Biden's VP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amy already has turned off some voters during the debate. Whitmer would bring excitement to the ticket. She is respected in the Midwest and would deliver Michigan and Wisconsin.

I agree. Barring anything disqualifying turning up, she's my no. 1.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to be Amy. Plainly.

The most logical choice, presuming Biden can hold the black vote. With the Obamas as his surrogates, he should be okay.

I honestly don't see what Amy brings to the ticket. Other than not being in her 70's?

Minnesota, Midwest, women, prosecutor, tough as nails, good life story, will rip little Pence to shreds, doesn't annoy people - she brings a lot to the table

^ That said I think it should be Harris or Abrams

Oh please. Two very poor team players who bring nothing to the table other than some skin pigmentation.

You are racist. And you've got to be kidding.

Racist are the folks pushing Harris and Abrams with zero logic other than skin color.

Yup.

Kamala tanked partially because black people weren't interested. She thought she would skeewee her way to the nomination.

Nope.

+1,000

+ a million.

Only some clueless whites care about her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to be Amy. Plainly.

The most logical choice, presuming Biden can hold the black vote. With the Obamas as his surrogates, he should be okay.

I honestly don't see what Amy brings to the ticket. Other than not being in her 70's?

Minnesota, Midwest, women, prosecutor, tough as nails, good life story, will rip little Pence to shreds, doesn't annoy people - she brings a lot to the table

^ That said I think it should be Harris or Abrams

Oh please. Two very poor team players who bring nothing to the table other than some skin pigmentation.

You are racist. And you've got to be kidding.

Racist are the folks pushing Harris and Abrams with zero logic other than skin color.

Yup.

Kamala tanked partially because black people weren't interested. She thought she would skeewee her way to the nomination.

Nope.

+1,000

+ a million.

Only some clueless whites care about her.

Each of you represents a thousand and a million people, respectively?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to be Amy. Plainly.

The most logical choice, presuming Biden can hold the black vote. With the Obamas as his surrogates, he should be okay.

I honestly don't see what Amy brings to the ticket. Other than not being in her 70's?

Minnesota, Midwest, women, prosecutor, tough as nails, good life story, will rip little Pence to shreds, doesn't annoy people - she brings a lot to the table

^ That said I think it should be Harris or Abrams

Oh please. Two very poor team players who bring nothing to the table other than some skin pigmentation.

You are racist. And you've got to be kidding.

Racist are the folks pushing Harris and Abrams with zero logic other than skin color.

Yup.

Kamala tanked partially because black people weren't interested. She thought she would skeewee her way to the nomination.

Nope.

+1,000

+ a million.

Only some clueless whites care about her.

Each of you represents a thousand and a million people, respectively?

At the very least.

Notice how few people voted for Harris when given the chance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to be Amy. Plainly.

The most logical choice, presuming Biden can hold the black vote. With the Obamas as his surrogates, he should be okay.

I honestly don't see what Amy brings to the ticket. Other than not being in her 70's?

Minnesota, Midwest, women, prosecutor, tough as nails, good life story, will rip little Pence to shreds, doesn't annoy people - she brings a lot to the table

^ That said I think it should be Harris or Abrams

Oh please. Two very poor team players who bring nothing to the table other than some skin pigmentation.

You are racist. And you've got to be kidding.

Racist are the folks pushing Harris and Abrams with zero logic other than skin color.

Yup.

Kamala tanked partially because black people weren't interested. She thought she would skeewee her way to the nomination.

Nope.

+1,000

+ a million.

Only some clueless whites care about her.

Each of you represents a thousand and a million people, respectively?

At the very least.

Notice how few people voted for Harris when given the chance.

Notice that she dropped out before anyone voted and she took her name off ballots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to be Amy. Plainly.

The most logical choice, presuming Biden can hold the black vote. With the Obamas as his surrogates, he should be okay.

I honestly don't see what Amy brings to the ticket. Other than not being in her 70's?

