade teen, as I said.
You are also a disgusting creep.
What is wrong with you to call someone names? This is why kids behave this way as they have people like you as role models. You are clearly checked out and cannot have a teen or just an average teen if you are this clueless to what goes on.
Someone who is fantasizing about 14-year-old girls and adult men the way you are is creepy. That’s not name-calling. That’s facts.
For non-weirdos, kids take mixed-age classes all the time. I took classes at my local junior college when I was 15 since I had finished the high school level courses. So did a lot of the other advanced kids. And that still goes on in a lot of places today. It was not weird, because my classmates were not weird creepers like you.
Honestly, having read your increasingly unhinged and gross posts on this thread, I am actually very glad you haven’t been anywhere near the inside of a high school for a long time. Those kids are safer with you staying far, far away.
Anonymous wrote:Public schools aren’t retaining anyone because that costs $$$. I’ve only heard of retention being offered when a kid missed a lot of a grade due to something like a serious medical issue, or at the end of the Covid school years - 2019-20 or 2020-21 - if a kid didn’t progress during the closures. My neighbor had a young for grade 1st grader in 20-21 and FCPS did offer to let her repeat 1st in person.
But let this thread be a heads up to everyone: redshirting is common, perhaps even expected, in private schools, especially for the younger for grade kids. So plan accordingly.
+1, and I would say it’s increasingly common in public school among parents who read the data on developmentally appropriate settings for 4-5. So, assume if you send a four year old they’ll be youngest by a year+, and an early five year old by a year. None of this is secret, or unavailable information to you.
Since most public schools do an age cut off around September 1st, the number of kids attending K at age 4 is very small (and even people who complain about excessive redshirting don't complain about redshirting a kid who would be 4 during the "normal" cut off). In NY (which is the only place with a midyear cut off that results in a lot of 4 year olds being eligible for K) it's common for people to redshirt those kids and no one complains about it.
The only redshirting people complain about is when people start redshirting kids who would be well over 5 when starting K but they hold them back anyway. Yes, in some privates that's common place, but the school generally encourages it and everyone has a chance to do it -- they like having an older class of K students and often they will strongly encourage redshirting summer or late spring birthdays. Some schools even offer a transitional year for young K students before taking the regular K class, so you still wind up with a fairly age-homogenous class.
But in public that's not the case, and when some parents start deciding their April or May birthday kid needs another year, it can leave other parents stuck with the consequences of those actions without warning. No one is going to get mad that a parent redshirted so their kid could start K at 5, but when you see kids starting K at 6 and a half, it becomes an issue.
Please yell at me now and tell me I'm a "crazy anti-redshirter" for agreeing this specific issue is a problem.
As someone with a young for grade kid, I think it is absolutely insane to consider this a problem whatsoever, and really makes you sound like someone who has no experience with any real problems in life.
My kid with an August birthday who I sent on time (she started K at 5 but was among the youngest in her grade) was viciously bullied by a redshirted child in 1st grade. My kid was 6 years old for the entirety of 1st grade. The bullying child turned 8 in September and was signficantly bigger and taller. Redshirting played a major role in the bullying because while this one child was the leader, there were many older kids in the classroom due to redshirting and when the bully would attack/provoke my kid, she'd cry, and then all the older kids would round on her and call her a baby and tease her for being small and young (she is average height for her age).
I had no idea how prevalent redshirting was when I enrolled my kid in K. She was academically and socially ready for a K classroom full of 5 and 6 year old children. In fact she continues to be at the top of her grade academically and she is well liked by teachers for being a good listener who follows directions and is helpful and kind in the classroom (something that apparently the extra years of preschool or staying home did not help instill in these redshirted kids who are merely bigger and older, not more mature).
I absolutely resent that my child's classroom environment has been dominated by older children who I think should have spent their 5/6 year in K learning out to function in elementary school, but instead spent it elsewhere and arrived at elementary school with their own ideas about how school should work. I resent how common bullying and relational aggression are at the school because of these older-but-less-mature kids.
Call me a crazy anti-redshirted if you want. I think redshirting sucks. Kids should start school at the same age so that they learn the same skills and are generally at the same developmental level. Kids with developmental delays can/should be held back to accommodate their delays, but it shouldn't be at the parents' discretion.
We will be moving school districts before these older kids hit puberty in 3rd grade and we have to deal with that.
As a parent who doesn't care about redshirting one way or another (and has both middle-of-age-for grade and young-for-grade kids, none old-for-grade): the bullying isn't because your kid is small. Bullies will find literally anything to gang up on kids about. One of my kids was bulled for not watching Spongebob Squarepants in a late elementary grade. Does that make sense as a thing to mock a kid over? No. But my kid was a prickly and kind of hard-to-get-to-know kid, so of course they were a target. The actual thing to make fun of was incidental to the act of piling on.
And it's possible (probable?) this older kid is lashing out because:
- they do have delays and you have no idea and the delays are social
- they feel embarassed about your kid doing as well when they are so much older.
PP here. Of course bullying can happen for a whole variety of reasons.
