
WRONG. NOT Murder learn science. Her body her choice. Not to mention Roe vs Wade still law. According to your guy Kavanaugh it's "settled law" unless he lied under oath? Also, not your business. |
Even if you and she already had children? So you'd rip up their existing lives by divorcing? |
MURDER ..IT IS...her chice ended when she agreed to take in the dick..
Pro life and proud |
Thank goodness the law disagrees with you. And even if it didn’t, thank goodness there are always ways. |
If you think it's gross, I can give him your number and you can help him navigate senior citizen life. Since you are so pro life and all. I hope you have adopted several foster children yourself and deal with their issues, if you are so freaking pro life. That's one thing the "pro life" people never talk about, what happens to the kids women are forced to have that they don't want, and what kind of lives those children have. My grandparents really did try, and loved him, but neither wanted a surprise (and difficult) child so late in life (right before menopause, mid 40s) in the 1950s. |
Oh yeah, and pre birth control, if you didn't want kids you just couldn't have sex. That's how my other set of grandparents did it in the old days; once my grandma decided she was done after 4 kids, she never had sex with granddad again. He eventually found another lady who would. Worked for Grandma, as long as he still loved there,gave her half his check and kept it on the down low.
So if you are so grossed out, you are looking at a life of no sex after you have had the number of children you want, because slip ups always happen. The only way to make sure. These are the old fashioned types of lives forced birthers (pro lifers) want to go back to. |
Plenty on the ultra left single issue vote on this as well, because they have you all think Conservatives are coming for your uterus, which is insane. But that’s another topic. If she aborts his kid, he certainly has every right to divorce her. As I said that’s a fundamental difference in values and a marital issue that will likely never heal. They’ll both be happier in the long run. |
Heck yes I would. What’s left of it but tatters anyway, after she kills his child. Good God people are selfish. It may be her right to kill the baby, but it’s also his right to be unchained from a Salomé |
Um, you realize the original Bible text says a fetus is not alive till it draws first breath, right? And that conservatives changed the Bible translation in the 70s to get “useful idiot” religious people (yes, this is what the GOP elite call you in private) to vote for the billionaires’ agenda, yes? Today it’s obvious to anyone who cares to look: anyone who ACTUALLY cares about sanctity of life would be prioritizing actual kids’ healthcare over tax cuts. But most religious people, Brett Kavanaugh being a notable example, do not. The majority of anti-abortion people in America are either hypocrites or fools and idiots getting used by billionaires. |
How about open adoption? It seems the best of both worlds. You'll know your baby son or daughter and make someone's dream come true without paying a penny. |
|
No, I am not aware of this. I am aware that some Protestant demonstional views have shifted right in response to abortion demand being used as birth control, but I am not aware of the text of the Bible, which is used across many denominations, was revised in the 70s for political purposes. Please educate me. |
I don’t see it as a sanctity if life issue. It’s a marriage issue. And I would either have to be on board as the co-parent father or not. We would have to make the decision together. It’s not like she is a random hookup. |
Please provide the Biblical citation where it says a fetus is not alive until it draws it's first breath? |
NO ONE used abortion as birth control. Yet another mind control talking point fed to you by republicans who need to manipulate the dumbest base in america. Southern baptist weren't opposed to abortion until the 80s when it became politically convenient. |