Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fun Fact; There were more people (29) that took down Stone than Osama bin Laden (11)

More people were scheduled to take down bin Laden but one of the helicopters crashed.

And what makes you think Stone would just go willingly?

Actually, it was 23 navy seals who went for Osama Bin Laden. Yes, a copter crashed, but it did so on landing and didn't hurt anyone on board, so they participated in the raid.
https://www.cnn.com/2016/05/02/politics/obama-osama-bin-laden-raid-helicopter-crash/index.html

As for the crazy NYDaily News article you posted..... really? You think this is an indication that Stone is a violent person? Someone who would go out with guns blazing even though he has never shown himself to be violent or aggressive?

Face it.... The FBI totally overdid the arrest, likely on orders from Mueller. And, if you think the CNN crew was there because they had a "gut feeling" that he would be arrested, well, as the saying goes..., I have a bridge to sell you.

Stone is not so special. He's just been charged with crimes, just like all the others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fun Fact; There were more people (29) that took down Stone than Osama bin Laden (11)

Your fun fact is stupid. No one was going in to kill Stone, unlike Bin Laden. Additionally, they were there to also seize property. FBI often goes with US Marshals for these arrests to ensure they have wide range of seizure capabilities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fun Fact; There were more people (29) that took down Stone than Osama bin Laden (11)

Your fun fact is stupid. No one was going in to kill Stone, unlike Bin Laden. Additionally, they were there to also seize property. FBI often goes with US Marshals for these arrests to ensure they have wide range of seizure capabilities.

The fun fact that CNN was tipped to this take down and not Bin Laden's reminds me the stupidity of an investigation into Russian collusion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fun Fact; There were more people (29) that took down Stone than Osama bin Laden (11)

Your fun fact is stupid. No one was going in to kill Stone, unlike Bin Laden. Additionally, they were there to also seize property. FBI often goes with US Marshals for these arrests to ensure they have wide range of seizure capabilities.

The fun fact that CNN was tipped to this take down and not Bin Laden's reminds me the stupidity of an investigation into Russian collusion.

CNN has a reporter sitting on Stone’s house round the clock. It doesn’t take a genius to know he was going to be arrested. Stone has a big f*king mouth.

[Anonymous]

Guys, the most important thing about all of this obviously that a lot of FBI agents were used to bring Stone in, and not the fact that he may have worked wuth Russians illegally and do benefit the trump campaign against Hillary. I mean they had several agents! It’s a travesty of justice! roGer stone is an upstanding gentleman who worked with patriots like Nixon! Also, CNN was tipped off by the deep state. And Atlantis is real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guys, the most important thing about all of this obviously that a lot of FBI agents were used to bring Stone in, and not the fact that he may have worked wuth Russians illegally and do benefit the trump campaign against Hillary. I mean they had several agents! It’s a travesty of justice! roGer stone is an upstanding gentleman who worked with patriots like Nixon! Also, CNN was tipped off by the deep state. And Atlantis is real.

Strange things are afoot in the Comet Ping Pong basement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guys, the most important thing about all of this obviously that a lot of FBI agents were used to bring Stone in, and not the fact that he may have worked wuth Russians illegally and do benefit the trump campaign against Hillary. I mean they had several agents! It’s a travesty of justice! roGer stone is an upstanding gentleman who worked with patriots like Nixon! Also, CNN was tipped off by the deep state. And Atlantis is real.

Ummm....ok.

[Anonymous]

Deep State is a fantasy. Let me guess you also believe in the Illuminati, too. Does the Deep State report to the Trilateral Commission, who is staffed by the lizard people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guys, the most important thing about all of this obviously that a lot of FBI agents were used to bring Stone in, and not the fact that he may have worked wuth Russians illegally and do benefit the trump campaign against Hillary. I mean they had several agents! It’s a travesty of justice! roGer stone is an upstanding gentleman who worked with patriots like Nixon! Also, CNN was tipped off by the deep state. And Atlantis is real.

OMGERD!!!! SEVERAL AGENTS?!?!?!?! PANIC!!!!

[Anonymous]

So his lawyers managed to finally get admitted pro hac vice to plead him not guilty today in DC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fun Fact; There were more people (29) that took down Stone than Osama bin Laden (11)

Your fun fact is stupid. No one was going in to kill Stone, unlike Bin Laden. Additionally, they were there to also seize property. FBI often goes with US Marshals for these arrests to ensure they have wide range of seizure capabilities.

The fun fact that CNN was tipped to this take down and not Bin Laden's reminds me the stupidity of an investigation into Russian collusion.

Stop watching Fox news. It is poisoning your brain.