But at my kid's specific school, in specific classrooms where there are a large percent of redshirted kids including one that was significantly older, the bullying was closely related to having a cohort of older, bigger, unsocialized kids. My DD was not the only child targeted, but all the children who were bullied were "on time" kids who were on the younger end of normal for the grade. All the bullies were the oldest kids in class.
Also, it's not just about the age difference. It's also that these redshirted kids were not socialized into elementary school when they were young enough for it help. They arrived at K too old and less malleable. In my child's 1st grade class, those older kids RAN the classroom. This year my kid is in 2nd and due to the bullying issues last year, my kid and others who were targeted are in a classroom without any of the much older kids. The classroom is significantly better, with less conflict and fewer behavioral issues.
I don't have any issue with moderate redshirting for kids with summer birthdays. I don't think you should be allowed to redshirt a kid with a birthday during the school year unless there is a clear reason why delaying kindergarten will help. And I actually think a lot of developmental delays might be made worse by redshirting unless you can show the kids are going to get services to improve the situation. Perhaps some of these delays would be best addressed by having the kid in a classroom with other kids and receiving services through the school.
I honestly do not understand why you continue to keep your child in a school where your DC experiences significant bullying and you believe the classroom activities and level are so wildly inappropriate. It seems weird to me.
You seem very ignorant of the reality that most parents experience. Most parents can’t just switch schools out of the blue.
Right. Which leads parents to make careful decisions about when their kids start school. For example— not sending a kid who may struggle to kindergarten too early.
Or, send our kid and get them the help they need so they don’t struggle.
What "help" do you recommend?
IEP’s. Soooo many kids have them. Professional help often paid for by the school district. I’ve see kids get services for adhd, dyslexia, occupational therapy… I think many people like you overestimate your ability and underestimate the ability of professionals with undergrad and grad degrees in education and therapy.
IEPs are for children with disabilities. You have to qualify for them. You can't just "get an IEP."
- Professional with an undergrad and grad degree in education and psychology.
Then what is the issue you feel that you can’t send a 5 to Kinder? I’m telling you, you’re making it something it’s not. It’s not that hard. Trust me.
Some kids just need a bit more time. That’s the help. It’s so weird you can’t understand that. Professionals and parents agree. Busy bodies with faux concerns about other people’s children don’t get an opinion.
No, they don’t. They need to be in school with age appropriate peers
Could you please share the data you’re sourcing this from? That age-identical classrooms are critical to children’s success? Moreso than the developmental appropriateness of the environment? Because candidly I think you’re making this up as you go along.
My four year old and her seven year old cousin are best friends. It’s amazing to see how she brings out leadership and compassion in her older cousin and how her cousin brings out courage and creativity in her.
The discussion is about peers and a child held back isn't necessarily going to be a leader just because they are older. It harms everyone and when you get to HS, do you want your 14 year old in classes with 19-20 year olds as that is whats happening.
You’re right, a child who is redshirted isn’t necessarily going to be a leader and— parents who are redshirting aren’t always doing it for that reason anyway. So don’t worry about the redshirted kids.
You seem to be suggesting a freshman in high school could be taking classes with a senior— while the 20 y/o would be shockingly rare, it’s not more worrying to have a 19 than an 18 y/o senior. What is your panic about here?
It’s it rare at all. Electives, gym, health ed and math are always mixed. My 13-14 year old freshman had three classes with seniors freshman year. An elective that was auditioned in, pe and math.
Ok so please explain your anxiety around a 14 year old being in a class with a 19 year old that doesn’t exist for an 18 year old?
.
19 year olds in high school isn’t redshirting. Those are kids who failed a year, had transfer issues, are foreign students who need more time for the language, were homeschooled or have GED and need the credit etc etc. It happens rarely, but that won’t be solved by banning redshirting. Some areas have specific adult only high schools for ages 18 plus - maybe advocate for that if it’s an issue in your area.
These kids were held back. Except the fall kids who missed the deadline. Let’s call it what it is. It’s a huge issue when these adults are with young teens.
Nonsense. I’m around a ton of teens. This is 100% a non-issue.
The hyperbole from the anti-redshirt posters is so ridiculous. It’s like none of you have contact with any actual teens.
The redshirted kids at my child's middle school who all started puberty a grade earlier than they would have had they started on time absolutely changed the culture if the school and the experience for the non-redshirted kids, for the worse.
I cannot fathom why anyone who has seen a kid through puberty would be like "oh yeah, it would be great to have an age spread of 18 months in 6th and 7th grade. Super cool." It's already a hard time and it's already harder for the kids who start puberty early or late, but now you want to stretch it out even more? Whyyyyyyyyy? It makes no sense.
I am fine if K is for 6/7 year olds. Just make it official and start school later. But this unofficial system where K is for 4-7 yr olds, and people are supposed to case the joint in advance to guess where in that age spread to send their kid? That's dumb. Just pick an age and have everyone send their kid when they hit that age.
Parent of a young-for-grade older teen here, now in high school. I absolutely, positively do not care whatsoever that there were, and are, kids who are 18 months older in DCs class. DC is doing great, and is friends with a lot of them (who are lovely kids). It had no impact at all on DCs experience.
This weird redshirting obsession is a DCUM nutcase thing. Don’t drag the rest of us with normal kids and normal families into your lunacy.
