Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Lol. Ok. Whatever you say anonymous board poster. How shall I sleep tonight? Some of you crazy Meghan fans are way too invested in this. |
There were 6k comments on Daily Mail just yesterday on the green tax article. They were not pretty, and the man is about to be king. Not that I have any sympathy for him, but the man has been torn apart and for years Brits demanded that the queen skip him in the line of succession. |
This is all for fun. It’s not affecting anyone’s mental health. It’s like watching (reading) a reality show. |
Surprise - the BRF whipping girl (Meghan) is gone so they have to turn on SOMEONE. Prince Charles calls for green TAXES as he meets Greta Thunberg in Davos (after flying in on a private jet) and pitches radical new world economy to tackle climate change - a day after Donald Trump rejected 'prophets of doom' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7915307/Prince-Charles-flies-Davos-jet-emitting-six-tonnes-carbon-launch-sustainable-project.html Charles got one article of bad comments. There were 300 negative articles posted about Meghan on the Daily Mail alone in the month she was giving birth - everything from she's having a drastic water birth to she has foreign doulas not doctors to not announcing the exact date of delivery to not coming out on those blasted steps hours after birth. They whined about everything and if they couldn't - they made it up. At the most critical time in a woman's life when her child is about to be born. The British press are sh*t. |
Lol, you clearly have no idea how much and what kind of press Charles has received for DECADES. They published the most embarrassing tapes of the man who would be king. |
As covered previously - embarrassing articles about Charles in regards to his INFIDELITY are fair game. He was issuing press releases left-and-right in the 90s denying he was having an affair meanwhile he was shaking up with his mistress for going on 20 years by then. It is not negative slander when its TRUE. And the fact that Charles threw pie in Britain (and the press who covered for him faces) when he actually married the mistress is worse. I am convinced the British press would have conveniently denied Camilla's existence until the day he died if he hadn't stepped up to marry her. So yeah - attacking Meghan on things like dark nail polish is in no way the same as publishing proof that Charles was a philanderer. |
Were there 6k comments about his jet hopping before The Duchess of Sussex left Britain? |
Nope, and the negative headlines were reserved for her alone as well. Pre-Meghan leaving it would have been framed like this - Three princes and a national treasure! William and Harry join their father for a rare joint engagement as they attend the premiere of Sir David Attenborough's new series Our Planet Same topic and shill but framed as a shining example of greatness. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6887257/Charles-William-Harry-arrive-Netflix-premiere-Sir-David-Attenboroughs-series-Planet.html |
Wow. I cannot imagine being so invested in a celebrity wedding that I cried. No wonder you hate MM so much. You view her leaving the UK as an extremely personal betrayal, something directed at you personally. You've given me good insight into the minds of Meghan's unusually vicious haters, and I am glad you posted. It's eye-opening. |
Yeah ok. It was the same as crying at a movie that moves you. American African American girl becoming a Princess was moving and so fun see. I love how MM stans attack random anonymous posters because are blinded by a narcissist. But it's ok, I don't take it personally because watching this narc bring down the royal family this is all just entertainment. One big reality show. Pass the popcorn please! Lol! |
Yeah ok. It was the same as crying at a movie that moves you. American African American girl becoming a Princess was moving and so fun see. I love how MM stans attack random anonymous posters because are blinded by a narcissist. But it's ok, I don't take it personally because watching this narc bring down the royal family this is all just entertainment. One big reality show. Pass the popcorn please! Lol! |
Oh, I am not a stan. I think they'll be divorced in less than a few years, and I don't think they are going to make a fortune at some ex-royal lifestyle brand. I also think both of them come from totally awful families, and are therefore likely to be awful themselves (I still remember Harry the Nazi). I am fascinated by her haters, though. Their level of hatred is so deeply personalized that it's been an interesting puzzle to figure out. |
There weren’t any about Meghan and Harry either, until they decided to take FOUR in the span of two weeks for a FAMILY VACATION. It reeked of “Marie Antoinette” and it followed several other such displays.
|
I am equally fascinated and puzzled by the rabid fans who come in guns blazing to try and refute and defend Meghan against any criticism. The idea that she is above reproach and totally faultless is bizarre. Some people in here expend a whole lot of energy fighting people with differing opinions and labeling every criticism as "hate". Stop reading tabloids you disagree with, easy peasy. Stop internalizing criticism made against a public figure you have never met and will never know. Live and let live. Meghan has made some gaffes and mistakes and may even regret some of her own decisions. So people discuss that. why is that so problematic for some people? |
|
What's fascinating or puzzling about blind allegiance?
It's not like it's anything new. |