“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Politico has seen the 98-page draft opinion. No, they’re not going to say that when they haven’t. Yes, it was effing leaked.

So, here is what we do:

Every sexually active woman in America: STOP F'cking your BF, lover, husband RIGHT NOW and make it clear : NO SEX for you EVER AGAIN unless this decision is re- written

No Congressman, Senator, Lobbyist, Lawyer in Washington is getting any PuXXy EVER AGAIN unless this legal draft is ABORTED

If men think THEY can control what We as Women do with OUR BODIES then , literally, teach them the lesson of what we can DENY THEM

The problem with that is about 1/2 the women in this country support the ruling based on voting history.

Well,, NOT the Women who live in Washington who can literally bring these men to their Knees.... and , of course, every prostitute they turn to JACK UP your rates to what Atty's charge: $1,000 / hr billed in 10 min increments... and remember EACH and EVERY visit to a prostitute may result in 18 years of child support for each child conceived the pregnancy of which cannot be " dealt with discretely "

Can someone place the call to Madonna, Angelina Jolie and maybe bring ALL the women from the Met Gala to the SCOTUS steps starting NEXT Monday and begin the SEX BAN in Washington ... let it commence

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now it'll be entirely unclear if Republicans will win in the midterms. They picked a really great time to rock the boat on a super charged issue that will absolutely rally the Democrat base to get out and vote.

I'd agree more with this sentiment if it wasn't for the fact that we have record inflation and a looming recession on our hands, along with the possibility of greater involvement in Ukraine. I'd wager the typical voter will prioritize these concerns over abortion come November.

I mean, sure, because the GOP has clear plans to deal with all those issues. Oh wait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ITA. The leaker needs to be identified and disbarred. Not sure any actual laws were broken, but this cannot go unpunished.

Unauthorized disclosures are generally illegal, but even for classified info, the sentences are usually pretty light relative to the damage.

The court is self governing and doesn't have rules about this. I am sorry, if one justice can participate in a coup against the country and not hasve to recuse themselves from related cases, then I don't GAF about this.

See how shattering norms and rules works?

I find it difficult to believe SCOTUS has no rules to protect its deliberative process.

I have heard former SCOTUS clerks say they were warned on the first day of the job that leaking opinions would not be tolerated and would end in dismissal and disbarment. So, I do believe they have rules.
Add to that the fact that no opinion has ever been leaked before.

This person needs to be identified immediately and dealt with. This is unacceptable.

So you’re more concerned with the leak than the fact that SCOTUS doing away with right to privacy? Good stuff.

Yes, I actually am. And, they are NOT doing away with the right to privacy if this report is accurate.
They are not even making abortion illegal. They are returning the decision to the people.... to be decided by the state officials elected by the people.

A breach such as this is actually an insurrection on the court. It is appalling and needs to be addressed immediately.

Excellent summary. Exactly correct.

+1

Many people are too emotionally charged over the draft opinion to comprehend what it actually means, and to comprehend the damage that was inflicted upon the court by the leak.

The Court was already damaged.

It’s partisan and impacts the lives of Americans more than Congress does.

So, if the Court had decided (or decides ultimately) to uphold Roe, would you still be saying that it's damaged? Are you only saying this because the Court may issue an opinion with which you disagree?

When the Court is wildly out of step with the country, that's a problem.

This ruling is a problem. The Court is broken. Sotomayor was right. Roberts was right.

The next 10 years in America are going to be very ugly. The oppression of women and minorities has to end.

Just stop. There is no oppression.

Forcing a woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term is oppression.

As kids, in school, I remember that lesson about actions have consequences. You wear a rubber to avoid what you’re describing. Otherwise, swallow. Or don’t it.

And what is your option for those who are raped or incest?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now it'll be entirely unclear if Republicans will win in the midterms. They picked a really great time to rock the boat on a super charged issue that will absolutely rally the Democrat base to get out and vote.

Economy drives voting. No surprise there are dismal figures this AM

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ITA. The leaker needs to be identified and disbarred. Not sure any actual laws were broken, but this cannot go unpunished.