Minnesota, Midwest, women, prosecutor, tough as nails, good life story, will rip little Pence to shreds, doesn't annoy people - she brings a lot to the table

^ That said I think it should be Harris or Abrams

Oh please. Two very poor team players who bring nothing to the table other than some skin pigmentation.

You are racist. And you've got to be kidding.

Racist are the folks pushing Harris and Abrams with zero logic other than skin color.

Yup.

Kamala tanked partially because black people weren't interested. She thought she would skeewee her way to the nomination.

Nope.

+1,000

+ a million.

Only some clueless whites care about her.

Each of you represents a thousand and a million people, respectively?

At the very least.

Notice how few people voted for Harris when given the chance.

Harris was targeted by ADOS, a MAGA movement; by Russian bots; and by Tulsi Gabbard, who seems to have been in the primary for just that purpose. I wonder why....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to be Amy. Plainly.

The most logical choice, presuming Biden can hold the black vote. With the Obamas as his surrogates, he should be okay.

I honestly don't see what Amy brings to the ticket. Other than not being in her 70's?

Minnesota, Midwest, women, prosecutor, tough as nails, good life story, will rip little Pence to shreds, doesn't annoy people - she brings a lot to the table

^ That said I think it should be Harris or Abrams

Oh please. Two very poor team players who bring nothing to the table other than some skin pigmentation.

You are racist. And you've got to be kidding.

Racist are the folks pushing Harris and Abrams with zero logic other than skin color.

Yup.

Kamala tanked partially because black people weren't interested. She thought she would skeewee her way to the nomination.

Nope.

+1,000

+ a million.

Only some clueless whites care about her.

Each of you represents a thousand and a million people, respectively?

At the very least.

Notice how few people voted for Harris when given the chance.

Harris was targeted by ADOS, a MAGA movement; by Russian bots; and by Tulsi Gabbard, who seems to have been in the primary for just that purpose. I wonder why....

Harris couldn't figure out what kind of candidate she wanted to be. Her messaging was all over the place, and she did not come across as authentic. Her debate performances were sub-par. I think she has a lot of potential but ran too soon, needs more time in the Senate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to be Amy. Plainly.

The most logical choice, presuming Biden can hold the black vote. With the Obamas as his surrogates, he should be okay.

I honestly don't see what Amy brings to the ticket. Other than not being in her 70's?

Minnesota, Midwest, women, prosecutor, tough as nails, good life story, will rip little Pence to shreds, doesn't annoy people - she brings a lot to the table

^ That said I think it should be Harris or Abrams

Oh please. Two very poor team players who bring nothing to the table other than some skin pigmentation.

You are racist. And you've got to be kidding.

Racist are the folks pushing Harris and Abrams with zero logic other than skin color.

Yup.

Kamala tanked partially because black people weren't interested. She thought she would skeewee her way to the nomination.

Nope.

+1,000

+ a million.

Only some clueless whites care about her.

Each of you represents a thousand and a million people, respectively?

At the very least.

Notice how few people voted for Harris when given the chance.

She would make an excellent VP!!!


#maga

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to be Amy. Plainly.

The most logical choice, presuming Biden can hold the black vote. With the Obamas as his surrogates, he should be okay.

I honestly don't see what Amy brings to the ticket. Other than not being in her 70's?

Minnesota, Midwest, women, prosecutor, tough as nails, good life story, will rip little Pence to shreds, doesn't annoy people - she brings a lot to the table

^ That said I think it should be Harris or Abrams

Oh please. Two very poor team players who bring nothing to the table other than some skin pigmentation.

You are racist. And you've got to be kidding.

Racist are the folks pushing Harris and Abrams with zero logic other than skin color.

Yup.

Kamala tanked partially because black people weren't interested. She thought she would skeewee her way to the nomination.

Nope.

+1,000

+ a million.

Only some clueless whites care about her.

Each of you represents a thousand and a million people, respectively?

At the very least.

Notice how few people voted for Harris when given the chance.

