Whistleblower complaint released

[Anonymous]

Trump continues to threaten and meddle with the whistleblower:
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1177579380819845120

Rightwing media take the cue to threaten the whistleblower:
Geraldo: “I want to beat up that rotten snitch” - https://www.mediaite.com/tv/geraldo-rivera-says-hed-like-to-beat-up-rotten-snitch-whistleblower-for-trump/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:



The informant did not file himself. That was my first suspicious moment. Something so devastating and the person doesn’t report it? Then it turned into ‘a pattern of behavior reported by many’. And that was the tell.

Except they filed twice. Only when the first filing was turned over to the White House did the complaint then go through the whistleblower protocol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump continues to threaten and meddle with the whistleblower:
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1177579380819845120

Rightwing media take the cue to threaten the whistleblower:
Geraldo: “I want to beat up that rotten snitch” - https://www.mediaite.com/tv/geraldo-rivera-says-hed-like-to-beat-up-rotten-snitch-whistleblower-for-trump/

Do they hear themselves?
What went wrong in their childhoods that they are so broken?

Sigh.

[Anonymous]

“The White House acknowledged Friday that administration officials directed a now-infamous Ukraine call transcript be filed in a highly classified system.”
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/09/27/politics/donald-trump-ukraine-transcript-white-house/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Incorrect information in the whistleblower's complaint....

The complaint stated that Trump made a “specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike" -- a request that does not appear in the declassified transcript of the call released by the Trump administration on Tuesday. Trump mentioned CrowdStrike, but did not demand the server.

And according to the whistleblower complaint, by mid-May, U.S. diplomat Kurt Volker sought to "contain the damage" from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani's outreach to Ukraine.

But a July 19 text message conversation from Volker to Giuliani, provided to Fox News on Thursday, showed that Volker had in fact encouraged Giuliani to reach out to Ukraine -- even sending Giuliani a message reading, "connecting you here with Andrey Yermak, who is very close to President Zelensky."

Additionally, the complaint said Trump "suggested that Mr. Zelensky might want to keep" his current prosecutor general, a claim not supported by the transcript.
CBS News reported late Thursday that the whistleblower complaint further inaccurately claimed that a State Department official was on the call with Zelensky.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-want-whistleblowers-sources-citing-apparent-white-house-leak-problem

This “error” assumes that we got the entire contents of the call. It wasn’t a transcript. And if you speak all of the words in what we got, it takes 11 minutes. The call was reported to be more than twice as long is that. Senator Feinstein has already demanded the entire call, so I guess we’ll see.

In other words, you’re going to speculate to dispel fact. LOL

With regard to the statement that Trump wanted to keep the current prosecutor general, that is what Rudy Giuliani wanted, but Trump couldn't articulate that because he doesn't know or can't remember the details, names, and timeline of his own collusion scheme. In the call he mixed up two different prosecutors.

Shokin was the guy that Biden, IMF, and everybody else wanted out, and was eventually removed by Parliament. Lutsenko was the next prosecutor general and he is the one that Rudy had already corrupted. For Rudy, Lutsenko smeared Ambassador Yovanovitch and promised to take up the Biden and Manafort investigations, but then Zelenskyy beat Lutsenko's boss Poroshenko in the election. Rudy tried to pressure Zelenskyy to keep his man Lutsenko. That is why Rudy was running around on TV and everywhere criticizing Zelenskyy as backsliding on corruption, and that is why Zelenskyy's guy Yermak wanted to meet with Rudy, which we now know the State Department helped to facilitate. Zelenskyy insisted on appointing his own prosecutor general to replace Lutsenko, but Yermak needed to convince Giuliani that they would still play ball.

Trump can't remember all of that. In the call summary, he says "I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that's really unfair. A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved." And then he says I want you to to Mr. Giuliani about it. Shokin is the guy who was shut down, supposedly by Biden. Lutsenko is the one that Rudy had already turned. Trump mixes the details of the two into one rambling incoherent demand to talk to Rudy and let him tell you what you have to do.

Thanks for the great explanation. It can be hard to keep all of this straight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Incorrect information in the whistleblower's complaint....

