Usha Vance - Fashion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys rabidly defending her friends/relatives or are you just Republicans? Because if you know her, I get that, but if you're just regular Trump voters...you know she wouldn't piss if you if you were on fire, right? She literally emailed her friends about what white trash you all are like, 20 minutes before her dh was named VP

I haven't been rabidly defending her, but I don't think her fashion choices are worthy of all the harsh criticism, and I have said as much here.

And no, I have never voted for Donald Trump. And I never would.

Okay. But what no one will answer is: Why is Usha exempt from criticism? There is a 75 page thread about Melania that I don't see you guys posting in every five minutes saying how misogynist and awful the posters are.

She is in the public eye and we can discuss her. It's not personal, it's fashion.

You really don’t understand the difference between a professional model and a lawyer?

I'm not clear on how a lawyer is unable to straighten her outfit before a photo is taken, but maybe it's some special Usha handicap. Okay then, poor thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Y'all are trying to compare her to fashionistas, she is a beautiful brown nerdy woman who probably never had time or interest for these frivolities. Always on top of her class, trying for top college, top law school, top internships, prestigious clerkships, top law firm, marriage, kids, husband's ambitions etc etc.

So it's just emotional intelligence she is lacking, is that it? Because none of this is that hard, or that unexpected.

Maybe she's just tired and needs to lie down.

Now that is the first piece of sage advice you've offered. You should do the same.
DP

I can keep my dress straight and don't have half my tatas screaming for help, so I'm good, thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's sad that on the White House bios page, there are head shots of Trump, Melania, and JD, but the photo of Usha is an AP photo taken from the Republican National Convention. That's how much of a rookie/unprepared she is for her role, she doesn't even have a headshot for the White House website.

She does indeed have a headshot on that page.

The single point of interest this dress/outfit has are those seams. That's it. So, with that being the focal point, you'd think someone would've cared enough about the one detail the dress had to pay attention to making sure it was correct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys rabidly defending her friends/relatives or are you just Republicans? Because if you know her, I get that, but if you're just regular Trump voters...you know she wouldn't piss if you if you were on fire, right? She literally emailed her friends about what white trash you all are like, 20 minutes before her dh was named VP

I haven't been rabidly defending her, but I don't think her fashion choices are worthy of all the harsh criticism, and I have said as much here.

And no, I have never voted for Donald Trump. And I never would.

Okay. But what no one will answer is: Why is Usha exempt from criticism? There is a 75 page thread about Melania that I don't see you guys posting in every five minutes saying how misogynist and awful the posters are.

She is in the public eye and we can discuss her. It's not personal, it's fashion.

You really don’t understand the difference between a professional model and a lawyer?

I'm not clear on how a lawyer is unable to straighten her outfit before a photo is taken, but maybe it's some special Usha handicap. Okay then, poor thing.

The photographer should have told her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys rabidly defending her friends/relatives or are you just Republicans? Because if you know her, I get that, but if you're just regular Trump voters...you know she wouldn't piss if you if you were on fire, right? She literally emailed her friends about what white trash you all are like, 20 minutes before her dh was named VP

I haven't been rabidly defending her, but I don't think her fashion choices are worthy of all the harsh criticism, and I have said as much here.

And no, I have never voted for Donald Trump. And I never would.

Okay. But what no one will answer is: Why is Usha exempt from criticism? There is a 75 page thread about Melania that I don't see you guys posting in every five minutes saying how misogynist and awful the posters are.

She is in the public eye and we can discuss her. It's not personal, it's fashion.

You really don’t understand the difference between a professional model and a lawyer?

You really don't understand the difference between "a lawyer" and the Second Lady?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's sad that on the White House bios page, there are head shots of Trump, Melania, and JD, but the photo of Usha is an AP photo taken from the Republican National Convention. That's how much of a rookie/unprepared she is for her role, she doesn't even have a headshot for the White House website.

She does indeed have a headshot on that page.