Unauthorized disclosures are generally illegal, but even for classified info, the sentences are usually pretty light relative to the damage.

The court is self governing and doesn't have rules about this. I am sorry, if one justice can participate in a coup against the country and not hasve to recuse themselves from related cases, then I don't GAF about this.

See how shattering norms and rules works?

I find it difficult to believe SCOTUS has no rules to protect its deliberative process.

I have heard former SCOTUS clerks say they were warned on the first day of the job that leaking opinions would not be tolerated and would end in dismissal and disbarment. So, I do believe they have rules.
Add to that the fact that no opinion has ever been leaked before.

This person needs to be identified immediately and dealt with. This is unacceptable.

So you’re more concerned with the leak than the fact that SCOTUS doing away with right to privacy? Good stuff.

Yes, I actually am. And, they are NOT doing away with the right to privacy if this report is accurate.
They are not even making abortion illegal. They are returning the decision to the people.... to be decided by the state officials elected by the people.

A breach such as this is actually an insurrection on the court. It is appalling and needs to be addressed immediately.

Excellent summary. Exactly correct.

+1

Many people are too emotionally charged over the draft opinion to comprehend what it actually means, and to comprehend the damage that was inflicted upon the court by the leak.

The Court was already damaged.

It’s partisan and impacts the lives of Americans more than Congress does.

So, if the Court had decided (or decides ultimately) to uphold Roe, would you still be saying that it's damaged? Are you only saying this because the Court may issue an opinion with which you disagree?

When the Court is wildly out of step with the country, that's a problem.

This ruling is a problem. The Court is broken. Sotomayor was right. Roberts was right.

+1

The nomination process is broken. Justices openly lie to Congress.

Justices don’t properly recuse themselves.

The court is broken.

It's only broken if it doesn't rule the way you want it to, right?

It is broken because one of the justices is involved in the insurrection, and three others have lied under oath about upholding precedent. It is broken.

This simply isn't true, but yell whatever you need to yell in order to stay smug and justified, I suppose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now it'll be entirely unclear if Republicans will win in the midterms. They picked a really great time to rock the boat on a super charged issue that will absolutely rally the Democrat base to get out and vote.

I'd agree more with this sentiment if it wasn't for the fact that we have record inflation and a looming recession on our hands, along with the possibility of greater involvement in Ukraine. I'd wager the typical voter will prioritize these concerns over abortion come November.

And this is the perfect issue to help hide all that…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ITA. The leaker needs to be identified and disbarred. Not sure any actual laws were broken, but this cannot go unpunished.

Unauthorized disclosures are generally illegal, but even for classified info, the sentences are usually pretty light relative to the damage.

The court is self governing and doesn't have rules about this. I am sorry, if one justice can participate in a coup against the country and not hasve to recuse themselves from related cases, then I don't GAF about this.

See how shattering norms and rules works?

I find it difficult to believe SCOTUS has no rules to protect its deliberative process.

I have heard former SCOTUS clerks say they were warned on the first day of the job that leaking opinions would not be tolerated and would end in dismissal and disbarment. So, I do believe they have rules.
Add to that the fact that no opinion has ever been leaked before.

This person needs to be identified immediately and dealt with. This is unacceptable.

So you’re more concerned with the leak than the fact that SCOTUS doing away with right to privacy? Good stuff.

Yes, I actually am. And, they are NOT doing away with the right to privacy if this report is accurate.
They are not even making abortion illegal. They are returning the decision to the people.... to be decided by the state officials elected by the people.

A breach such as this is actually an insurrection on the court. It is appalling and needs to be addressed immediately.

Excellent summary. Exactly correct.

+1

Many people are too emotionally charged over the draft opinion to comprehend what it actually means, and to comprehend the damage that was inflicted upon the court by the leak.

The Court was already damaged.

It’s partisan and impacts the lives of Americans more than Congress does.

So, if the Court had decided (or decides ultimately) to uphold Roe, would you still be saying that it's damaged? Are you only saying this because the Court may issue an opinion with which you disagree?

