Kate is darker than Edwina, and a lot of people cannot see beyond the dark complexion to recognize beauty. But anyone looking at Simone Ashley and not seeing beauty is blind and/or prejudiced against darker skin. That does not take anything away from the actress Charithra Chandra, who played Edwina. https://www.elle.com/culture/movies-tv/a39670256/simone-ashley-interview-may-2022/ https://www.imdb.com/name/nm7592760/ |
| They announced Season 5 and it's Francesa and I am bored already. |
They have all the costumes and all the sets already and they obvs have an audience and they don't need good story lines or scripts so it just makes sense... |
Bridgerton is a “vibes” show. I put Emily in Paris in the bucket too. The plot isn’t the most important part, the aesthetic and lifestyle is, the story is secondary. |
| I hoped for Eloise next, like most people, which is clearly why they are putting her last. Francesca is beautiful but boring. |
season 5 is Francesca and the cousin - a lesbian romance. |
|
Eloise will be last - big finale
Are they really going to have bodice ripping lesbian sex on Bridgerton? I could skip. |
It’s not her dark complexion. It’s her nose. |
Ugh!!!!! I wanted Eloise. |
But we still will need Gregory and Hyacinth. So Eloise can’t be last. |
I’ll watch any type of coupling, as long as there is chemistry. I need some longing looks, heaving chests, and clenched fists set to the orchestral version of a recognizable pop song. Bridgerton has a formula. They’ll be fine IF they follow it. Speaking of pop songs, has anyone else noticed Harry Styles’ “Coming Up Roses” is already Bridgerton-ready? I’m crossing my fingers for this one. |
|
The weird politics on Bridgerton are actually working against them doing a lesbian romance. Normally, a lesbian romance set in Regency England could be pretty steamy because the tension is built right in -- forbidden romance is an effective romance trope.
But as with Benedict's bisexuality last season, the show has gone out of its way to pretend that LGBTQ+ romances are just no big deal in this world. Benedict told Sophie about having affairs with men, and she was like "Huh, okay, sounds good!" Because god forbid one of their heroines be anything other than totally, 100% open minded in the style of a 2026 Millennial. Actually, the women on Girls and Sex Lives of College Girls struggled more with bisexual men than Sophie did. And Francesca creates the same problem. I just think they are going to skip over some of the most clear sources of drama for this romance, in order to deliver a super-woke version of Regency England. Instead of a period drama, it's like watching Gen Zers hook up at Ren Fair. Ugh. |
Woman on Fire (French film from a few years ago) did a great portrayal of two women falling in love in the 18th century, with all the drama and consternation. But it was much more period accurate. Also explored what it was like to be a female painter at the time, and especially one doing portraiture. Really good movie. |
It will be Eloise and Francesca, i'm sure in the same season. In the books, gregory and hyacinth were much later than Eloise. |
| Maybe the whole season will mostly focus on other people, and at the end Francesca will stand up, stamp her foot, and announce she's in a relationship with the cousin. The family will go silent for a beat, then continue as normal after the Queen winks and nods. It will be the Don't Ask Don't Tell of Regency. |