Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody "throws showers" in England you're out of your goddamn minds.

That is an AMERICAN invention and may it stay firmly this side of the pond, thank you.

We don't need all that nonsense.

Yes but you do have hen dos and bridal parties. Don't act like Kate didn't have 3 major chances to welcome Meghan (not to mention be a representative of modern British conventions) and she missed all of them.

She doesn’t owe you anything, looney-tunes. And how do you know what private events they may have had?

Anything Kate does that might even be considered minimal effort is reported. It never would have gone unnoticed if she had done any of those three things.

And I get that you're protective over her but take a chill pill. Meghan has taken far more flack for much less.

No - anything kate does publicly is reported. You have no clue what went on behind closed doors - but from MM and Harry’s engagement interview where they single out Kate as being particularly amazing, to prince Charles walking MM down the aisle to the queen giving MM unprecedentedly rapid royal responsibilities - the family appear, at least publicly to be plenty welcoming.

And for those clamoring that the family should have stood up for MM when some of the nastier articles came out - I’m not sure why you were expecting that. They don’t even stand up for themselves when they get bad press. No one said a peep when they called Fergie the duchess of pork... which frankly is true bullying.

They stand up for themselves plenty.

William calling out his lawyers and complaining about his 'human rights' being violated after reports of cheating.

Kensington Palace issuing a notice that Kate does not use botox.

Prince Andrew doing a live national interview on BBC from Buckingham Palace refuting he slept with a 17-year-old.

William suing a French newspaper over Kate's nude photos.

And might I remind you that Buckingham Palace threatened a international AMERICAN media organization over their Prince Andrew allegations just last year.

The only thing they didn't do was stand-up for the biracial actress.

Pray do tell which article should Buckingham Palace have gone after, the Meghan holds her belly too much or the Avocado toast one?

They should have simply reorganized the ROTA. Oh, you want to print racist stories about the newest member of the family? you’re out. It could have been done quietly and easily and it would have shown that the royal family expects basic journalistic ethics of its press team.

This would have sent a strong message to the press and to the world.

Their silence also spoke volumes.

[Anonymous]

I don’t think that the reason the royal family did nothing was because they didn’t care. I think that Harry and Meghan didn’t ask them to help. Or H&M took matters into their own hands. The royal family has no experience with this exact problem so it might have required some planning and thought. I see no evidence that the Queen or Charles don’t have H&Ms best interest. The Royal family has a long line of ancestors who were ahead of their time wrt racial acceptance and tolerance.
The Prince Andrew thing was different. They had something serious to hide. They felt that they had no choice but to be aggressive with the press on that story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think that the reason the royal family did nothing was because they didn’t care. I think that Harry and Meghan didn’t ask them to help. Or H&M took matters into their own hands. The royal family has no experience with this exact problem so it might have required some planning and thought. I see no evidence that the Queen or Charles don’t have H&Ms best interest. The Royal family has a long line of ancestors who were ahead of their time wrt racial acceptance and tolerance.
The Prince Andrew thing was different. They had something serious to hide. They felt that they had no choice but to be aggressive with the press on that story.

Well the other thing is that the courtiers frequently control access to top royals, especially the Queen AND were the sources for some of these negative stories. So not sure that Harry could just waltz in and ask granny for help.

[Anonymous]

Nothing that was printed was overtly racist. And please don’t cite the tweet that got the guy immediately fired.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think that the reason the royal family did nothing was because they didn’t care. I think that Harry and Meghan didn’t ask them to help. Or H&M took matters into their own hands. The royal family has no experience with this exact problem so it might have required some planning and thought. I see no evidence that the Queen or Charles don’t have H&Ms best interest. The Royal family has a long line of ancestors who were ahead of their time wrt racial acceptance and tolerance.
The Prince Andrew thing was different. They had something serious to hide. They felt that they had no choice but to be aggressive with the press on that story.

Well the other thing is that the courtiers frequently control access to top royals, especially the Queen AND were the sources for some of these negative stories. So not sure that Harry could just waltz in and ask granny for help.

Queen told him that he had to work with his father (also imminently future king) and come up with a workable arrangement. He wasn’t getting what he wanted through those talks, so he tried to go above his father’s head. Initially Queen said yes to a visit, then was told this is no personal visit, Harry is looking to bypass Charles. Queen declined to meet him. He forced the issue publicly by publishing his wish list, knowing the Royals want scandals like this to go away quickly and would cave. He miscalculated.

And yes he does have the Queen’s private number and they do communicate informally, he has said so himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nothing that was printed was overtly racist. And please don’t cite the tweet that got the guy immediately fired.