Who keeps doing this poor woman this dirty?! I dislike her politics, and her husband, and probably most other things about her, but I'm offended on her behalf that nobody helps her dress for the role she's in. She looks like someone gave the AI the prompt "pull a book from the background and make it Usha Vance". The seams are crooked, the cut is as boring and plain as possible, the color is useless...

Like her or not, this is our VP's wife. She should at least get the kind of care and attention befitting her station for a single public photo! If someone spent half the time dressing Usha that they spent retouching Melania's photo, it'd be fine.

Bless your heart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Be kind. Quit tearing down other women.

This! You women are so freaking nasty! Usha has a beautiful smile, is smart and has 3 young kids. She's busy!

So busy she can't straighten her dress for this sort of photo? It would've taken 4 seconds. If she's that busy, maybe she needs a new position?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys rabidly defending her friends/relatives or are you just Republicans? Because if you know her, I get that, but if you're just regular Trump voters...you know she wouldn't piss if you if you were on fire, right? She literally emailed her friends about what white trash you all are like, 20 minutes before her dh was named VP

I haven't been rabidly defending her, but I don't think her fashion choices are worthy of all the harsh criticism, and I have said as much here.

And no, I have never voted for Donald Trump. And I never would.

Okay. But what no one will answer is: Why is Usha exempt from criticism? There is a 75 page thread about Melania that I don't see you guys posting in every five minutes saying how misogynist and awful the posters are.

She is in the public eye and we can discuss her. It's not personal, it's fashion.

You really don’t understand the difference between a professional model and a lawyer?

You really don't understand the difference between "a lawyer" and the Second Lady?

Not to mention I think they are saying since Melania was a professional model, she deserves criticism and Usha doesn't. So some women deserve criticism but the ones you deem worthy don't. Got it. Not sexist at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys rabidly defending her friends/relatives or are you just Republicans? Because if you know her, I get that, but if you're just regular Trump voters...you know she wouldn't piss if you if you were on fire, right? She literally emailed her friends about what white trash you all are like, 20 minutes before her dh was named VP

I haven't been rabidly defending her, but I don't think her fashion choices are worthy of all the harsh criticism, and I have said as much here.

And no, I have never voted for Donald Trump. And I never would.

Okay. But what no one will answer is: Why is Usha exempt from criticism? There is a 75 page thread about Melania that I don't see you guys posting in every five minutes saying how misogynist and awful the posters are.

She is in the public eye and we can discuss her. It's not personal, it's fashion.

You really don’t understand the difference between a professional model and a lawyer?

I'm not clear on how a lawyer is unable to straighten her outfit before a photo is taken, but maybe it's some special Usha handicap. Okay then, poor thing.

The photographer should have told her.

+1. Like many lawyers here, I’ve had many professional headshots. The photographer or their assistant always points out and fixes issues with your hair, shine, clothes, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys rabidly defending her friends/relatives or are you just Republicans? Because if you know her, I get that, but if you're just regular Trump voters...you know she wouldn't piss if you if you were on fire, right? She literally emailed her friends about what white trash you all are like, 20 minutes before her dh was named VP

I haven't been rabidly defending her, but I don't think her fashion choices are worthy of all the harsh criticism, and I have said as much here.

And no, I have never voted for Donald Trump. And I never would.

Okay. But what no one will answer is: Why is Usha exempt from criticism? There is a 75 page thread about Melania that I don't see you guys posting in every five minutes saying how misogynist and awful the posters are.

She is in the public eye and we can discuss her. It's not personal, it's fashion.

You really don’t understand the difference between a professional model and a lawyer?

You really don't understand the difference between "a lawyer" and the Second Lady?

No one cares about the Second Lady’s fashion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys rabidly defending her friends/relatives or are you just Republicans? Because if you know her, I get that, but if you're just regular Trump voters...you know she wouldn't piss if you if you were on fire, right? She literally emailed her friends about what white trash you all are like, 20 minutes before her dh was named VP

I haven't been rabidly defending her, but I don't think her fashion choices are worthy of all the harsh criticism, and I have said as much here.

