List of Insta matriculation pages?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What happened with GDS this year?

Not as good as last year's, but still decent.

Just barely ok, I'd say. I know somewhat more disappointed families than happy ones.

Couple of unhooked very high stats kids got T10s - just a couple...otherwise, I'd say everyone was hooked for T10.

ED was the ticket for SLACs and esp. Tufts.

Unhooked/high stats had a bunch of kids shut out of T30...and scrambling between safeties since targets were often...off-target

Yes, hooked vs. unhooked, ED or not ED etc…is the same story at GDS, Sidwell or NCS. Same story everywhere, why pick on GDS kids?

One school that’s doing very well is SWW.

Congratulations to all kids!

YES!

The recent admits that Sidwell posted are all hooked kids: mostly legacy from very high profile, $$$, law-partner parents. Any school on the planet could have placed them into their parents' alma maters.
These private high schools can only work with what they've been given. If they get a class of the kids of high-honor alums they are golden. Random federal employees (like myself)--well then
you're looking at the (even high achieving) kids ending up at the type of schools you would all scoff at.

Ironically, you have touched on the very reason why students from top (and expensive) private high schools will always be over represented at top (and expensive) private colleges and universities. Ivies, Stanford, MIT, SLACs, etc. need these wealthy, connected, and very well educated/prepared students to pay full tuition and provide the rarefied social atmosphere that many parents want their children to be immersed. If these schools become full of only high stats strivers who need a lot of financial aid, these top schools will lose that which so many covet.

Sidwell has the most well educated and connected parents in the DMV. For an unhooked smart kid, chances are probably worse going to a school like this. For the hooked kids, they probably could have gotten in wherever they went to high school. There is just a higher concentration of these kids at Sidwell. The strivers are the ones who are going to be disappointed.

Untrue. The unhooked high stats strivers also do well coming out of Sidwell (at least the majority of the students I know).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

They’re not all “hooked” (because I know a few students/families personally), but I see that you are determined to make excuses.

Btw, are none of the public school students hooked at Langley, McLean, and Churchill? Is that why they attend public school and can’t get into Ivies at the same rate as Sidwell students?

There are plenty of Ivy legacies in certain area public schools. Their parents are just poorer, on average, than private school parents.

Didn’t you know that a condition of graduating from an Ivy League school is committing to send future children to private school only? That’s how you know all Ivy admits from public schools aren’t legacies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

They’re not all “hooked” (because I know a few students/families personally), but I see that you are determined to make excuses.

Btw, are none of the public school students hooked at Langley, McLean, and Churchill? Is that why they attend public school and can’t get into Ivies at the same rate as Sidwell students?

There are plenty of Ivy legacies in certain area public schools. Their parents are just poorer, on average, than private school parents.

Didn’t you know that a condition of graduating from an Ivy League school is committing to send future children to private school only? That’s how you know all Ivy admits from public schools aren’t legacies.

There are plenty of Ivy legacies in certain area public schools. Their parents are just poorer, on average, than private school parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

They’re not all “hooked” (because I know a few students/families personally), but I see that you are determined to make excuses.

Btw, are none of the public school students hooked at Langley, McLean, and Churchill? Is that why they attend public school and can’t get into Ivies at the same rate as Sidwell students?

There are plenty of Ivy legacies in certain area public schools. Their parents are just poorer, on average, than private school parents.

Didn’t you know that a condition of graduating from an Ivy League school is committing to send future children to private school only? That’s how you know all Ivy admits from public schools aren’t legacies.

There are plenty of Ivy legacies in certain area public schools. Their parents are just poorer, on average, than private school parents.

McLean parent here. This is true. We know many ivy educated parents. Some do make $$. DH earns $3m a year and we send our kids to public. DH and I are both public school kids and wanted our kids to not be around just rich kids. Our kids have a mix of MC and UMC friends. I know our $3m HHI would be fine at private and we would likely be average. Most of our neighbors send their kids to private.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

How do you know this?

Google is your friend.

You googled the kids and found their parents’ names and college info?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

How do you know this?

Google is your friend.

