Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

Mitchell is doing a good job. She is really revealing holes in her memory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mitchell is doing a good job. She is really revealing holes in her memory.

No, she's not

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mitchell is doing a good job. She is really revealing holes in her memory.

But not that this didn't happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This woman’s babbling about brain chemicals sounds cray cray.

She is a research psychologist who has likely had training in neuroanatomy, memory, emotion, etc. She said that the memory of their laughter was "indelible in the hippocampus." Sorry that you didn't quite understand that.

I understand that’s her background but she sounds like an idiot. Sorry.

More importantly, that's simply meant to seem believable because a technical word was used.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Both prosecutor Mitchell (pardon me, "the female assistant") and Dr. Blasey Ford are coming across as highly personable. Dr. Blasey Ford seems genuine and credible.

Is the prosecutor slated to ask judge Kavanaugh questions as well? Wouldn't it be something if she helped the accuser's credibility and punctured the accused's? It would be retribution for senator Grassley's "female assistant" comment.

Is the prosecutor questioning Kavanaugh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Teach your kids to speak up when they are the target of assault, or witnesses anything that's not right.

Are you people doing this?

Guess what is the BEST way to teach them?

Believe victims who come forward. If we changed our reactions to victims coming forward it would DRAMATICALLY change the reporting stats.

+1,000,000
Well said.

And once more for the people in the back.

How are we supposed to believe the victims when women clearly lie just as often as men? Did you not see the Brian Banks case that was just resolved? He served 6 years in jail for a rape he didn’t commit and had his whole life ruined. That is a good reason to take a step back in these situations I’d say

[Anonymous]

Why the hell wouldn’t they give copies of the documents to the SJC members? Bizarre.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Teach your kids to speak up when they are the target of assault, or witnesses anything that's not right.

Are you people doing this?

Guess what is the BEST way to teach them?

Believe victims who come forward. If we changed our reactions to victims coming forward it would DRAMATICALLY change the reporting stats.

+1,000,000
Well said.

And once more for the people in the back.

And, once more for the people who “believe” regardless of evidence.....
Women do not ALWAYS tell the truth. That has been proven. Evidence is what helps convict. Not “belief.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mitchell is doing a good job. She is really revealing holes in her memory.

That's very well-put. Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Teach your kids to speak up when they are the target of assault, or witnesses anything that's not right.

Are you people doing this?

Guess what is the BEST way to teach them?

Believe victims who come forward. If we changed our reactions to victims coming forward it would DRAMATICALLY change the reporting stats.

+1,000,000
Well said.

And once more for the people in the back.

How are we supposed to believe the victims when women clearly lie just as often as men? Did you not see the Brian Banks case that was just resolved? He served 6 years in jail for a rape he didn’t commit and had his whole life ruined. That is a good reason to take a step back in these situations I’d say

Tell Grassley that, not Ford.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mitchell is in way over her head. This is going to back fire. She is used to acting as a prosector, and asking questions she already knows the answer to. She's not going to get anything from Ford. It's almost like she is gearing up or fishing for a "catch you in a lie" question, and it's making Ford look highly sympathetic. Plus, Mitchell is not managing her time well by digging into details and asking question after question and then getting interrupted by her time being up. Mitchell is swimming in this so far and she is drowning.

Agreed. This focus on minutiaie is really aggravating.

[Anonymous]

Listen to the narrative from the Dems. That's telling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love this prosecutor. She’s no bull.

Yes. She doesn't believe her.

It's her job to not believe her. They had to go all the way out to Arizona and Joe Arpaio country to find her.

She's punching holes all over the story

No, not at all.

I haven’t heard any holes either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Both prosecutor Mitchell (pardon me, "the female assistant") and Dr. Blasey Ford are coming across as highly personable. Dr. Blasey Ford seems genuine and credible.

Is the prosecutor slated to ask judge Kavanaugh questions as well? Wouldn't it be something if she helped the accuser's credibility and punctured the accused's? It would be retribution for senator Grassley's "female assistant" comment.

Is the prosecutor questioning Kavanaugh?

I doubt it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mitchell is doing a good job. She is really revealing holes in her memory.

No, she's not

+1 Mitchell is doing a good job of trying to establish the facts of the story, and to get clarification and more detail on key elements. Those are not holes, no matter how much you want them to be.