Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Roger Stone is now saying he was “treated worse than Osama Bin Laden.”

Who can forget that appearance bin Laden made on Tucker Carlson’s show with that bullet through his eye?

I thought that was a "quote" from an Onion article? Did he really say that?

Yeah he really said that.

“To storm my house with greater force than was used to take down bin Laden or El Chapo or Pablo Escobar, to terrorize my wife and my dogs, is unconscionable,” Stone told reporters Monday.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/politics/2019/01/28/roger-stone-claimed-more-force-was-used-him-than-bin-laden-el-chapo-raids-nope/?__twitter_impression=true

What a jack a$$

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump is sharing his orange make up with Stone. He's got it on and there is a big line where he missed a spot applying it. Maybe he should get some tips from Mr. Trump.

Liberal: I can’t argue with the truth so I’m going to say something stupid

Ummm, what? This is just a comment about Stone's stupid make up. Thought it would liven the debate or at the very least make someone chuckle. It is a bit ridiculous defending this media hound, don't ya think?

Your comment was beyond vapid. I'm not defending anyone - I'm simply interested in equal application under the law. The FBI seems to be weaponized for the Democrats, as I don't see Abedin nor Mills being perp-walked.

Maybe Abedin didn't commit any crimes or lie to the FBI. Has that thought even occurred to you?

OMG, the stupid just radiates off the screen:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/breaking-report-top-hillary-aide-huma-abedin-gave-false-statements-to-fbi-agents-in-2017-interview/

https://dailycaller.com/2017/12/04/clinton-aides-went-unpunished-after-making-false-statements-to-anti-trump-fbi-supervisor/

And for the people that missed it the first time I posted it:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-hanson-mueller-mccabe-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-james-comey-huma-abedin-investigation-0430-story.html

Yes, the stupid radiates from the screens of idiots linking to thegatewaypundit and daily caller. Why don’t you find some normal sources? Yours promulgate pizzagate and Jade helm conspiracies. Seriously, you are brainwashed and you’re too dunning-Kruger to see it.

+1 The sources are unreliable, and themselves are lying or Dunning-Krueger victims. I look at Abedin's actual F-302 the way a prosecutor or defense lawyer would, and it is not a prosecutable case. Anyone who thinks she is lying makes an unwarranted assumption about her meaning. Any 3rd rate defense lawyer could drive a truck through that assumption. I'd explain it, but Dunning-Krueger PP who called me stupid would not understand it.

[Anonymous]

Love Roger Stone. Such a badass ... and with panache. The Nixon salute was priceless.

[Anonymous]

Roger Stone's lawyers? Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump is sharing his orange make up with Stone. He's got it on and there is a big line where he missed a spot applying it. Maybe he should get some tips from Mr. Trump.

Liberal: I can’t argue with the truth so I’m going to say something stupid

Ummm, what? This is just a comment about Stone's stupid make up. Thought it would liven the debate or at the very least make someone chuckle. It is a bit ridiculous defending this media hound, don't ya think?

Your comment was beyond vapid. I'm not defending anyone - I'm simply interested in equal application under the law. The FBI seems to be weaponized for the Democrats, as I don't see Abedin nor Mills being perp-walked.

Maybe Abedin didn't commit any crimes or lie to the FBI. Has that thought even occurred to you?

OMG, the stupid just radiates off the screen:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/breaking-report-top-hillary-aide-huma-abedin-gave-false-statements-to-fbi-agents-in-2017-interview/

https://dailycaller.com/2017/12/04/clinton-aides-went-unpunished-after-making-false-statements-to-anti-trump-fbi-supervisor/

And for the people that missed it the first time I posted it:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-hanson-mueller-mccabe-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-james-comey-huma-abedin-investigation-0430-story.html

Yes, the stupid radiates from the screens of idiots linking to thegatewaypundit and daily caller. Why don’t you find some normal sources? Yours promulgate pizzagate and Jade helm conspiracies. Seriously, you are brainwashed and you’re too dunning-Kruger to see it.

+1 The sources are unreliable, and themselves are lying or Dunning-Krueger victims. I look at Abedin's actual F-302 the way a prosecutor or defense lawyer would, and it is not a prosecutable case. Anyone who thinks she is lying makes an unwarranted assumption about her meaning. Any 3rd rate defense lawyer could drive a truck through that assumption. I'd explain it, but Dunning-Krueger PP who called me stupid would not understand it.