You googled the kids and found their parents’ names and college info?

That’s stalker behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

How do you know this?

Google is your friend.

You googled the kids and found their parents’ names and college info?

It’s public info.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

How do you know this?

Google is your friend.

You googled the kids and found their parents’ names and college info?

It’s public info.

It’s public information that you googled. After you googled the student, you googled the parents. You had to have spent at least 10-15 minutes per student. You are a stalker. Sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have McLean and Langley HS pages?

https://instagram.com/mcleancommits2023

https://instagram.com/langleycommits2023

Don’t these two schools have about 600 students per grade? Their college admissions results are underwhelming.

We are zoned for Langley. Their instagram doesn’t represent their whole class. Both McLean and Langley have a lot of smart Asian kids and they often don’t post on these social media platforms. I know my son won’t want to. Last year, at least 10 kids went to Yale. I don’t know anything about this year. My kid is only 14.

10 to Yale? I don't think that is right.

This was last year. We were applying to privates and I spent a lot of time on this board. Multiple Langley parents posted and I spoke to a few Langley parents in real life. I would never admit to spending all this time looking at private and public school college matriculation info online. I act very nonchalant about college in real life. We absolutely 100% care where our kids end up for college. Both McLean and Langley had very impressive college admissions last year.

Highly doubtful there were 10 to Yale. I see only one to Yale in last year's instagram post, and this was an athletic recruit. https://www.instagram.com/langleycommits2022/

There was a long thread about Langley college admissions last year and some parents had shared some private info about the Yale admits and a lot of the thread got taken down. Someone shared pdf documents and one poster even created an entire spreadsheet comparing Langley to McLean High. Maybe it wasn’t 10 to Yale. Maybe it was 10 to HYP or ivy? My memory is blurry and I had not thought about college admissions for over 20 years. My takeaway from all my time reading various forums and college counseling sites was that if you graduate at the top 10% of McLean or Langley, you should be able to get into a T30 college or UVA. I am still not sure exactly what gpa that needs to be to make it to the top 10%.

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/90/1060115.page

I clearly remember being surprised at parents considering Northeastern a top college. I remember thinking people online must be uneducated and confusing Northeastern and Northwestern. I was annoyed at the UVA boosters who seemed to put UVA in the same category as HYPS.

LOL you are basing your information on an old DCUM thread full of anonymous posts plus your memory is blurry as to whether they were all Yale admits or other ivies...or maybe even just top 30 schools. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

They’re not all “hooked” (because I know a few students/families personally), but I see that you are determined to make excuses.

Btw, are none of the public school students hooked at Langley, McLean, and Churchill? Is that why they attend public school and can’t get into Ivies at the same rate as Sidwell students?

There are plenty of Ivy legacies in certain area public schools. Their parents are just poorer, on average, than private school parents.

Didn’t you know that a condition of graduating from an Ivy League school is committing to send future children to private school only? That’s how you know all Ivy admits from public schools aren’t legacies.

There are plenty of Ivy legacies in certain area public schools. Their parents are just poorer, on average, than private school parents.

McLean parent here. This is true. We know many ivy educated parents. Some do make $$. DH earns $3m a year and we send our kids to public. DH and I are both public school kids and wanted our kids to not be around just rich kids. Our kids have a mix of MC and UMC friends. I know our $3m HHI would be fine at private and we would likely be average. Most of our neighbors send their kids to private.

so why are you on this thread in the first place? seems like you can’t stop thinking about private school, but keep telling yourself that public was the was the right choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

They’re not all “hooked” (because I know a few students/families personally), but I see that you are determined to make excuses.

Btw, are none of the public school students hooked at Langley, McLean, and Churchill? Is that why they attend public school and can’t get into Ivies at the same rate as Sidwell students?

There are plenty of Ivy legacies in certain area public schools. Their parents are just poorer, on average, than private school parents.

Didn’t you know that a condition of graduating from an Ivy League school is committing to send future children to private school only? That’s how you know all Ivy admits from public schools aren’t legacies.

