Trump says he's agreed to Fox debate while Harris sticks with ABC plan

[Anonymous]

Harris has to go on Fox to show that she can handle it. I people will rightly say if she can’t handle Fox, how can she handle being a world leader?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harris has to go on Fox to show that she can handle it. I people will rightly say if she can’t handle Fox, how can she handle being a world leader?

I tend to agree with this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harris has to go on Fox to show that she can handle it. I people will rightly say if she can’t handle Fox, how can she handle being a world leader?

Ball's in your court, Kamala........

Are you going to chicken out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris has to go on Fox to show that she can handle it. I people will rightly say if she can’t handle Fox, how can she handle being a world leader?

I tend to agree with this.

I think she’ll go on FOX. But she doesn’t need to rush to respond.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris has to go on Fox to show that she can handle it. I people will rightly say if she can’t handle Fox, how can she handle being a world leader?

Ball's in your court, Kamala........

Are you going to chicken out?

You guys are so weird. Three debates were already agreed on. Not sure why Chicken Donald has to back out of that.

[Anonymous]

Orange man talks debate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harris has to go on Fox to show that she can handle it. I people will rightly say if she can’t handle Fox, how can she handle being a world leader?

No, she doesn't.

[Anonymous]

No one has to go on Fox to prove anything. Fox is a joke (which they’ve pretty much admitted themselves).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harris has to go on Fox to show that she can handle it. I people will rightly say if she can’t handle Fox, how can she handle being a world leader?

You’re absolutely right. Over 2 weeks and no press conference or questions. Refusing debates. Her VP nominee is being put through the ringer and neither are addressing it. If she can’t run a campaign how can she run a country?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris has to go on Fox to show that she can handle it. I people will rightly say if she can’t handle Fox, how can she handle being a world leader?

Ball's in your court, Kamala........

Are you going to chicken out?

You guys are so weird. Three debates were already agreed on. Not sure why Chicken Donald has to back out of that.

Waiting to hear from Kamala. Will she agree to the three debates?

Will she respond, or will she only have men speak for her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No one has to go on Fox to prove anything. Fox is a joke (which they’ve pretty much admitted themselves).

You are so FOS.
Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum are two of the best.
Kamala can't handle it. She doesn't know what she stands for, or won't articulate it because she knows the American people would reject it.
If she is such a tough prosecutor, she should not fear being questioned by Baier and MacCallum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread is misleading. Trump did not"agree" to anything. He is trying to set the terms.

There was an already scheduled debate that Kamala 100% plans to attend. Trump is trying to set the terms where a debate will be held at Fox entertainment before the already scheduled debate and if Kamala does not show up, he will then have an excuse to drop out of the pre-scheduled debate on ABC where he is already prepared to say "Kamala did not show up to the fox debate so I don't need to show up to the ABC debate" He is so transparent.

The thing is, there should not ever be a debate on Fox entertainment. They were complicit with the 2020 election fraud lie.

He agreed to a debate, which you all said he wouldn’t, because he’s scared.

Keep moving the goalposts.

Did you not read everything I wrote? My prediction is because he's setting this new debate scheduled for September 4 which Harris has no reason to go to and Fox entertainment has no right to hold. When Harris does not go to that debate as you noticed, she has not yet agreed to his new terms, Trump is going to drop out of the September 10 debate. so I repeat. Trump has not agreed to three debates. He might have agreed to the ABC debate. But the Fox debate is not an agreement. That's something he added on his own. And I repeat, I predict he will end up not showing up for the September 10 debate on ABC based on the reason I just outlined.

my prediction is based on his past behavior which predicts future behavior. And he has shown himself to be a coward in the past.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread is misleading. Trump did not"agree" to anything. He is trying to set the terms.

There was an already scheduled debate that Kamala 100% plans to attend. Trump is trying to set the terms where a debate will be held at Fox entertainment before the already scheduled debate and if Kamala does not show up, he will then have an excuse to drop out of the pre-scheduled debate on ABC where he is already prepared to say "Kamala did not show up to the fox debate so I don't need to show up to the ABC debate" He is so transparent.

The thing is, there should not ever be a debate on Fox entertainment. They were complicit with the 2020 election fraud lie.

He agreed to a debate, which you all said he wouldn’t, because he’s scared.

Keep moving the goalposts.

Did you not read everything I wrote? My prediction is because he's setting this new debate scheduled for September 4 which Harris has no reason to go to and Fox entertainment has no right to hold. When Harris does not go to that debate as you noticed, she has not yet agreed to his new terms, Trump is going to drop out of the September 10 debate. so I repeat. Trump has not agreed to three debates. He might have agreed to the ABC debate. But the Fox debate is not an agreement. That's something he added on his own. And I repeat, I predict he will end up not showing up for the September 10 debate on ABC based on the reason I just outlined.

my prediction is based on his past behavior which predicts future behavior. And he has shown himself to be a coward in the past.

Actually, at this point, it appears that Kamala is the coward.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris has to go on Fox to show that she can handle it. I people will rightly say if she can’t handle Fox, how can she handle being a world leader?

Ball's in your court, Kamala........

Are you going to chicken out?

Why should anybody go on Fox. It's an entertainment network not a news network and they had to pay millions because they were part of the 2020 election fraud lie. They don't deserve the advertisers or the viewership of a national debate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris has to go on Fox to show that she can handle it. I people will rightly say if she can’t handle Fox, how can she handle being a world leader?

I tend to agree with this.

I think she’ll go on FOX. But she doesn’t need to rush to respond.

I agree and I think she’ll do OK in a Fox debate. But the September 4 date is the problem. He wants to put her straight into debate prep right after the convention instead of barnstorming the country right after the convention. And there’s no way it should be the first one.