Again, you ignore the Chicago Tribune. But of course you do. Brennan thought she and Mills were lying but I guess he's not nearly as smart as you are. Narcissistic much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump is sharing his orange make up with Stone. He's got it on and there is a big line where he missed a spot applying it. Maybe he should get some tips from Mr. Trump.

Liberal: I can’t argue with the truth so I’m going to say something stupid

Ummm, what? This is just a comment about Stone's stupid make up. Thought it would liven the debate or at the very least make someone chuckle. It is a bit ridiculous defending this media hound, don't ya think?

Your comment was beyond vapid. I'm not defending anyone - I'm simply interested in equal application under the law. The FBI seems to be weaponized for the Democrats, as I don't see Abedin nor Mills being perp-walked.

Maybe Abedin didn't commit any crimes or lie to the FBI. Has that thought even occurred to you?

OMG, the stupid just radiates off the screen:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/breaking-report-top-hillary-aide-huma-abedin-gave-false-statements-to-fbi-agents-in-2017-interview/

https://dailycaller.com/2017/12/04/clinton-aides-went-unpunished-after-making-false-statements-to-anti-trump-fbi-supervisor/

And for the people that missed it the first time I posted it:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-hanson-mueller-mccabe-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-james-comey-huma-abedin-investigation-0430-story.html

Yes, the stupid radiates from the screens of idiots linking to thegatewaypundit and daily caller. Why don’t you find some normal sources? Yours promulgate pizzagate and Jade helm conspiracies. Seriously, you are brainwashed and you’re too dunning-Kruger to see it.

+1 The sources are unreliable, and themselves are lying or Dunning-Krueger victims. I look at Abedin's actual F-302 the way a prosecutor or defense lawyer would, and it is not a prosecutable case. Anyone who thinks she is lying makes an unwarranted assumption about her meaning. Any 3rd rate defense lawyer could drive a truck through that assumption. I'd explain it, but Dunning-Krueger PP who called me stupid would not understand it.

Again, you ignore the Chicago Tribune. But of course you do. Brennan thought she and Mills were lying but I guess he's not nearly as smart as you are. Narcissistic much?

The Chicago Tribune published an opinion piece by a National Review columnist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump is sharing his orange make up with Stone. He's got it on and there is a big line where he missed a spot applying it. Maybe he should get some tips from Mr. Trump.

Liberal: I can’t argue with the truth so I’m going to say something stupid

Ummm, what? This is just a comment about Stone's stupid make up. Thought it would liven the debate or at the very least make someone chuckle. It is a bit ridiculous defending this media hound, don't ya think?

Your comment was beyond vapid. I'm not defending anyone - I'm simply interested in equal application under the law. The FBI seems to be weaponized for the Democrats, as I don't see Abedin nor Mills being perp-walked.

Maybe Abedin didn't commit any crimes or lie to the FBI. Has that thought even occurred to you?

OMG, the stupid just radiates off the screen:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/breaking-report-top-hillary-aide-huma-abedin-gave-false-statements-to-fbi-agents-in-2017-interview/

https://dailycaller.com/2017/12/04/clinton-aides-went-unpunished-after-making-false-statements-to-anti-trump-fbi-supervisor/

And for the people that missed it the first time I posted it:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-hanson-mueller-mccabe-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-james-comey-huma-abedin-investigation-0430-story.html

Yes, the stupid radiates from the screens of idiots linking to thegatewaypundit and daily caller. Why don’t you find some normal sources? Yours promulgate pizzagate and Jade helm conspiracies. Seriously, you are brainwashed and you’re too dunning-Kruger to see it.

+1 The sources are unreliable, and themselves are lying or Dunning-Krueger victims. I look at Abedin's actual F-302 the way a prosecutor or defense lawyer would, and it is not a prosecutable case. Anyone who thinks she is lying makes an unwarranted assumption about her meaning. Any 3rd rate defense lawyer could drive a truck through that assumption. I'd explain it, but Dunning-Krueger PP who called me stupid would not understand it.

Again, you ignore the Chicago Tribune. But of course you do. Brennan thought she and Mills were lying but I guess he's not nearly as smart as you are. Narcissistic much?

That was an opinion piece in the Chicago Tribune, so that's a fail. Why are you citing Brennan? I thought he was supposed to be one of the liars?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump is sharing his orange make up with Stone. He's got it on and there is a big line where he missed a spot applying it. Maybe he should get some tips from Mr. Trump.