Harris was targeted by ADOS, a MAGA movement; by Russian bots; and by Tulsi Gabbard, who seems to have been in the primary for just that purpose. I wonder why....

Harris couldn't figure out what kind of candidate she wanted to be. Her messaging was all over the place, and she did not come across as authentic. Her debate performances were sub-par. I think she has a lot of potential but ran too soon, needs more time in the Senate.

She certainly made mistakes, and perhaps one of them was thinking that there was room for a woman to follow the Obama model of running for President your first term in the Senate. Only men get to do that. (See, e.g., Mayor Pete.)

Still, it is striking that the agitprop against Kamala went silent for awhile and immediately reared up again today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to be Amy. Plainly.

The most logical choice, presuming Biden can hold the black vote. With the Obamas as his surrogates, he should be okay.

I honestly don't see what Amy brings to the ticket. Other than not being in her 70's?

Minnesota, Midwest, women, prosecutor, tough as nails, good life story, will rip little Pence to shreds, doesn't annoy people - she brings a lot to the table

^ That said I think it should be Harris or Abrams

Oh please. Two very poor team players who bring nothing to the table other than some skin pigmentation.

You are racist. And you've got to be kidding.

Racist are the folks pushing Harris and Abrams with zero logic other than skin color.

Yup.

Kamala tanked partially because black people weren't interested. She thought she would skeewee her way to the nomination.

Nope.

+1,000

+ a million.

Only some clueless whites care about her.

Each of you represents a thousand and a million people, respectively?

At the very least.

Notice how few people voted for Harris when given the chance.

Harris was targeted by ADOS, a MAGA movement; by Russian bots; and by Tulsi Gabbard, who seems to have been in the primary for just that purpose. I wonder why....

Harris couldn't figure out what kind of candidate she wanted to be. Her messaging was all over the place, and she did not come across as authentic. Her debate performances were sub-par. I think she has a lot of potential but ran too soon, needs more time in the Senate.

I think this is true. I was most excited about her when she decided to run but she didn't contribute much substantive to the discourse. I still have no idea what she stands for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to be Amy. Plainly.

The most logical choice, presuming Biden can hold the black vote. With the Obamas as his surrogates, he should be okay.

I honestly don't see what Amy brings to the ticket. Other than not being in her 70's?

Minnesota, Midwest, women, prosecutor, tough as nails, good life story, will rip little Pence to shreds, doesn't annoy people - she brings a lot to the table

^ That said I think it should be Harris or Abrams

Oh please. Two very poor team players who bring nothing to the table other than some skin pigmentation.

You are racist. And you've got to be kidding.

Racist are the folks pushing Harris and Abrams with zero logic other than skin color.

Yup.

Kamala tanked partially because black people weren't interested. She thought she would skeewee her way to the nomination.

Nope.

+1,000

+ a million.

Only some clueless whites care about her.

Each of you represents a thousand and a million people, respectively?

At the very least.

Notice how few people voted for Harris when given the chance.

Harris was targeted by ADOS, a MAGA movement; by Russian bots; and by Tulsi Gabbard, who seems to have been in the primary for just that purpose. I wonder why....

Harris couldn't figure out what kind of candidate she wanted to be. Her messaging was all over the place, and she did not come across as authentic. Her debate performances were sub-par. I think she has a lot of potential but ran too soon, needs more time in the Senate.

She certainly made mistakes, and perhaps one of them was thinking that there was room for a woman to follow the Obama model of running for President your first term in the Senate. Only men get to do that. (See, e.g., Mayor Pete.)

Still, it is striking that the agitprop against Kamala went silent for awhile and immediately reared up again today.

I absolutely agree all the women had to deal with sexism, add racism to boot and that's tough to overcome. Still, there's no denying Obama's intellectual agility and excellent speaking ability. Mayor Pete has that too. They both absorb new information well and have a knack for responding quickly and (seemingly) easily to difficult topics. Harris seemed over prepared yet flatfooted in debates. She might turn out to be an excellent legislator, but she's not a great salesperson for her positions. At least not yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to be Amy. Plainly.

