List of Insta matriculation pages?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What happened with GDS this year?

Not as good as last year's, but still decent.

Just barely ok, I'd say. I know somewhat more disappointed families than happy ones.

Couple of unhooked very high stats kids got T10s - just a couple...otherwise, I'd say everyone was hooked for T10.

ED was the ticket for SLACs and esp. Tufts.

Unhooked/high stats had a bunch of kids shut out of T30...and scrambling between safeties since targets were often...off-target

Yes, hooked vs. unhooked, ED or not ED etc…is the same story at GDS, Sidwell or NCS. Same story everywhere, why pick on GDS kids?

One school that’s doing very well is SWW.

Congratulations to all kids!

SWW’s results are very underwhelming as well. 150-160 graduating seniors and only 5 or 6 are going to Ivies. If you think that’s great than you’re using a low bar to measure SWW students.

Says a parent who looks on an Instagram feed run by a few kids who knows nothing about the school. My daughter was told by me that creepy private school parents are looking at the insta pists many of them are boycotting posting this year. They’d rather keep their sweet secret private and let you all suffer wondering how well they’re doing. PS they are doing very well with excellent choices including many more IVs that are posted.

(Funny Joke was that they were going to post fake ones of really mediocre schools To further rile you up and confuse you.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

How do you know this?

Google is your friend.

You googled the kids and found their parents’ names and college info?

It’s public info.

It’s public information that you googled. After you googled the student, you googled the parents. You had to have spent at least 10-15 minutes per student. You are a stalker. Sad.

Yeah, this is genuinely frightening behavior. It’s stalking kids to determine if they’re legacy for college. What made you think it was appropriate to do that?

What are you going to do about it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

How do you know this?

Google is your friend.

You googled the kids and found their parents’ names and college info?

It’s public info.

It’s public information that you googled. After you googled the student, you googled the parents. You had to have spent at least 10-15 minutes per student. You are a stalker. Sad.

Yeah, this is genuinely frightening behavior. It’s stalking kids to determine if they’re legacy for college. What made you think it was appropriate to do that?

There’s nothing illegal about it, and nothing you can do about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Their parents are just poorer, on average, than private school parents.

Yes, those Whitman and Churchill families not paying 13 years of private school tuition are so poor.

PoorER. Can you read?!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What happened with GDS this year?

Not as good as last year's, but still decent.

Just barely ok, I'd say. I know somewhat more disappointed families than happy ones.

Couple of unhooked very high stats kids got T10s - just a couple...otherwise, I'd say everyone was hooked for T10.

ED was the ticket for SLACs and esp. Tufts.

Unhooked/high stats had a bunch of kids shut out of T30...and scrambling between safeties since targets were often...off-target

Yes, hooked vs. unhooked, ED or not ED etc…is the same story at GDS, Sidwell or NCS. Same story everywhere, why pick on GDS kids?

One school that’s doing very well is SWW.

Congratulations to all kids!

SWW’s results are very underwhelming as well. 150-160 graduating seniors and only 5 or 6 are going to Ivies. If you think that’s great than you’re using a low bar to measure SWW students.

Says a parent who looks on an Instagram feed run by a few kids who knows nothing about the school. My daughter was told by me that creepy private school parents are looking at the insta pists many of them are boycotting posting this year. They’d rather keep their sweet secret private and let you all suffer wondering how well they’re doing. PS they are doing very well with excellent choices including many more IVs that are posted.

(Funny Joke was that they were going to post fake ones of really mediocre schools To further rile you up and confuse you.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What happened with GDS this year?

Not as good as last year's, but still decent.

Just barely ok, I'd say. I know somewhat more disappointed families than happy ones.

Couple of unhooked very high stats kids got T10s - just a couple...otherwise, I'd say everyone was hooked for T10.

ED was the ticket for SLACs and esp. Tufts.

Unhooked/high stats had a bunch of kids shut out of T30...and scrambling between safeties since targets were often...off-target

Yes, hooked vs. unhooked, ED or not ED etc…is the same story at GDS, Sidwell or NCS. Same story everywhere, why pick on GDS kids?

One school that’s doing very well is SWW.

Congratulations to all kids!

SWW’s results are very underwhelming as well. 150-160 graduating seniors and only 5 or 6 are going to Ivies. If you think that’s great than you’re using a low bar to measure SWW students.

