Joe cut off Christines clothes and god knows what else, as he thought she was a willing participant. I hope he never knew the truth in the end.
|
That is terrifying. At least in that short article though, it sounds like the guy who committed the actual r*** just messaged the person back and then showed up and did that? Which to me, means he should have known it was fishy, or didn't care (or hoped??) that it was actually a real r***. I would think- hope- that if the guy and the fake Sarah spoke on the phone, and had days of texts about what exactly she wanted done, along with friendly chit chat about liking dogs, and about "i'll set an alarm and unchain you at X time" and "i'm worried about restraining you with that specific item because you won't be able to snap your fingers to signal you want me to stop" and "just to warn you that part of your body will bruise really easily if I do that even lightly, are you in to that or not?", then he'd have gotten off with a much lighter sentence if any sentence at all. |
They didn't make the kind of money to drop 30k on new windows on a whim. It was a new home, builder grade or not. |
I spent more on widow treatments!! But it is odd considering one thing he told JM was that if he divorced CB she would get more money than him... wouldn't that 30k be needed? |
I think the most likely situation is that he showed up, started doing things he thought they'd agreed on, and then BB and J showed up and he thought her husband had unexpectedly come home and found them and shot him. He probably never knew he'd been set up, he probably thought BB had no idea what was happening. |
| It's the truth. You are making way too much of it. Please grow up. |
I agree, Joe’s actions here seem pretty different from the defendant in that case. There was also a (45 minute long? I thought that was the length mentioned somewhere) phone call as well. We’ve gotten a little detail from Juliana on that but I assume they were validating any concerns pretty heavily. Like maybe showed parts of the house, etc. At that point he’s talking to a female inside the location that was part of the request. I don’t think a reasonable person would be like “maybe this could be the lady’s au pair soliciting my participation in a murder plot.” Obviously he was wrong but the lengths they went to were extremely bizarre and creepy. I don’t see a judge and jury deciding that Joe should go to prison for 60 years in this exact case had they somehow survived at the last second (unfortunately I don’t think that was ever a realistic probability). But I think there is going to be a legal issue there. It goes without saying though that Joe is not on trial here. We can’t really fully hear the evidence that would support his side of the story. We don’t know exactly what happened on the phone call or the extent of the “evidence” he asked for. They were obviously trying really hard to manipulate him and there was a female in on it, so that made further manipulation possible. He also already paid the ultimate price for any mistakes he made. |
| $30K seems low for a whole house of triple paned windows. |
Perhaps only need them triple paned on the top floor, where the murder would happen. |
And without involving his dumb au pair. So many faster and easier ways to kill someone. |
With everything he did to plan this, it's pretty crazy he involved two big X factors... another adult male with weapons and the low-IQ au pair. Even if this plan worked flawlessly, he's still killed a man (albeit in apparent defense of his wife) which would mean an investigation and the possibility of needing a lawyer and being suspended from work... so how on earth could that be logistically easier than a regular divorce? This must have been both about the brutality and the wanting to see if he was smart enough to get away with this. |
I haven’t been listening to the testimony but my guess is that basically as soon as he walked into the bedroom he knew something was off and I think he was shot pretty much right thereafter. I don’t think the sex scenario had even started — there’s no indication that she was bound, for instance. |
Almost every court does this because the judge needs time to deal with motions in that case and other cases, and the alternative is to make the jury sit around on days when they are there. The feeling is the most people appreciate a long weekend and/or the time to catch up on their own work emails. |
You might have uncovered another crime, consumer fraud. |
No but the timeline has Joe coming, Juliana coming back home from wherever she was parked, calling Brendan, Brendan arriving back home, them taking the daughter and putting her in the basement, and then going upstairs. What happened between Joe and Christine in that time? Or is that not what happened
|