“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now it'll be entirely unclear if Republicans will win in the midterms. They picked a really great time to rock the boat on a super charged issue that will absolutely rally the Democrat base to get out and vote.

I'd agree more with this sentiment if it wasn't for the fact that we have record inflation and a looming recession on our hands, along with the possibility of greater involvement in Ukraine. I'd wager the typical voter will prioritize these concerns over abortion come November.

Abortion has been a priority issue for voting for many years for many people.

There are many so-called priority issues. Right now, I don't see abortion -- even with a ruling on Roe -- prioritized over the economy and national security/foreign affairs. As a PP indicated earlier, I agree that the picture might look different if we didn't have crippling inflation, a possible recession on the horizon, and a worsening war in Europe.

Okay. The fun thing is, we're all going to find out soon. Maybe you're right. Maybe not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now it'll be entirely unclear if Republicans will win in the midterms. They picked a really great time to rock the boat on a super charged issue that will absolutely rally the Democrat base to get out and vote.

I'd agree more with this sentiment if it wasn't for the fact that we have record inflation and a looming recession on our hands, along with the possibility of greater involvement in Ukraine. I'd wager the typical voter will prioritize these concerns over abortion come November.

Abortion has been a priority issue for voting for many years for many people.

There are many so-called priority issues. Right now, I don't see abortion -- even with a ruling on Roe -- prioritized over the economy and national security/foreign affairs. As a PP indicated earlier, I agree that the picture might look different if we didn't have crippling inflation, a possible recession on the horizon, and a worsening war in Europe.

I don't see it going away at all. There are millions of single issue voters on this issue and have been for a long time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ITA. The leaker needs to be identified and disbarred. Not sure any actual laws were broken, but this cannot go unpunished.

Unauthorized disclosures are generally illegal, but even for classified info, the sentences are usually pretty light relative to the damage.

The court is self governing and doesn't have rules about this. I am sorry, if one justice can participate in a coup against the country and not hasve to recuse themselves from related cases, then I don't GAF about this.

See how shattering norms and rules works?

I find it difficult to believe SCOTUS has no rules to protect its deliberative process.

I have heard former SCOTUS clerks say they were warned on the first day of the job that leaking opinions would not be tolerated and would end in dismissal and disbarment. So, I do believe they have rules.
Add to that the fact that no opinion has ever been leaked before.

This person needs to be identified immediately and dealt with. This is unacceptable.

So you’re more concerned with the leak than the fact that SCOTUS doing away with right to privacy? Good stuff.

Yes, I actually am. And, they are NOT doing away with the right to privacy if this report is accurate.
They are not even making abortion illegal. They are returning the decision to the people.... to be decided by the state officials elected by the people.

A breach such as this is actually an insurrection on the court. It is appalling and needs to be addressed immediately.

Excellent summary. Exactly correct.

+1

Many people are too emotionally charged over the draft opinion to comprehend what it actually means, and to comprehend the damage that was inflicted upon the court by the leak.

The Court was already damaged.

It’s partisan and impacts the lives of Americans more than Congress does.

So, if the Court had decided (or decides ultimately) to uphold Roe, would you still be saying that it's damaged? Are you only saying this because the Court may issue an opinion with which you disagree?

When the Court is wildly out of step with the country, that's a problem.

This ruling is a problem. The Court is broken. Sotomayor was right. Roberts was right.

The next 10 years in America are going to be very ugly. The oppression of women and minorities has to end.

Just stop. There is no oppression.

Forcing a woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term is oppression.

As kids, in school, I remember that lesson about actions have consequences. You wear a rubber to avoid what you’re describing. Otherwise, swallow. Or don’t it.

And what is your option for those who are raped or incest?

For rape and incest I wholeheartedly agree to do it. Not because oops I messed up. However, you shouldn’t bring a life that’s created from an evil act. 100%

Right. Now how do you prove rape or incest?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ITA. The leaker needs to be identified and disbarred. Not sure any actual laws were broken, but this cannot go unpunished.

Unauthorized disclosures are generally illegal, but even for classified info, the sentences are usually pretty light relative to the damage.

The court is self governing and doesn't have rules about this. I am sorry, if one justice can participate in a coup against the country and not hasve to recuse themselves from related cases, then I don't GAF about this.

See how shattering norms and rules works?

I find it difficult to believe SCOTUS has no rules to protect its deliberative process.

I have heard former SCOTUS clerks say they were warned on the first day of the job that leaking opinions would not be tolerated and would end in dismissal and disbarment. So, I do believe they have rules.
Add to that the fact that no opinion has ever been leaked before.

This person needs to be identified immediately and dealt with. This is unacceptable.

So you’re more concerned with the leak than the fact that SCOTUS doing away with right to privacy? Good stuff.

Yes, I actually am. And, they are NOT doing away with the right to privacy if this report is accurate.
They are not even making abortion illegal. They are returning the decision to the people.... to be decided by the state officials elected by the people.

A breach such as this is actually an insurrection on the court. It is appalling and needs to be addressed immediately.

Excellent summary. Exactly correct.

+1

Many people are too emotionally charged over the draft opinion to comprehend what it actually means, and to comprehend the damage that was inflicted upon the court by the leak.

The Court was already damaged.

It’s partisan and impacts the lives of Americans more than Congress does.

So, if the Court had decided (or decides ultimately) to uphold Roe, would you still be saying that it's damaged? Are you only saying this because the Court may issue an opinion with which you disagree?