Says a parent who looks on an Instagram feed run by a few kids who knows nothing about the school. My daughter was told by me that creepy private school parents are looking at the insta pists many of them are boycotting posting this year. They’d rather keep their sweet secret private and let you all suffer wondering how well they’re doing. PS they are doing very well with excellent choices including many more IVs that are posted.

(Funny Joke was that they were going to post fake ones of really mediocre schools To further rile you up and confuse you.)

Rile who up? No one expects much of Walls’ college outcomes. A handful of Ivies, a few more state colleges, and a lot of local (or faraway) colleges and universities most people haven’t heard of. That’s what is expected, and that’s generally what Walls delivers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

How do you know this?

Google is your friend.

You googled the kids and found their parents’ names and college info?

Ok stalker.

It’s public info.

It’s public information that you googled. After you googled the student, you googled the parents. You had to have spent at least 10-15 minutes per student. You are a stalker. Sad.

Yeah, this is genuinely frightening behavior. It’s stalking kids to determine if they’re legacy for college. What made you think it was appropriate to do that?

There’s nothing illegal about it, and nothing you can do about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

How do you know this?

Google is your friend.

You googled the kids and found their parents’ names and college info?

It’s public info.

It’s public information that you googled. After you googled the student, you googled the parents. You had to have spent at least 10-15 minutes per student. You are a stalker. Sad.

Yeah, this is genuinely frightening behavior. It’s stalking kids to determine if they’re legacy for college. What made you think it was appropriate to do that?

There’s nothing illegal about it, and nothing you can do about it.

Ok stalker.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What happened with GDS this year?

Not as good as last year's, but still decent.

Just barely ok, I'd say. I know somewhat more disappointed families than happy ones.

Couple of unhooked very high stats kids got T10s - just a couple...otherwise, I'd say everyone was hooked for T10.

ED was the ticket for SLACs and esp. Tufts.

Unhooked/high stats had a bunch of kids shut out of T30...and scrambling between safeties since targets were often...off-target

Yes, hooked vs. unhooked, ED or not ED etc…is the same story at GDS, Sidwell or NCS. Same story everywhere, why pick on GDS kids?

One school that’s doing very well is SWW.

Congratulations to all kids!

SWW’s results are very underwhelming as well. 150-160 graduating seniors and only 5 or 6 are going to Ivies. If you think that’s great than you’re using a low bar to measure SWW students.

Says a parent who looks on an Instagram feed run by a few kids who knows nothing about the school. My daughter was told by me that creepy private school parents are looking at the insta pists many of them are boycotting posting this year. They’d rather keep their sweet secret private and let you all suffer wondering how well they’re doing. PS they are doing very well with excellent choices including many more IVs that are posted.

(Funny Joke was that they were going to post fake ones of really mediocre schools To further rile you up and confuse you.)

IVs? Mmmkay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

How do you know this?

Google is your friend.

You googled the kids and found their parents’ names and college info?

It’s public info.

It’s public information that you googled. After you googled the student, you googled the parents. You had to have spent at least 10-15 minutes per student. You are a stalker. Sad.

Yeah, this is genuinely frightening behavior. It’s stalking kids to determine if they’re legacy for college. What made you think it was appropriate to do that?

There’s nothing illegal about it, and nothing you can do about it.

Ok stalker.

+1. So gross!

[Anonymous]

Stalking requires known interaction with the person you’re preying upon.

[Anonymous]

What you do is google the parents last name and Washington DC and you come up with the parent's LinkedIn.
It works almost 10@% of the time for unique or some heat unique names. It takes one minute of googling, not 15.

You are not accessing one bit of info that the kids or parents themselves have posted on open-to-the-public social media sites. trust me, the parents want you to know that they went to Harvard or Brown. They could go private at any minute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stalking requires known interaction with the person you’re preying upon.

Listen stalker: You are a stalker! Seek help and stop trying to justify your behavior on this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What you do is google the parents last name and Washington DC and you come up with the parent's LinkedIn.
It works almost 10@% of the time for unique or some heat unique names. It takes one minute of googling, not 15.

You are not accessing one bit of info that the kids or parents themselves have posted on open-to-the-public social media sites. trust me, the parents want you to know that they went to Harvard or Brown. They could go private at any minute.

STALKER!!!

[Anonymous]

Lol. Because accessing LinkedIn is stalker behavior. Got it.

Every single linkedin user is able to make every single aspect of their profile private and yet mysteriously they don't. 30 years into their law careers and they still want everyone who googles their name to come up with "Harvard class of 1995."