Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Sorry, I’m late to this case. What is the main reason for doubting that Karen Read ran over him with her car? Seems like she may not have done it intentionally, but why is it not a plausible explanation? [/quote] Injuries being incomparable with being hit by a car is the jumping off point. [/quote] But, they ARE NOT. The defendant's own experts from ARCCA testified that his injuries were consistent with being knocked down, potentially by her SUV, and sustaining a fatal head injury. The Commonwealth's medical examiner also testified that his injuries were both inconsistent, AND CONSISTENT, with a pedestrian strike by a vehicle. They are not classic, but they are not incongruent. Just wait until the nationally renowned biomechanical engineer expert witness for the CW testifies at this trial. The defense theories are all fantastical fabricated BS.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
