Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Fairfax Murder
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Maybe she is still there by choice and has cut ties with the Au Pair agency. |
Anonymous
If the au pair is still there, clearly dad and au pair are having affair. They killed off mom. |
Anonymous
Uh, right. |
Anonymous
How do you know this? |
Anonymous
of course that is true... of course it was a planned murder of the wife, but not by Joe who had not known Christine for a long time. It was the husband and the Au Pair and the case is NOT closed at all. Yes the case is still open. You can say whatever you want about the case but everyone that knew Joe Ryan even a bit knows he did NOT do this. He wasn't violent with women. He did not have a mental break at 39 and all of the sudden become a killer of women. That doesn't even happen. He did not stalk or date the Au Pair. He had a consensual relationship and was killed by the husband and possibly the Au Pair. When the 911 call came through and was hung up on with no words, then dialed 13 minutes later with enough time to make sure everyone was fully dead and then speak... you dont call and then hang up and then wait 13 minutes when you had nothing to do with murdering your wife, you call for help. The killers are still free, and the case is still open. |
Anonymous
Right?! I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but IF the Au pair is still there, that is suspicious. Most Au pairs would be out of there so fast… |
Anonymous
| I don’t buy this story, because it would be hard if not impossible for the husband to stab the wife and then pretend the dead guy did it. There wasn’t time for a clean up and if there was, there’d be forensic evidence of it. The forensics should show who did the stabbing. I’m buying the husband’s story. |
Anonymous
the case is still open, it took how long before some cases come to trial or someone is arrested. It can take months to a year before the case goes to trial. The husband was in federal crime investigation. He would clearly understand aspects of the law. |
Anonymous
Of course DCUM is insisting the au pair and husband have been in an affair but no one dares think: Maybe the au pair is staying for the daughter and the dad is keeping the au pair around for the daughter and not for himself. But of course, around these forums, "au pair" is always translated as another type of "AP," affair partner. Because it's not salacious fun for the posters here unless there's illicit sex to speculate about. |
Anonymous
| If au pair is not allowed to leave the country, it would make sense that she’s still living with dad. Where else would she go? |
Anonymous
How many times are people going to express surprise that some psychopath put flattering posts of themselves on Facebook. FB is not people's real life guys. You should know that BY NOW. (And murderers do not come with warning labels. Which is why our society's default policy should not be, "Let's give everyone a gun, and see who can handle access to a lethal weapon.") |
Anonymous
In this case the husband is the gun and weapons owner. Ryan had no criminal record of violence, stalking, sexual violence, or any crimes at all. Rarely do people have a violent breakdown at age 39. No one is lusting after blaming anyone for what they do as consenting adults. The facts seem to be that Ryan was there consensually. I'm not playing sleuth here. I am saying based on what I know I see it as the husband with the knowledge and aid of the Au Pair, I have no idea if they had an affair but I believe the thirteen minute phone call silent phone drop while your wife bleeds out is beyond damning. |
Anonymous
I am with you but interested in your thoughts on the husband leaving for work, then coming back when the au pair called him...? |
Anonymous
Without the husband leaving for work he would have no way to claim he walked in on his wife being murdered. Why did he return home? Since he did not tell the police anything on the day of the murders that was never reported on. It is also maybe likely Ryan would not have entered the home and been found in the bedroom WITH Christine if the husband was still home. The husband leaving for work gave him opportunity to come back and accuse Ryan of killing Christine and then an excuse to shift blame and kill Ryan. It feels like a preplanned set up from a man in Federal Law Enforcement for the IRS to get rid of his wife, and to escape being held responsible. What did Ryan have to gain? NOTHING what did husband have to gain? a free life without a wife, custody of his daughter, I don't know as I am not a murderer. |
Anonymous
| You can’t shoot someone and then stab someone and stage it to seem like the shot guy stabbed. And you can’t stage that the guy you haven’t shot yet stabbed someone. And the person you haven’t shot/stabbed isn’t hanging around waiting for you to finish the other part. It doesn’t make sense. If the husband did it, he would have shot them both. |