DP. Are you unfamiliar with the military? They actually have rules about all of this stuff - the Secretary of Defense should know about them and follow them, right? |
MAGAS don't care. They're uneducated so they have no idea. |
They do not understand that. They also can’t imagine that a leader’s character matters, obviously. They also don’t understand that military rules are expectations are different than civilians. He will not be respected. They will be professional, of course, but they will be rolling their eyes behind his back and mumbling a lot of complaints as they get dressed for work every morning. |
Old news. The affair he had a decade ago is irrelevant now. Sure, if he has another affair while SoD and starts sharing classified documents with his mistress and compromising security, David Petraeus style, that’s a different story. We’ll see if he can keep his parts to himself. |
Oh, if only those 70+ million Trumo voters could be as well educated as Hollywood's elite? |
So - just to be clear - you’re claiming no one in the military has had an affair or *gasp* gotten divorced? Do tell! |
+1 I do laugh every time these twits trot out the “uneducated” line. As if the bulk of the Democrats’ base aren’t completely uneducated. What a joke. |
Ok, so tell me what it means then. I’m listening. |
MAGA is all about anger. They couldn’t care less about the country. Never mind education, MAGA doesn’t have manners. And they’re proud of it. |
Look at the stats dolt. And, your MAGA friend above cannot even spell your leader's name. |
DP. I forgot about David Petraeus - appointed by Obama, btw. |
The only time I’ve seen a service member punished for an affair under UCMJ was if the affair partner was another service member’s spouse (makes for some hard feelings at work!) or if the affair partner was also a service member and it was fraternization, or if the affair comprised their duty/mission/security. A National Gaurd solider having an affair with a civilian is unlikely to be prosecuted, which is exactly why he wasn’t. |
We’re pointing out typos now? Oh, great. I should get started on all the abysmally written posts by LWNJs. Now tell us about all the uneducated inner-city voters that make up the Democrats’ base. |
No. Not at all. We’re saying that you would get passed over for a leadership position/command. It’s “conduct unbecoming.” And of if he cheated while in command, he’d be let go and moved to a less desirable position with not much hope of upward career trajectory. |
I know two who lost command and promotions over it. |