Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mitchell is in way over her head. This is going to back fire. She is used to acting as a prosector, and asking questions she already knows the answer to. She's not going to get anything from Ford. It's almost like she is gearing up or fishing for a "catch you in a lie" question, and it's making Ford look highly sympathetic. Plus, Mitchell is not managing her time well by digging into details and asking question after question and then getting interrupted by her time being up. Mitchell is swimming in this so far and she is drowning.

Agreed. This focus on minutiaie is really aggravating.

Because you'd rather hear the 'brave brave girl' narrative. The truth is, the devil is in the details.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s not credible. Bubbling. Random weird details.

Love the part where the epinephrine (?) in her brain helps her remember..........

[Anonymous]

Mark judge needs to address this story.

[Anonymous]

Wonder if R's are thinking WTF?

The prosecutor is asking her to confirm her childhood home's location with their minutes

Nice job -- hammer them for not subpoenaing Mark Judge

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love this prosecutor. She’s no bull.

Yes. She doesn't believe her.

It's her job to not believe her. They had to go all the way out to Arizona and Joe Arpaio country to find her.

She's punching holes all over the story

No, not at all.

I haven’t heard any holes either.

I don't see any holes so far. This situation is so common you have no idea.

[Anonymous]

One of the biggest factors in a murder investigation is motive. Why would this person be murdered? Who are their enemies?

Rape and sexual assault is often times, an evidence-less crime, or a crime full of circumstantial evidence that can be explained away. So why don't we look more at the motive? What is the motive for Kavanaugh to lie? He has many, many reasons. What is Dr. Ford's motive to lie?

Anyone? Anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Teach your kids to speak up when they are the target of assault, or witnesses anything that's not right.

Are you people doing this?

Guess what is the BEST way to teach them?

Believe victims who come forward. If we changed our reactions to victims coming forward it would DRAMATICALLY change the reporting stats.

+1,000,000
Well said.

And once more for the people in the back.

How are we supposed to believe the victims when women clearly lie just as often as men? Did you not see the Brian Banks case that was just resolved? He served 6 years in jail for a rape he didn’t commit and had his whole life ruined. That is a good reason to take a step back in these situations I’d say

Tell Grassley that, not Ford.

I’m not telling Ford that. I’m just saying the “believe all women” narrative leaves no room for nuance/liars/human error

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s not credible. Bubbling. Random weird details.

Love the part where the epinephrine (?) in her brain helps her remember..........

So true. Time slows down and the traumatic event is vivid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mitchell is doing a good job. She is really revealing holes in her memory.

No, she's not

+1 Mitchell is doing a good job of trying to establish the facts of the story, and to get clarification and more detail on key elements. Those are not holes, no matter how much you want them to be.

Ford just admitted to not hearing conversation, yet claimed the people downstairs were talking in her letter and testimony.
May seem small.... but details like this are important since she lacks so many other details.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s not credible. Bubbling. Random weird details.

Love the part where the epinephrine (?) in her brain helps her remember..........

Epinephrine is adrenaline. I had no idea it had anything to do with forming memories.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mitchell is doing a good job. She is really revealing holes in her memory.

+1 It's Recovered Memory, which research indicates is not always accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s not credible. Bubbling. Random weird details.

Love the part where the epinephrine (?) in her brain helps her remember..........

They actually asked her "how do you know this happened to you?" WTF kind of question is that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Teach your kids to speak up when they are the target of assault, or witnesses anything that's not right.

Are you people doing this?

Guess what is the BEST way to teach them?

Believe victims who come forward. If we changed our reactions to victims coming forward it would DRAMATICALLY change the reporting stats.

+1,000,000
Well said.

And once more for the people in the back.

How are we supposed to believe the victims when women clearly lie just as often as men? Did you not see the Brian Banks case that was just resolved? He served 6 years in jail for a rape he didn’t commit and had his whole life ruined. That is a good reason to take a step back in these situations I’d say

Tell Grassley that, not Ford.

I’m not telling Ford that. I’m just saying the “believe all women” narrative leaves no room for nuance/liars/human error

I quoted your "step back", which I took to mean "slow down". If you actually meant, don't bother with this, then I guess I misunderstood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if R's are thinking WTF?

The prosecutor is asking her to confirm her childhood home's location with their minutes

Nice job -- hammer them for not subpoenaing Mark Judge

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
I’m not telling Ford that. I’m just saying the “believe all women” narrative leaves no room for nuance/liars/human error

I think that we can not believe all women but still believe Kavanaugh assaulted women.

For example, I think the Duke Lacrosse thing, the Columbia U mattress girl, etc are horrible, but these accusers seem much more credible

Kavanaugh is the one acting like a liar. Won't even have his buddy Mark testify in his defense