When the Court is wildly out of step with the country, that's a problem.

This ruling is a problem. The Court is broken. Sotomayor was right. Roberts was right.

+1

The nomination process is broken. Justices openly lie to Congress.

Justices don’t properly recuse themselves.

The court is broken.

It's only broken if it doesn't rule the way you want it to, right?

It is broken because one of the justices is involved in the insurrection, and three others have lied under oath about upholding precedent. It is broken.

This simply isn't true, but yell whatever you need to yell in order to stay smug and justified, I suppose.

It absolutely is true. I know you only believe in what Fox News tell you, but the facts are there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ITA. The leaker needs to be identified and disbarred. Not sure any actual laws were broken, but this cannot go unpunished.

Unauthorized disclosures are generally illegal, but even for classified info, the sentences are usually pretty light relative to the damage.

The court is self governing and doesn't have rules about this. I am sorry, if one justice can participate in a coup against the country and not hasve to recuse themselves from related cases, then I don't GAF about this.

See how shattering norms and rules works?

I find it difficult to believe SCOTUS has no rules to protect its deliberative process.

I have heard former SCOTUS clerks say they were warned on the first day of the job that leaking opinions would not be tolerated and would end in dismissal and disbarment. So, I do believe they have rules.
Add to that the fact that no opinion has ever been leaked before.

This person needs to be identified immediately and dealt with. This is unacceptable.

So you’re more concerned with the leak than the fact that SCOTUS doing away with right to privacy? Good stuff.

Yes, I actually am. And, they are NOT doing away with the right to privacy if this report is accurate.
They are not even making abortion illegal. They are returning the decision to the people.... to be decided by the state officials elected by the people.

A breach such as this is actually an insurrection on the court. It is appalling and needs to be addressed immediately.

Excellent summary. Exactly correct.

+1

Many people are too emotionally charged over the draft opinion to comprehend what it actually means, and to comprehend the damage that was inflicted upon the court by the leak.

The Court was already damaged.

It’s partisan and impacts the lives of Americans more than Congress does.

So, if the Court had decided (or decides ultimately) to uphold Roe, would you still be saying that it's damaged? Are you only saying this because the Court may issue an opinion with which you disagree?

When the Court is wildly out of step with the country, that's a problem.

This ruling is a problem. The Court is broken. Sotomayor was right. Roberts was right.

The next 10 years in America are going to be very ugly. The oppression of women and minorities has to end.

Just stop. There is no oppression.

Forcing a woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term is oppression.

As kids, in school, I remember that lesson about actions have consequences. You wear a rubber to avoid what you’re describing. Otherwise, swallow. Or don’t it.

And what is your option for those who are raped or incest?

For rape and incest I wholeheartedly agree to do it. Not because oops I messed up. However, you shouldn’t bring a life that’s created from an evil act. 100%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ITA. The leaker needs to be identified and disbarred. Not sure any actual laws were broken, but this cannot go unpunished.

Unauthorized disclosures are generally illegal, but even for classified info, the sentences are usually pretty light relative to the damage.

The court is self governing and doesn't have rules about this. I am sorry, if one justice can participate in a coup against the country and not hasve to recuse themselves from related cases, then I don't GAF about this.

See how shattering norms and rules works?

I find it difficult to believe SCOTUS has no rules to protect its deliberative process.

I have heard former SCOTUS clerks say they were warned on the first day of the job that leaking opinions would not be tolerated and would end in dismissal and disbarment. So, I do believe they have rules.
Add to that the fact that no opinion has ever been leaked before.

This person needs to be identified immediately and dealt with. This is unacceptable.

So you’re more concerned with the leak than the fact that SCOTUS doing away with right to privacy? Good stuff.

Yes, I actually am. And, they are NOT doing away with the right to privacy if this report is accurate.
They are not even making abortion illegal. They are returning the decision to the people.... to be decided by the state officials elected by the people.

A breach such as this is actually an insurrection on the court. It is appalling and needs to be addressed immediately.

