My kid is in a class with a chair thrower

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Counties hide behind LRE to act like it’s the legal requirement for a certain child. In reality mainstream classes are just cheaper. Self-contained is way more expensive so they try to keep anyone they can mainstream. Even if the classroom teacher and the sped teacher and the parents agree the placement is not working, the county will fight it. I’ve seen it happen.


Private schools are failing because of this. Parents will not use them and vote to defund them. It is a death spiral.


You know what is also expensive? TJ. But the school board finds the money to help the advanced kids get even more advanced. They found the money for that. So the kids who are just normal are in the classroom with the disruptive kids and the majority go downhill because they don't have the same advocacy power.


What mainstreaming does is turn regular classrooms into special education classrooms, but it is the wrong fit for everyone.
Anonymous
Call the police every single time and file a report. Report the incident of violence and threat to the public welfare.

Inform the principal and the superintendent every single time. Speak at school board meetings. Ask them what would happen if instead of speaking you began throwing things and destroying the room. Would they simply tell the superintendent he needs to do a better job managing teachers and parents?

I sympathize with all that this child and his or her parents are going through, but a classroom free from violence shouldn’t be a hard ask.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:^ and the jerks I am referring to are the parents trying to insist that the children throwing chairs should stay home.



Why shouldn't they? They should be suspended for a certain amount of time to get behavior under control before given another chance.


So what if the parents can't get the behavior under control? Should these kids not get educated?


Violent kids have bigger issues and perhaps should enter full time therapy so they can be addressed properly instead of being ignored in school.


Cool. Want to tell us where to find “full time therapy” and tell me which health insurance plan pays for it? Cause I’m over here trying to find an in-network child psychologist for my kid with availability, and no dice. Surely you have a solution?


You pay for it.


I can’t afford it. The vast majority of people can’t. Full time therapy (like a partial in patient program) can be a hundred thousand dollars private pay, if you can even get a spot. If your family income is that of an average American, say $90k, there is simply no way to make it work. None.


What makes you think the average tax payer can afford to fund it? Also why should they fund your medical bills and not those of parents of children with Cystic Fibrosis or any other hardship?


Are you asking why health insurance should cover health care? Perhaps you’d like to go without yourself? You don’t need that cancer medicine, do you? No chemo for you! Good parents don’t get cancer, after all. They stay healthy so the normal tax payer isn’t inconvenienced!


Actually, if my kid gets cancer, I can't drop her off at school and tell the school the cancer is their problem because its too expensive for me to solve. If my kid gets sick I'm on my own.


Schools don’t take over medical care for kids with mental health issues either. They just provide an education which would happen for a kid with cancer too.


Not true. Schools are expected to control the behavior, which is a symptom of the “illness” and not part of educating the student.


Schools are accommodating disabilities, not providing treatment. A 1:1 aide or smaller class is a tool to help the child access education just like a wheelchair ramp.


The girl who was super violent in my daughter's 4th and 5th grade classroom had a 1:1 aide. The aide's job was to call for help when the student started throwing things while the teacher tried to evacuate the other 25+ students. No one was allowed to touch the child so they had to try and talk her down. It was madness. The next day she'd be in the class just like normal. Eventually they put her in a different class (I think with the 6th graders) and my daughter says she is in her in middle school this year. I have great sympathy for the parents of this girl - raising kids is extremely difficult - especially when your child has problems. It is nearly impossible to get therapy these days, the medications all have weird side effects - it's hard. My friend in New York asked the school to pay for private school for her son that had emotional difficulties and the school worked with her to find an appropriate school. I don't see why this can't be the case in this area as well.


Oh wow.

A good friend of mine has a second grader with a 1:1 aide. If all the aide did was talk him down, there is no way he could be mainstreamed. The aide actually holds him when he tries to throw things. They can also hold his hand on the playground, which they often do.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Call the police every single time and file a report. Report the incident of violence and threat to the public welfare.

Inform the principal and the superintendent every single time. Speak at school board meetings. Ask them what would happen if instead of speaking you began throwing things and destroying the room. Would they simply tell the superintendent he needs to do a better job managing teachers and parents?

