Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I’m late to this case. What is the main reason for doubting that Karen Read ran over him with her car? Seems like she may not have done it intentionally, but why is it not a plausible explanation?

Injuries being incomparable with being hit by a car is the jumping off point.

But, they ARE NOT.

The defendant's own experts from ARCCA testified that his injuries were consistent with being knocked down, potentially by her SUV, and sustaining a fatal head injury.

The Commonwealth's medical examiner also testified that his injuries were both inconsistent, AND CONSISTENT, with a pedestrian strike by a vehicle. They are not classic, but they are not incongruent.

Just wait until the nationally renowned biomechanical engineer expert witness for the CW testifies at this trial.

The defense theories are all fantastical fabricated BS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I’m late to this case. What is the main reason for doubting that Karen Read ran over him with her car? Seems like she may not have done it intentionally, but why is it not a plausible explanation?

Phone records show that John O’Keefe was walking around with his phone, turning it on by facial recognition, and turning it off with the lock button for roughly two full minutes after Karen Read had driven away. So, after she left, he was still standing and using his phone for two minutes.

You didn't listen very carefully. He was moving and using his phone for 20 SECONDS, not 2 minutes. Go back and listen to the timestamps again, poster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I’m late to this case. What is the main reason for doubting that Karen Read ran over him with her car? Seems like she may not have done it intentionally, but why is it not a plausible explanation?

It is the ONLY plausible explanation.

The Free Karen Read followers have been duped and led down a garden path by Karen and her tool Aiden Kearney aka Turtleboy, an online blogger who disseminated her third party culprit conspiracy theory that John went into the house, was immediately set upon by the residents therein, beaten to death, attacked by a DNA-less dog, and thrown out on the lawn to die.

The house was full of young adults celebrating the homeowner's son's 21st birthday as well as the close friends and some a coworkers of John's from the Boston PD who he knew but not well.

The defense theory is that all of those people are covering up a murder, and also the Canton PD, and also the MSP, and also the ME, and also the other ME who specializes in brain injury, and also the ER doctor who warmed John up and then declared him dead (because you're not dead until you're warm and dead), and also John's family is in on it, and also the EMTs, paramedics, firefighters, and the prosecutor's office AND the judge.

Mostly this is all true because the MSP trooper heading the investigation called Karen a 'whack job c*nt' in private text messages to his family and friends while he was investigating the case. Never mind that her behavior from the early morning hours when she killed John to this very moment have revealed that the trooper was a very discerning judge of character re: Karen Read.

It's all INSANE. She is a guilty as sin binge drunk driver who plowed over her boyfriend in a rage. ALL of the actual, admissible physical, testimonial, circumstantial evidence points squarely at Karen Read. There is no actual admissible evidence whatsoever that backs the defense's sick theories, which are ever changing because they are pure fabrications.

Beyond the disgustingness of Karen's defense team's sleazy tactics, there is a whole INDUSTRY of YouTube and other social media content creators who are monetizing the obsession with the case that FKR have, and who have stoked actual physical and verbal harassment of witnesses, court personnel, prosecutors, police, victim's friends and family, etc. from among the FKR followers.

Unfreakingbelievable.

Brian Albert was turning 23 that year. If you can’t even get basic facts right, no one is believing the rest of hysterical screeds.

You are a totally unserious person - no wonder you are FKR.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Only plausible explanation” is not how we adjudicate in this country. “Beyond a reasonable doubt” is a higher burden, even than the civil court’s burden of “preponderance of the evidence.”

I'm a former defender and prosecutor, I know very well the burden of proof to take somebody's liberty. I've seen many people go to prison on far less evidence than exists in this case. You are unserious and not nearly as smart as you think you are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I’m late to this case. What is the main reason for doubting that Karen Read ran over him with her car? Seems like she may not have done it intentionally, but why is it not a plausible explanation?

Phone records show that John O’Keefe was walking around with his phone, turning it on by facial recognition, and turning it off with the lock button for roughly two full minutes after Karen Read had driven away. So, after she left, he was still standing and using his phone for two minutes.

INCORRECT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The minute, I heard that the cop stayed in his house while the person dying on his front lawn and refused to go outside to help. I knew they were guilty.

I have a household of law-enforcement officers and believe me, dude is guilty AF

He was already dead. Killed eight hours earlier by Karen

So if you looked outside and saw a dead body on your lawn, and police outside, you’d…stay in your house? No.
That’s guilt.

I agree. A lone random fire truck or ambulance goes down our street and within 10 minutes there are 30 neighbors outside to see what's going on. There is literally no scenario where there is police/EMS activity ON MY FRONT LAWN and I don't go outside.

Its clear from insane posts like this people are running their mouths yet not actually following the case. THEY WERE ASLEEP ALL OF THEM IN THE HOUSE SOUND ASLEEP WOKEN UP AS IT WAS HAPPENING.