When the Court is wildly out of step with the country, that's a problem.

This ruling is a problem. The Court is broken. Sotomayor was right. Roberts was right.

The next 10 years in America are going to be very ugly. The oppression of women and minorities has to end.

Just stop. There is no oppression.

Forcing a woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term is oppression.

As kids, in school, I remember that lesson about actions have consequences. You wear a rubber to avoid what you’re describing. Otherwise, swallow. Or don’t it.

I’m sorry I’m not seeing the consequences for the male partner in this scenario. Why do they bare none of the consequences?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ITA. The leaker needs to be identified and disbarred. Not sure any actual laws were broken, but this cannot go unpunished.

Unauthorized disclosures are generally illegal, but even for classified info, the sentences are usually pretty light relative to the damage.

The court is self governing and doesn't have rules about this. I am sorry, if one justice can participate in a coup against the country and not hasve to recuse themselves from related cases, then I don't GAF about this.

See how shattering norms and rules works?

I find it difficult to believe SCOTUS has no rules to protect its deliberative process.

I have heard former SCOTUS clerks say they were warned on the first day of the job that leaking opinions would not be tolerated and would end in dismissal and disbarment. So, I do believe they have rules.
Add to that the fact that no opinion has ever been leaked before.

This person needs to be identified immediately and dealt with. This is unacceptable.

So you’re more concerned with the leak than the fact that SCOTUS doing away with right to privacy? Good stuff.

Yes, I actually am. And, they are NOT doing away with the right to privacy if this report is accurate.
They are not even making abortion illegal. They are returning the decision to the people.... to be decided by the state officials elected by the people.

A breach such as this is actually an insurrection on the court. It is appalling and needs to be addressed immediately.

Excellent summary. Exactly correct.

+1

Many people are too emotionally charged over the draft opinion to comprehend what it actually means, and to comprehend the damage that was inflicted upon the court by the leak.

The Court was already damaged.

It’s partisan and impacts the lives of Americans more than Congress does.

So, if the Court had decided (or decides ultimately) to uphold Roe, would you still be saying that it's damaged? Are you only saying this because the Court may issue an opinion with which you disagree?

When the Court is wildly out of step with the country, that's a problem.

This ruling is a problem. The Court is broken. Sotomayor was right. Roberts was right.

The next 10 years in America are going to be very ugly. The oppression of women and minorities has to end.

Just stop. There is no oppression.

Forcing a woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term is oppression.

As kids, in school, I remember that lesson about actions have consequences. You wear a rubber to avoid what you’re describing. Otherwise, swallow. Or don’t it.

And what is your option for those who are raped or incest?

For rape and incest I wholeheartedly agree to do it. Not because oops I messed up. However, you shouldn’t bring a life that’s created from an evil act. 100%

Right. Now how do you prove rape or incest?

You have the baby, do a paternity test, put it back in and then abort it. Duh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now it'll be entirely unclear if Republicans will win in the midterms. They picked a really great time to rock the boat on a super charged issue that will absolutely rally the Democrat base to get out and vote.

I'd agree more with this sentiment if it wasn't for the fact that we have record inflation and a looming recession on our hands, along with the possibility of greater involvement in Ukraine. I'd wager the typical voter will prioritize these concerns over abortion come November.

It’s all one and the same. We have record inflation, looming recession and the GOP are focused on taking away women right to bodily autonomy and a handful of trans kids playing little league. How does that help the average American?

[Anonymous]

revise that to $10,000/hr for " servicing" , but NO Incremental Billing. Instead, min flat fee is $10,000 whether the law maker, lobbyist, Congressman, Senator, Legislative Aid or Staffer is given a 30 second wank or an hour long " decompression session" the FEE is the same : $10,000

Of course, they can always wank each other off...prison style in the privacy of their Senate quarters, but wait.... they ALREADY DO that figuratively EVERY DAY

[Anonymous]

An alternative view

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now it'll be entirely unclear if Republicans will win in the midterms. They picked a really great time to rock the boat on a super charged issue that will absolutely rally the Democrat base to get out and vote.

I'd agree more with this sentiment if it wasn't for the fact that we have record inflation and a looming recession on our hands, along with the possibility of greater involvement in Ukraine. I'd wager the typical voter will prioritize these concerns over abortion come November.

It’s all one and the same. We have record inflation, looming recession and the GOP are focused on taking away women right to bodily autonomy and a handful of trans kids playing little league. How does that help the average American?

The GOP has been razor focused on this issue for a long long time. Just because fox news covers this for 10 minutes with a bunch of old white guys commenting does not mean they can just turn off years of this being a critical issue. Nope. This will drive plenty in the election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:An alternative view

Are you kidding? This guy doesn’t matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:An alternative view

I am the product of IVF. This ruling is an gigantic threat. Fight against it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:An alternative view

🤷‍♀️ Opinions are like a***les, everyone has them. Also have we confirmed this tweet is true? Pro-life advocates lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:An alternative view

He’s a moron. No one is trying to take away the rights of rape victims to carry their pregnancies to term. Typical white male self-absorption.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An alternative view

He’s a moron. No one is trying to take away the rights of rape victims to carry their pregnancies to term. Typical white male self-absorption.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An alternative view

He’s a moron. No one is trying to take away the rights of rape victims to carry their pregnancies to term. Typical white male self-absorption.

So if he is raped and gets pregnant he can carry the fetus full term. Or if he daughter does (and wants to). I have no issues with that. I do have issues with his person FEELINGS taking precedence over others.