Usha Vance - Fashion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody gave two hoots about Gwen Walz or Karen Pence. Why is there so much attention on Usha?

Jealousy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's sad that on the White House bios page, there are head shots of Trump, Melania, and JD, but the photo of Usha is an AP photo taken from the Republican National Convention. That's how much of a rookie/unprepared she is for her role, she doesn't even have a headshot for the White House website.

She does indeed have a headshot on that page.

That’s a different photo than what was there earlier. Before they slapped up an AP photo as if she’s not that important.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the juxtaposition of all that coat with her hair up. She looks like a pin head attached to a giant coat with puss n boot boots attached. This is where a stylist could really help. https://images.app.goo.gl/kaRafYgQQy1ywFsB6

And yet, if her hair had been down, then the poster who is outraged about "flyaways" would have taken to her fainting couch. This woman can't win. Nor should she try to. I hope she continues to dress in this way - classic and feminine.

I don’t even know what you’re talking about, but for dressing, proportions matter. If you’re wearing a big look like this, with a coat hitting baggy boots, you need your hair down.

How silly. There are no rules. And again, had her hair been down, you'd be upset about that. It was a great look on her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's sad that on the White House bios page, there are head shots of Trump, Melania, and JD, but the photo of Usha is an AP photo taken from the Republican National Convention. That's how much of a rookie/unprepared she is for her role, she doesn't even have a headshot for the White House website.

She does indeed have a headshot on that page.

That’s a different photo than what was there earlier. Before they slapped up an AP photo as if she’s not that important.

It's exactly ONE day after the inauguration. Calm down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe noone has posted this atrocity yet. Kudos to her for choosing an Indian-American designer, but I don't like the dress.

Really? I'm one of Usha's biggest fashion haters but that is actually one of her better looks.

I like it too. Flattering color and cut but some interesting details. Her make up is not my favorite but not bad.

She doesn't have good skin, large patches of melasma and very dark undereye circles. She needed better foundation and a brighter lip.

I love her outfit, think it's the bad hair and makeup that make her look a little dowdy.

Way too much product on her hair, which is styled in an unflattering way. Earrings look silly and eye makeup looks messy not polished.

So comical. I bet you're the same poster who criticized her last year for not looking polished enough, not doing her hair (to your specifications, of course), and not wearing enough makeup. She looked great. The one strapless dress was a little ill-fitting up top, but not horrible. All of her other dresses have been on point, as has her hair and makeup.
DP

Do you...do you think there's only one person here who thinks Usha can't style herself properly???

Usha has styled herself impeccably. I'm so sorry you know this deep down but can't bring yourself to admit it.

You must know her or something because she is not impeccably styled. Ivanka’s Eva Braun dress modeled on Meghan Markel’s famous green dress looked much better.

The BRF is styled much better.

DP

You mean, this BRF?

No. Vanky imitates Megan Markle and Catherine. They are different people than the ones you shared.

Vanky also imitated Grace Kelly at Tiff’s wedding and Audrey Hepburn at the inaugural ball and Megan Markle during the inauguration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s a different photo than what was there earlier. Before they slapped up an AP photo as if she’s not that important.

It is. And note that in this official headshot, she can't even get the seams straight.

I know, I know, she is ethereal and the baby diaper brown is just to piquant note her gorgeous face needs, but come on, people. Did none of you ever have an adult tell you to straighten your dress? This is toddler stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her inaugural ball dress:



It's okay. It's not fashionable but it's inoffensive. A little figure skater-y but that's a standard evening wear look. Her hair looks weird and I think she should have worn it up.

On the subject of her hair, I appreciate that she doesn't dye it -- I have a similar amount of gray and don't dye it either. But it really wouldn't take that much effort to make her hair look smooth and shiny and healthy. Again, I have similar hair and it can easily look as hers does (and often does like that when I'm just dropping off kids at school or going to the beach or something) but it doesn't take that much effort to make it look very nice. And that's just me at home doing a hair mask and giving myself a blowout with some midrange products to keep it smooth. It's what I do if I'm meeting with clients, going to a party, or having my photo taken for something. I'm not getting highlights or having extensions put in or anything -- just putting a little extra time and effort into my hair so it looks nice in a situation where looking particularly professional or photogenic is helpful.

She can do what she wants but it's so weird to me that she wouldn't want to just look a bit more polished. We have the technology!

Except that she *does* look polished. Very much so. Your obsession with her hair as compared to… yours… is bizarre.

Her hair is sticking out in back. That is not a polished look.

Post a picture. Nothing I've seen even shows the back.

There are many photos in this thread that show it. Not my job to show you her messy hair or deal with your bad vision issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the juxtaposition of all that coat with her hair up. She looks like a pin head attached to a giant coat with puss n boot boots attached. This is where a stylist could really help. https://images.app.goo.gl/kaRafYgQQy1ywFsB6

And yet, if her hair had been down, then the poster who is outraged about "flyaways" would have taken to her fainting couch. This woman can't win. Nor should she try to. I hope she continues to dress in this way - classic and feminine.