Liberal: I can’t argue with the truth so I’m going to say something stupid

Ummm, what? This is just a comment about Stone's stupid make up. Thought it would liven the debate or at the very least make someone chuckle. It is a bit ridiculous defending this media hound, don't ya think?

Your comment was beyond vapid. I'm not defending anyone - I'm simply interested in equal application under the law. The FBI seems to be weaponized for the Democrats, as I don't see Abedin nor Mills being perp-walked.

What did they do wrong? What have they been charged with? The GOP had two years to investigate them. Did they?

Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey -- they are not Dems

You seem to believe that reality and laws have a liberal bias.

All protect Hillary

Yeah Comey protected her so much that she lost the election.

He actually did try to protect her but it backfired.

Because being stupid about emails is not illegal and not unAmerican.

She was freaking Secretary of State and supposedly a brilliant woman. You think she had no clue? Really?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

All protect Hillary

Maybe you missed this: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/12/house-benghazi-committee-files-final-report-and-shuts-down/95336692/

or were you talking about emails? https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/392314-read-the-ig-report-on-justice-fbi-clinton-emails

So what did Hillary do that needs protecting? And if you are outraged about that, what about the servicement who died in Niger? And how about the entire Trump family using unsecure phones and emails despite multiple warnings to the contrary?

Firstly, there has been so much crap that's been proven untrue about the Trump administration, I take all that news with a grain of salt. Regarding Hillary, again, Brennan himself was surprised she, Mills and Abedin got off scott free.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump is sharing his orange make up with Stone. He's got it on and there is a big line where he missed a spot applying it. Maybe he should get some tips from Mr. Trump.

Liberal: I can’t argue with the truth so I’m going to say something stupid

Ummm, what? This is just a comment about Stone's stupid make up. Thought it would liven the debate or at the very least make someone chuckle. It is a bit ridiculous defending this media hound, don't ya think?

Your comment was beyond vapid. I'm not defending anyone - I'm simply interested in equal application under the law. The FBI seems to be weaponized for the Democrats, as I don't see Abedin nor Mills being perp-walked.

Maybe Abedin didn't commit any crimes or lie to the FBI. Has that thought even occurred to you?

OMG, the stupid just radiates off the screen:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/breaking-report-top-hillary-aide-huma-abedin-gave-false-statements-to-fbi-agents-in-2017-interview/

https://dailycaller.com/2017/12/04/clinton-aides-went-unpunished-after-making-false-statements-to-anti-trump-fbi-supervisor/

And for the people that missed it the first time I posted it:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-hanson-mueller-mccabe-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-james-comey-huma-abedin-investigation-0430-story.html

Yes, the stupid radiates from the screens of idiots linking to thegatewaypundit and daily caller. Why don’t you find some normal sources? Yours promulgate pizzagate and Jade helm conspiracies. Seriously, you are brainwashed and you’re too dunning-Kruger to see it.

+1 The sources are unreliable, and themselves are lying or Dunning-Krueger victims. I look at Abedin's actual F-302 the way a prosecutor or defense lawyer would, and it is not a prosecutable case. Anyone who thinks she is lying makes an unwarranted assumption about her meaning. Any 3rd rate defense lawyer could drive a truck through that assumption. I'd explain it, but Dunning-Krueger PP who called me stupid would not understand it.

Again, you ignore the Chicago Tribune. But of course you do. Brennan thought she and Mills were lying but I guess he's not nearly as smart as you are. Narcissistic much?

The Chicago Tribune published an opinion piece by a National Review columnist.

And?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump is sharing his orange make up with Stone. He's got it on and there is a big line where he missed a spot applying it. Maybe he should get some tips from Mr. Trump.

Liberal: I can’t argue with the truth so I’m going to say something stupid

Ummm, what? This is just a comment about Stone's stupid make up. Thought it would liven the debate or at the very least make someone chuckle. It is a bit ridiculous defending this media hound, don't ya think?

Your comment was beyond vapid. I'm not defending anyone - I'm simply interested in equal application under the law. The FBI seems to be weaponized for the Democrats, as I don't see Abedin nor Mills being perp-walked.

What did they do wrong? What have they been charged with? The GOP had two years to investigate them. Did they?

Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey -- they are not Dems

You seem to believe that reality and laws have a liberal bias.

All protect Hillary

Yeah Comey protected her so much that she lost the election.

