Where is the outrage about the Israeli starvation of Gaza?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hamas has been circulating fake stories and images about Gaza starvation, people on here are either Hamas or trolls or maybe both lol

I know right. It reminds me of all those fake stories and images in Germany 1943. Fake news. Fake holocaust. All fake

Starvation photos are not fake - however, there is more to the story. Look at the entirety of the photos, not just closeups. You will see plenty of able bodied adults, male and female, and even children.

The disturbing photos are of children who are sick or disabled, and have special nutrition needs. That type of food has been very scarce to absent, and the most vulnerable and sickest children are suffering. Neurotypical children, not so much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wars end when the losing side surrenders. End of story. If the Palestinians prefer fighting to the death than surrendering then so be it. They're getting their wish.

Interesting. Would you say the same about the siege of Leningrad, where up to one million people died of hunger?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wars end when the losing side surrenders. End of story. If the Palestinians prefer fighting to the death than surrendering then so be it. They're getting their wish.

Interesting. Would you say the same about the siege of Leningrad, where up to one million people died of hunger?

No, because they are not the chosen people. And if you think otherwise, that's just being anti-Semitic

[Anonymous]

It’s horrific. Truly horrific. Israel deserves to be leveled

[Anonymous]

I think the Jewish will find themselves in the long run ostracized globally in the court of public opinion. Unfortunately on the business and organizational front, because they control in many industries, the money, they will be able to continue to succeed but I really do think that the genocide they started will result in more anti-semitism which will wreck havoc on them ultimately moving forward. It'll be interesting to see how they may continue with their success in the business world when enough people personally take issue with their nationalism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wars end when the losing side surrenders. End of story. If the Palestinians prefer fighting to the death than surrendering then so be it. They're getting their wish.

Interesting. Would you say the same about the siege of Leningrad, where up to one million people died of hunger?

The war in Gaza would end today if Hamas surrendered and agreed to live in peace with Israel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wars end when the losing side surrenders. End of story. If the Palestinians prefer fighting to the death than surrendering then so be it. They're getting their wish.

Interesting. Would you say the same about the siege of Leningrad, where up to one million people died of hunger?

The war in Gaza would end today if Hamas surrendered and agreed to live in peace with Israel.

How exactly might one live in peace with a neighbor who asserts their right to attack you (for any reason or none at all) as part of their “preemptive self-defense” doctrine, but denies you the same right?

[Anonymous]

I'm outraged by the Gazans being starved when NGOs have full food trucks waiting on the Israeli border trying to get in and save them (I got a message from World Central Kitchen last week saying they have run out of food in Gaza, but couldn't get the food they have over the border).

I am nauseated that I myself am complicit in the killing of the Gazan children. Hundreds of billions of our American tax dollars go to Israeli military aid each year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wars end when the losing side surrenders. End of story. If the Palestinians prefer fighting to the death than surrendering then so be it. They're getting their wish.

Interesting. Would you say the same about the siege of Leningrad, where up to one million people died of hunger?

The war in Gaza would end today if Hamas surrendered and agreed to live in peace with Israel.

How exactly might one live in peace with a neighbor who asserts their right to attack you (for any reason or none at all) as part of their “preemptive self-defense” doctrine, but denies you the same right?

We all know the various governing bodies of the Palestinians have been attacking Israel and stating out loud they want Israel destroyed for as long as Israel has existed. Again, if they agreed to live in peace with Israel, the conflict would be over. That's their choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wars end when the losing side surrenders. End of story. If the Palestinians prefer fighting to the death than surrendering then so be it. They're getting their wish.

Interesting. Would you say the same about the siege of Leningrad, where up to one million people died of hunger?

it was war. And in the end the Soviets won, as will the Israelis, despite terrorist pinpricks all along the way. The Germans suffered dramatically in the Soviet Union, and could avoided all their own losses had they not invaded to begin with, just as Hamas could have avoided all this by not invading on Oct 7.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wars end when the losing side surrenders. End of story. If the Palestinians prefer fighting to the death than surrendering then so be it. They're getting their wish.

Interesting. Would you say the same about the siege of Leningrad, where up to one million people died of hunger?

The war in Gaza would end today if Hamas surrendered and agreed to live in peace with Israel.

How exactly might one live in peace with a neighbor who asserts their right to attack you (for any reason or none at all) as part of their “preemptive self-defense” doctrine, but denies you the same right?

You look at history, and see that Israel leaves alone those who leave them alone, e.g., Egypt, Jordan, and other former enemies who have made peace with Israel. Who refuses to make peace? Palestinians. Who reaps the consequences of their aggression? Palestinians. Who can put an end to it? Palestinians. They just don't want to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wars end when the losing side surrenders. End of story. If the Palestinians prefer fighting to the death than surrendering then so be it. They're getting their wish.

Interesting. Would you say the same about the siege of Leningrad, where up to one million people died of hunger?

it was war. And in the end the Soviets won, as will the Israelis, despite terrorist pinpricks all along the way. The Germans suffered dramatically in the Soviet Union, and could avoided all their own losses had they not invaded to begin with, just as Hamas could have avoided all this by not invading on Oct 7.

Remind us all what happened to the “winning” Soviet Union, eventually.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wars end when the losing side surrenders. End of story. If the Palestinians prefer fighting to the death than surrendering then so be it. They're getting their wish.

Interesting. Would you say the same about the siege of Leningrad, where up to one million people died of hunger?

The war in Gaza would end today if Hamas surrendered and agreed to live in peace with Israel.

How exactly might one live in peace with a neighbor who asserts their right to attack you (for any reason or none at all) as part of their “preemptive self-defense” doctrine, but denies you the same right?

You look at history, and see that Israel leaves alone those who leave them alone, e.g., Egypt, Jordan, and other former enemies who have made peace with Israel. Who refuses to make peace? Palestinians. Who reaps the consequences of their aggression? Palestinians. Who can put an end to it? Palestinians. They just don't want to.

No, they leave alone those who are paid to suffer in silence aside them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wars end when the losing side surrenders. End of story. If the Palestinians prefer fighting to the death than surrendering then so be it. They're getting their wish.

Interesting. Would you say the same about the siege of Leningrad, where up to one million people died of hunger?

The war in Gaza would end today if Hamas surrendered and agreed to live in peace with Israel.

How exactly might one live in peace with a neighbor who asserts their right to attack you (for any reason or none at all) as part of their “preemptive self-defense” doctrine, but denies you the same right?

You look at history, and see that Israel leaves alone those who leave them alone, e.g., Egypt, Jordan, and other former enemies who have made peace with Israel. Who refuses to make peace? Palestinians. Who reaps the consequences of their aggression? Palestinians. Who can put an end to it? Palestinians. They just don't want to.

And the sovereign nations of Lebanon, Syria, Iran … none of those sovereign nations have launched an attack against Israel first to warrant Israel’s “preemptive self-defense” against them.

Since your response will be so predictable, let’s just jump ahead … why shouldn’t the Palestinians have complete justification for any attacks made against Israel and the Israeli people based on the terrorists (the settlers) who launch repeated attacks against the Palestinians? Israel should be fair game since the settlers are attacking them, right?

[Anonymous]

Israel can go F itself, for the shitstain parasitic "country" that it is.