And no, I have never voted for Donald Trump. And I never would.

Okay. But what no one will answer is: Why is Usha exempt from criticism? There is a 75 page thread about Melania that I don't see you guys posting in every five minutes saying how misogynist and awful the posters are.

She is in the public eye and we can discuss her. It's not personal, it's fashion.

You really don’t understand the difference between a professional model and a lawyer?

You really don't understand the difference between "a lawyer" and the Second Lady?

No one cares about the Second Lady’s fashion.

Babe you're literally posting in a thread about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys rabidly defending her friends/relatives or are you just Republicans? Because if you know her, I get that, but if you're just regular Trump voters...you know she wouldn't piss if you if you were on fire, right? She literally emailed her friends about what white trash you all are like, 20 minutes before her dh was named VP

I haven't been rabidly defending her, but I don't think her fashion choices are worthy of all the harsh criticism, and I have said as much here.

And no, I have never voted for Donald Trump. And I never would.

Okay. But what no one will answer is: Why is Usha exempt from criticism? There is a 75 page thread about Melania that I don't see you guys posting in every five minutes saying how misogynist and awful the posters are.

She is in the public eye and we can discuss her. It's not personal, it's fashion.

You really don’t understand the difference between a professional model and a lawyer?

You really don't understand the difference between "a lawyer" and the Second Lady?

Not to mention I think they are saying since Melania was a professional model, she deserves criticism and Usha doesn't. So some women deserve criticism but the ones you deem worthy don't. Got it. Not sexist at all.

You cannot possibly be serious - at this point, you must’ve purposely trolling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys rabidly defending her friends/relatives or are you just Republicans? Because if you know her, I get that, but if you're just regular Trump voters...you know she wouldn't piss if you if you were on fire, right? She literally emailed her friends about what white trash you all are like, 20 minutes before her dh was named VP

I haven't been rabidly defending her, but I don't think her fashion choices are worthy of all the harsh criticism, and I have said as much here.

And no, I have never voted for Donald Trump. And I never would.

Okay. But what no one will answer is: Why is Usha exempt from criticism? There is a 75 page thread about Melania that I don't see you guys posting in every five minutes saying how misogynist and awful the posters are.

She is in the public eye and we can discuss her. It's not personal, it's fashion.

You really don’t understand the difference between a professional model and a lawyer?

I'm not clear on how a lawyer is unable to straighten her outfit before a photo is taken, but maybe it's some special Usha handicap. Okay then, poor thing.

There are so many things you're not clear on.

[Anonymous]

I would love to have her smile and eyes. My eyes are hooded and my face is so fat that I'm self-conscious when I smile. She looks wonderful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody gave two hoots about Gwen Walz or Karen Pence. Why is there so much attention on Usha?

I remember people here praising Gwen's jacket that turned out to be from Talbots.

This from a board that otherwise roundly condemns anything from Talbots.

My memory is that opinion was mixed on the Talbots jacket. I was one of the people that liked it but I also admitted that I own at least two Talbots jackets. It also worked well for the assignment which was “approachable Midwestern mom.”
I posted above I really like the white silk dress and think it looks great on her, although I’m not sure it was quite the right pick for this occasion. (Seems more spring to me and maybe some more festive?). I think part of the problem here is that no one knows what the assignment is for Isha. It’s not “approachable midwestern mom” like karen pence or Gwen walz. It’s not “fashion model emeritus” like Melania. It’s not “slightly cool suburban grandma” like Jill. At the moment, she’s stuck between “big law senior associate” and “DC socialite” and “suburban mom” and the message is mixed. I think she’ll find her groove but it’s going to take a minute.

Also, for the record, I wish people would STFU about her grey hair. Grey hair is totally fine. She is fine with it. Don’t force her to stepfprd wife it.