No not when it supposedly happened. When the police showed up. It was morning, Albert saw the scene outside. In what world wouldn’t you be alarmed about that?? It’s incredibly suspicious.

He was asleep Jen went and woke him up then the cameras on the police cars see the lights go on upstairs after she wakes them up.

You are an idiot and clearly not watching any of the coverage and testimonies. This is not debatable this is a fact caught on the cameras from the cop cars. How can you be so stupid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I’m late to this case. What is the main reason for doubting that Karen Read ran over him with her car? Seems like she may not have done it intentionally, but why is it not a plausible explanation?

Phone records show that John O’Keefe was walking around with his phone, turning it on by facial recognition, and turning it off with the lock button for roughly two full minutes after Karen Read had driven away. So, after she left, he was still standing and using his phone for two minutes.

That is not at all what evidence showed yesterday in court. His phone did not move until the next morning, after his body was found.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I’m late to this case. What is the main reason for doubting that Karen Read ran over him with her car? Seems like she may not have done it intentionally, but why is it not a plausible explanation?

Phone records show that John O’Keefe was walking around with his phone, turning it on by facial recognition, and turning it off with the lock button for roughly two full minutes after Karen Read had driven away. So, after she left, he was still standing and using his phone for two minutes.

No, that's NOT what cellbrite testified to. Stop putting lies out there.

Actually, that’s exactly what Mr. Whiffen testified to. He described the exact times that various phone events happened. Mr. O’Keefe locked his phone with the lock button at 00:32. Since Karen Read’s phone connected to WiFi at JOK’s house at 00:36, she couldn’t have been at Fairview at 00:32, at which time he was still walking around and using his phone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I’m late to this case. What is the main reason for doubting that Karen Read ran over him with her car? Seems like she may not have done it intentionally, but why is it not a plausible explanation?

Phone records show that John O’Keefe was walking around with his phone, turning it on by facial recognition, and turning it off with the lock button for roughly two full minutes after Karen Read had driven away. So, after she left, he was still standing and using his phone for two minutes.

That is not at all what evidence showed yesterday in court. His phone did not move until the next morning, after his body was found.

It was unlocked at 12:32 and she was at his house by 12:36 so she had to have left already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I’m late to this case. What is the main reason for doubting that Karen Read ran over him with her car? Seems like she may not have done it intentionally, but why is it not a plausible explanation?

Phone records show that John O’Keefe was walking around with his phone, turning it on by facial recognition, and turning it off with the lock button for roughly two full minutes after Karen Read had driven away. So, after she left, he was still standing and using his phone for two minutes.

You didn't listen very carefully. He was moving and using his phone for 20 SECONDS, not 2 minutes. Go back and listen to the timestamps again, poster.

You can't even bother with the people on here. They throw bs out and have no clue as to what's happening live in the court room, on cameras, cell phone data.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I’m late to this case. What is the main reason for doubting that Karen Read ran over him with her car? Seems like she may not have done it intentionally, but why is it not a plausible explanation?

Phone records show that John O’Keefe was walking around with his phone, turning it on by facial recognition, and turning it off with the lock button for roughly two full minutes after Karen Read had driven away. So, after she left, he was still standing and using his phone for two minutes.

You didn't listen very carefully. He was moving and using his phone for 20 SECONDS, not 2 minutes. Go back and listen to the timestamps again, poster.

That is, 20 seconds after exiting the Lexus - not after Karen had driven away.

He exited the vehicle which she had pulled away from the house because she was trying to kidnap him away from the after party that she didn't want him to attend.

He insisted she stop, he got out, he grabbed her cocktail from the console and probably said something like, 'don't be pissy, come into the party with me' - and then he closed the door and started walking back toward the house. He probably heard the vehicle backing toward him and thought she was going to park back at the flagpole area where they'd been sitting and fighting so she could join him in going into the party - but instead, she gunned the vehicle into his body and sent him flying into the ground and thus caused his fatal head injury. Then she drove off and left him there to die.

[Anonymous]

The butt dials are what clinches it for me-it’s reasonable doubt to many no matter how much it enrages you, former prosecutor/defender/GUSL grad/Mayflower descendant lady!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The butt dials are what clinches it for me-it’s reasonable doubt to many no matter how much it enrages you, former prosecutor/defender/GUSL grad/Mayflower descendant lady!

GUSL?

Moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The butt dials are what clinches it for me-it’s reasonable doubt to many no matter how much it enrages you, former prosecutor/defender/GUSL grad/Mayflower descendant lady!

According to the General Society of Mayflower Descendants, there may be as many as 35 million living descendants of the Mayflower worldwide and 10 million living descendants in the United States.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The butt dials are what clinches it for me-it’s reasonable doubt to many no matter how much it enrages you, former prosecutor/defender/GUSL grad/Mayflower descendant lady!

It's only reasonable doubt to a moron.

The last jury did not believe even a tiny, wee little bit in the defense's third party culprit theory of the case.