I don’t even know what you’re talking about, but for dressing, proportions matter. If you’re wearing a big look like this, with a coat hitting baggy boots, you need your hair down.

How silly. There are no rules. And again, had her hair been down, you'd be upset about that. It was a great look on her.

This photo demonstrates that she looked like a pin head and the boots looked completely foolish with the coat, so thanks for that. A dress coat with these casual boots and a tight head bun on a small head with a big as$ coat looks off. I don’t GAF if that makes you think I’m jealous: her look is crap. That’s what we’re talking about on here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's sad that on the White House bios page, there are head shots of Trump, Melania, and JD, but the photo of Usha is an AP photo taken from the Republican National Convention. That's how much of a rookie/unprepared she is for her role, she doesn't even have a headshot for the White House website.

She does indeed have a headshot on that page.

That’s a different photo than what was there earlier. Before they slapped up an AP photo as if she’s not that important.

It's exactly ONE day after the inauguration. Calm down.

If only there was some advance note, am I right? Given that we all were completely caught by surprise by who was inaugurated today, you can see why this was all dealt with so ineptly.

Who could have known.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s a different photo than what was there earlier. Before they slapped up an AP photo as if she’s not that important.

It is. And note that in this official headshot, she can't even get the seams straight.

I know, I know, she is ethereal and the baby diaper brown is just to piquant note her gorgeous face needs, but come on, people. Did none of you ever have an adult tell you to straighten your dress? This is toddler stuff.

All they had to do was crop the photo. Strange choice to post it as is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:why are you women so intent on criticizing other women? think about that for a moment before you post. You are all
misogynists

Misogynist hypocrites, to be more precise. The ultra-critical posters would be going out of their mind if these ugly comments were directed toward any liberal woman.

I think it’s something beyond politics that’s driving the responses here. I just haven’t put my finger on it yet.

The critical posts are so over-the-top as to be trollish. The way some of these posters are harshly criticizing everything about her appearance is something else.

Any woman in the limelight gets torn apart. Are you new here?

They were absolutely ruthless to Michelle

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's sad that on the White House bios page, there are head shots of Trump, Melania, and JD, but the photo of Usha is an AP photo taken from the Republican National Convention. That's how much of a rookie/unprepared she is for her role, she doesn't even have a headshot for the White House website.

She does indeed have a headshot on that page.

That’s a different photo than what was there earlier. Before they slapped up an AP photo as if she’s not that important.

I have a similar coloring to Usha and camel/yellow brown never looks good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the WaPo article: "Usha Vance, who is not working with a stylist but received advice on her inaugural wardrobe from friends, "

Those must be the friends that were posting here all weekend, LOL

I'm guessing most of her friends are nerdy lawyers like her and this would explain why her clothes are pretty meh.

Get a stylist, girl! You don't have to go high fashion but people are going to be taking your photograph continuously for four years. Find someone who will put together a system for you that works for most events and then will create evening looks for you when you need one. And I think you need to start from scratch on your hair -- get a lob and a deep condition, start scheduling monthly trims to keep it in shape, follow directions regarding washing and drying.

This isn't about vanity. This is the job she signed on for.

Actually her “job” is to stay bland and out of the limelight. Who has ever cared what the second lady wears? Half the time we don’t even remember her name.

+1
She looked great and not at all like someone who was demanding the spotlight. In short, she looked just right. I loved her inauguration ball gown and her pink coat.

That coat was humongous and weird and it showed off her crazy gray hair which looks awful. I don’t GAF who designed it it did not fit and it looked crazy.

You sound utterly crazy. The coat fit her perfectly. It's a *coat* not a bodycon dress. I don't care who designed it either - she looked lovely.

Here's Kamala Harris's coat from Inauguration 2021. Now THIS is a humongous and ill-fitting coat. I'm sure you agree.

Meh. She was probably forced to wear a bullet proof vest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:why are you women so intent on criticizing other women? think about that for a moment before you post. You are all
misogynists

Misogynist hypocrites, to be more precise. The ultra-critical posters would be going out of their mind if these ugly comments were directed toward any liberal woman.

I think it’s something beyond politics that’s driving the responses here. I just haven’t put my finger on it yet.

The critical posts are so over-the-top as to be trollish. The way some of these posters are harshly criticizing everything about her appearance is something else.

Any woman in the limelight gets torn apart. Are you new here?

Were Karen Pence and Gwen Walz torn down like that? I don’t remember it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's sad that on the White House bios page, there are head shots of Trump, Melania, and JD, but the photo of Usha is an AP photo taken from the Republican National Convention. That's how much of a rookie/unprepared she is for her role, she doesn't even have a headshot for the White House website.

She does indeed have a headshot on that page.

That’s a different photo than what was there earlier. Before they slapped up an AP photo as if she’s not that important.

I have a similar coloring to Usha and camel/yellow brown never looks good.

Me too. So sad because it looks great on much lighter and much darker skin.