Missionaries should be banned

[Anonymous]

The thing is, if nobody pushes back on 9:49 and her sock puppet, in 2-3 days we’ll see this:

“On a recent thread everybody agreed that ALL missionaries proselytize all the time.”

That’s how dishonest they are.

Don’t get me started on how ridiculous it is to boast about agreement/consensus among the 10 people who read this thread. As if that means squat out in the real world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For example, PP can watch this video and then perform some crazy mental gymnastics to claim there was no proselytizing.

"I was in the waiting room and my daughter was having surgery for four hours. SP's staff shared the Gospel with me. That's when I heard about Jesus Christ. I received Jesus Christ as my savior on the day my daughter had surgery in the Cayman Islands. ... I know that Jesus healed my daughter's heart."

Prove to us that the Mongolian mom didn’t ask about the missionaries faith, and they were simply answering. You can’t.

What amazes me is that mom spent weeks with the missionaries, in Mongolia, on the plane, and then in the Cayman Islands, before they finally told her about Jesus. They must be piss-poor missionaries.

They know they need to build trust first.

I'm sure they've thought through their technique.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For example, PP can watch this video and then perform some crazy mental gymnastics to claim there was no proselytizing.

"I was in the waiting room and my daughter was having surgery for four hours. SP's staff shared the Gospel with me. That's when I heard about Jesus Christ. I received Jesus Christ as my savior on the day my daughter had surgery in the Cayman Islands. ... I know that Jesus healed my daughter's heart."

Prove to us that the Mongolian mom didn’t ask about the missionaries faith, and they were simply answering. You can’t.

What amazes me is that mom spent weeks with the missionaries, in Mongolia, on the plane, and then in the Cayman Islands, before they finally told her about Jesus. They must be piss-poor missionaries.

They know they need to build trust first.

I'm sure they've thought through their technique.

FFS. Get a grip, you look ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For example, PP can watch this video and then perform some crazy mental gymnastics to claim there was no proselytizing.

"I was in the waiting room and my daughter was having surgery for four hours. SP's staff shared the Gospel with me. That's when I heard about Jesus Christ. I received Jesus Christ as my savior on the day my daughter had surgery in the Cayman Islands. ... I know that Jesus healed my daughter's heart."

Prove to us that the Mongolian mom didn’t ask about the missionaries faith, and they were simply answering. You can’t.

What amazes me is that mom spent weeks with the missionaries, in Mongolia, on the plane, and then in the Cayman Islands, before they finally told her about Jesus. They must be piss-poor missionaries.

They know they need to build trust first.

I'm sure they've thought through their technique.

So 3rd world citizens are ignorant as well as poor? They don’t have the mental capacity to make decisions based on their own feelings and thoughts? I am stunned people here are denigrating 3rd world people so. Just because they are in poverty doesn’t mean they are stupid.

Religious people are called mentally ill here as well. So according to dcum, mentally ill religious missionaries are preying upon ignorant 3rd world people.

What a narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The thing is, if nobody pushes back on 9:49 and her sock puppet, in 2-3 days we’ll see this:

“On a recent thread everybody agreed that ALL missionaries proselytize all the time.”

That’s how dishonest they are.

Don’t get me started on how ridiculous it is to boast about agreement/consensus among the 10 people who read this thread. As if that means squat out in the real world.

Whoah, look out world! PP declares that 10 people reading a thread on a mom’s website are in total agreement* about missionaries.

*They weren’t actually in agreement, but that takes backseat to the ridiculous claims about how important pp thinks said agreement should be out in the real world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For example, PP can watch this video and then perform some crazy mental gymnastics to claim there was no proselytizing.

"I was in the waiting room and my daughter was having surgery for four hours. SP's staff shared the Gospel with me. That's when I heard about Jesus Christ. I received Jesus Christ as my savior on the day my daughter had surgery in the Cayman Islands. ... I know that Jesus healed my daughter's heart."

Prove to us that the Mongolian mom didn’t ask about the missionaries faith, and they were simply answering. You can’t.