As a parent of a HS kid, you don't think its weird and bullying doesn't go on when young freshman and older for the grade Seniors are in the same classes and its uncomfortable for everyone? You really think they are peers? How does it work when the freshman outshines the Senior?
No. I don’t think it’s weird. And anyone who does think it’s weird has not stepped foot in a high school in thirty years, nor talked to any actual teens.
As for bullying, my God you are naive and sheltered (which is why I suspect you are so worked up about something as irrelevant as redshirting). Come back and talk to me when you actually know anything about what is actually going on in high schools these days.
Of course its weird and not healthy. You are lazy and didn't want to put in the effort with yoru kids so you held them back. Its not about 30 years ago as it rarely happened then, its about what's happening today and how its unhealthy. You are really out of touch. You want 14 year old girls dating 18-20 year old men?
You can’t read. I have a young-for-grade teen, as I said.
You are also a disgusting creep.
What is wrong with you to call someone names? This is why kids behave this way as they have people like you as role models. You are clearly checked out and cannot have a teen or just an average teen if you are this clueless to what goes on.
Someone who is fantasizing about 14-year-old girls and adult men the way you are is creepy. That’s not name-calling. That’s facts.
For non-weirdos, kids take mixed-age classes all the time. I took classes at my local junior college when I was 15 since I had finished the high school level courses. So did a lot of the other advanced kids. And that still goes on in a lot of places today. It was not weird, because my classmates were not weird creepers like you.
Honestly, having read your increasingly unhinged and gross posts on this thread, I am actually very glad you haven’t been anywhere near the inside of a high school for a long time. Those kids are safer with you staying far, far away.
Get your mental health checked.
Ah, I see I nailed it exactly, so you are flailing. You are just gross, sorry. We can all see it.
Anonymous wrote:Public schools aren’t retaining anyone because that costs $$$. I’ve only heard of retention being offered when a kid missed a lot of a grade due to something like a serious medical issue, or at the end of the Covid school years - 2019-20 or 2020-21 - if a kid didn’t progress during the closures. My neighbor had a young for grade 1st grader in 20-21 and FCPS did offer to let her repeat 1st in person.
But let this thread be a heads up to everyone: redshirting is common, perhaps even expected, in private schools, especially for the younger for grade kids. So plan accordingly.
+1, and I would say it’s increasingly common in public school among parents who read the data on developmentally appropriate settings for 4-5. So, assume if you send a four year old they’ll be youngest by a year+, and an early five year old by a year. None of this is secret, or unavailable information to you.
Since most public schools do an age cut off around September 1st, the number of kids attending K at age 4 is very small (and even people who complain about excessive redshirting don't complain about redshirting a kid who would be 4 during the "normal" cut off). In NY (which is the only place with a midyear cut off that results in a lot of 4 year olds being eligible for K) it's common for people to redshirt those kids and no one complains about it.
The only redshirting people complain about is when people start redshirting kids who would be well over 5 when starting K but they hold them back anyway. Yes, in some privates that's common place, but the school generally encourages it and everyone has a chance to do it -- they like having an older class of K students and often they will strongly encourage redshirting summer or late spring birthdays. Some schools even offer a transitional year for young K students before taking the regular K class, so you still wind up with a fairly age-homogenous class.
But in public that's not the case, and when some parents start deciding their April or May birthday kid needs another year, it can leave other parents stuck with the consequences of those actions without warning. No one is going to get mad that a parent redshirted so their kid could start K at 5, but when you see kids starting K at 6 and a half, it becomes an issue.
Please yell at me now and tell me I'm a "crazy anti-redshirter" for agreeing this specific issue is a problem.
As someone with a young for grade kid, I think it is absolutely insane to consider this a problem whatsoever, and really makes you sound like someone who has no experience with any real problems in life.
My kid with an August birthday who I sent on time (she started K at 5 but was among the youngest in her grade) was viciously bullied by a redshirted child in 1st grade. My kid was 6 years old for the entirety of 1st grade. The bullying child turned 8 in September and was signficantly bigger and taller. Redshirting played a major role in the bullying because while this one child was the leader, there were many older kids in the classroom due to redshirting and when the bully would attack/provoke my kid, she'd cry, and then all the older kids would round on her and call her a baby and tease her for being small and young (she is average height for her age).
I had no idea how prevalent redshirting was when I enrolled my kid in K. She was academically and socially ready for a K classroom full of 5 and 6 year old children. In fact she continues to be at the top of her grade academically and she is well liked by teachers for being a good listener who follows directions and is helpful and kind in the classroom (something that apparently the extra years of preschool or staying home did not help instill in these redshirted kids who are merely bigger and older, not more mature).
I absolutely resent that my child's classroom environment has been dominated by older children who I think should have spent their 5/6 year in K learning out to function in elementary school, but instead spent it elsewhere and arrived at elementary school with their own ideas about how school should work. I resent how common bullying and relational aggression are at the school because of these older-but-less-mature kids.
Call me a crazy anti-redshirted if you want. I think redshirting sucks. Kids should start school at the same age so that they learn the same skills and are generally at the same developmental level. Kids with developmental delays can/should be held back to accommodate their delays, but it shouldn't be at the parents' discretion.