In the real world, there are journalists who stake out suspects ALL THE TIME. I have done it myself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump is sharing his orange make up with Stone. He's got it on and there is a big line where he missed a spot applying it. Maybe he should get some tips from Mr. Trump.

Liberal: I can’t argue with the truth so I’m going to say something stupid

Ummm, what? This is just a comment about Stone's stupid make up. Thought it would liven the debate or at the very least make someone chuckle. It is a bit ridiculous defending this media hound, don't ya think?

Your comment was beyond vapid. I'm not defending anyone - I'm simply interested in equal application under the law. The FBI seems to be weaponized for the Democrats, as I don't see Abedin nor Mills being perp-walked.

What did they do wrong? What have they been charged with? The GOP had two years to investigate them. Did they?

Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey -- they are not Dems

You seem to believe that reality and laws have a liberal bias.

All protect Hillary

Yeah Comey protected her so much that she lost the election.

He actually did try to protect her but it backfired.

Because being stupid about emails is not illegal and not unAmerican.

She was freaking Secretary of State and supposedly a brilliant woman. You think she had no clue? Really?

Lol Ivanka didn't know better.

C'mon, everyone is so stupid about email. Not everyone has clandestine Russian contacts.

So you think Hillary had no clue. That says loads

I don't think Hillary was a great candidate. But given the alternative, someone with no clue about so many things?

You can love Trump, if you want. And everyone who comes along with him, including Cohen, Manafort, Stone, Flynn, etc.

That you believe that Hillary didn't know the C was for classified has to be willful ignorance. That you would accept that as a defense is laughable.

Make's about as much sense as the Secretary of Commerce thinking grocery stores extend credit to customers with sob stories, The Administrator of the EPA borrowing a rich friend's apartment, or a President whose signature issue is immigration hiring illegal immigrants. Really, if you think all of that's perfectly fine just because you want your tax cut, your wall, or you hate government workers, that's really up to you. But the rest of us see exactly what has happened to your brain and it's really pretty sad. Dunning and Krueger really deserve the Nobel Prize.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump is sharing his orange make up with Stone. He's got it on and there is a big line where he missed a spot applying it. Maybe he should get some tips from Mr. Trump.

Liberal: I can’t argue with the truth so I’m going to say something stupid

Ummm, what? This is just a comment about Stone's stupid make up. Thought it would liven the debate or at the very least make someone chuckle. It is a bit ridiculous defending this media hound, don't ya think?

Your comment was beyond vapid. I'm not defending anyone - I'm simply interested in equal application under the law. The FBI seems to be weaponized for the Democrats, as I don't see Abedin nor Mills being perp-walked.

What did they do wrong? What have they been charged with? The GOP had two years to investigate them. Did they?

Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey -- they are not Dems

You seem to believe that reality and laws have a liberal bias.

All protect Hillary

Yeah Comey protected her so much that she lost the election.

He actually did try to protect her but it backfired.

Because being stupid about emails is not illegal and not unAmerican.

She was freaking Secretary of State and supposedly a brilliant woman. You think she had no clue? Really?

Lol Ivanka didn't know better.

C'mon, everyone is so stupid about email. Not everyone has clandestine Russian contacts.

So you think Hillary had no clue. That says loads

I don't think Hillary was a great candidate. But given the alternative, someone with no clue about so many things?

You can love Trump, if you want. And everyone who comes along with him, including Cohen, Manafort, Stone, Flynn, etc.

That you believe that Hillary didn't know the C was for classified has to be willful ignorance. That you would accept that as a defense is laughable.

Make's about as much sense as the Secretary of Commerce thinking grocery stores extend credit to customers with sob stories, The Administrator of the EPA borrowing a rich friend's apartment, or a President whose signature issue is immigration hiring illegal immigrants. Really, if you think all of that's perfectly fine just because you want your tax cut, your wall, or you hate government workers, that's really up to you. But the rest of us see exactly what has happened to your brain and it's really pretty sad. Dunning and Krueger really deserve the Nobel Prize.

The SOS had no idea how classified was marked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fun Fact; There were more people (29) that took down Stone than Osama bin Laden (11)

Fun fact: DJT told police to rough up suspects when they arrest them.

Sounds like Stone was treated much more kindly than Trump wants perps to be treated.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/07/28/trump-tells-police-not-to-worry-about-injuring-suspects-during-arrests/?utm_term=.992793714192

[Anonymous]

Roger Stone case: Prosecutors say discovery is 'both voluminous and complex... composed of multiple hard drives containing several terabytes of information.' Including banking records. But I’m sure they’re just looking for “process crimes,” right?

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5707496/Stone-Evidence-20190131.pdf