There are plenty of Ivy legacies in certain area public schools. Their parents are just poorer, on average, than private school parents.

McLean parent here. This is true. We know many ivy educated parents. Some do make $$. DH earns $3m a year and we send our kids to public. DH and I are both public school kids and wanted our kids to not be around just rich kids. Our kids have a mix of MC and UMC friends. I know our $3m HHI would be fine at private and we would likely be average. Most of our neighbors send their kids to private.

so why are you on this thread in the first place? seems like you can’t stop thinking about private school, but keep telling yourself that public was the was the right choice.

she probably comes here to get validation because her kid was too dumb to get in anywhere

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have McLean and Langley HS pages?

https://instagram.com/mcleancommits2023

https://instagram.com/langleycommits2023

Don’t these two schools have about 600 students per grade? Their college admissions results are underwhelming.

We are zoned for Langley. Their instagram doesn’t represent their whole class. Both McLean and Langley have a lot of smart Asian kids and they often don’t post on these social media platforms. I know my son won’t want to. Last year, at least 10 kids went to Yale. I don’t know anything about this year. My kid is only 14.

10 to Yale? I don't think that is right.

This was last year. We were applying to privates and I spent a lot of time on this board. Multiple Langley parents posted and I spoke to a few Langley parents in real life. I would never admit to spending all this time looking at private and public school college matriculation info online. I act very nonchalant about college in real life. We absolutely 100% care where our kids end up for college. Both McLean and Langley had very impressive college admissions last year.

Highly doubtful there were 10 to Yale. I see only one to Yale in last year's instagram post, and this was an athletic recruit. https://www.instagram.com/langleycommits2022/

There was a long thread about Langley college admissions last year and some parents had shared some private info about the Yale admits and a lot of the thread got taken down. Someone shared pdf documents and one poster even created an entire spreadsheet comparing Langley to McLean High. Maybe it wasn’t 10 to Yale. Maybe it was 10 to HYP or ivy? My memory is blurry and I had not thought about college admissions for over 20 years. My takeaway from all my time reading various forums and college counseling sites was that if you graduate at the top 10% of McLean or Langley, you should be able to get into a T30 college or UVA. I am still not sure exactly what gpa that needs to be to make it to the top 10%.

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/90/1060115.page

I clearly remember being surprised at parents considering Northeastern a top college. I remember thinking people online must be uneducated and confusing Northeastern and Northwestern. I was annoyed at the UVA boosters who seemed to put UVA in the same category as HYPS.

LOL you are basing your information on an old DCUM thread full of anonymous posts plus your memory is blurry as to whether they were all Yale admits or other ivies...or maybe even just top 30 schools. Got it.

I think I trolled that thread with the 12 yale acceptances post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

How do you know this?

Google is your friend.

You googled the kids and found their parents’ names and college info?

It’s public info.

It’s public information that you googled. After you googled the student, you googled the parents. You had to have spent at least 10-15 minutes per student. You are a stalker. Sad.

Yeah, this is genuinely frightening behavior. It’s stalking kids to determine if they’re legacy for college. What made you think it was appropriate to do that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell’s recent posts have been incredibly impressive.

Yes, very impressive! I’m not a Sidwell parent, but credit should be given where credit is due. There are a bunch of Sidwell haters in the Private School Forum.

Being considered the top school in the DMV is great for Sidwell. The downside is that it makes the school a constant target.

The recent Sidwell posts are all hooked kids as well. Harvard is legacy, Brown legacy, Penn URM. It's the same story.

How do you know this?

Google is your friend.

You googled the kids and found their parents’ names and college info?

It’s public info.

It’s public information that you googled. After you googled the student, you googled the parents. You had to have spent at least 10-15 minutes per student. You are a stalker. Sad.

Yeah, this is genuinely frightening behavior. It’s stalking kids to determine if they’re legacy for college. What made you think it was appropriate to do that?

Wow, I admit I browse the different schools to compare outcomes but to actually google kids seems like stalker behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Their parents are just poorer, on average, than private school parents.

Yes, those Whitman and Churchill families not paying 13 years of private school tuition are so poor.