Excellent summary. Exactly correct.

+1

Many people are too emotionally charged over the draft opinion to comprehend what it actually means, and to comprehend the damage that was inflicted upon the court by the leak.

The Court was already damaged.

It’s partisan and impacts the lives of Americans more than Congress does.

So, if the Court had decided (or decides ultimately) to uphold Roe, would you still be saying that it's damaged? Are you only saying this because the Court may issue an opinion with which you disagree?

When the Court is wildly out of step with the country, that's a problem.

This ruling is a problem. The Court is broken. Sotomayor was right. Roberts was right.

+1

The nomination process is broken. Justices openly lie to Congress.

Justices don’t properly recuse themselves.

The court is broken.

It's only broken if it doesn't rule the way you want it to, right?

It is broken because one of the justices is involved in the insurrection, and three others have lied under oath about upholding precedent. It is broken.

This simply isn't true, but yell whatever you need to yell in order to stay smug and justified, I suppose.

It is true. I had this right for my entire life...and I am not young. Decades and decades. This was the last and my kids are now denied this fundamental right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think this helps Republicans in the long run. This has been the thing they have dangled over their base for a long time. If Roe goes away, then a certain chunk of the base who were single issue voters on abortion can actually start considering other things and may vote differently. How many religious women in particular held their noses and voted Trump because he was the pro-life candidate? I know at least a couple. They hate Trump and would gladly vote for a Democrat if abortion were no longer an issue to be debated.

I hate that this is happening but I would consider it a good thing for right wing politicians to not be able to use it as a wedge issue anymore.

No, but that wash post article about trying to pass a law to ban it nation wide is the next step for republicans. They will continue to find another issue to consume people.

Look all the privacy protections are gone- birth control, gay rights, etc. We no long have a right to privacy. The Supreme is a radical and unaccountable government branch. It is time for massive reforms including increasing the court to 120 and making them stand for election.

The right to privacy is not given to you by the Constitution. It’s a natural right. The government is the one stepping on those natural rights

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ITA. The leaker needs to be identified and disbarred. Not sure any actual laws were broken, but this cannot go unpunished.

Unauthorized disclosures are generally illegal, but even for classified info, the sentences are usually pretty light relative to the damage.

The court is self governing and doesn't have rules about this. I am sorry, if one justice can participate in a coup against the country and not hasve to recuse themselves from related cases, then I don't GAF about this.

See how shattering norms and rules works?

I find it difficult to believe SCOTUS has no rules to protect its deliberative process.

I have heard former SCOTUS clerks say they were warned on the first day of the job that leaking opinions would not be tolerated and would end in dismissal and disbarment. So, I do believe they have rules.
Add to that the fact that no opinion has ever been leaked before.

This person needs to be identified immediately and dealt with. This is unacceptable.

So you’re more concerned with the leak than the fact that SCOTUS doing away with right to privacy? Good stuff.

Yes, I actually am. And, they are NOT doing away with the right to privacy if this report is accurate.
They are not even making abortion illegal. They are returning the decision to the people.... to be decided by the state officials elected by the people.

A breach such as this is actually an insurrection on the court. It is appalling and needs to be addressed immediately.

Excellent summary. Exactly correct.

+1

Many people are too emotionally charged over the draft opinion to comprehend what it actually means, and to comprehend the damage that was inflicted upon the court by the leak.

The Court was already damaged.

It’s partisan and impacts the lives of Americans more than Congress does.

So, if the Court had decided (or decides ultimately) to uphold Roe, would you still be saying that it's damaged? Are you only saying this because the Court may issue an opinion with which you disagree?

When the Court is wildly out of step with the country, that's a problem.

This ruling is a problem. The Court is broken. Sotomayor was right. Roberts was right.

+1

The nomination process is broken. Justices openly lie to Congress.

Justices don’t properly recuse themselves.

The court is broken.

It's only broken if it doesn't rule the way you want it to, right?

It is broken because one of the justices is involved in the insurrection, and three others have lied under oath about upholding precedent. It is broken.