What amazes me is that mom spent weeks with the missionaries, in Mongolia, on the plane, and then in the Cayman Islands, before they finally told her about Jesus. They must be piss-poor missionaries.

They know they need to build trust first.

I'm sure they've thought through their technique.

So 3rd world citizens are ignorant as well as poor? They don’t have the mental capacity to make decisions based on their own feelings and thoughts? I am stunned people here are denigrating 3rd world people so. Just because they are in poverty doesn’t mean they are stupid.

Religious people are called mentally ill here as well. So according to dcum, mentally ill religious missionaries are preying upon ignorant 3rd world people.

What a narrative.

+1000. Pp has been asked on nearly every page (I’m bored at work) why she thinks third world peoples can’t make up their own minds. 40 pages later and she still hasn’t answered.

Can you spell “patronizing”?

But hey, she keeps swigging that Cotes du Rhône as she argues that helpful services should be banned because poor people are too dumb to make their own choices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The thing is, if nobody pushes back on 9:49 and her sock puppet, in 2-3 days we’ll see this:

“On a recent thread everybody agreed that ALL missionaries proselytize all the time.”

That’s how dishonest they are.

Don’t get me started on how ridiculous it is to boast about agreement/consensus among the 10 people who read this thread. As if that means squat out in the real world.

Whoah, look out world! PP declares that 10 people reading a thread on a mom’s website are in total agreement* about missionaries.

*They weren’t actually in agreement, but that takes backseat to the ridiculous claims about how important pp thinks said agreement should be out in the real world.

I’ve noticed that kind of post before. Someone claims there’s a agreement among posters as if it’s noteworthy. It’s so weird and arrogant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For example, PP can watch this video and then perform some crazy mental gymnastics to claim there was no proselytizing.

"I was in the waiting room and my daughter was having surgery for four hours. SP's staff shared the Gospel with me. That's when I heard about Jesus Christ. I received Jesus Christ as my savior on the day my daughter had surgery in the Cayman Islands. ... I know that Jesus healed my daughter's heart."

Prove to us that the Mongolian mom didn’t ask about the missionaries faith, and they were simply answering. You can’t.

What amazes me is that mom spent weeks with the missionaries, in Mongolia, on the plane, and then in the Cayman Islands, before they finally told her about Jesus. They must be piss-poor missionaries.

They know they need to build trust first.

I'm sure they've thought through their technique.

So 3rd world citizens are ignorant as well as poor? They don’t have the mental capacity to make decisions based on their own feelings and thoughts? I am stunned people here are denigrating 3rd world people so. Just because they are in poverty doesn’t mean they are stupid.

Religious people are called mentally ill here as well. So according to dcum, mentally ill religious missionaries are preying upon ignorant 3rd world people.

What a narrative.

+1000. Pp has been asked on nearly every page (I’m bored at work) why she thinks third world peoples can’t make up their own minds. 40 pages later and she still hasn’t answered.

Can you spell “patronizing”?

But hey, she keeps swigging that Cotes du Rhône as she argues that helpful services should be banned because poor people are too dumb to make their own choices.

You certainly do know your wines; I'll give you major credit for that

[Anonymous]

Jeff, can you please check if it's the same exact person posting basically THE SAME post over and over and over and over - asking rhetorically isn't it unethical for missionaries to be "proselytizing."

It's The Proselytizing Poster.

Surely over 15 posts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For example, PP can watch this video and then perform some crazy mental gymnastics to claim there was no proselytizing.

"I was in the waiting room and my daughter was having surgery for four hours. SP's staff shared the Gospel with me. That's when I heard about Jesus Christ. I received Jesus Christ as my savior on the day my daughter had surgery in the Cayman Islands. ... I know that Jesus healed my daughter's heart."

Prove to us that the Mongolian mom didn’t ask about the missionaries faith, and they were simply answering. You can’t.

