Queen Elizabeth II

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What will Camilla’s new title be? Queen Consort sounds like a mouthful.

She will be referred to simply as Queen Camilla. Queen Consort is just her role and it means that she is married to the monarch, not the actual monarch. QE2 was Queen Regent which meant she was the actual monarch.

So why was Prince Phillip never King Phillip?

Because technically QEII was the king, but it would’ve sounded weird and calling him king was not accurate, because he wasn’t the monarch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the bruises on her hand might signify she had had an IV inserted for fluids and/or medications, but perhaps was removed prior to meeting with new PM.

I wonder...will they ever disclose her actual cause of death?

She was 96. I think we all know her actual cause of death.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who controls the jewels and tiaras now? Kate and Camila and the others generally "borrowed" from the queen. Will they be Charles's to lend out or Camilla's?

The country owns them not the family.

Some of the jewels are the Queen’s personal property, and I assume will be dispensed according to her will. Many of the jewels, including the “Crown Jewels,” belong to the Crown, so they will be under Charles’s control.

No they don't get dispensed, they get kept in a line - so Camilla can wear them and then Kate.

Interesting - so the Queen doesn't will any of them specifically? Does she have personal property/items she can pass through a will?

She can will her personal jewels as she pleases. The pieces that belong to the Crown stay in the vault.

Yep so Camilla will have first pick and will probably reserve a few for her personal exclusive use (which she already has but may start wearing ones that were reserved for QEII only). Catherine will either get second pick or Charles/Camilla will loan specific ones out to her.

It’s so disrespectful calling the late Queen Elizabeth II by the name of a ship, the QEII. Please stop.

Sorry. Didn’t mean to disrespect. I was going to say the Queen before I realized I’d be talking about a different person I personally wish the press would stop calling Catherine Kate Middleton eleven years after her marriage so I get it…

Why are we supposed to call Kate Catherine?

Well technically we shouldn't call her either. We should call her HRH The Duchess of Cambridge and I guess soon to be HRH The Princess of Wales.

lol nobody’s ever calling Kate all of that.

Yea I get it. Nobody’s going to be calling the the Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge (her new title). I want Charles to invest them ASAP as Prince and Princess of Wales so we can call her Princess Catherine or Princess Kate and be done with it (yes, I know that’s technically incorrect but we did it with Princess Diana and we can do it with Kate).

Its not incorrect if she's GIVEN the title, which she will be (and Diana was.) The only thing that's incorrect is that she did not automatically become Princess Catherine upon her marriage. Unless she is bestowed the title, she would just be Princess William, which sounds weird to us because no one modern actually does this and instead uses their Duchess/Countess title given by the Queen. There is an older wife though Princess Michael of Kent and she uses it because she was not given a different title.

[Anonymous]

I’m just so happy that a 73 year old man can get a job finally!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the bruises on her hand might signify she had had an IV inserted for fluids and/or medications, but perhaps was removed prior to meeting with new PM.

I wonder...will they ever disclose her actual cause of death?

Her cause of death was being 96.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who controls the jewels and tiaras now? Kate and Camila and the others generally "borrowed" from the queen. Will they be Charles's to lend out or Camilla's?

The country owns them not the family.

Some of the jewels are the Queen’s personal property, and I assume will be dispensed according to her will. Many of the jewels, including the “Crown Jewels,” belong to the Crown, so they will be under Charles’s control.

No they don't get dispensed, they get kept in a line - so Camilla can wear them and then Kate.

Interesting - so the Queen doesn't will any of them specifically? Does she have personal property/items she can pass through a will?

She can will her personal jewels as she pleases. The pieces that belong to the Crown stay in the vault.

Yep so Camilla will have first pick and will probably reserve a few for her personal exclusive use (which she already has but may start wearing ones that were reserved for QEII only). Catherine will either get second pick or Charles/Camilla will loan specific ones out to her.

It’s so disrespectful calling the late Queen Elizabeth II by the name of a ship, the QEII. Please stop.

Sorry. Didn’t mean to disrespect. I was going to say the Queen before I realized I’d be talking about a different person I personally wish the press would stop calling Catherine Kate Middleton eleven years after her marriage so I get it…

Why are we supposed to call Kate Catherine?

Well technically we shouldn't call her either. We should call her HRH The Duchess of Cambridge and I guess soon to be HRH The Princess of Wales.

lol nobody’s ever calling Kate all of that.

Yea I get it. Nobody’s going to be calling the the Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge (her new title). I want Charles to invest them ASAP as Prince and Princess of Wales so we can call her Princess Catherine or Princess Kate and be done with it (yes, I know that’s technically incorrect but we did it with Princess Diana and we can do it with Kate).

Its not incorrect if she's GIVEN the title, which she will be (and Diana was.) The only thing that's incorrect is that she did not automatically become Princess Catherine upon her marriage. Unless she is bestowed the title, she would just be Princess William, which sounds weird to us because no one modern actually does this and instead uses their Duchess/Countess title given by the Queen. There is an older wife though Princess Michael of Kent and she uses it because she was not given a different title.

Huh? No, that’s not what I meant. The title Diana had and the title Catherine will get is The Princess of Wales. No name. But everyone called her Princess Diana anyway, even though that was wrong. Same with Duchess Meghan or Duchess Kate. Again, that’s wrong. No name. It’s “The Duchess of Sussex” and “The Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge.” The “The” gets removed and the name gets added in if they were to divorce (Diana became “Diana, Princess of Wales” - no “the,” add in the name).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the bruises on her hand might signify she had had an IV inserted for fluids and/or medications, but perhaps was removed prior to meeting with new PM.

I wonder...will they ever disclose her actual cause of death?

She was 96. I think we all know her actual cause of death.

Exactly - she died of complications of old age.

No that bruising is not from an IV. There are two pictures of the Queen with the new PM, one which shows her shaking Truss’s hand and the other shows her holding her cane - in that one you can see that both hands are darkened all over, fingers and back of the hands etc. This is something that I have seen only in the very very elderly hospice patients close to the end. The blood starts seeping out of the veins because the skin is very thin and even the most minor of pressure on the hands can damage the fragile aged blood vessels and cause them to weep and the skin to appear bruised. At this point of decline the person is often so frail - as in the Queen’s case - and they have lost much of the body fat on the extremities that would cushion their veins from this kind of damage.

In the photos notice how white the Queen’s face is - this is not only because she hadn’t been outside much in recent weeks, but also I’m sure she has been heavily powdered by her ladies in waiting to allow her appearance on camera in what would be her last photo. Under her clothing I’m sure her arms and legs also were heavily bruised in the manner of her hands. It’s a classic symptom of a dying body which I’ve seen many times in very elderly hospice patients.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who controls the jewels and tiaras now? Kate and Camila and the others generally "borrowed" from the queen. Will they be Charles's to lend out or Camilla's?

The country owns them not the family.

Some of the jewels are the Queen’s personal property, and I assume will be dispensed according to her will. Many of the jewels, including the “Crown Jewels,” belong to the Crown, so they will be under Charles’s control.

No they don't get dispensed, they get kept in a line - so Camilla can wear them and then Kate.

Interesting - so the Queen doesn't will any of them specifically? Does she have personal property/items she can pass through a will?

She can will her personal jewels as she pleases. The pieces that belong to the Crown stay in the vault.

Yep so Camilla will have first pick and will probably reserve a few for her personal exclusive use (which she already has but may start wearing ones that were reserved for QEII only). Catherine will either get second pick or Charles/Camilla will loan specific ones out to her.

It’s so disrespectful calling the late Queen Elizabeth II by the name of a ship, the QEII. Please stop.

No different than saying JPII for the late Pope John Paul II. In casual conversation I see no disrespect unless you’re saying it with a certain “tone”. - a Catholic

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who controls the jewels and tiaras now? Kate and Camila and the others generally "borrowed" from the queen. Will they be Charles's to lend out or Camilla's?

The country owns them not the family.

