Malaysia Airlines Flight Goes Missing En Route to China

Anonymous
Is anyone else still searching on tomnod?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You would need a huge runway to land a Boeing 777. It's kinda hard to hide this plane!

There are huge runways all over the world -- they are called "roads" It is not an airport. People land planes all over the world outside of airports. Yes, it is a big plane, but many roads and fields are also big. Its a big world out there. 7000 ft = 1.5 miles.


Where are roads?

Roads are made where people are. If this was landed on a road, someone would have seen it (even if it was covered up by 50 tarps), or it would have pinged on land - because it landed where there are facets of civilization.


There are lots of abandoned places. I don't know how smooth a road you need in order to land (and whether you want the plane to be fly able again). It is a big world.

At night with no lights on...or do you have people on the ground turning lights on for plane ? You need like 1450 feet min to land that type of plane.... more if the winds are not right or the pilot is not great. Once it's on the ground(assuming the plane is not burning) you need to refuel(like 30,0000 to 45,000 gallons for a max load, this is why airports are connected to the refineries by pipelines). Also, for take off the runaway has to be longer and clean(otherwise shit will be sucked into the engines and damage them). It's a big plane (like 200 feet across the wings and 200 feet long and weighs empty 166 tons). Try landing a 166 ton plane traveling at 150 mph plus on a road, remember the wings are 200 feet and it's night with no lights on. Oh and a lot of the area is hill, so no flat and level road. Would you drive a car that fast over a road at night with no lights? What do you thing would happen?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
We still haven't found Amelia Earhart, right?


Good point. I think Amelia Earhart hijacked it. I mean think about it - there isn't any evidence to point *against* that idea, right?

I bet the terrorist are planning on using her plane in a 911 attack. They think long term.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Is anyone else still searching on tomnod?


I had to stop because it was too depressing.
Anonymous
If the authorities 100% believed it crashed, we would have none of these issues with the back and forth.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
You would need a huge runway to land a Boeing 777. It's kinda hard to hide this plane!

There are huge runways all over the world -- they are called "roads" It is not an airport. People land planes all over the world outside of airports. Yes, it is a big plane, but many roads and fields are also big. Its a big world out there. 7000 ft = 1.5 miles.


Where are roads?

Roads are made where people are. If this was landed on a road, someone would have seen it (even if it was covered up by 50 tarps), or it would have pinged on land - because it landed where there are facets of civilization.


There are lots of abandoned places. I don't know how smooth a road you need in order to land (and whether you want the plane to be fly able again). It is a big world.

At night with no lights on...or do you have people on the ground turning lights on for plane ? You need like 1450 feet min to land that type of plane.... more if the winds are not right or the pilot is not great. Once it's on the ground(assuming the plane is not burning) you need to refuel(like 30,0000 to 45,000 gallons for a max load, this is why airports are connected to the refineries by pipelines). Also, for take off the runaway has to be longer and clean(otherwise shit will be sucked into the engines and damage them). It's a big plane (like 200 feet across the wings and 200 feet long and weighs empty 166 tons). Try landing a 166 ton plane traveling at 150 mph plus on a road, remember the wings are 200 feet and it's night with no lights on. Oh and a lot of the area is hill, so no flat and level road. Would you drive a car that fast over a road at night with no lights? What do you thing would happen?


The pilot had a simulator in his home. He loved flying and had the knowledge necessary to
Anonymous
They ain't finding this thing.
Anonymous
They are searching an area with a radius of 2500 miles. What that 19.6 million square miles?
Anonymous
It seems like there is a lot of private information, as well as incompetence. I hope it is eventually revealed and reported on.
Anonymous
My thought all along was that there was a malfunction causing the plane to crash. The latest news about the twenty defense experts on board, and the "manual intervention" though? It's perplexing.

Bottom line, something horrible happened. Those poor passengers and their families. My heart goes out to them.
Anonymous
More and more evidence that the plane was hijacked. I doubt it was hijacked by the friendly aliens form ET.
Anonymous
Satellite Data Reveal Route of Missing Malaysia Airlines Plane....The automatic pings, or attempts to link up with satellites operated by Inmarsat PLC, occurred a number of times after Flight 370's last verified position, the people briefed on the situation said, indicating that at least through those five hours, the Boeing Co. BA -2.04% 777 carrying 239 people remained intact and hadn't been destroyed in a crash, act of sabotage or explosion.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/ Wall Street Journal

Someone turned the tracking navigations systems off one by one....Don't think it was an alien.
Anonymous
So these "pings" are separate from the transponder communications, which had already been turned off ? I have been following a lot of this coverage but am getting confused as I don't know much about the communication of aircraft.

The article suggests after 4 hours the pings may have been disabled by someone on board. If they knew how to disable it, why wait 4 hours? What is the difference between pings and transponder?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have noticed the lack of public reporting about the pilot and other passengers. I imagine the investigators are scouring the lives of everyone on that plane. I am sure there is a lot of info that just isn't public yet, especially if they are trying to stop a secondary terrorist act. Could there be some advantage to publicly stating that they think the plane is deep in the Indian ocean while actually believing that it is on land somewhere?


They are reporting on it (not to be snarky) but you probably arent reading the right sources.

Ive seen pics plus details about the pilot. Also Malaysian authorities have already searched his home.

They have also reported about other passengers such as the male Chinese passenger who not too long ago took flight simulatiom training.


Yes, also another passenger from new zealand who was flyinh to Mongolia for a new job took off his wedding ring and watch before the flight and instructed his wife to give them to his two sons both under 3 years old should something happen to him.
Anonymous
They're saying (Reuters) that the plane was "deliberately flown" toward Andaman Islands.
Forum Index » Off-Topic
Go to: