Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have to wonder why she can't put on the baby carrier securely
that child looks pretty precarious in that photo

My theory is that he was facing out (the carrier is set up that way and he’s the right age for that) and she had to turn him around to face her quickly to avoid having his face in the photo. That’s why the strap isn’t even on her shoulder. If not that, yeah it’s not the right way to use the carrier.

Anyway probably best if we all ignore these people for a while. The drama was fun, but I don’t care about their normal lives (royal or not). *tells self to stop looking at this thread!*

[Anonymous]

I have to stop reading this thread. The pack mentality is strong with the ugly sisters egging each other on. Truly deranged bunch!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have to wonder why she can't put on the baby carrier securely
that child looks pretty precarious in that photo

My theory is that he was facing out (the carrier is set up that way and he’s the right age for that) and she had to turn him around to face her quickly to avoid having his face in the photo. That’s why the strap isn’t even on her shoulder. If not that, yeah it’s not the right way to use the carrier.

Anyway probably best if we all ignore these people for a while. The drama was fun, but I don’t care about their normal lives (royal or not). *tells self to stop looking at this thread!*

If that were true there would be pics of her flipping. I agree it looks like she’s never worn that carrier a day in her life. He needs to be in an ergo carrier with a wide seat. That doesn’t look good for his crotch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have to stop reading this thread. The pack mentality is strong with the ugly sisters egging each other on. Truly deranged bunch!

Yes we are!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have to stop reading this thread. The pack mentality is strong with the ugly sisters egging each other on. Truly deranged bunch!

Yes we are!

They’re just mad Prince Harry went back to his wife with joy in his eyes. Meanwhile the world press was there at the airport in the middle of the night at 1AM in freezing temperatures to capture it.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ABC/status/1219555764886495232

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Both of Harry’s main ex’s were at his wedding to MM. Meghan’s maid of honor at her first wedding said that out of the blue MM fedexd her rings back to her first husband and served him with divorce papers. MM also cut out this best friend (maid of honor) for no apparent reason.

I guess that’s why she only had one family member at her second wedding - she’s cut out everyone else. Even her uncle who pulled strings to get her a diplomatic internship hasn’t heard from her in a long time and gave an interview saying he was sad and perplexed as to why he was cut out.

Not defending MM, but her family - from her father to her sister - all seem like users and losers. Her father sells pictures and personal letters to/from his daughter to TABLOIDS and makes nasty, critical public comments about her to the press. Her sister has repeatedly seized the opportunity to bash MM to make a buck. The rest of the family, particularly on MM’s father’s side, seem like nasty degenerates.

Did MM fall far from the tree? Who knows? But her family seems pretty awful and I wouldn’t want relatives who behave like this at my wedding.

It sounds like mental illness runs in this family. While you can see why she’s cut out Samantha, it’s strange that Thomas went from someone she praised frequently on The Tig to someone not good enough to meet her fiancée. The way he handled it rightly caused a greater rift. What’s inexplicable is how she’s also cut out just about everyone else in her life also. Her former maid of honor being a good example. Someone’s close enough to you to serve in that role then you cut them out of your life when you climb up the ladder?

For someone wanting privacy, she sure seems to love being papped. Poor Harry seems to just want peace and normalcy but won’t be getting anything close to either. He gave up his family, heritage and lifestyle in exchange for nothing. It’s not going to end well for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Both of Harry’s main ex’s were at his wedding to MM. Meghan’s maid of honor at her first wedding said that out of the blue MM fedexd her rings back to her first husband and served him with divorce papers. MM also cut out this best friend (maid of honor) for no apparent reason.

I guess that’s why she only had one family member at her second wedding - she’s cut out everyone else. Even her uncle who pulled strings to get her a diplomatic internship hasn’t heard from her in a long time and gave an interview saying he was sad and perplexed as to why he was cut out.