Some of the jewels are the Queen’s personal property, and I assume will be dispensed according to her will. Many of the jewels, including the “Crown Jewels,” belong to the Crown, so they will be under Charles’s control.

No they don't get dispensed, they get kept in a line - so Camilla can wear them and then Kate.

Interesting - so the Queen doesn't will any of them specifically? Does she have personal property/items she can pass through a will?

She can will her personal jewels as she pleases. The pieces that belong to the Crown stay in the vault.

Yep so Camilla will have first pick and will probably reserve a few for her personal exclusive use (which she already has but may start wearing ones that were reserved for QEII only). Catherine will either get second pick or Charles/Camilla will loan specific ones out to her.

It’s so disrespectful calling the late Queen Elizabeth II by the name of a ship, the QEII. Please stop.

Sorry. Didn’t mean to disrespect. I was going to say the Queen before I realized I’d be talking about a different person I personally wish the press would stop calling Catherine Kate Middleton eleven years after her marriage so I get it…

Why are we supposed to call Kate Catherine?

Well technically we shouldn't call her either. We should call her HRH The Duchess of Cambridge and I guess soon to be HRH The Princess of Wales.

lol nobody’s ever calling Kate all of that.

Yea I get it. Nobody’s going to be calling the the Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge (her new title). I want Charles to invest them ASAP as Prince and Princess of Wales so we can call her Princess Catherine or Princess Kate and be done with it (yes, I know that’s technically incorrect but we did it with Princess Diana and we can do it with Kate).

Its not incorrect if she's GIVEN the title, which she will be (and Diana was.) The only thing that's incorrect is that she did not automatically become Princess Catherine upon her marriage. Unless she is bestowed the title, she would just be Princess William, which sounds weird to us because no one modern actually does this and instead uses their Duchess/Countess title given by the Queen. There is an older wife though Princess Michael of Kent and she uses it because she was not given a different title.

Huh? No, that’s not what I meant. The title Diana had and the title Catherine will get is The Princess of Wales. No name. But everyone called her Princess Diana anyway, even though that was wrong. Same with Duchess Meghan or Duchess Kate. Again, that’s wrong. No name. It’s “The Duchess of Sussex” and “The Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge.” The “The” gets removed and the name gets added in if they were to divorce (Diana became “Diana, Princess of Wales” - no “the,” add in the name).

I don't think anyone is going to start referring to her as Princess Catherine. The press either use the super informal "Kate Middleton" or "Catherine Middleton" (both obviously irreverent and also incorrect) or they will use her title/style HRH The Duches of Cornwall and Cambridge (until this is formally changed to HRH The Princess of Wales.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who controls the jewels and tiaras now? Kate and Camila and the others generally "borrowed" from the queen. Will they be Charles's to lend out or Camilla's?

The country owns them not the family.

Some of the jewels are the Queen’s personal property, and I assume will be dispensed according to her will. Many of the jewels, including the “Crown Jewels,” belong to the Crown, so they will be under Charles’s control.

No they don't get dispensed, they get kept in a line - so Camilla can wear them and then Kate.

Interesting - so the Queen doesn't will any of them specifically? Does she have personal property/items she can pass through a will?

She can will her personal jewels as she pleases. The pieces that belong to the Crown stay in the vault.

Yep so Camilla will have first pick and will probably reserve a few for her personal exclusive use (which she already has but may start wearing ones that were reserved for QEII only). Catherine will either get second pick or Charles/Camilla will loan specific ones out to her.

It’s so disrespectful calling the late Queen Elizabeth II by the name of a ship, the QEII. Please stop.

LOL

She'll always be QEII to me.

Besides as we’re often reminded by the BRM-haters we aren’t British. We aren’t her subjects. Still I have a fondness for QEII despite her personal flaws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the bruises on her hand might signify she had had an IV inserted for fluids and/or medications, but perhaps was removed prior to meeting with new PM.

I wonder...will they ever disclose her actual cause of death?

She was 96. I think we all know her actual cause of death.

Exactly - she died of complications of old age.