The complaint stated that Trump made a “specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike" -- a request that does not appear in the declassified transcript of the call released by the Trump administration on Tuesday. Trump mentioned CrowdStrike, but did not demand the server.

And according to the whistleblower complaint, by mid-May, U.S. diplomat Kurt Volker sought to "contain the damage" from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani's outreach to Ukraine.

But a July 19 text message conversation from Volker to Giuliani, provided to Fox News on Thursday, showed that Volker had in fact encouraged Giuliani to reach out to Ukraine -- even sending Giuliani a message reading, "connecting you here with Andrey Yermak, who is very close to President Zelensky."

Additionally, the complaint said Trump "suggested that Mr. Zelensky might want to keep" his current prosecutor general, a claim not supported by the transcript.

CBS News reported late Thursday that the whistleblower complaint further inaccurately claimed that a State Department official was on the call with Zelensky.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-want-whistleblowers-sources-citing-apparent-white-house-leak-problem

Let's understand where the whole 'crowdstrike" thing came from

https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1177635600389857284

[Anonymous]

The whistle blower is not a whistleblower. Everybody good on that or does someone need an explanation?
And because he/she isn’t a whistleblower, it’s time to release the name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The whistle blower is not a whistleblower. Everybody good on that or does someone need an explanation?
And because he/she isn’t a whistleblower, it’s time to release the name.

Two Trump appointees disagree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The whistle blower is not a whistleblower. Everybody good on that or does someone need an explanation?
And because he/she isn’t a whistleblower, it’s time to release the name.

Is this sarcasm?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whistle blower is not a whistleblower. Everybody good on that or does someone need an explanation?
And because he/she isn’t a whistleblower, it’s time to release the name.

Is this sarcasm?

More like idiocy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Incorrect information in the whistleblower's complaint....

The complaint stated that Trump made a “specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike" -- a request that does not appear in the declassified transcript of the call released by the Trump administration on Tuesday. Trump mentioned CrowdStrike, but did not demand the server.

And according to the whistleblower complaint, by mid-May, U.S. diplomat Kurt Volker sought to "contain the damage" from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani's outreach to Ukraine.

But a July 19 text message conversation from Volker to Giuliani, provided to Fox News on Thursday, showed that Volker had in fact encouraged Giuliani to reach out to Ukraine -- even sending Giuliani a message reading, "connecting you here with Andrey Yermak, who is very close to President Zelensky."

Additionally, the complaint said Trump "suggested that Mr. Zelensky might want to keep" his current prosecutor general, a claim not supported by the transcript.

CBS News reported late Thursday that the whistleblower complaint further inaccurately claimed that a State Department official was on the call with Zelensky.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-want-whistleblowers-sources-citing-apparent-white-house-leak-problem

Let's understand where the whole 'crowdstrike" thing came from

https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1177635600389857284

For the record, we have no idea what Trump said about crowdstrike. That part was ellipsised on the released summary transcript.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The whistle blower is not a whistleblower. Everybody good on that or does someone need an explanation?
And because he/she isn’t a whistleblower, it’s time to release the name.

The person is still a whistleblower in need of protection against retaliation. That the WH already knows their name because they trusted the CIA GC makes it all the more important that they are protected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“The White House acknowledged Friday that administration officials directed a now-infamous Ukraine call transcript be filed in a highly classified system.”
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/09/27/politics/donald-trump-ukraine-transcript-white-house/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

It's nice they're not obstructing, for a change.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The whistle blower is not a whistleblower. Everybody good on that or does someone need an explanation?
And because he/she isn’t a whistleblower, it’s time to release the name.

Why are you saying this? The whistle-blower filed a formal "whistle-blowing" complaint, and therefore is considered as such and has legal protections, such as they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“The White House acknowledged Friday that administration officials directed a now-infamous Ukraine call transcript be filed in a highly classified system.”
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/09/27/politics/donald-trump-ukraine-transcript-white-house/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

It's nice they're not obstructing, for a change.

No one actually admitted it. Just "a senior White House official".