Whistleblower complaint released

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nunes doesn't agree. Blaming dems and mainstream media. Sickened

He is truly shocking to listen to. Bold faced lies.

He actually told it like it is. If you want to talk lies, look at Schiff. Instead of including facts in his opening statement, he editorialized and attributed fake dialogue to Trump.

Most of what Nunes said was conspiracy theory jibberish.

No. It is not. It is based on testimony of Nellie Ohr and Bruce Ohr.

[Anonymous]

It looks pretty damn damming to me!

[Anonymous]

Complaint so much more devastating than I was expecting. I feel like he might literally have gotten too cocky and gone too far. Coming off the high of the mueller collapse he just did everything he's always done but now 12 people listen in on all his calls and conversations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nunes doesn't agree. Blaming dems and mainstream media. Sickened

He is truly shocking to listen to. Bold faced lies.

He actually told it like it is. If you want to talk lies, look at Schiff. Instead of including facts in his opening statement, he editorialized and attributed fake dialogue to Trump.

Most of what Nunes said was conspiracy theory jibberish.

No. It is not. It is based on testimony of Nellie Ohr and Bruce Ohr.

Uh, we're talking about Ukraine here, buddy.

Not the Ohr's.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This sums it up.

CNN's banner: "WHISTLEBLOWER: TRUMP TRIED TO GET UKRAINE TO INTERFERE IN ELECTION, AND WHITE HOUSE TRIED TO COVER IT UP."

That’s pretty much it.

The question I have is: on how many other issues did he do something of this magnitude of criminality?

Actually, it should read: TRUMP ASKS FOR UKRAINE PRESIDENT'S HELP IN DETERMINING HOW UKRAINE INTERFERRED IN 2016 ELECTION

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:it's what you do when the majority of people in your district are trump supporters because getting elected matters more than the truth. That's true for both sides.

The senate is what matters. Republican senators have already signaled the seriousness of this situation.

And, some of them really are just mini version Trumps themselves. Obviously not all -- I'm sure there are plenty that go home at night and really wish they weren't forced to be suppliants to such a tool. But Nunes isn't going to come around because at his core he's the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This sums it up.

CNN's banner: "WHISTLEBLOWER: TRUMP TRIED TO GET UKRAINE TO INTERFERE IN ELECTION, AND WHITE HOUSE TRIED TO COVER IT UP."

That’s pretty much it.

The question I have is: on how many other issues did he do something of this magnitude of criminality?

Actually, it should read: TRUMP ASKS FOR UKRAINE PRESIDENT'S HELP IN DETERMINING HOW UKRAINE INTERFERRED IN 2016 ELECTION

No. You are lost in a partisan fantasy land.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nunes doesn't agree. Blaming dems and mainstream media. Sickened

He is truly shocking to listen to. Bold faced lies.

He actually told it like it is. If you want to talk lies, look at Schiff. Instead of including facts in his opening statement, he editorialized and attributed fake dialogue to Trump.

Most of what Nunes said was conspiracy theory jibberish.

No. It is not. It is based on testimony of Nellie Ohr and Bruce Ohr.

Uh, we're talking about Ukraine here, buddy.

Not the Ohr's.

You can't talk about Ukraine and interference in the 2016 election without talking about the Ohrs.

Nellie Ohr testified to Congress that some of the dirt she found on Trump during her 2016 election opposition research came from a Ukrainian parliament member. She also said that she eventually took the information to the FBI through her husband — another way Ukraine got inserted into the 2016 election.

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/462658-lets-get-real-democrats-were-first-to-enlist-ukraine-in-us-elections

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This sums it up.

CNN's banner: "WHISTLEBLOWER: TRUMP TRIED TO GET UKRAINE TO INTERFERE IN ELECTION, AND WHITE HOUSE TRIED TO COVER IT UP."

That’s pretty much it.

The question I have is: on how many other issues did he do something of this magnitude of criminality?

Actually, it should read: TRUMP ASKS FOR UKRAINE PRESIDENT'S HELP IN DETERMINING HOW UKRAINE INTERFERRED IN 2016 ELECTION

No. You are lost in a partisan fantasy land.

Yeah, perhaps more accurately PP with your particularly angle it would be

TRUMP TRIED TO MANIPULATE UKRAINE INTO FALSELY IMPLICATING DEMOCRATS IN 2016 ELECTION TO INFLUENCE OUTCOME OF 2020 ELECTION

[Anonymous]

It is clear there are some people who are simply willing to see "red" and say "green" because Trump says so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This sums it up.

CNN's banner: "WHISTLEBLOWER: TRUMP TRIED TO GET UKRAINE TO INTERFERE IN ELECTION, AND WHITE HOUSE TRIED TO COVER IT UP."

That’s pretty much it.

The question I have is: on how many other issues did he do something of this magnitude of criminality?

Well now we know they are all stored in the separate stand alone national security computer system..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

You can't talk about Ukraine and interference in the 2016 election without talking about the Ohrs.

Or Manafort.

Only one of these people are in jail for their actions. Rightfully so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nunes doesn't agree. Blaming dems and mainstream media. Sickened

He is truly shocking to listen to. Bold faced lies.

He actually told it like it is. If you want to talk lies, look at Schiff. Instead of including facts in his opening statement, he editorialized and attributed fake dialogue to Trump.

Most of what Nunes said was conspiracy theory jibberish.

No. It is not. It is based on testimony of Nellie Ohr and Bruce Ohr.

Uh, we're talking about Ukraine here, buddy.

Not the Ohr's.

You can't talk about Ukraine and interference in the 2016 election without talking about the Ohrs.

Nellie Ohr testified to Congress that some of the dirt she found on Trump during her 2016 election opposition research came from a Ukrainian parliament member. She also said that she eventually took the information to the FBI through her husband — another way Ukraine got inserted into the 2016 election.

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/462658-lets-get-real-democrats-were-first-to-enlist-ukraine-in-us-elections

SMH.

Trump told Ukraine to stop cooperating with Mueller's investigation. Do you even care?

Do you even care about this country? The United States?

[Anonymous]

Not sure where the issue is with this hearing: phone call, whistleblower, review of complaint, release of phone call transcript, release of complaint. Schiff doesn't like the process but everything is out in the open. in what seems lightning speed with how government usually works.

[Anonymous]

Who do you think is the WB?