We will be moving school districts before these older kids hit puberty in 3rd grade and we have to deal with that.
As a parent who doesn't care about redshirting one way or another (and has both middle-of-age-for grade and young-for-grade kids, none old-for-grade): the bullying isn't because your kid is small. Bullies will find literally anything to gang up on kids about. One of my kids was bulled for not watching Spongebob Squarepants in a late elementary grade. Does that make sense as a thing to mock a kid over? No. But my kid was a prickly and kind of hard-to-get-to-know kid, so of course they were a target. The actual thing to make fun of was incidental to the act of piling on.
And it's possible (probable?) this older kid is lashing out because:
- they do have delays and you have no idea and the delays are social
- they feel embarassed about your kid doing as well when they are so much older.
PP here. Of course bullying can happen for a whole variety of reasons.
But at my kid's specific school, in specific classrooms where there are a large percent of redshirted kids including one that was significantly older, the bullying was closely related to having a cohort of older, bigger, unsocialized kids. My DD was not the only child targeted, but all the children who were bullied were "on time" kids who were on the younger end of normal for the grade. All the bullies were the oldest kids in class.
Also, it's not just about the age difference. It's also that these redshirted kids were not socialized into elementary school when they were young enough for it help. They arrived at K too old and less malleable. In my child's 1st grade class, those older kids RAN the classroom. This year my kid is in 2nd and due to the bullying issues last year, my kid and others who were targeted are in a classroom without any of the much older kids. The classroom is significantly better, with less conflict and fewer behavioral issues.
I don't have any issue with moderate redshirting for kids with summer birthdays. I don't think you should be allowed to redshirt a kid with a birthday during the school year unless there is a clear reason why delaying kindergarten will help. And I actually think a lot of developmental delays might be made worse by redshirting unless you can show the kids are going to get services to improve the situation. Perhaps some of these delays would be best addressed by having the kid in a classroom with other kids and receiving services through the school.
I honestly do not understand why you continue to keep your child in a school where your DC experiences significant bullying and you believe the classroom activities and level are so wildly inappropriate. It seems weird to me.
You seem very ignorant of the reality that most parents experience. Most parents can’t just switch schools out of the blue.
Right. Which leads parents to make careful decisions about when their kids start school. For example— not sending a kid who may struggle to kindergarten too early.
Or, send our kid and get them the help they need so they don’t struggle.
What "help" do you recommend?
IEP’s. Soooo many kids have them. Professional help often paid for by the school district. I’ve see kids get services for adhd, dyslexia, occupational therapy… I think many people like you overestimate your ability and underestimate the ability of professionals with undergrad and grad degrees in education and therapy.
IEPs are for children with disabilities. You have to qualify for them. You can't just "get an IEP."
- Professional with an undergrad and grad degree in education and psychology.
Then what is the issue you feel that you can’t send a 5 to Kinder? I’m telling you, you’re making it something it’s not. It’s not that hard. Trust me.
Some kids just need a bit more time. That’s the help. It’s so weird you can’t understand that. Professionals and parents agree. Busy bodies with faux concerns about other people’s children don’t get an opinion.
No, they don’t. They need to be in school with age appropriate peers
Could you please share the data you’re sourcing this from? That age-identical classrooms are critical to children’s success? Moreso than the developmental appropriateness of the environment? Because candidly I think you’re making this up as you go along.
My four year old and her seven year old cousin are best friends. It’s amazing to see how she brings out leadership and compassion in her older cousin and how her cousin brings out courage and creativity in her.
The discussion is about peers and a child held back isn't necessarily going to be a leader just because they are older. It harms everyone and when you get to HS, do you want your 14 year old in classes with 19-20 year olds as that is whats happening.
You’re right, a child who is redshirted isn’t necessarily going to be a leader and— parents who are redshirting aren’t always doing it for that reason anyway. So don’t worry about the redshirted kids.
You seem to be suggesting a freshman in high school could be taking classes with a senior— while the 20 y/o would be shockingly rare, it’s not more worrying to have a 19 than an 18 y/o senior. What is your panic about here?
It’s it rare at all. Electives, gym, health ed and math are always mixed. My 13-14 year old freshman had three classes with seniors freshman year. An elective that was auditioned in, pe and math.
Ok so please explain your anxiety around a 14 year old being in a class with a 19 year old that doesn’t exist for an 18 year old?
.
19 year olds in high school isn’t redshirting. Those are kids who failed a year, had transfer issues, are foreign students who need more time for the language, were homeschooled or have GED and need the credit etc etc. It happens rarely, but that won’t be solved by banning redshirting. Some areas have specific adult only high schools for ages 18 plus - maybe advocate for that if it’s an issue in your area.
These kids were held back. Except the fall kids who missed the deadline. Let’s call it what it is. It’s a huge issue when these adults are with young teens.
Nonsense. I’m around a ton of teens. This is 100% a non-issue.
The hyperbole from the anti-redshirt posters is so ridiculous. It’s like none of you have contact with any actual teens.
The redshirted kids at my child's middle school who all started puberty a grade earlier than they would have had they started on time absolutely changed the culture if the school and the experience for the non-redshirted kids, for the worse.