He actually did try to protect her but it backfired.

Because being stupid about emails is not illegal and not unAmerican.

She was freaking Secretary of State and supposedly a brilliant woman. You think she had no clue? Really?

Lol Ivanka didn't know better.

C'mon, everyone is so stupid about email. Not everyone has clandestine Russian contacts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump is sharing his orange make up with Stone. He's got it on and there is a big line where he missed a spot applying it. Maybe he should get some tips from Mr. Trump.

Liberal: I can’t argue with the truth so I’m going to say something stupid

Ummm, what? This is just a comment about Stone's stupid make up. Thought it would liven the debate or at the very least make someone chuckle. It is a bit ridiculous defending this media hound, don't ya think?

Your comment was beyond vapid. I'm not defending anyone - I'm simply interested in equal application under the law. The FBI seems to be weaponized for the Democrats, as I don't see Abedin nor Mills being perp-walked.

Maybe Abedin didn't commit any crimes or lie to the FBI. Has that thought even occurred to you?

OMG, the stupid just radiates off the screen:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/breaking-report-top-hillary-aide-huma-abedin-gave-false-statements-to-fbi-agents-in-2017-interview/

https://dailycaller.com/2017/12/04/clinton-aides-went-unpunished-after-making-false-statements-to-anti-trump-fbi-supervisor/

And for the people that missed it the first time I posted it:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-hanson-mueller-mccabe-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-james-comey-huma-abedin-investigation-0430-story.html

Yes, the stupid radiates from the screens of idiots linking to thegatewaypundit and daily caller. Why don’t you find some normal sources? Yours promulgate pizzagate and Jade helm conspiracies. Seriously, you are brainwashed and you’re too dunning-Kruger to see it.

+1 The sources are unreliable, and themselves are lying or Dunning-Krueger victims. I look at Abedin's actual F-302 the way a prosecutor or defense lawyer would, and it is not a prosecutable case. Anyone who thinks she is lying makes an unwarranted assumption about her meaning. Any 3rd rate defense lawyer could drive a truck through that assumption. I'd explain it, but Dunning-Krueger PP who called me stupid would not understand it.

Again, you ignore the Chicago Tribune. But of course you do. Brennan thought she and Mills were lying but I guess he's not nearly as smart as you are. Narcissistic much?

The Chicago Tribune published an opinion piece by a National Review columnist.

And?

As in, it's opinion piece by a conservative columnist, not a news article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump is sharing his orange make up with Stone. He's got it on and there is a big line where he missed a spot applying it. Maybe he should get some tips from Mr. Trump.

Liberal: I can’t argue with the truth so I’m going to say something stupid

Ummm, what? This is just a comment about Stone's stupid make up. Thought it would liven the debate or at the very least make someone chuckle. It is a bit ridiculous defending this media hound, don't ya think?

Your comment was beyond vapid. I'm not defending anyone - I'm simply interested in equal application under the law. The FBI seems to be weaponized for the Democrats, as I don't see Abedin nor Mills being perp-walked.

What did they do wrong? What have they been charged with? The GOP had two years to investigate them. Did they?

Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey -- they are not Dems

You seem to believe that reality and laws have a liberal bias.

All protect Hillary

Yeah Comey protected her so much that she lost the election.

He actually did try to protect her but it backfired.

Because being stupid about emails is not illegal and not unAmerican.

She was freaking Secretary of State and supposedly a brilliant woman. You think she had no clue? Really?

Well I suppose she is not so brilliant after all. She did lose the election to the dumbest, most inexperienced person ever to run for President, so yeah, there might quite a few things she doesn't know much about.

[Anonymous]

At the time, the rules around emails and secure devices was such that Hillary didn't break any laws. Was it unethical to circumvent government email servers? Sure. But now, because of Hillary, it is illegal. So why is it ok for GWB and Se. Powell to have done the same thing Hillary did, and now it is ok for the Trumps to do it (and worse actually, because they have been explicitly told their devices are unsecure?)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At the time, the rules around emails and secure devices was such that Hillary didn't break any laws. Was it unethical to circumvent government email servers? Sure. But now, because of Hillary, it is illegal. So why is it ok for GWB and Se. Powell to have done the same thing Hillary did, and now it is ok for the Trumps to do it (and worse actually, because they have been explicitly told their devices are unsecure?)

Because she didn’t want to bake those f*cking cookies. GOP has viscerally hated her ever since.