|
You do realize, don't you, that I'm not one of the reporters? It seems you take glee in posting about all the personal details you've managed to dig up on him. But I really don't care about your efforts to drag his private life into this.
Indeed, I'm all for publishing in the news a full list of all people who have unpaid traffic tickets in DC. They're all short-changing our city - just like the DCPS residency cheaters - so let's hold them all accountable. |
Hmm. Could it be that another fraudster has inadvertently unmasked herself? I would think that most people referring to their home city would say "I...live in DC and pay taxes here" -- not "there." |
If you work for the Daily Caller, indeed: using "there," instead of "here" is definitely grounds for a conviction, sure. Personally, I think you're grasping at tiny little straws. |
Ouch, you wrote what I was actually thinking. |
And ambulance service. |
Nope. This thread follow the direction of the crappy reporting. |
This statement is so trite. Come up with something original as a retort. You knew as you were typing that stupid unremarkable statement that not even you believed it. Stop being stupid and lazy of thought and come up with something original. |
How about Silver Spring communities? |
|
There's the evidence that the daily caller article does not use actual numbers
They counted a thousand cars, rosniak said it was the hardest he'd ever worked, but they don't actually provide a number of cars with MD plates, vs VA plates, vs DC plates. Nor do they mention, specifically, which schools they polled, except for excel. They also do not mention a specific time period, although I think at one point they wave their hands and say "months." They worked on this for months, people. It was like, hard and stuff. I have to assume the daily caller fact checker is actually more of a libel expert. I can imagine him or her going through their article with red pen and saying , "you have to be more vague because that wasn't legal; or verifiable. But if you want to imply that this woman might still live in Maryland..." etc. Rosniak and Watson mention, vaguely, "some other schools." They mention others "along the borders." They mention one specific family, but fail to prove where the woman actually lives in 2016. Instead they rely entirely on unfounded and vague accusations. Look, I'm not the poster with a journalism degree who said this is bad journalism. It just so obviously is. Then there's the lovely part where they assume that all Maryland plates are evidence of cheating, and that anyone who doesn't talk to them is obviously guilty. Can anyone who had bothered to Google rosniak, a man with the charm and face of a hamster, honestly say they'd respond well to his interrogatory techniques after he trailed them--or their babysitter? Do you think Watson has more charm? Generally speaking, when someone follows you in their car, pulls up behind you and demands your address, how do you respond? And finally, when confronted with their lack of factual evidence, these Yahoos or their sock puppet interns come up with the same gems over and over again: it's true! Anyone who disagrees is a cheater! This is costing the taxpayers. Even Byron and cindy, were i writing them and making all of the facts up completely from scratch, could come up with more convincing ones to "prove" the same points. |
| And I will do that tomorrow, if this waste of a thread doesn't vanish into the ether. |
Wherever. MoCo or PeeGee, no difference. |
Haha! Exactly! |
Maybe maybe not but there is most likely not one real world example of that happening. I can't fathom why a two lawyer family who paid DC prices to not live in DC would lie to send their kids to the system which is most likely why they refused to live there in the first place. Even the thought of some rag tag subsidized child care seams beneath them even if allowed in. |
+1 absolutely. start with the cross-check. That would help eliminate 90% of families needing to supply any documentation at all. Most would be fine with the cross-check for property taxes, income taxes, TANF, etc. Those who aren't can then provide the other forms of residency verification. |
Well your original statement was very limiting in jurisdiction and telling of your true thoughts. |