I cannot fathom why anyone who has seen a kid through puberty would be like "oh yeah, it would be great to have an age spread of 18 months in 6th and 7th grade. Super cool." It's already a hard time and it's already harder for the kids who start puberty early or late, but now you want to stretch it out even more? Whyyyyyyyyy? It makes no sense.
I am fine if K is for 6/7 year olds. Just make it official and start school later. But this unofficial system where K is for 4-7 yr olds, and people are supposed to case the joint in advance to guess where in that age spread to send their kid? That's dumb. Just pick an age and have everyone send their kid when they hit that age.
Typical onset of puberty for girls is between 8 and 13 years old. For boys, it’s between 9-14 years old. That’s already a 5-year spread within the realm of completely normal.
You need to calm down.
1) Onset is not not equally distributed along those ranges.
2) Redshirting of non-summer birthdays makes the range even wider, which is a substantial issue. It forces families of on time kids to deal with puberty issues a year earlier than even the earliest year they would otherwise deal with it.
3) I feel very calm, thank you -- my kids are through this. Parents choosing to redshirt have not. They are making a choice based on a perceived disadvantage in kindergarten, not understanding the negative impact 4-6 years later. Both for their kid and dir peers.
There is absolutely no evidence for the bolded statement. You don’t understand statistics.
You don't need evidence for basic math.
Redshirting expands the range if ages in one grade. You can argue whether that's a good thing or a bad thing or a neutral thing. But you can't argue it's not a thing.
Without redshirting, the typical 6th grade class would have 11 year olds turning 12, either during the school year or in the summer following. With redshirting, it will have a mix of 11 and 12 year olds at the beginning of the year, and a mix of 12 and 13 year olds at the end PLUS some non-redshirted summer birthdays who are still 11.
Again, you can argue that's not a big deal or that it only amounts to a few extra minutes months, but mathematically, redshirting expands the age range for the grade. Which means, yes, it expands the range of puberty onset.
These are just facts.
That applies equally to the Summer birthdays you’re good with redshirting.
I'm not advocating for any policy or another.
Yes, redshirting summer birthdays expands the age range of a grade. But by less. If redshirting is restricted to summer birthdays, you still get a cohort of kids who are 11/12 in 6th. But some kids will start the year at 12+, instead of starting at 11 and turning 12 during the year. So an expansion, yes, though a more minor one. And say only late summer birthdays are redshirted-- this might expand the range by only a week or two.
That is different than a situation where some parents are redshirting kids with spring birthdays, which will expand the range by 4-6 months.
Two weeks is a fraction of 6 months, so it is not unreasonable for a person to argue that redshirting of kids with birthdays close to the cut off should be allowed, but not kids with birthdays far from the cut off.
Except you know more children are born in August/July/September so the impact isn’t proportionally much smaller.
The thing that makes it unreasonable to argue that redshirting of a September birthday is fine and an October birthday isn’t is that the rules say both are equally permitted and no one on DCUM makes the rules. No schools are trying to limit the practice (private schools outright encourage it) and no lawmaker is going to support giving a right to a September parent that an October parent is denied. So all the anti-redshirt hysteria is just screaming into the internet void that other parents are exercising their prerogatives in a way that OP and her comrades didn’t.
You have to look at the cut off dates. This is a DC/MD/VA board that recently has people from all over but in DC the cut off is 9/30, MD 9/1, and VA 9/30. So, in MD, a September kid can test in from 9/1-10/15 but because the school are so overcrowded, many refuse or find bogus reasons to deny a child, which happened to so we had to go private. Only a few states allow an October kid so that's a mute point.
Privates encourage it due to lack of space and its EASIER for them. Its far easier teaching a 6 year old reading or prereading than a 5 year old who isn't. However, what is also missing is these play based preschools and parents don't work with their kids to get them ready and then blame the child for not being ready and except for documented delays, someone failed this child if they aren't ready or someone is lying. At 5, there should be no expectecations. K is for learning all that.
But preschool should be play based. 3 and 4 year olds should not be doing worksheets at preschool. Kindergarten *should* be that bridge year for introduction to learning - and it used to be- but it’s not anymore. That’s a huge part of the problem; kindergarten expectations are not aligned with the development of 4 turning 5 year olds/very recently turned 5 year olds so those parents of younger kids need to choose if they’re going to send their kids young or at 5 going on 6/early 6 instead.
It should be a mix of things but have academics to prepare kids for school. This is why kids are not ready. K is not a bridge. It’s school. My younger kid with delays did fine as they were prepared for it. This is a parenting and preschool issue.
Anonymous wrote:As a parent with older kids, I urge folks not to worry about this - it really isn't a big deal in the context of your child's life. Bullying, competing against kids who are bigger in sports, disruptive kids can happen even with kids who are not redshirted. My son is in a sport that goes by birth year and some of the kids are the size of elementary school kids, and others are almost 6 feet tall. Teach your kid to adapt to a diverse world and don't sweat other people's choices that really aren't a big deal.
You are too rational for DCUM’s anti-redshirters to understand, but of course you are exactly correct.