40 years of running and hiding from her past as she acts out new “roles”. Common amongst frauds, interlopers and low class social climbers. Her and the dopey prince will run into money troubles within 3 to 5 years. Megain will be desperate enough to join a real housewives cast. Harry will be begging the family to take him back in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Samantha Markle has written an op ed for the Sun staying that her half sister in ungrateful and disrespectful.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10775155/samantha-markle-meghan-harry-never-find-happiness/

So the papers get a woman who has hated Meghan since the day Meghan drew breath to write an op-Ed. According to Samantha’s own daughter, Samantha has always hated Meghan. Samantha was an abusive mother. Samantha has no relationship with her three kids. However PP, you and others will pump Samantha up because she says what you want to hear about Meghan. How and what would Samantha know about Meghan to write about her. The two of them have not been in the same room since Meghan was a small child

Samantha Markle has no relationship with any of her three kids? And yet she is praised by the MM haters?

That suddenly clears up a lot.

No one praises Samantha.

The Meghan haters sure give her a lot of credibility. Same with Thomas Markle.

As a parent, I can’t imagine selling out my child to the tabloids. Even if I was upset with them or angry, selling information about your kids to the highest bidder is so morally bankrupt, I automatically have zero respect for them. They think they’re making Meghan look bad, but all they’re doing is showing the world what she had to overcome to get where she is.

Honestly, every time I see one of these stories, I gain more respect for Meghan. Getting away from those vultures is no small feat. Good for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have to wonder why she can't put on the baby carrier securely
that child looks pretty precarious in that photo

My theory is that he was facing out (the carrier is set up that way and he’s the right age for that) and she had to turn him around to face her quickly to avoid having his face in the photo. That’s why the strap isn’t even on her shoulder. If not that, yeah it’s not the right way to use the carrier.

Anyway probably best if we all ignore these people for a while. The drama was fun, but I don’t care about their normal lives (royal or not). *tells self to stop looking at this thread!*

There were several blinds about MM wanting to monetize exposure to the baby which is why you didn't see him very often at all, but they were trying to do it without the RF getting wind of it since it was clearly outside of firm rules. So it looks like they're only hiding him so they can expose him for money later. Definitely would not be surprised to see an 'Archie's 1st Birthday!' spread in People since that seems to be her lackey of choice these days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have to wonder why she can't put on the baby carrier securely
that child looks pretty precarious in that photo

My theory is that he was facing out (the carrier is set up that way and he’s the right age for that) and she had to turn him around to face her quickly to avoid having his face in the photo. That’s why the strap isn’t even on her shoulder. If not that, yeah it’s not the right way to use the carrier.

Anyway probably best if we all ignore these people for a while. The drama was fun, but I don’t care about their normal lives (royal or not). *tells self to stop looking at this thread!*

There were several blinds about MM wanting to monetize exposure to the baby which is why you didn't see him very often at all, but they were trying to do it without the RF getting wind of it since it was clearly outside of firm rules. So it looks like they're only hiding him so they can expose him for money later. Definitely would not be surprised to see an 'Archie's 1st Birthday!' spread in People since that seems to be her lackey of choice these days.

Seems plausible to me and we’ll know soon enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Samantha Markle has written an op ed for the Sun staying that her half sister in ungrateful and disrespectful.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10775155/samantha-markle-meghan-harry-never-find-happiness/

So the papers get a woman who has hated Meghan since the day Meghan drew breath to write an op-Ed. According to Samantha’s own daughter, Samantha has always hated Meghan. Samantha was an abusive mother. Samantha has no relationship with her three kids. However PP, you and others will pump Samantha up because she says what you want to hear about Meghan. How and what would Samantha know about Meghan to write about her. The two of them have not been in the same room since Meghan was a small child

Samantha Markle has no relationship with any of her three kids? And yet she is praised by the MM haters?

That suddenly clears up a lot.

No one praises Samantha.

The Meghan haters sure give her a lot of credibility. Same with Thomas Markle.

As a parent, I can’t imagine selling out my child to the tabloids. Even if I was upset with them or angry, selling information about your kids to the highest bidder is so morally bankrupt, I automatically have zero respect for them. They think they’re making Meghan look bad, but all they’re doing is showing the world what she had to overcome to get where she is.