I sympathize with all that this child and his or her parents are going through, but a classroom free from violence shouldn’t be a hard ask.


Agree and I also have a lot of sympathy for these kids. It can’t be easy. I view doing all these things as not just helping your kid and the teacher, but also the kid who’s having problems. The school will drag their feet on this stuff as long as they can. They’ll try to strong arm the parents into accepting less. Be the squeaky wheel and that helps everyone get what they need.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:^ and the jerks I am referring to are the parents trying to insist that the children throwing chairs should stay home.



Why shouldn't they? They should be suspended for a certain amount of time to get behavior under control before given another chance.


So what if the parents can't get the behavior under control? Should these kids not get educated?


Violent kids have bigger issues and perhaps should enter full time therapy so they can be addressed properly instead of being ignored in school.


Cool. Want to tell us where to find “full time therapy” and tell me which health insurance plan pays for it? Cause I’m over here trying to find an in-network child psychologist for my kid with availability, and no dice. Surely you have a solution?


You pay for it.


I can’t afford it. The vast majority of people can’t. Full time therapy (like a partial in patient program) can be a hundred thousand dollars private pay, if you can even get a spot. If your family income is that of an average American, say $90k, there is simply no way to make it work. None.


What makes you think the average tax payer can afford to fund it? Also why should they fund your medical bills and not those of parents of children with Cystic Fibrosis or any other hardship?


Are you asking why health insurance should cover health care? Perhaps you’d like to go without yourself? You don’t need that cancer medicine, do you? No chemo for you! Good parents don’t get cancer, after all. They stay healthy so the normal tax payer isn’t inconvenienced!


Actually, if my kid gets cancer, I can't drop her off at school and tell the school the cancer is their problem because its too expensive for me to solve. If my kid gets sick I'm on my own.


Schools don’t take over medical care for kids with mental health issues either. They just provide an education which would happen for a kid with cancer too.


Not true. Schools are expected to control the behavior, which is a symptom of the “illness” and not part of educating the student.


Schools are accommodating disabilities, not providing treatment. A 1:1 aide or smaller class is a tool to help the child access education just like a wheelchair ramp.


The girl who was super violent in my daughter's 4th and 5th grade classroom had a 1:1 aide. The aide's job was to call for help when the student started throwing things while the teacher tried to evacuate the other 25+ students. No one was allowed to touch the child so they had to try and talk her down. It was madness. The next day she'd be in the class just like normal. Eventually they put her in a different class (I think with the 6th graders) and my daughter says she is in her in middle school this year. I have great sympathy for the parents of this girl - raising kids is extremely difficult - especially when your child has problems. It is nearly impossible to get therapy these days, the medications all have weird side effects - it's hard. My friend in New York asked the school to pay for private school for her son that had emotional difficulties and the school worked with her to find an appropriate school. I don't see why this can't be the case in this area as well.


But there are too many kids that need a 1:1 aide to be a mainstream class. It isn’t reasonable to be providing 1:1 for all the kids that need them. There would be one or more in each classroom
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:^ and the jerks I am referring to are the parents trying to insist that the children throwing chairs should stay home.



Why shouldn't they? They should be suspended for a certain amount of time to get behavior under control before given another chance.


So what if the parents can't get the behavior under control? Should these kids not get educated?


Violent kids have bigger issues and perhaps should enter full time therapy so they can be addressed properly instead of being ignored in school.


Cool. Want to tell us where to find “full time therapy” and tell me which health insurance plan pays for it? Cause I’m over here trying to find an in-network child psychologist for my kid with availability, and no dice. Surely you have a solution?


You pay for it.


I can’t afford it. The vast majority of people can’t. Full time therapy (like a partial in patient program) can be a hundred thousand dollars private pay, if you can even get a spot. If your family income is that of an average American, say $90k, there is simply no way to make it work. None.


What makes you think the average tax payer can afford to fund it? Also why should they fund your medical bills and not those of parents of children with Cystic Fibrosis or any other hardship?


Are you asking why health insurance should cover health care? Perhaps you’d like to go without yourself? You don’t need that cancer medicine, do you? No chemo for you! Good parents don’t get cancer, after all. They stay healthy so the normal tax payer isn’t inconvenienced!