This simply isn't true, but yell whatever you need to yell in order to stay smug and justified, I suppose.

It is true. I had this right for my entire life...and I am not young. Decades and decades. This was the last and my kids are now denied this fundamental right.

And it is not going to end with abortion rights. Shame on this court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now it'll be entirely unclear if Republicans will win in the midterms. They picked a really great time to rock the boat on a super charged issue that will absolutely rally the Democrat base to get out and vote.

I'd agree more with this sentiment if it wasn't for the fact that we have record inflation and a looming recession on our hands, along with the possibility of greater involvement in Ukraine. I'd wager the typical voter will prioritize these concerns over abortion come November.

Abortion has been a priority issue for voting for many years for many people.

There are many so-called priority issues. Right now, I don't see abortion -- even with a ruling on Roe -- prioritized over the economy and national security/foreign affairs. As a PP indicated earlier, I agree that the picture might look different if we didn't have crippling inflation, a possible recession on the horizon, and a worsening war in Europe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ITA. The leaker needs to be identified and disbarred. Not sure any actual laws were broken, but this cannot go unpunished.

Unauthorized disclosures are generally illegal, but even for classified info, the sentences are usually pretty light relative to the damage.

The court is self governing and doesn't have rules about this. I am sorry, if one justice can participate in a coup against the country and not hasve to recuse themselves from related cases, then I don't GAF about this.

See how shattering norms and rules works?

I find it difficult to believe SCOTUS has no rules to protect its deliberative process.

I have heard former SCOTUS clerks say they were warned on the first day of the job that leaking opinions would not be tolerated and would end in dismissal and disbarment. So, I do believe they have rules.
Add to that the fact that no opinion has ever been leaked before.

This person needs to be identified immediately and dealt with. This is unacceptable.

So you’re more concerned with the leak than the fact that SCOTUS doing away with right to privacy? Good stuff.

Yes, I actually am. And, they are NOT doing away with the right to privacy if this report is accurate.
They are not even making abortion illegal. They are returning the decision to the people.... to be decided by the state officials elected by the people.

A breach such as this is actually an insurrection on the court. It is appalling and needs to be addressed immediately.

Excellent summary. Exactly correct.

+1

Many people are too emotionally charged over the draft opinion to comprehend what it actually means, and to comprehend the damage that was inflicted upon the court by the leak.

The Court was already damaged.

It’s partisan and impacts the lives of Americans more than Congress does.

So, if the Court had decided (or decides ultimately) to uphold Roe, would you still be saying that it's damaged? Are you only saying this because the Court may issue an opinion with which you disagree?

When the Court is wildly out of step with the country, that's a problem.

This ruling is a problem. The Court is broken. Sotomayor was right. Roberts was right.

The next 10 years in America are going to be very ugly. The oppression of women and minorities has to end.

Just stop. There is no oppression.

Forcing a woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term is oppression.

As kids, in school, I remember that lesson about actions have consequences. You wear a rubber to avoid what you’re describing. Otherwise, swallow. Or don’t it.

And what is your option for those who are raped or incest?

For rape and incest I wholeheartedly agree to do it. Not because oops I messed up. However, you shouldn’t bring a life that’s created from an evil act. 100%

Conservatives don’t care about your caveats for rape, incest, and IVF. They are banning all of it. It’s already written into the trigger laws. Gov DeSantis just banned abortion with no carve out for rape of incest.

WHAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? These Republicans are not “moderate” - the extremists have overtaken the party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ITA. The leaker needs to be identified and disbarred. Not sure any actual laws were broken, but this cannot go unpunished.

Unauthorized disclosures are generally illegal, but even for classified info, the sentences are usually pretty light relative to the damage.

The court is self governing and doesn't have rules about this. I am sorry, if one justice can participate in a coup against the country and not hasve to recuse themselves from related cases, then I don't GAF about this.

See how shattering norms and rules works?

I find it difficult to believe SCOTUS has no rules to protect its deliberative process.