Honestly, every time I see one of these stories, I gain more respect for Meghan. Getting away from those vultures is no small feat. Good for her.

But she escaped the Markle’s years ago. Has nothing to do with leaving the BRF.

[Anonymous]

They’re just mad Prince Harry went back to his wife with joy in his eyes. Meanwhile the world press was there at the airport in the middle of the night at 1AM in freezing temperatures to capture it.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ABC/status/1219555764886495232

He does look really happy to be reunited! We’ll have to see how this works out for the long term but he looks happy. Good for him!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Samantha Markle has written an op ed for the Sun staying that her half sister in ungrateful and disrespectful.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10775155/samantha-markle-meghan-harry-never-find-happiness/

So the papers get a woman who has hated Meghan since the day Meghan drew breath to write an op-Ed. According to Samantha’s own daughter, Samantha has always hated Meghan. Samantha was an abusive mother. Samantha has no relationship with her three kids. However PP, you and others will pump Samantha up because she says what you want to hear about Meghan. How and what would Samantha know about Meghan to write about her. The two of them have not been in the same room since Meghan was a small child

Samantha Markle has no relationship with any of her three kids? And yet she is praised by the MM haters?

That suddenly clears up a lot.

No one praises Samantha.

The Meghan haters sure give her a lot of credibility. Same with Thomas Markle.

As a parent, I can’t imagine selling out my child to the tabloids. Even if I was upset with them or angry, selling information about your kids to the highest bidder is so morally bankrupt, I automatically have zero respect for them. They think they’re making Meghan look bad, but all they’re doing is showing the world what she had to overcome to get where she is.

Honestly, every time I see one of these stories, I gain more respect for Meghan. Getting away from those vultures is no small feat. Good for her.

But she escaped the Markle’s years ago. Has nothing to do with leaving the BRF.

Sure, she cut them off after they sold her out to the tabloids and published horrible letters about her. But look, Thomas Markle and Samantha are still trying to drag her down. He’s testifying in support of the tabloids in an upcoming trial. Samantha still shows up in opinion pieces to anyone who will give her an audience. They are the definition of parasites.

They are out of her private life, but they are still doing everything they can to drag her through the mud publicly. Again, I have enormous respect for Meghan for having gotten out of those toxic relationships.

[Anonymous]

We so far they haven’t had a break from the press. Wonder if that will ever happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Samantha Markle has written an op ed for the Sun staying that her half sister in ungrateful and disrespectful.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10775155/samantha-markle-meghan-harry-never-find-happiness/

So the papers get a woman who has hated Meghan since the day Meghan drew breath to write an op-Ed. According to Samantha’s own daughter, Samantha has always hated Meghan. Samantha was an abusive mother. Samantha has no relationship with her three kids. However PP, you and others will pump Samantha up because she says what you want to hear about Meghan. How and what would Samantha know about Meghan to write about her. The two of them have not been in the same room since Meghan was a small child

Samantha Markle has no relationship with any of her three kids? And yet she is praised by the MM haters?

That suddenly clears up a lot.

No one praises Samantha.

The Meghan haters sure give her a lot of credibility. Same with Thomas Markle.

As a parent, I can’t imagine selling out my child to the tabloids. Even if I was upset with them or angry, selling information about your kids to the highest bidder is so morally bankrupt, I automatically have zero respect for them. They think they’re making Meghan look bad, but all they’re doing is showing the world what she had to overcome to get where she is.

Honestly, every time I see one of these stories, I gain more respect for Meghan. Getting away from those vultures is no small feat. Good for her.

But she escaped the Markle’s years ago. Has nothing to do with leaving the BRF.

Sure, she cut them off after they sold her out to the tabloids and published horrible letters about her. But look, Thomas Markle and Samantha are still trying to drag her down. He’s testifying in support of the tabloids in an upcoming trial. Samantha still shows up in opinion pieces to anyone who will give her an audience. They are the definition of parasites.

They are out of her private life, but they are still doing everything they can to drag her through the mud publicly. Again, I have enormous respect for Meghan for having gotten out of those toxic relationships.

But still has nothing to do with leaving Harry’s family too.