What amazes me is that mom spent weeks with the missionaries, in Mongolia, on the plane, and then in the Cayman Islands, before they finally told her about Jesus. They must be piss-poor missionaries.

They know they need to build trust first.

I'm sure they've thought through their technique.

So 3rd world citizens are ignorant as well as poor? They don’t have the mental capacity to make decisions based on their own feelings and thoughts? I am stunned people here are denigrating 3rd world people so. Just because they are in poverty doesn’t mean they are stupid.

Religious people are called mentally ill here as well. So according to dcum, mentally ill religious missionaries are preying upon ignorant 3rd world people.

What a narrative.

I didn’t say anything about people from “3rd world” countries. And I included an example of proselytizing in the US. Should I repost that one?

I’m talking about the behavior of some missionaries.

It’s unethical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jeff, can you please check if it's the same exact person posting basically THE SAME post over and over and over and over - asking rhetorically isn't it unethical for missionaries to be "proselytizing."

It's The Proselytizing Poster.

Surely over 15 posts.

How many times has it been answered?

How did you respond?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For example, PP can watch this video and then perform some crazy mental gymnastics to claim there was no proselytizing.

"I was in the waiting room and my daughter was having surgery for four hours. SP's staff shared the Gospel with me. That's when I heard about Jesus Christ. I received Jesus Christ as my savior on the day my daughter had surgery in the Cayman Islands. ... I know that Jesus healed my daughter's heart."

Prove to us that the Mongolian mom didn’t ask about the missionaries faith, and they were simply answering. You can’t.

What amazes me is that mom spent weeks with the missionaries, in Mongolia, on the plane, and then in the Cayman Islands, before they finally told her about Jesus. They must be piss-poor missionaries.

They know they need to build trust first.

I'm sure they've thought through their technique.

So 3rd world citizens are ignorant as well as poor? They don’t have the mental capacity to make decisions based on their own feelings and thoughts? I am stunned people here are denigrating 3rd world people so. Just because they are in poverty doesn’t mean they are stupid.

Religious people are called mentally ill here as well. So according to dcum, mentally ill religious missionaries are preying upon ignorant 3rd world people.

What a narrative.

+1000. Pp has been asked on nearly every page (I’m bored at work) why she thinks third world peoples can’t make up their own minds. 40 pages later and she still hasn’t answered.

Can you spell “patronizing”?

But hey, she keeps swigging that Cotes du Rhône as she argues that helpful services should be banned because poor people are too dumb to make their own choices.

I don’t think that so… N/A.

Have you answered? Is it ethical for missionaries to verbally “sell” Jesus while they are helping someone through a crisis?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For example, PP can watch this video and then perform some crazy mental gymnastics to claim there was no proselytizing.

"I was in the waiting room and my daughter was having surgery for four hours. SP's staff shared the Gospel with me. That's when I heard about Jesus Christ. I received Jesus Christ as my savior on the day my daughter had surgery in the Cayman Islands. ... I know that Jesus healed my daughter's heart."

Prove to us that the Mongolian mom didn’t ask about the missionaries faith, and they were simply answering. You can’t.

What amazes me is that mom spent weeks with the missionaries, in Mongolia, on the plane, and then in the Cayman Islands, before they finally told her about Jesus. They must be piss-poor missionaries.

They know they need to build trust first.

I'm sure they've thought through their technique.

FFS. Get a grip, you look ridiculous.

Not nearly as ridiculous as the PPs who watch that video and deny that the missionaries were proselytizing.

And refuse to say that it’s unethical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The thing is, if nobody pushes back on 9:49 and her sock puppet, in 2-3 days we’ll see this:

“On a recent thread everybody agreed that ALL missionaries proselytize all the time.”

That’s how dishonest they are.

Don’t get me started on how ridiculous it is to boast about agreement/consensus among the 10 people who read this thread. As if that means squat out in the real world.

So. Do you agree or not?

Do some missionaries proselytize with words?

Is that ethical or not?

[Anonymous]

so I think we can all agree these missionaries have ulterior motives.