Actually, if my kid gets cancer, I can't drop her off at school and tell the school the cancer is their problem because its too expensive for me to solve. If my kid gets sick I'm on my own.


Schools don’t take over medical care for kids with mental health issues either. They just provide an education which would happen for a kid with cancer too.


Not true. Schools are expected to control the behavior, which is a symptom of the “illness” and not part of educating the student.


Schools are accommodating disabilities, not providing treatment. A 1:1 aide or smaller class is a tool to help the child access education just like a wheelchair ramp.


The girl who was super violent in my daughter's 4th and 5th grade classroom had a 1:1 aide. The aide's job was to call for help when the student started throwing things while the teacher tried to evacuate the other 25+ students. No one was allowed to touch the child so they had to try and talk her down. It was madness. The next day she'd be in the class just like normal. Eventually they put her in a different class (I think with the 6th graders) and my daughter says she is in her in middle school this year. I have great sympathy for the parents of this girl - raising kids is extremely difficult - especially when your child has problems. It is nearly impossible to get therapy these days, the medications all have weird side effects - it's hard. My friend in New York asked the school to pay for private school for her son that had emotional difficulties and the school worked with her to find an appropriate school. I don't see why this can't be the case in this area as well.


Oh wow.

A good friend of mine has a second grader with a 1:1 aide. If all the aide did was talk him down, there is no way he could be mainstreamed. The aide actually holds him when he tries to throw things. They can also hold his hand on the playground, which they often do.


You can usually talk my son down before his behaviors become physical, but he would benefit from physical interventions. I know some schools and staff members are extremely averse to physical interventions. I'm not sure how much of that is driven by parents versus staff.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:^ and the jerks I am referring to are the parents trying to insist that the children throwing chairs should stay home.



Why shouldn't they? They should be suspended for a certain amount of time to get behavior under control before given another chance.


So what if the parents can't get the behavior under control? Should these kids not get educated?


Violent kids have bigger issues and perhaps should enter full time therapy so they can be addressed properly instead of being ignored in school.


Cool. Want to tell us where to find “full time therapy” and tell me which health insurance plan pays for it? Cause I’m over here trying to find an in-network child psychologist for my kid with availability, and no dice. Surely you have a solution?


You pay for it.


I can’t afford it. The vast majority of people can’t. Full time therapy (like a partial in patient program) can be a hundred thousand dollars private pay, if you can even get a spot. If your family income is that of an average American, say $90k, there is simply no way to make it work. None.


What makes you think the average tax payer can afford to fund it? Also why should they fund your medical bills and not those of parents of children with Cystic Fibrosis or any other hardship?


Are you asking why health insurance should cover health care? Perhaps you’d like to go without yourself? You don’t need that cancer medicine, do you? No chemo for you! Good parents don’t get cancer, after all. They stay healthy so the normal tax payer isn’t inconvenienced!


Actually, if my kid gets cancer, I can't drop her off at school and tell the school the cancer is their problem because its too expensive for me to solve. If my kid gets sick I'm on my own.


Schools don’t take over medical care for kids with mental health issues either. They just provide an education which would happen for a kid with cancer too.


Not true. Schools are expected to control the behavior, which is a symptom of the “illness” and not part of educating the student.


Schools are accommodating disabilities, not providing treatment. A 1:1 aide or smaller class is a tool to help the child access education just like a wheelchair ramp.


The girl who was super violent in my daughter's 4th and 5th grade classroom had a 1:1 aide. The aide's job was to call for help when the student started throwing things while the teacher tried to evacuate the other 25+ students. No one was allowed to touch the child so they had to try and talk her down. It was madness. The next day she'd be in the class just like normal. Eventually they put her in a different class (I think with the 6th graders) and my daughter says she is in her in middle school this year. I have great sympathy for the parents of this girl - raising kids is extremely difficult - especially when your child has problems. It is nearly impossible to get therapy these days, the medications all have weird side effects - it's hard. My friend in New York asked the school to pay for private school for her son that had emotional difficulties and the school worked with her to find an appropriate school. I don't see why this can't be the case in this area as well.