I have heard former SCOTUS clerks say they were warned on the first day of the job that leaking opinions would not be tolerated and would end in dismissal and disbarment. So, I do believe they have rules.
Add to that the fact that no opinion has ever been leaked before.

This person needs to be identified immediately and dealt with. This is unacceptable.

So you’re more concerned with the leak than the fact that SCOTUS doing away with right to privacy? Good stuff.

Yes, I actually am. And, they are NOT doing away with the right to privacy if this report is accurate.
They are not even making abortion illegal. They are returning the decision to the people.... to be decided by the state officials elected by the people.

A breach such as this is actually an insurrection on the court. It is appalling and needs to be addressed immediately.

Excellent summary. Exactly correct.

+1

Many people are too emotionally charged over the draft opinion to comprehend what it actually means, and to comprehend the damage that was inflicted upon the court by the leak.

The Court was already damaged.

It’s partisan and impacts the lives of Americans more than Congress does.

So, if the Court had decided (or decides ultimately) to uphold Roe, would you still be saying that it's damaged? Are you only saying this because the Court may issue an opinion with which you disagree?

When the Court is wildly out of step with the country, that's a problem.

This ruling is a problem. The Court is broken. Sotomayor was right. Roberts was right.

The next 10 years in America are going to be very ugly. The oppression of women and minorities has to end.

Just stop. There is no oppression.

Forcing a woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term is oppression.

As kids, in school, I remember that lesson about actions have consequences. You wear a rubber to avoid what you’re describing. Otherwise, swallow. Or don’t it.

And what is your option for those who are raped or incest?

For rape and incest I wholeheartedly agree to do it. Not because oops I messed up. However, you shouldn’t bring a life that’s created from an evil act. 100%

But this is not an option in most states now. The GOP is banning abortion no matter the circumstances.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ITA. The leaker needs to be identified and disbarred. Not sure any actual laws were broken, but this cannot go unpunished.

Unauthorized disclosures are generally illegal, but even for classified info, the sentences are usually pretty light relative to the damage.

The court is self governing and doesn't have rules about this. I am sorry, if one justice can participate in a coup against the country and not hasve to recuse themselves from related cases, then I don't GAF about this.

See how shattering norms and rules works?

I find it difficult to believe SCOTUS has no rules to protect its deliberative process.

I have heard former SCOTUS clerks say they were warned on the first day of the job that leaking opinions would not be tolerated and would end in dismissal and disbarment. So, I do believe they have rules.
Add to that the fact that no opinion has ever been leaked before.

This person needs to be identified immediately and dealt with. This is unacceptable.

So you’re more concerned with the leak than the fact that SCOTUS doing away with right to privacy? Good stuff.

Yes, I actually am. And, they are NOT doing away with the right to privacy if this report is accurate.
They are not even making abortion illegal. They are returning the decision to the people.... to be decided by the state officials elected by the people.

A breach such as this is actually an insurrection on the court. It is appalling and needs to be addressed immediately.

Excellent summary. Exactly correct.

+1

Many people are too emotionally charged over the draft opinion to comprehend what it actually means, and to comprehend the damage that was inflicted upon the court by the leak.

The Court was already damaged.

It’s partisan and impacts the lives of Americans more than Congress does.

So, if the Court had decided (or decides ultimately) to uphold Roe, would you still be saying that it's damaged? Are you only saying this because the Court may issue an opinion with which you disagree?

When the Court is wildly out of step with the country, that's a problem.

This ruling is a problem. The Court is broken. Sotomayor was right. Roberts was right.

The next 10 years in America are going to be very ugly. The oppression of women and minorities has to end.

Just stop. There is no oppression.

Forcing a woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term is oppression.

As kids, in school, I remember that lesson about actions have consequences. You wear a rubber to avoid what you’re describing. Otherwise, swallow. Or don’t it.

And what is your option for those who are raped or incest?

For rape and incest I wholeheartedly agree to do it. Not because oops I messed up. However, you shouldn’t bring a life that’s created from an evil act. 100%

I see. Because you differentiate between embryos/fetuses. How very noble of you.