Anonymous wrote:There are two ten year olds in my child’s third grade class. When will a school draw a line with this?
Why do you care?
Even funnier and more pathetic, OP is in a private school. I’m low key second-hand embarrassed for her.
Same. I wonder if this OP is the one who complained a few years ago about the school carnival having rides or games her young kid was too short for. I think she's been lodging this complaint here for years and is just obsessed with the kids in the class and their birthdays. It's really weird.
Anonymous wrote:Public schools aren’t retaining anyone because that costs $$$. I’ve only heard of retention being offered when a kid missed a lot of a grade due to something like a serious medical issue, or at the end of the Covid school years - 2019-20 or 2020-21 - if a kid didn’t progress during the closures. My neighbor had a young for grade 1st grader in 20-21 and FCPS did offer to let her repeat 1st in person.
But let this thread be a heads up to everyone: redshirting is common, perhaps even expected, in private schools, especially for the younger for grade kids. So plan accordingly.
+1, and I would say it’s increasingly common in public school among parents who read the data on developmentally appropriate settings for 4-5. So, assume if you send a four year old they’ll be youngest by a year+, and an early five year old by a year. None of this is secret, or unavailable information to you.
Since most public schools do an age cut off around September 1st, the number of kids attending K at age 4 is very small (and even people who complain about excessive redshirting don't complain about redshirting a kid who would be 4 during the "normal" cut off). In NY (which is the only place with a midyear cut off that results in a lot of 4 year olds being eligible for K) it's common for people to redshirt those kids and no one complains about it.
The only redshirting people complain about is when people start redshirting kids who would be well over 5 when starting K but they hold them back anyway. Yes, in some privates that's common place, but the school generally encourages it and everyone has a chance to do it -- they like having an older class of K students and often they will strongly encourage redshirting summer or late spring birthdays. Some schools even offer a transitional year for young K students before taking the regular K class, so you still wind up with a fairly age-homogenous class.
But in public that's not the case, and when some parents start deciding their April or May birthday kid needs another year, it can leave other parents stuck with the consequences of those actions without warning. No one is going to get mad that a parent redshirted so their kid could start K at 5, but when you see kids starting K at 6 and a half, it becomes an issue.
Please yell at me now and tell me I'm a "crazy anti-redshirter" for agreeing this specific issue is a problem.
As someone with a young for grade kid, I think it is absolutely insane to consider this a problem whatsoever, and really makes you sound like someone who has no experience with any real problems in life.
My kid with an August birthday who I sent on time (she started K at 5 but was among the youngest in her grade) was viciously bullied by a redshirted child in 1st grade. My kid was 6 years old for the entirety of 1st grade. The bullying child turned 8 in September and was signficantly bigger and taller. Redshirting played a major role in the bullying because while this one child was the leader, there were many older kids in the classroom due to redshirting and when the bully would attack/provoke my kid, she'd cry, and then all the older kids would round on her and call her a baby and tease her for being small and young (she is average height for her age).
I had no idea how prevalent redshirting was when I enrolled my kid in K. She was academically and socially ready for a K classroom full of 5 and 6 year old children. In fact she continues to be at the top of her grade academically and she is well liked by teachers for being a good listener who follows directions and is helpful and kind in the classroom (something that apparently the extra years of preschool or staying home did not help instill in these redshirted kids who are merely bigger and older, not more mature).
I absolutely resent that my child's classroom environment has been dominated by older children who I think should have spent their 5/6 year in K learning out to function in elementary school, but instead spent it elsewhere and arrived at elementary school with their own ideas about how school should work. I resent how common bullying and relational aggression are at the school because of these older-but-less-mature kids.
Call me a crazy anti-redshirted if you want. I think redshirting sucks. Kids should start school at the same age so that they learn the same skills and are generally at the same developmental level. Kids with developmental delays can/should be held back to accommodate their delays, but it shouldn't be at the parents' discretion.
We will be moving school districts before these older kids hit puberty in 3rd grade and we have to deal with that.
As a parent who doesn't care about redshirting one way or another (and has both middle-of-age-for grade and young-for-grade kids, none old-for-grade): the bullying isn't because your kid is small. Bullies will find literally anything to gang up on kids about. One of my kids was bulled for not watching Spongebob Squarepants in a late elementary grade. Does that make sense as a thing to mock a kid over? No. But my kid was a prickly and kind of hard-to-get-to-know kid, so of course they were a target. The actual thing to make fun of was incidental to the act of piling on.
And it's possible (probable?) this older kid is lashing out because:
- they do have delays and you have no idea and the delays are social
- they feel embarassed about your kid doing as well when they are so much older.
PP here. Of course bullying can happen for a whole variety of reasons.
But at my kid's specific school, in specific classrooms where there are a large percent of redshirted kids including one that was significantly older, the bullying was closely related to having a cohort of older, bigger, unsocialized kids. My DD was not the only child targeted, but all the children who were bullied were "on time" kids who were on the younger end of normal for the grade. All the bullies were the oldest kids in class.
Also, it's not just about the age difference. It's also that these redshirted kids were not socialized into elementary school when they were young enough for it help. They arrived at K too old and less malleable. In my child's 1st grade class, those older kids RAN the classroom. This year my kid is in 2nd and due to the bullying issues last year, my kid and others who were targeted are in a classroom without any of the much older kids. The classroom is significantly better, with less conflict and fewer behavioral issues.