No that bruising is not from an IV. There are two pictures of the Queen with the new PM, one which shows her shaking Truss’s hand and the other shows her holding her cane - in that one you can see that both hands are darkened all over, fingers and back of the hands etc. This is something that I have seen only in the very very elderly hospice patients close to the end. The blood starts seeping out of the veins because the skin is very thin and even the most minor of pressure on the hands can damage the fragile aged blood vessels and cause them to weep and the skin to appear bruised. At this point of decline the person is often so frail - as in the Queen’s case - and they have lost much of the body fat on the extremities that would cushion their veins from this kind of damage.

In the photos notice how white the Queen’s face is - this is not only because she hadn’t been outside much in recent weeks, but also I’m sure she has been heavily powdered by her ladies in waiting to allow her appearance on camera in what would be her last photo. Under her clothing I’m sure her arms and legs also were heavily bruised in the manner of her hands. It’s a classic symptom of a dying body which I’ve seen many times in very elderly hospice patients.

In some 2017 pictures her hands/wrist show some bruising. While the bruising look can happen near end of death, they are usually not conscious. And it’s not true bruising. It’s cyanosis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who controls the jewels and tiaras now? Kate and Camila and the others generally "borrowed" from the queen. Will they be Charles's to lend out or Camilla's?

The country owns them not the family.

Some of the jewels are the Queen’s personal property, and I assume will be dispensed according to her will. Many of the jewels, including the “Crown Jewels,” belong to the Crown, so they will be under Charles’s control.

No they don't get dispensed, they get kept in a line - so Camilla can wear them and then Kate.

Interesting - so the Queen doesn't will any of them specifically? Does she have personal property/items she can pass through a will?

She can will her personal jewels as she pleases. The pieces that belong to the Crown stay in the vault.

Yep so Camilla will have first pick and will probably reserve a few for her personal exclusive use (which she already has but may start wearing ones that were reserved for QEII only). Catherine will either get second pick or Charles/Camilla will loan specific ones out to her.

It’s so disrespectful calling the late Queen Elizabeth II by the name of a ship, the QEII. Please stop.

Sorry. Didn’t mean to disrespect. I was going to say the Queen before I realized I’d be talking about a different person I personally wish the press would stop calling Catherine Kate Middleton eleven years after her marriage so I get it…

Why are we supposed to call Kate Catherine?

Well technically we shouldn't call her either. We should call her HRH The Duchess of Cambridge and I guess soon to be HRH The Princess of Wales.

lol nobody’s ever calling Kate all of that.

Yea I get it. Nobody’s going to be calling the the Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge (her new title). I want Charles to invest them ASAP as Prince and Princess of Wales so we can call her Princess Catherine or Princess Kate and be done with it (yes, I know that’s technically incorrect but we did it with Princess Diana and we can do it with Kate).

Its not incorrect if she's GIVEN the title, which she will be (and Diana was.) The only thing that's incorrect is that she did not automatically become Princess Catherine upon her marriage. Unless she is bestowed the title, she would just be Princess William, which sounds weird to us because no one modern actually does this and instead uses their Duchess/Countess title given by the Queen. There is an older wife though Princess Michael of Kent and she uses it because she was not given a different title.

Huh? No, that’s not what I meant. The title Diana had and the title Catherine will get is The Princess of Wales. No name. But everyone called her Princess Diana anyway, even though that was wrong. Same with Duchess Meghan or Duchess Kate. Again, that’s wrong. No name. It’s “The Duchess of Sussex” and “The Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge.” The “The” gets removed and the name gets added in if they were to divorce (Diana became “Diana, Princess of Wales” - no “the,” add in the name).

I don't think anyone is going to start referring to her as Princess Catherine. The press either use the super informal "Kate Middleton" or "Catherine Middleton" (both obviously irreverent and also incorrect) or they will use her title/style HRH The Duches of Cornwall and Cambridge (until this is formally changed to HRH The Princess of Wales.)

I think they’re going to start calling her Princess Catherine when she becomes Princess of Wales. Just my opinion though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who controls the jewels and tiaras now? Kate and Camila and the others generally "borrowed" from the queen. Will they be Charles's to lend out or Camilla's?

