Married NY Times sports reporter viral after being busted allegedly having an affair with married NFL coach

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Male coaches and execs make 20x plus more than her annually. They were using her not just for a warm hole to cheat on their spouses, they were also using her to tamper with other players and teams, which is illegal per NFL rules.

She actually was paid pretty well if you believe some of the stories that have come out from this. Let's say 10x

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Male coaches and execs make 20x plus more than her annually. They were using her not just for a warm hole to cheat on their spouses, they were also using her to tamper with other players and teams, which is illegal per NFL rules.

The only thing she was being used for was sex, which she clearly consented to. Please stop with people trying to paint her as some delicate young professional who was being taken advantage of.

Based on reports, he was not the first coach over her career she chose to have an affair with.

He was a jerk for cheating on his wife, no doubt about that.

But she wasn’t some innocent victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Male coaches and execs make 20x plus more than her annually. They were using her not just for a warm hole to cheat on their spouses, they were also using her to tamper with other players and teams, which is illegal per NFL rules.

Seems like they were playing her not vice versa. I feel awful for her husband. Who now has to doubt the paternity of his kids.

Russini wasn’t anything special. These men were doing the same to any of the other attractive female reporters who were willing to put out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Male coaches and execs make 20x plus more than her annually. They were using her not just for a warm hole to cheat on their spouses, they were also using her to tamper with other players and teams, which is illegal per NFL rules.

Seems like they were playing her not vice versa. I feel awful for her husband. Who now has to doubt the paternity of his kids.

Russini wasn’t anything special. These men were doing the same to any of the other attractive female reporters who were willing to put out.

These reporters are great for banging. They also have something to lose if word gets out. They are not trying to get pregnant or shake down the coach for a payout, like most of the trashy WAGs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Male coaches and execs make 20x plus more than her annually. They were using her not just for a warm hole to cheat on their spouses, they were also using her to tamper with other players and teams, which is illegal per NFL rules.

She actually was paid pretty well if you believe some of the stories that have come out from this. Let's say 10x

Mike Vrabel makes something like $15M-20M a year. Another coach she is allegedly linked to, Sean Payton, makes $18M a year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Male coaches and execs make 20x plus more than her annually. They were using her not just for a warm hole to cheat on their spouses, they were also using her to tamper with other players and teams, which is illegal per NFL rules.

They were using her because she was easy. She had nothing they wanted or needed.

She was constantly scooping dirt and stoking drama to lower the value of players. To the benefit of whom? Coaches she was...chummy with.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else thinking that Mrs. Vrabel is more pissed that they got publicly busted, which makes her look bad, rather than the cheating itself?

I actually think she hired the private detective that took the pics and knew the worst thing she could do to them was go public with the pics. Burn the house down as she leaves.

There’s also a theory that her contract was up (it was, that part is true) and the Times knew about this plus didn’t want to pay her, so they set her up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:24 hours of weekend “counseling” and it’s water under the bridge for the cheating male.

Professionally maybe, but not personally. This was never going to sink him professionally.

Missing the draft should sink him professionally IMO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:24 hours of weekend “counseling” and it’s water under the bridge for the cheating male.

Professionally maybe, but not personally. This was never going to sink him professionally.

Missing the draft should sink him professionally IMO.

in your opinion.... as if that carries any weight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Male coaches and execs make 20x plus more than her annually. They were using her not just for a warm hole to cheat on their spouses, they were also using her to tamper with other players and teams, which is illegal per NFL rules.

They were using her because she was easy. She had nothing they wanted or needed.

She was constantly scooping dirt and stoking drama to lower the value of players. To the benefit of whom? Coaches she was...chummy with.

She wasn't actually that good at her job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:24 hours of weekend “counseling” and it’s water under the bridge for the cheating male.

Professionally maybe, but not personally. This was never going to sink him professionally.

Missing the draft should sink him professionally IMO.

in your opinion.... as if that carries any weight.

Did I stutter when I said IMO? And the fact is that’s an enormous part of a head coach’s job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Male coaches and execs make 20x plus more than her annually. They were using her not just for a warm hole to cheat on their spouses, they were also using her to tamper with other players and teams, which is illegal per NFL rules.

They were using her because she was easy. She had nothing they wanted or needed.

She was constantly scooping dirt and stoking drama to lower the value of players. To the benefit of whom? Coaches she was...chummy with.

She wasn't actually that good at her job.

She was clearly good at something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else thinking that Mrs. Vrabel is more pissed that they got publicly busted, which makes her look bad, rather than the cheating itself?

I actually think she hired the private detective that took the pics and knew the worst thing she could do to them was go public with the pics. Burn the house down as she leaves.

There’s also a theory that her contract was up (it was, that part is true) and the Times knew about this plus didn’t want to pay her, so they set her up.

Not a chance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Male coaches and execs make 20x plus more than her annually. They were using her not just for a warm hole to cheat on their spouses, they were also using her to tamper with other players and teams, which is illegal per NFL rules.

They were using her because she was easy. She had nothing they wanted or needed.

She was constantly scooping dirt and stoking drama to lower the value of players. To the benefit of whom? Coaches she was...chummy with.

She wasn't actually that good at her job.

She was clearly good at something.

But she couldn't lock it in. So she married her dud boring guy.