I don't have any issue with moderate redshirting for kids with summer birthdays. I don't think you should be allowed to redshirt a kid with a birthday during the school year unless there is a clear reason why delaying kindergarten will help. And I actually think a lot of developmental delays might be made worse by redshirting unless you can show the kids are going to get services to improve the situation. Perhaps some of these delays would be best addressed by having the kid in a classroom with other kids and receiving services through the school.
I honestly do not understand why you continue to keep your child in a school where your DC experiences significant bullying and you believe the classroom activities and level are so wildly inappropriate. It seems weird to me.
You seem very ignorant of the reality that most parents experience. Most parents can’t just switch schools out of the blue.
Right. Which leads parents to make careful decisions about when their kids start school. For example— not sending a kid who may struggle to kindergarten too early.
Or, send our kid and get them the help they need so they don’t struggle.
What "help" do you recommend?
IEP’s. Soooo many kids have them. Professional help often paid for by the school district. I’ve see kids get services for adhd, dyslexia, occupational therapy… I think many people like you overestimate your ability and underestimate the ability of professionals with undergrad and grad degrees in education and therapy.
IEPs are for children with disabilities. You have to qualify for them. You can't just "get an IEP."
- Professional with an undergrad and grad degree in education and psychology.
Then what is the issue you feel that you can’t send a 5 to Kinder? I’m telling you, you’re making it something it’s not. It’s not that hard. Trust me.
Some kids just need a bit more time. That’s the help. It’s so weird you can’t understand that. Professionals and parents agree. Busy bodies with faux concerns about other people’s children don’t get an opinion.
No, they don’t. They need to be in school with age appropriate peers
Could you please share the data you’re sourcing this from? That age-identical classrooms are critical to children’s success? Moreso than the developmental appropriateness of the environment? Because candidly I think you’re making this up as you go along.
My four year old and her seven year old cousin are best friends. It’s amazing to see how she brings out leadership and compassion in her older cousin and how her cousin brings out courage and creativity in her.
The discussion is about peers and a child held back isn't necessarily going to be a leader just because they are older. It harms everyone and when you get to HS, do you want your 14 year old in classes with 19-20 year olds as that is whats happening.
You’re right, a child who is redshirted isn’t necessarily going to be a leader and— parents who are redshirting aren’t always doing it for that reason anyway. So don’t worry about the redshirted kids.
You seem to be suggesting a freshman in high school could be taking classes with a senior— while the 20 y/o would be shockingly rare, it’s not more worrying to have a 19 than an 18 y/o senior. What is your panic about here?
It’s it rare at all. Electives, gym, health ed and math are always mixed. My 13-14 year old freshman had three classes with seniors freshman year. An elective that was auditioned in, pe and math.
Ok so please explain your anxiety around a 14 year old being in a class with a 19 year old that doesn’t exist for an 18 year old?
.
19 year olds in high school isn’t redshirting. Those are kids who failed a year, had transfer issues, are foreign students who need more time for the language, were homeschooled or have GED and need the credit etc etc. It happens rarely, but that won’t be solved by banning redshirting. Some areas have specific adult only high schools for ages 18 plus - maybe advocate for that if it’s an issue in your area.
These kids were held back. Except the fall kids who missed the deadline. Let’s call it what it is. It’s a huge issue when these adults are with young teens.
Nonsense. I’m around a ton of teens. This is 100% a non-issue.
The hyperbole from the anti-redshirt posters is so ridiculous. It’s like none of you have contact with any actual teens.
The redshirted kids at my child's middle school who all started puberty a grade earlier than they would have had they started on time absolutely changed the culture if the school and the experience for the non-redshirted kids, for the worse.
I cannot fathom why anyone who has seen a kid through puberty would be like "oh yeah, it would be great to have an age spread of 18 months in 6th and 7th grade. Super cool." It's already a hard time and it's already harder for the kids who start puberty early or late, but now you want to stretch it out even more? Whyyyyyyyyy? It makes no sense.
I am fine if K is for 6/7 year olds. Just make it official and start school later. But this unofficial system where K is for 4-7 yr olds, and people are supposed to case the joint in advance to guess where in that age spread to send their kid? That's dumb. Just pick an age and have everyone send their kid when they hit that age.
Typical onset of puberty for girls is between 8 and 13 years old. For boys, it’s between 9-14 years old. That’s already a 5-year spread within the realm of completely normal.
You need to calm down.
1) Onset is not not equally distributed along those ranges.
2) Redshirting of non-summer birthdays makes the range even wider, which is a substantial issue. It forces families of on time kids to deal with puberty issues a year earlier than even the earliest year they would otherwise deal with it.
3) I feel very calm, thank you -- my kids are through this. Parents choosing to redshirt have not. They are making a choice based on a perceived disadvantage in kindergarten, not understanding the negative impact 4-6 years later. Both for their kid and dir peers.
There is absolutely no evidence for the bolded statement. You don’t understand statistics.
You don't need evidence for basic math.