The most logical choice, presuming Biden can hold the black vote. With the Obamas as his surrogates, he should be okay.

I honestly don't see what Amy brings to the ticket. Other than not being in her 70's?

Minnesota, Midwest, women, prosecutor, tough as nails, good life story, will rip little Pence to shreds, doesn't annoy people - she brings a lot to the table

^ That said I think it should be Harris or Abrams

Oh please. Two very poor team players who bring nothing to the table other than some skin pigmentation.

You are racist. And you've got to be kidding.

Racist are the folks pushing Harris and Abrams with zero logic other than skin color.

Yup.

Kamala tanked partially because black people weren't interested. She thought she would skeewee her way to the nomination.

Nope.

+1,000

+ a million.

Only some clueless whites care about her.

Each of you represents a thousand and a million people, respectively?

At the very least.

Notice how few people voted for Harris when given the chance.

Harris was targeted by ADOS, a MAGA movement; by Russian bots; and by Tulsi Gabbard, who seems to have been in the primary for just that purpose. I wonder why....

Harris couldn't figure out what kind of candidate she wanted to be. Her messaging was all over the place, and she did not come across as authentic. Her debate performances were sub-par. I think she has a lot of potential but ran too soon, needs more time in the Senate.

Harris only used her Senate seat as a stepping stone to the Presidency. She never even bothered to set up a fully-functioning Senate office. Frankly, she’s ripe for a primary challenge in 2022.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to be Amy. Plainly.

The most logical choice, presuming Biden can hold the black vote. With the Obamas as his surrogates, he should be okay.

I honestly don't see what Amy brings to the ticket. Other than not being in her 70's?

Minnesota, Midwest, women, prosecutor, tough as nails, good life story, will rip little Pence to shreds, doesn't annoy people - she brings a lot to the table

^ That said I think it should be Harris or Abrams

Oh please. Two very poor team players who bring nothing to the table other than some skin pigmentation.

You are racist. And you've got to be kidding.

Racist are the folks pushing Harris and Abrams with zero logic other than skin color.

Yup.

Kamala tanked partially because black people weren't interested. She thought she would skeewee her way to the nomination.

Nope.

+1,000

+ a million.

Only some clueless whites care about her.

Each of you represents a thousand and a million people, respectively?

At the very least.

Notice how few people voted for Harris when given the chance.

Harris was targeted by ADOS, a MAGA movement; by Russian bots; and by Tulsi Gabbard, who seems to have been in the primary for just that purpose. I wonder why....

Harris couldn't figure out what kind of candidate she wanted to be. Her messaging was all over the place, and she did not come across as authentic. Her debate performances were sub-par. I think she has a lot of potential but ran too soon, needs more time in the Senate.

Harris only used her Senate seat as a stepping stone to the Presidency. She never even bothered to set up a fully-functioning Senate office. Frankly, she’s ripe for a primary challenge in 2022.

+1

CA deserves to have a Latina as Senator.

[Anonymous]

He'll pick I'm Rourke or someone like him, a younger white male.
The party has made it clear they don't want women or anything non white, straight, and male in the forefront right now, and America seems to support that. 2024 or 2028 might be different, whenever the millineals become the base. For now any talk of a female VP is just pandering and trying to drive up ratings.

Harris and other women will get seats in the administration.

[Anonymous]

Good article in the WaPo on possible Biden VP picks.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-bidens-vp-pick-is-so-important/2020/03/08/81c22fb2-5fe3-11ea-9055-5fa12981bbbf_story.html

They pretty much follow DCUM's train of thought but an interesting name from the article is ...

"Michelle Lujan Grisham was elected governor of New Mexico in 2018, and she knows Washington, too, having served three terms in the House. She is the first Democratic Latina to be elected as a governor, and she is a 12th-generation New Mexican from a storied political family. On the other hand, outside New Mexico she is not a household name."