But there are too many kids that need a 1:1 aide to be a mainstream class. It isn’t reasonable to be providing 1:1 for all the kids that need them. There would be one or more in each classroom


It’s even less reasonable, and would be much more expensive, to send all kids with behavorial challenges to self-contained classrooms, which would similarly require more staff. If the students’ issues can be addressed by adding a paraeducator to the classroom, that’s almost always going to be the best and cheapest path for everyone.

But, in some cases that won’t be enough. And that’s where the more restrictive, more expensive classrooms with more supports and modifications should come in.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:^ and the jerks I am referring to are the parents trying to insist that the children throwing chairs should stay home.



Why shouldn't they? They should be suspended for a certain amount of time to get behavior under control before given another chance.


So what if the parents can't get the behavior under control? Should these kids not get educated?


Violent kids have bigger issues and perhaps should enter full time therapy so they can be addressed properly instead of being ignored in school.


Cool. Want to tell us where to find “full time therapy” and tell me which health insurance plan pays for it? Cause I’m over here trying to find an in-network child psychologist for my kid with availability, and no dice. Surely you have a solution?


You pay for it.


I can’t afford it. The vast majority of people can’t. Full time therapy (like a partial in patient program) can be a hundred thousand dollars private pay, if you can even get a spot. If your family income is that of an average American, say $90k, there is simply no way to make it work. None.


What makes you think the average tax payer can afford to fund it? Also why should they fund your medical bills and not those of parents of children with Cystic Fibrosis or any other hardship?


Are you asking why health insurance should cover health care? Perhaps you’d like to go without yourself? You don’t need that cancer medicine, do you? No chemo for you! Good parents don’t get cancer, after all. They stay healthy so the normal tax payer isn’t inconvenienced!


Actually, if my kid gets cancer, I can't drop her off at school and tell the school the cancer is their problem because its too expensive for me to solve. If my kid gets sick I'm on my own.


Schools don’t take over medical care for kids with mental health issues either. They just provide an education which would happen for a kid with cancer too.


Not true. Schools are expected to control the behavior, which is a symptom of the “illness” and not part of educating the student.


Schools are accommodating disabilities, not providing treatment. A 1:1 aide or smaller class is a tool to help the child access education just like a wheelchair ramp.


The girl who was super violent in my daughter's 4th and 5th grade classroom had a 1:1 aide. The aide's job was to call for help when the student started throwing things while the teacher tried to evacuate the other 25+ students. No one was allowed to touch the child so they had to try and talk her down. It was madness. The next day she'd be in the class just like normal. Eventually they put her in a different class (I think with the 6th graders) and my daughter says she is in her in middle school this year. I have great sympathy for the parents of this girl - raising kids is extremely difficult - especially when your child has problems. It is nearly impossible to get therapy these days, the medications all have weird side effects - it's hard. My friend in New York asked the school to pay for private school for her son that had emotional difficulties and the school worked with her to find an appropriate school. I don't see why this can't be the case in this area as well.


We do have appropriate schools in this area. In Frederick there is Laurel Hall. In PG and Ffx there is Phillips. In Mont Co there is Shephard Pratt, RICA, Foundation, and Ridge. In FFX there is also Keller. Baltimore has even more options.

Of all of these only RICA is run by a school system supported by the state. The rest of these schools are private and the placing school district has to bear the cost. It’s expensive and considered the most restrictive environment. Schools want to try every less restrictive environment first before non public placement.

Unlike TJ, no parent runs to FB posting with pride and joy that their child was accepted to one of these schools. There is still very much a stigma associated with attending one of these schools.

My kid is in one of the schools I mentioned. What’s ironic to me is that parents don’t know how much their kid needs the help and support until they are placed there and they are finally successful. Most parents I’ve met over the years are grateful that their child is in this environment. It’s also interesting that most teachers in the gen ed settings are not familiar with the available programs. The school districts do a very good job of trying to keep information about available programs quiet. If you read the SN forum there are hundreds of questions asking about the different programs in different counties. Transparency would help a lot. The burden is on the parent to figure out what’s available and then try and figure out the best fit. This is where an advocate is helpful. But if you don’t have the money for an advocate and you don’t know that DCUM exists, then you don’t know what you don’t know. What you know is that your kid is the chair thrower and tomorrow the school will try X.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My kid got home from first grade today and started telling me there is a kid in his class who is mean to other kids and get SO MAD. Today he got SO MAD he threw a chair. So, what is my recourse here?


