They do nothing to help the players/families other than the badge. |
Keep telling yourself “the club doesn’t matter” and “all the clubs are the same with college recruiting”. Bless your heart. |
There are some talented players that dont get reposts. Are you saying they aren’t good? |
We see what you did there. |
Move girls down. Aquire new talent? |
|
New concept this year - it used to be move girls up and acquire new talent. |
There were a grand total of 3 VDA girls on that team, 4 st james, 2 syc, and a mixture of RL players who lost to Richmond united 2011 and 2012s all ECNL players- 1-0 in the finals- off a corner. 🤔 |
I'm saying that they won't get the kind of support the favored ones will. |
| He is launching a new campaign: VSA (ECRL) > GA. |
whut? |
|
Pipeline had a similar post up today. There is definitely a move on social media to compare RL to GA. My child currently on an ECNL (girl, recruiting years age, for what it is worth) has only seen girls who have not been reoffered go to GA teams over RL. They have taken a few girls from GA teams but I think that is largely a function of the realignment from one major club in the area.
My son (just shy of recruiting age) has seen both kinds of movement. RL boys are definitely choosing MLSN2 over RL. Some boys have moved to MLSN1 teams that have 28-30 kids rostered and made their way back for playing time/not rostered reasons. |
Interesting. Was this an ecnl directive from the top. FVU also cringe posted with their pathway clubs touting unity. GA must be doing major damage to ECRL. And it makes sense imo. They have a better platform than RL. |
My guess is ECNL armed clubs with the data to promote RL. Valor had a similar post as VSA. The big piece missing is D1. The posts only focus on D2 and D3. I am guessing if you add D1 then it shows that GA has a % that goes there and RL is less than 5% that goes D1. |
What was the VSA post about? |