Fairfax Murder

[Anonymous]

How come there is absolutely no information concerning JR's employment, what he did for a living? And I'm not just talking about no information on this thread but online in general. I think it might (repeat, "might") help clear up what his connection to the B family, as a whole and individually, as well as to the au pair was. Also, to clear up one point regarding the husband not cooperating with police. That was mentioned once by police in the immediate aftermath of the crime yet many seem to extend said statement to imply a long-term lack of cooperation which is anything but what happened. Any LE officer involved in a shooting with his/her service weapon (whether on or off duty) is best advised to get counsel first. And it's a constitutional right to do so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe the guy went after the aupair first and the mother stepped in and got stabbed. Maybe the guy was stalking the aupair.

I also read somewhere, but can't find it now, so not sure of the validity, that the aupair referred to the alleged stabber as "my friend" when she called the police the 2nd time.

This is what I wondered; if the deceased was somehow involved with and jilted by the au pair.

Pretty sure she referred to her friend who had been stabbed, so Christine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How come there is absolutely no information concerning JR's employment, what he did for a living? And I'm not just talking about no information on this thread but online in general. I think it might (repeat, "might") help clear up what his connection to the B family, as a whole and individually, as well as to the au pair was. Also, to clear up one point regarding the husband not cooperating with police. That was mentioned once by police in the immediate aftermath of the crime yet many seem to extend said statement to imply a long-term lack of cooperation which is anything but what happened. Any LE officer involved in a shooting with his/her service weapon (whether on or off duty) is best advised to get counsel first. And it's a constitutional right to do so.

Their connection had absolutely nothing to do with his employment.

[Anonymous]

What is the "kids only on cards theory?"

[Anonymous]

Give me a break people. If you are not friends with someone on Facebook you see very little of their pictures. That’s the purpose of privacy settings. I know this family and they were happy.

[Anonymous]

if you only have pictures of you and your dog then that is all you want others to see IE he was using the profile to point out to other women. No other reason for that. He put his dog in and not his wife and kid. Thats totally a sign it was not a happy family.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lol what? I've never heard the kids only on cards theory...weird...

. Because he was a cheater. We all know this everyone who knew him knows this.

What is the kids only on cards theory?

Guessing you are saying the DH was a cheater? I have not seen anyone say anything + about him, in contrast to Christine and JR.

Families who are happy take pictures together.

You mean fake "happy" on Fakebook and holiday cards? Seems common if this site is anything to go by. Yet few DH shoot and stab people. Cheating and drinking seem more the go tos.

Fake happy does happen. But families that do not take pictures together are not happy. Something is usually off. He had his own Facebook profile that showcases him and his dog.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://wtop.com/fairfax-county/2023/04/three-found-dead-in-fairfax-co-home-in-apparent-domestic-shooting/

I saw that and immediately thought of this thread. Is there a separate thread for it? If not, there should be.

This is not such a mystery because the shooter killed himself: https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/northern-virginia/man-shot-wife-her-brother-before-shooting-himself-police/3338695/ Motive is likely very different from this case.

[Anonymous]

What is ironic is that the people claiming to be concerned for the safety of this child are the ones making the most outlandish and disgusting claims about this family. I would also bet most people have zero connection or knowledge of anyone involved with this tragedy. Instead of getting enjoyment from giving your “Dateline” narratives wait for the investigation to be completed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is ironic is that the people claiming to be concerned for the safety of this child are the ones making the most outlandish and disgusting claims about this family. I would also bet most people have zero connection or knowledge of anyone involved with this tragedy. Instead of getting enjoyment from giving your “Dateline” narratives wait for the investigation to be completed.

Yet YOU feel free to chime in and get YOUR enjoyment from your narrative prior to the investigation being completed. Pot/kettle. Thread would be much shorter without the self appointed scolds and those opining about their family's holiday cards. No need to share every thought.

[Anonymous]

( . )( . )

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's clear that the police don't consider this a slam dunk case of self defense. Of course, that doesn't mean that they won't eventually conclude it was self-defense, but given that there's still an active investigation after 2 years, we should all be able to agree that police don't see this as an easy case.

Do you mean 2 months?

I have no inside knowledge, but yes, 2 months seems a bit long if it was straightforward self-defense, BUT I have no idea how long these investigations typically take so it's really hard to judge.

Sorry, I 100% meant two months. That is still a long time for police to say nothing in a typical self-defense case. You'll often see the police closing down the investigation within a week or two.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Give me a break people. If you are not friends with someone on Facebook you see very little of their pictures. That’s the purpose of privacy settings. I know this family and they were happy.

EXACTLY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's clear that the police don't consider this a slam dunk case of self defense. Of course, that doesn't mean that they won't eventually conclude it was self-defense, but given that there's still an active investigation after 2 years, we should all be able to agree that police don't see this as an easy case.

Do you mean 2 months?

I have no inside knowledge, but yes, 2 months seems a bit long if it was straightforward self-defense, BUT I have no idea how long these investigations typically take so it's really hard to judge.

Sorry, I 100% meant two months. That is still a long time for police to say nothing in a typical self-defense case. You'll often see the police closing down the investigation within a week or two.

Oh so the police contact you directly anytime they close a case? You keep track of the closing time of all "typical" self defense cases? GTFOH

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's clear that the police don't consider this a slam dunk case of self defense. Of course, that doesn't mean that they won't eventually conclude it was self-defense, but given that there's still an active investigation after 2 years, we should all be able to agree that police don't see this as an easy case.

Do you mean 2 months?

I have no inside knowledge, but yes, 2 months seems a bit long if it was straightforward self-defense, BUT I have no idea how long these investigations typically take so it's really hard to judge.

Sorry, I 100% meant two months. That is still a long time for police to say nothing in a typical self-defense case. You'll often see the police closing down the investigation within a week or two.

Oh so the police contact you directly anytime they close a case? You keep track of the closing time of all "typical" self defense cases? GTFOH

DP- FFX Co updates their blog when cases are updated/closed. Its not unusual to pay attention to cases you are interested in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's clear that the police don't consider this a slam dunk case of self defense. Of course, that doesn't mean that they won't eventually conclude it was self-defense, but given that there's still an active investigation after 2 years, we should all be able to agree that police don't see this as an easy case.

Do you mean 2 months?

I have no inside knowledge, but yes, 2 months seems a bit long if it was straightforward self-defense, BUT I have no idea how long these investigations typically take so it's really hard to judge.

Sorry, I 100% meant two months. That is still a long time for police to say nothing in a typical self-defense case. You'll often see the police closing down the investigation within a week or two.

Oh so the police contact you directly anytime they close a case? You keep track of the closing time of all "typical" self defense cases? GTFOH

Fact is the case is still very much open and the investigation is currently going on. WHEN AND IF the investigation is over the police will make a public statement to the families. They have not done this, they have informed the families that the case is still very much under investigation. I am not sleuthing, it's the reality of this case.