The Compton headline was overtly racist. Are you blind as well as racist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think that the reason the royal family did nothing was because they didn’t care. I think that Harry and Meghan didn’t ask them to help. Or H&M took matters into their own hands. The royal family has no experience with this exact problem so it might have required some planning and thought. I see no evidence that the Queen or Charles don’t have H&Ms best interest. The Royal family has a long line of ancestors who were ahead of their time wrt racial acceptance and tolerance.
The Prince Andrew thing was different. They had something serious to hide. They felt that they had no choice but to be aggressive with the press on that story.

Well the other thing is that the courtiers frequently control access to top royals, especially the Queen AND were the sources for some of these negative stories. So not sure that Harry could just waltz in and ask granny for help.

Queen told him that he had to work with his father (also imminently future king) and come up with a workable arrangement. He wasn’t getting what he wanted through those talks, so he tried to go above his father’s head. Initially Queen said yes to a visit, then was told this is no personal visit, Harry is looking to bypass Charles. Queen declined to meet him. He forced the issue publicly by publishing his wish list, knowing the Royals want scandals like this to go away quickly and would cave. He miscalculated.

And yes he does have the Queen’s private number and they do communicate informally, he has said so himself.

Yep, acting like a spoiled brat. Queen called his bluff though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing that was printed was overtly racist. And please don’t cite the tweet that got the guy immediately fired.

The Compton headline was overtly racist. Are you blind as well as racist?

Please link to a racist headline since their engagement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing that was printed was overtly racist. And please don’t cite the tweet that got the guy immediately fired.

The Compton headline was overtly racist. Are you blind as well as racist?

Please link to a racist headline since their engagement.

The British press stopped with the outright racist headlines and stuck with passive-aggressive bullsh*t that both pushed boundaries and othered the biracial royal quite affectively.

They knew what they were doing.




None of this disrespect was shown to Kate M post-engagement or post-wedding. And yes - a reference to a word with a history of hatred attached to it globally and overtly sexualizing the fiance on the day of her wedding is BS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing that was printed was overtly racist. And please don’t cite the tweet that got the guy immediately fired.

The Compton headline was overtly racist. Are you blind as well as racist?

Please link to a racist headline since their engagement.

The British press stopped with the outright racist headlines and stuck with passive-aggressive bullsh*t that both pushed boundaries and othered the biracial royal quite affectively.

They knew what they were doing.

None of this disrespect was shown to Kate M post-engagement or post-wedding. And yes - a reference to a word with a history of hatred attached to it globally and overtly sexualizing the fiance on the day of her wedding is BS.

So none then.

But I do recall an overtly racist incident when that relative of Harry’s wore a blackamour to the engagement or Christmas party. The media were up in roars, but no peep from Harry or Meghan.

I get it the media is a convenient target, as is convenient to use the race card.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing that was printed was overtly racist. And please don’t cite the tweet that got the guy immediately fired.

The Compton headline was overtly racist. Are you blind as well as racist?

Please link to a racist headline since their engagement.

The British press stopped with the outright racist headlines and stuck with passive-aggressive bullsh*t that both pushed boundaries and othered the biracial royal quite affectively.

They knew what they were doing.

None of this disrespect was shown to Kate M post-engagement or post-wedding. And yes - a reference to a word with a history of hatred attached to it globally and overtly sexualizing the fiance on the day of her wedding is BS.

So none then.

But I do recall an overtly racist incident when that relative of Harry’s wore a blackamour to the engagement or Christmas party. The media were up in roars, but no peep from Harry or Meghan.

I get it the media is a convenient target, as is convenient to use the race card.

That relative of Harry's?? You mean the Queen's first cousin - HRH The Princess Michael of Kent?

That is exactly what we're talking about. She wore this to MEET Meghan. If she thought she could get away with this racism, what must of Harry and Meghan been dealing with behind the scenes with courtiers, staffers, and other royals?

[Anonymous]

Will Harry and Megan be at the Oscars on Feb 24?

[Anonymous]

re: racism!

I really don’t think anyone cares that she has a small amount of African ancestry. She passes for a fit middle aged Caucasian woman. I just think clever people saw thru her conniving manipulating status obsessed BS. And of course the royal family’s background check on her no doubt confirmed all their suspicions and more. Harry the halfwit married her anyways. This “show” and her separating Harry from his family (and his country) is her MO. She needs to seek a shrink far more than she needs to seek voiceover gigs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Will Harry and Megan be at the Oscars on Feb 24?

No. But Kate and William will be at the BAFTAs on Feb 2. Funny how 'hollywood' some royals are and some aren't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will Harry and Megan be at the Oscars on Feb 24?

No. But Kate and William will be at the BAFTAs on Feb 2. Funny how 'hollywood' some royals are and some aren't.

They go every year. B stands for British. It’s not called the HAFTAs.