“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The leak investigation is still ongoing
“Supreme Court investigators probing the May leak of Justice Samuel Alito‘s draft opinion overruling Roe v. Wade have narrowed their inquiry to a small number of suspects including law clerks, but officials have yet to conclusively identify the alleged culprit, people familiar with the matter said.”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-investigators-have-narrowed-leak-inquiry-to-small-number-of-suspects-11673635774

And now it’s over and SUPPOSEDLY they can’t find the perpetrator. 🤔

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The leak investigation is still ongoing
“Supreme Court investigators probing the May leak of Justice Samuel Alito‘s draft opinion overruling Roe v. Wade have narrowed their inquiry to a small number of suspects including law clerks, but officials have yet to conclusively identify the alleged culprit, people familiar with the matter said.”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-investigators-have-narrowed-leak-inquiry-to-small-number-of-suspects-11673635774

And now it’s over and SUPPOSEDLY they can’t find the perpetrator. 🤔

Well that all but confirms it came from the Alito/Thomas camp.

[Anonymous]

Did they really not investigate the Justices? 🤦‍♀️

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Easy to miss the leaker when you skip interviewing the justices, particularly Alito and Thomas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Easy to miss the leaker when you skip interviewing the justices, particularly Alito and Thomas.

Easy not to identify the leaker when the aides having access to the doc refused to have their phones searched.
It wasn't a Justice who did this. It was a clerk with an agenda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Easy to miss the leaker when you skip interviewing the justices, particularly Alito and Thomas.

Easy not to identify the leaker when the aides having access to the doc refused to have their phones searched.
It wasn't a Justice who did this. It was a clerk with an agenda.

Which aides refused? Where is that in the report? Phones were searched.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Easy to miss the leaker when you skip interviewing the justices, particularly Alito and Thomas.

Easy not to identify the leaker when the aides having access to the doc refused to have their phones searched.
It wasn't a Justice who did this. It was a clerk with an agenda.

The report specifically says that all personnel who were requested to do so provided their call and text logs and billing statements. While this may not include the text themselves, it would have identified anyone corresponding with a reporter on those phones. Which leads me to believe even more that a justice did this.

[Anonymous]

I'm shocked that the Supreme Court Marshall with no real investigative experience with a force that lacks any investigative capacity didn't find the culprit. baffling

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm shocked that the Supreme Court Marshall with no real investigative experience with a force that lacks any investigative capacity didn't find the culprit. baffling

And who didn't bother investigating the two most likely suspects!

[Anonymous]

It was Ginni Thomas, obviously.

[Anonymous]

This is more slipshod than the investigation into the Kavanaugh allegations. This Court is a joke bordering on banana republic status.

Neither the Justices nor their spouses were interviewed. Gee, thanks for wasting taxpayer money CJ Roberts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm shocked that the Supreme Court Marshall with no real investigative experience with a force that lacks any investigative capacity didn't find the culprit. baffling

They also consulted with The Chertoff Group. https://www.chertoffgroup.com/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm shocked that the Supreme Court Marshall with no real investigative experience with a force that lacks any investigative capacity didn't find the culprit. baffling

They also consulted with The Chertoff Group. https://www.chertoffgroup.com/

Unless the law just doesn't apply to them, they can't get the kind of evidence or do the kind of investigation that the FBI could. If Roberts really wanted the leaker, the FBI would have found them

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is more slipshod than the investigation into the Kavanaugh allegations. This Court is a joke bordering on banana republic status.

Neither the Justices nor their spouses were interviewed. Gee, thanks for wasting taxpayer money CJ Roberts.

This is horrifyingly bad. So it was Thomas or Alito and duck the rest of us, we’re not entitled to law-abiding justices.