Fire in upper NW?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The house had a security system, so the security company and the police probably had several contact numbers, including Savvas' office at AIW.

A neighbor may have had the office number, but any neighbor who knew the name of the business could have looked up the number and called.

When a house is on fire, a lot of people immediately try to contact the owner.

You newbies are a piece of work. The alarm system was disabled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bruce Leshan is now reporting that police failed to find anything from the search warrant for JW's car and that police are not even calling JW a person of interest.

http://www.wusa9.com/videos/news/local/dc/2015/06/04/28501343/

He never has been called a person of interest by police or anyone w/ any knowledge of the case...only by people speculating here

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The house had a security system, so the security company and the police probably had several contact numbers, including Savvas' office at AIW.

A neighbor may have had the office number, but any neighbor who knew the name of the business could have looked up the number and called.

When a house is on fire, a lot of people immediately try to contact the owner.

You newbies are a piece of work. The alarm system was disabled.

Not saying the alarm system went off. Explaining that the office number of the home owner was not some mysterious secret. Fire/police would try to contact homeowner and would contact security company for contact number if they didn't already have it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bruce Leshan is now reporting that police failed to find anything from the search warrant for JW's car and that police are not even calling JW a person of interest.

http://www.wusa9.com/videos/news/local/dc/2015/06/04/28501343/

Maybe Bruce should have asked the police that before he stirred up a mob against Wallace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Okay - neighbor calls AIW. AIW immediately starts trying to contact Savvas unsuccessfully. They try his home, his cell. They try his wife. They then try his driver/assistant, who either is with him or may have a clue where he is.

Driver, having just deposited a crazy amount of money at the house, zooms to house. Save the money for the boss! Yikes!

I guess it is all plausible. The only piece it depends on is a neighbor calling AIW. Without that, it is farfetched.

Obviously, there is someone in the neighborhood who knows s/he called AIW. Obviously, there is someone at AIW who made a slew of calls at that point. Obviously, there's a record of the call from AIW to JW. So our speculation is unnecessary; the police have all the information necessary to evaluate whether his decision to zoom to the house is credible.

One question is why calls from Savvas were unanswered after drop off of package by JW.

[Anonymous]

I don't know if it's just one person or a particular dynamic, but saying things like "you newbies are a piece of work" is insulting. Why are you being so rude to other posters? Isn't there a way that you could communicate your substantive point (disabled alarm system) without being condescending, rude, and disdainful?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if it's just one person or a particular dynamic, but saying things like "you newbies are a piece of work" is insulting. Why are you being so rude to other posters? Isn't there a way that you could communicate your substantive point (disabled alarm system) without being condescending, rude, and disdainful?

I've been following this thread since almost the beginning and I totally agree about rude comments like this. What's the point? What are you trying to prove? Why can't you resist the urge to just NOT respond if you can't respond without being rude or snarky?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if it's just one person or a particular dynamic, but saying things like "you newbies are a piece of work" is insulting. Why are you being so rude to other posters? Isn't there a way that you could communicate your substantive point (disabled alarm system) without being condescending, rude, and disdainful?

I've been following this thread since almost the beginning and I totally agree about rude comments like this. What's the point? What are you trying to prove? Why can't you resist the urge to just NOT respond if you can't respond without being rude or snarky?

meant to say "and" just not respond

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if it's just one person or a particular dynamic, but saying things like "you newbies are a piece of work" is insulting. Why are you being so rude to other posters? Isn't there a way that you could communicate your substantive point (disabled alarm system) without being condescending, rude, and disdainful?

I've been following this thread since almost the beginning and I totally agree about rude comments like this. What's the point? What are you trying to prove? Why can't you resist the urge to just NOT respond if you can't respond without being rude or snarky?

Plus, the snarky reply was wrong. The poster had not said the alarm was on, but that if you have an alarm system, the police have your contact numbers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if it's just one person or a particular dynamic, but saying things like "you newbies are a piece of work" is insulting. Why are you being so rude to other posters? Isn't there a way that you could communicate your substantive point (disabled alarm system) without being condescending, rude, and disdainful?

It happens on every forum. Veteran posters believe they own the conversation.

[Anonymous]

It's one thing to say, "hey, we actually covered that several pages ago." That isn't rude, it's a heads up that more in-depth discussion can be found several pages prior. It's the extremely negative tone, and sometimes ad hominem attacks, that are completely unwarranted. I actually came to this forum on about day 3 because the WaPo comments section was abhorrent, rude, and racist.

[Anonymous]

Just saw on Fox news that the investigation has shifted to the assistant. They focused on fact that the camera was stolen from the house prior to the crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bruce Leshan is now reporting that police failed to find anything from the search warrant for JW's car and that police are not even calling JW a person of interest.

http://www.wusa9.com/videos/news/local/dc/2015/06/04/28501343/

Maybe Bruce should have asked the police that before he stirred up a mob against Wallace.

JW has not been cleared by the police that we know of. Leshan merely stated that they didn't find anything as a result of the search warrant. We have insufficient information to come to a conclusion with respect to JW one way or another.

[Anonymous]

Maybe we should just move past JW discussion and see what factual info evolves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe we should just move past JW discussion and see what factual info evolves.

but then we will have nothing do discuss...