The country owns them not the family.

Some of the jewels are the Queen’s personal property, and I assume will be dispensed according to her will. Many of the jewels, including the “Crown Jewels,” belong to the Crown, so they will be under Charles’s control.

No they don't get dispensed, they get kept in a line - so Camilla can wear them and then Kate.

Interesting - so the Queen doesn't will any of them specifically? Does she have personal property/items she can pass through a will?

She can will her personal jewels as she pleases. The pieces that belong to the Crown stay in the vault.

Yep so Camilla will have first pick and will probably reserve a few for her personal exclusive use (which she already has but may start wearing ones that were reserved for QEII only). Catherine will either get second pick or Charles/Camilla will loan specific ones out to her.

It’s so disrespectful calling the late Queen Elizabeth II by the name of a ship, the QEII. Please stop.

LOL

She'll always be QEII to me.

Besides as we’re often reminded by the BRM-haters we aren’t British. We aren’t her subjects. Still I have a fondness for QEII despite her personal flaws.[/quot
e]

Are people haters for reminding you that we fought two wars against those people or are you just very ignorant and cloaking under the 'fondness'for QEII?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who controls the jewels and tiaras now? Kate and Camila and the others generally "borrowed" from the queen. Will they be Charles's to lend out or Camilla's?

The country owns them not the family.

Some of the jewels are the Queen’s personal property, and I assume will be dispensed according to her will. Many of the jewels, including the “Crown Jewels,” belong to the Crown, so they will be under Charles’s control.

No they don't get dispensed, they get kept in a line - so Camilla can wear them and then Kate.

Interesting - so the Queen doesn't will any of them specifically? Does she have personal property/items she can pass through a will?

She can will her personal jewels as she pleases. The pieces that belong to the Crown stay in the vault.

Yep so Camilla will have first pick and will probably reserve a few for her personal exclusive use (which she already has but may start wearing ones that were reserved for QEII only). Catherine will either get second pick or Charles/Camilla will loan specific ones out to her.

It’s so disrespectful calling the late Queen Elizabeth II by the name of a ship, the QEII. Please stop.

LOL

She'll always be QEII to me.

Besides as we’re often reminded by the BRM-haters we aren’t British. We aren’t her subjects. Still I have a fondness for QEII despite her personal flaws.[/quot
e]

Are people haters for reminding you that we fought two wars against those people or are you just very ignorant and cloaking under the 'fondness'for QEII?

Who is “we”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the bruises on her hand might signify she had had an IV inserted for fluids and/or medications, but perhaps was removed prior to meeting with new PM.

I wonder...will they ever disclose her actual cause of death?

She was 96. I think we all know her actual cause of death.

Exactly - she died of complications of old age.

No that bruising is not from an IV. There are two pictures of the Queen with the new PM, one which shows her shaking Truss’s hand and the other shows her holding her cane - in that one you can see that both hands are darkened all over, fingers and back of the hands etc. This is something that I have seen only in the very very elderly hospice patients close to the end. The blood starts seeping out of the veins because the skin is very thin and even the most minor of pressure on the hands can damage the fragile aged blood vessels and cause them to weep and the skin to appear bruised. At this point of decline the person is often so frail - as in the Queen’s case - and they have lost much of the body fat on the extremities that would cushion their veins from this kind of damage.

In the photos notice how white the Queen’s face is - this is not only because she hadn’t been outside much in recent weeks, but also I’m sure she has been heavily powdered by her ladies in waiting to allow her appearance on camera in what would be her last photo. Under her clothing I’m sure her arms and legs also were heavily bruised in the manner of her hands. It’s a classic symptom of a dying body which I’ve seen many times in very elderly hospice patients.

In some 2017 pictures her hands/wrist show some bruising. While the bruising look can happen near end of death, they are usually not conscious. And it’s not true bruising. It’s cyanosis.

No, cyanosis is from inadequate oxygenation. A person can have bruising from seeping veins and still have healthy O2 saturation. Are you someone who works in elder care or hospice care? I doubt that you do or you would be very familiar with senile purpura.