Redshirting expands the range if ages in one grade. You can argue whether that's a good thing or a bad thing or a neutral thing. But you can't argue it's not a thing.
Without redshirting, the typical 6th grade class would have 11 year olds turning 12, either during the school year or in the summer following. With redshirting, it will have a mix of 11 and 12 year olds at the beginning of the year, and a mix of 12 and 13 year olds at the end PLUS some non-redshirted summer birthdays who are still 11.
Again, you can argue that's not a big deal or that it only amounts to a few extra minutes months, but mathematically, redshirting expands the age range for the grade. Which means, yes, it expands the range of puberty onset.
These are just facts.
That applies equally to the Summer birthdays you’re good with redshirting.
I'm not advocating for any policy or another.
Yes, redshirting summer birthdays expands the age range of a grade. But by less. If redshirting is restricted to summer birthdays, you still get a cohort of kids who are 11/12 in 6th. But some kids will start the year at 12+, instead of starting at 11 and turning 12 during the year. So an expansion, yes, though a more minor one. And say only late summer birthdays are redshirted-- this might expand the range by only a week or two.
That is different than a situation where some parents are redshirting kids with spring birthdays, which will expand the range by 4-6 months.
Two weeks is a fraction of 6 months, so it is not unreasonable for a person to argue that redshirting of kids with birthdays close to the cut off should be allowed, but not kids with birthdays far from the cut off.
Except you know more children are born in August/July/September so the impact isn’t proportionally much smaller.
The thing that makes it unreasonable to argue that redshirting of a September birthday is fine and an October birthday isn’t is that the rules say both are equally permitted and no one on DCUM makes the rules. No schools are trying to limit the practice (private schools outright encourage it) and no lawmaker is going to support giving a right to a September parent that an October parent is denied. So all the anti-redshirt hysteria is just screaming into the internet void that other parents are exercising their prerogatives in a way that OP and her comrades didn’t.
You have to look at the cut off dates. This is a DC/MD/VA board that recently has people from all over but in DC the cut off is 9/30, MD 9/1, and VA 9/30. So, in MD, a September kid can test in from 9/1-10/15 but because the school are so overcrowded, many refuse or find bogus reasons to deny a child, which happened to so we had to go private. Only a few states allow an October kid so that's a mute point.
Privates encourage it due to lack of space and its EASIER for them. Its far easier teaching a 6 year old reading or prereading than a 5 year old who isn't. However, what is also missing is these play based preschools and parents don't work with their kids to get them ready and then blame the child for not being ready and except for documented delays, someone failed this child if they aren't ready or someone is lying. At 5, there should be no expectecations. K is for learning all that.
But preschool should be play based. 3 and 4 year olds should not be doing worksheets at preschool. Kindergarten *should* be that bridge year for introduction to learning - and it used to be- but it’s not anymore. That’s a huge part of the problem; kindergarten expectations are not aligned with the development of 4 turning 5 year olds/very recently turned 5 year olds so those parents of younger kids need to choose if they’re going to send their kids young or at 5 going on 6/early 6 instead.
It should be a mix of things but have academics to prepare kids for school. This is why kids are not ready. K is not a bridge. It’s school. My younger kid with delays did fine as they were prepared for it. This is a parenting and preschool issue.
My experience is that it was a kindergarten issue. My kid had all the academic skills (and then some) coming out of a well respected preschool, but kindergarten was far too much seat time and not enough play. The kids on the older end were mostly okay, but the younger cohort were all really stressed by the environment.
Anonymous wrote:I have older kids and my SIL held her kids back for a ridiculously long time. It’s weird with the cousins and it always kind of was. One 21 year old went straight to law school and is a 21 year old law student. Same age cousin is a sophomore. One got back from junior year abroad and same age cousin is applying to college. It is a little strange.
It’s very weird when freshman are getting drivers licenses at 16 when other kids turn 16 in sophomore or junior year, for example too. If a kid is not mature enough to be in the proper grade they should not be driving.
My freshman had seniors being nice and offering rides. No way.
Anonymous wrote:There are two ten year olds in my child’s third grade class. When will a school draw a line with this?
Why do you care?
Even funnier and more pathetic, OP is in a private school. I’m low key second-hand embarrassed for her.
Same. I wonder if this OP is the one who complained a few years ago about the school carnival having rides or games her young kid was too short for. I think she's been lodging this complaint here for years and is just obsessed with the kids in the class and their birthdays. It's really weird.
Oh my gosh. I bet you are right. That lady was totally insane, and OP gives off the same vibes. I bet it is carnival lady. Same private school entitlement, same weirdness.
Anonymous wrote:I have older kids and my SIL held her kids back for a ridiculously long time. It’s weird with the cousins and it always kind of was. One 21 year old went straight to law school and is a 21 year old law student. Same age cousin is a sophomore. One got back from junior year abroad and same age cousin is applying to college. It is a little strange.
It’s very weird when freshman are getting drivers licenses at 16 when other kids turn 16 in sophomore or junior year, for example too. If a kid is not mature enough to be in the proper grade they should not be driving.
My freshman had seniors being nice and offering rides. No way.
Forum Index
»
Elementary School-Aged Kids
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}