Why the name calling? Why do you care that many of us on this thread are able to overcome whatever (wiring or laziness or whatever) and maintain a healthy weight? No one cares that you are obese and want to take a drug to lose weight. There are plenty of healthy, low calorie foods that taste good. When I was having a health issue I went to a provider who advised that I eat and move like my geat grandmother. That generation did not eat processed food or lead sedentary lifestyles. Once I made the changes the health issue disappeared. It wasn't easy and it cost more money and took longer than take out, but I didn't want to take the medicine. Good luck to you. |
DP. Have you seen Eugenia Cooney, Karen Carpenter, or other completely emaciated women ... those people can barely survive (Karen didn't) as their organs fail and no one can call them healthy. That's what happens eventually if you keep losing weight. Corollary question: can you see why comparing everyone in a group to extremes is offensive and stupid? |
Should we talk about the anorexic lifestyle, and how bulemic teeth rot occurs and lanugo hairs break out over your body to try to keep you warm enough to survive, and ask you why you want to live like that? |
I’m very glad you are able to maintain a happy weight without pharmaceutical or surgical intervention. Love that for you. Unfortunately, many many people aren’t. To say that it’s as simple as eating less and moving more is asinine. If it was so simple, nearly half of people in our country wouldn’t be obese. |
Pp and others who believe people need to just suck it up and eat healthy believe that obesity is a moral failing, not a medical problem. The rest of us are over here talking about this from a policy and health perspective and they are in another place. |
I would say you are definitely on another planet, no doubt. Your argument about obesity being a "moral failing" is hogwash. Choosing to eat horrible food is simply a choice and has nothing to do with morality. Same thing goes for refusing to exercise. I guess some people would call it laziness, but calling it a moral failing is a huge stretch. |
You may be bigger than your adoptive mom but that doesn’t make you unhealthy. People come in all shapes. Some people are just naturally bigger than others. That should be considered ok. |
Why are half of people in our country obese now? It didn't used to be that way. Can one of our internet scientists answer that question? |
Approximately 10 percent of U.S. adults were classified as having obesity during the 1950s. Today it is over 41 percent. Do you think lifestyle choices such as big gulps, fast food, driving vs walking, desk jobs, and watching TV has anything to do with the increase? What has changed? Why was 90 percent of the population a healthy weight then? |
You’re sooo close to the point. Telling people to eat less and move more does not fix any of the above. It also doesn’t help people be less fat. So we can either overhaul society and fix the current food and lifestyle environment (not likely) or encourage the use of tools like Ozempic etc to help people achieve and maintain a healthy weight in our current environment. |
NP. Well said. They are getting left behind fortunately, and sound increasingly like old men shaking their fists at clouds. |
Because they eat unhealthy food and don't exercise! And they keep gaining and gaining until they reach a point of no return, where they have no choice left but drugs or surgery. Which is good that those options are available. I don't begrudge them those tools as an average weight person because I enjoy my healthy lifestyle that works for me. If some day it stops working for me, I hope that drugs and surgery are available if I need them. Just like cancer treatments or whatever. |
Yes, agree, anorexia and bulimia are also terrible. What is your point? The PP said we should accept that fat = healthy. No, neither too fat nor too skinny are healthy. |
Again, yes, it is also bad to be too skinny, just as it is to be too fat. |
Why not do both? |