Nothing because of Sped laws in this country. Move to Europe instead?


DP.

If you dont mind answering, how do they handle in Europe?


NP. Of the countries that I know, they don’t mainstream. They have specialized facilities that provide therapy+education. They try to integrate partially or fully kids who may be ready after years of therapy. Violent children as described in this thread would never be in a mainstream classroom. The US schooling and medical systems are too fractured to solve this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Call the police every single time and file a report. Report the incident of violence and threat to the public welfare.

Inform the principal and the superintendent every single time. Speak at school board meetings. Ask them what would happen if instead of speaking you began throwing things and destroying the room. Would they simply tell the superintendent he needs to do a better job managing teachers and parents?

I sympathize with all that this child and his or her parents are going through, but a classroom free from violence shouldn’t be a hard ask.


Agree and I also have a lot of sympathy for these kids. It can’t be easy. I view doing all these things as not just helping your kid and the teacher, but also the kid who’s having problems. The school will drag their feet on this stuff as long as they can. They’ll try to strong arm the parents into accepting less. Be the squeaky wheel and that helps everyone get what they need.


This. Keeping a violent child in a mainstream classroom isn’t fair to the mainstream kids nor the child who needs help. And we can all point fingers at the parents and say this is your fault/we don’t care what happens to your child just get them out of here. Or we can complain to the police, school board, anyone who will listen. Because we should all be having the same end goal here.

And I agree with a PP who says if there’s funding for TJ then there should be funding for special schools for kids with other needs. Which in turn will improve mainstream classrooms. It’s sort of outrageous that the status quo is currently considered acceptable for any of these kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Counties hide behind LRE to act like it’s the legal requirement for a certain child. In reality mainstream classes are just cheaper. Self-contained is way more expensive so they try to keep anyone they can mainstream. Even if the classroom teacher and the sped teacher and the parents agree the placement is not working, the county will fight it. I’ve seen it happen.


Private schools are failing because of this. Parents will not use them and vote to defund them. It is a death spiral.


You know what is also expensive? TJ. But the school board finds the money to help the advanced kids get even more advanced. They found the money for that. So the kids who are just normal are in the classroom with the disruptive kids and the majority go downhill because they don't have the same advocacy power.


What mainstreaming does is turn regular classrooms into special education classrooms, but it is the wrong fit for everyone.


+1

Schools need SPED rooms, but the SPED parents fight it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My kid got home from first grade today and started telling me there is a kid in his class who is mean to other kids and get SO MAD. Today he got SO MAD he threw a chair. So, what is my recourse here?


Nothing because of Sped laws in this country. Move to Europe instead?


DP.

If you dont mind answering, how do they handle in Europe?


NP. Of the countries that I know, they don’t mainstream. They have specialized facilities that provide therapy+education. They try to integrate partially or fully kids who may be ready after years of therapy. Violent children as described in this thread would never be in a mainstream classroom. The US schooling and medical systems are too fractured to solve this.


The tracking and segregation common in Europe is not a good system for the kids with special needs, whose future educational and job opportunities will be significantly limited. But at least many of those countries have better public support programs for adults, so their lives hopefully won’t be as poor as they would be in the US.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:^ and the jerks I am referring to are the parents trying to insist that the children throwing chairs should stay home.



Why shouldn't they? They should be suspended for a certain amount of time to get behavior under control before given another chance.


So what if the parents can't get the behavior under control? Should these kids not get educated?


Violent kids have bigger issues and perhaps should enter full time therapy so they can be addressed properly instead of being ignored in school.


Cool. Want to tell us where to find “full time therapy” and tell me which health insurance plan pays for it? Cause I’m over here trying to find an in-network child psychologist for my kid with availability, and no dice. Surely you have a solution?


You pay for it.


I can’t afford it. The vast majority of people can’t. Full time therapy (like a partial in patient program) can be a hundred thousand dollars private pay, if you can even get a spot. If your family income is that of an average American, say $90k, there is simply no way to make it work. None.


What makes you think the average tax payer can afford to fund it? Also why should they fund your medical bills and not those of parents of children with Cystic Fibrosis or any other hardship?


Are you asking why health insurance should cover health care? Perhaps you’d like to go without yourself? You don’t need that cancer medicine, do you? No chemo for you! Good parents don’t get cancer, after all. They stay healthy so the normal tax payer isn’t inconvenienced!


Actually, if my kid gets cancer, I can't drop her off at school and tell the school the cancer is their problem because its too expensive for me to solve. If my kid gets sick I'm on my own.


Schools don’t take over medical care for kids with mental health issues either. They just provide an education which would happen for a kid with cancer too.


Not true. Schools are expected to control the behavior, which is a symptom of the “illness” and not part of educating the student.


Schools are accommodating disabilities, not providing treatment. A 1:1 aide or smaller class is a tool to help the child access education just like a wheelchair ramp.


The girl who was super violent in my daughter's 4th and 5th grade classroom had a 1:1 aide. The aide's job was to call for help when the student started throwing things while the teacher tried to evacuate the other 25+ students. No one was allowed to touch the child so they had to try and talk her down. It was madness. The next day she'd be in the class just like normal. Eventually they put her in a different class (I think with the 6th graders) and my daughter says she is in her in middle school this year. I have great sympathy for the parents of this girl - raising kids is extremely difficult - especially when your child has problems. It is nearly impossible to get therapy these days, the medications all have weird side effects - it's hard. My friend in New York asked the school to pay for private school for her son that had emotional difficulties and the school worked with her to find an appropriate school. I don't see why this can't be the case in this area as well.


We do have appropriate schools in this area. In Frederick there is Laurel Hall. In PG and Ffx there is Phillips. In Mont Co there is Shephard Pratt, RICA, Foundation, and Ridge. In FFX there is also Keller. Baltimore has even more options.

Of all of these only RICA is run by a school system supported by the state. The rest of these schools are private and the placing school district has to bear the cost. It’s expensive and considered the most restrictive environment. Schools want to try every less restrictive environment first before non public placement.

Unlike TJ, no parent runs to FB posting with pride and joy that their child was accepted to one of these schools. There is still very much a stigma associated with attending one of these schools.

My kid is in one of the schools I mentioned. What’s ironic to me is that parents don’t know how much their kid needs the help and support until they are placed there and they are finally successful. Most parents I’ve met over the years are grateful that their child is in this environment. It’s also interesting that most teachers in the gen ed settings are not familiar with the available programs. The school districts do a very good job of trying to keep information about available programs quiet. If you read the SN forum there are hundreds of questions asking about the different programs in different counties. Transparency would help a lot. The burden is on the parent to figure out what’s available and then try and figure out the best fit. This is where an advocate is helpful. But if you don’t have the money for an advocate and you don’t know that DCUM exists, then you don’t know what you don’t know. What you know is that your kid is the chair thrower and tomorrow the school will try X.


Thank you for sharing this. I’m so glad your child finally found a good educational fit. I wish this process was easier for parents to navigate.
Anonymous
Thankfully this mostly resolves by MS because the chair throwers can’t typically handle honors classes even with accommodation. You still have to deal with them in PE and electives though.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Counties hide behind LRE to act like it’s the legal requirement for a certain child. In reality mainstream classes are just cheaper. Self-contained is way more expensive so they try to keep anyone they can mainstream. Even if the classroom teacher and the sped teacher and the parents agree the placement is not working, the county will fight it. I’ve seen it happen.


Private schools are failing because of this. Parents will not use them and vote to defund them. It is a death spiral.


You know what is also expensive? TJ. But the school board finds the money to help the advanced kids get even more advanced. They found the money for that. So the kids who are just normal are in the classroom with the disruptive kids and the majority go downhill because they don't have the same advocacy power.


What mainstreaming does is turn regular classrooms into special education classrooms, but it is the wrong fit for everyone.


+1

Schools need SPED rooms, but the SPED parents fight it.


"Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever!"
Forum Index » Elementary School-Aged Kids
Go to: